Memory and motivational/emotional processes
- 1Department of Applied Clinical and Biotechnologic Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
- 2Laboratory of Neurosciences and Behavior, Department of Physiological Sciences, Institute of Biology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil
As we know from our own experiences and the findings of many studies, emotional events are remembered with greater accuracy, vividness, and persistency compared to events lacking an emotional component (LaBar and Cabeza, 2006; Roozendaal and McGaugh, 2011). How emotional memory is controlled and regulated? This question has fascinated scientists and clinicians for a long time; in fact, the field focused on memory and motivational/emotional processes represents one of the fastest growing areas of neuroscience research. The selectivity that arousal creates is generally beneficial, as emotionally arousing situations in our lives are worth remembering, so that they can be savored and/or instructive. From an evolutionary point of view, it seems logical that a confrontation with an emotionally arousing event, such as a stressful one, is better remembered than a neutral one, resulting in a more adequate motivation to react in a similar situation.
Why emotional arousal enhances memory? Taking into account that neural processes initiated by an experience perseverate and consolidate over time, a possible explanation is that emotional arousal could activate neurobiological processes that modulate the consolidation of memories of recent experiences.
This special issue includes original papers and review articles that cover cutting-edge research in the interplay between memory, motivation, and emotion, providing the reader with what is up and coming with respect to research findings, theoretical advances, and methodological techniques. Many of the current “hot” topics in the field are covered, including the involvement of specific cerebral regions on the interaction between memory and motivational/emotional processes, the contribution of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, and the role of arousal and stress.
The enhanced memory for emotional events has been attributed to the involvement and interaction of brain regions, in particular between the amygdala and other areas such as the hippocampal formation and prefrontal cortex (Phelps, 2004; Richter-Levin, 2004; McIntyre et al., 2012). The amygdala is active during emotional situations, and this activity influences the encoding and consolidation of the memory trace for the emotional event (McGaugh, 2004). On the light of previous evidence, some papers of this special issue focus on the role of specific neural regions in the interplay between memory and motivational/emotional processes, such as cortical and mesocorticolimbic areas (Martínez-Moreno et al., 2011; El Rawas et al., 2012; Holloway-Erickson et al., 2012; Puglisi-Allegra and Ventura, 2012), hippocampal formation (Hori et al., 2011; Garín-Aguilar et al., 2012), amygdala, substantia nigra, and striatum (Salado-Castillo et al., 2011; Wolf et al., 2011), septal nuclei (Matsuyama et al., 2011), nucleus accumbens (Núñez-Jaramillo et al., 2012), and autonomic nervous system (Garcia et al., 2011). Another group of papers analyzes the role and interaction of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, such as catecholamines (Puglisi-Allegra and Ventura, 2012), endocannabinoids (Campolongo et al., 2012), acetylcholine and glucocorticoids (Fornari et al., 2012; Sánchez-Resendis et al., 2012) on memory and motivational/emotional processes. In order to highlight the impact of motivation and emotion on memory, functional neuroimaging techniques were used, including multichannel electroencephalography (EEG) (Arnone et al., 2011; Garcia et al., 2011; Uribe et al., 2011) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (Jepma et al., 2012; Rosales-Lagarde et al., 2012). Moreover, taking into account that recent studies have revealed seemingly large, but previously unsuspected, sex-related influences on the well-known mechanism that emotional events are better memorized than neutral events, this special issue includes evidence of sex-related differences in memory and talkativeness for emotional stimuli (Arnone et al., 2011). Finally, considering that in recent years a key conceptual issue, that warrants attention, is the fact that many studies examining emotional memory have focused on the highly arousing nature of emotional stimuli or experimental contexts, as the key component contributing to the enhancement of memory, some papers of this special issue discuss the involvement of arousal and stress in the interplay between memory, motivation, and emotion (Cruciani et al., 2011; Uribe et al., 2011; Packard and Goodman, 2012).
In conclusion, we hope that this special issue have provided evidence of the important and rapid progresses in this very interesting and relevant topic, and may give a significant contribution to the knowledge of how memory can be affected by emotional experiences, and related motivation. Then, taking into account that this emergent field is in continuous and fast growing, we strongly hope that the present special issue may motivate many neuroscientists to conduct other studies, paving the way for the next great theories and advances.
References
Arnone, B., Pompili, A., Tavares, M. C., and Gasbarri, A. (2011). Sex-related memory recall and talkativeness for emotional stimuli. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 5:52. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00052
Campolongo, P., Ratano, P., Manduca, A., Scattoni, M. L., Palmery, M., Trezza, V., et al. (2012). The endocannabinoid transport inhibitor AM404 differentially modulates recognition memory in rats depending on environmental aversiveness. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:11. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00011
Cruciani, F., Berardi, A., Cabib, S., and Conversi, D. (2011). Positive and negative emotional arousal increases duration of memory traces: common and independent mechanisms. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 5:86. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00086
El Rawas, R., Klement, S., Salti, A., Fritz, M., Dechant, G., Saria, A., et al. (2012). Preventive role of social interaction for cocaine conditioned place preference: correlation with FosB/DeltaFosB and pCREB expression in rat mesocorticolimbic areas. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:8. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00008
Fornari, R. V., Wichmann, R., Atucha, E., Desprez, T., Eggens-Meijer, E., and Roozendaal, B. (2012). Involvement of the insular cortex in regulating glucocorticoid effects on memory consolidation of inhibitory avoidance training. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:10. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00010
Garcia, A., Uribe, C. E., Tavares, M. C. H., and Tomaz, C. (2011). EEG and autonomic responses during performance of matching and non-matching to sample working memory tasks with emotional content. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 5:82. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00082
Garín-Aguilar, M. E., Díaz-Cintra, S., Quirarte, G. L., Aguilar-Vázquez, A., Medina, A. C., and Prado-Alcalá, R. A. (2012). Extinction procedure induces pruning of dendritic spines in CA1 hippocampal field depending on strength of training in rats. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:12. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00012
Holloway-Erickson, C. M., McReynolds, J. R., and McIntyre, C. K. (2012). Memory-enhancing intra-basolateral amygdala infusions of clenbuterol increase Arc and CaMKIIα protein expression in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:17. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00017
Hori, E., Tabuchi, E., Matsumura, N., Ono, T., and Nishijo, H. (2011). Task-dependent and independent synchronous activity of monkey hippocampal neurons in real and virtual translocation. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 5:36. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00036
Jepma, M., Verdonschot, R. G., van Steenbergen, H., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., and Nieuwenhuis, S. (2012). Neural mechanisms underlying the induction and relief of perceptual curiosity. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:5. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00005
LaBar, K. S., and Cabeza, R. (2006). Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 54–64.
Martínez-Moreno, A., Rodríguez-Durán, L. F., and Escobar, M. L. (2011). Late protein synthesis-dependent phases in CTA long-term memory: BDNF requirement. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 5:61. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00061
Matsuyama, N., Uwano, T., Hori, E., Ono, T., and Nishijo, H. (2011). Reward contingency modulates neuronal activity in rat septal nuclei during elemental and configural association tasks. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 5:26. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00026
McGaugh, J. L. (2004). The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 1–28.
McIntyre, C. K., McGaugh, J. L., and Williams, C. L. (2012). Interacting brain systems modulate memory consolidation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1750–1762.
Núñez-Jaramillo, L., Rangel-Hernández, J. A., Burgueño-Zúñiga, B., and Miranda, M. I. (2012). Activation of nucleus accumbens NMDA receptors differentially affects appetitive or aversive taste learning and memory. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:13. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00013
Packard, M. G., and Goodman, J. (2012). Emotional arousal and multiple memory systems in the mammalian brain. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:14. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00014
Phelps, E. A. (2004). Human emotion and memory: interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 198–202.
Puglisi-Allegra, S., and Ventura, R. (2012). Prefrontal/accumbal catecholamine system processes high motivational salience. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:31. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00031
Richter-Levin, G. (2004). The amygdala, the hippocampus, and emotional modulation of memory. Neuroscientist 10, 31–39.
Rosales-Lagarde, A., Armony, J. L. d, el Río-Portilla, Y., Trejo-Martínez, D., Conde, R., and Corsi-Cabrera, M. (2012). Enhanced emotional reactivity after selective REM sleep deprivation in humans: an fMRI study. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:25. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00025
Salado-Castillo, R., Sánchez-Alavéz, M., Quirarte, G. L., Martínez García, M. I., and Prado-Alcalá, R. A. (2011). Enhanced training protects memory against amnesia produced by concurrent inactivation of amygdala and striatum, amygdala and substantia nigra, or striatum and substantia nigra. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 5:83. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00083
Sánchez-Resendis, O., Medina, A. C., Serafín, N., Prado-Alcalá, R. A., Roozendaal, B., and Quirarte, G. L. (2012). Glucocorticoid-cholinergic interactions in the dorsal striatum in memory consolidation of inhibitory avoidance training. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:33. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00033
Uribe, C. E., Garcia, A., and Tomaz, C. (2011). Electroencephalographic brain dynamics of memory encoding in emotionally arousing context. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 5:35. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00035
Wolf, D. H., Gerraty, R. T., Satterthwaite, T. D., Loughead, J., Campellone, T., Elliott, M. A., et al. (2011). Striatal intrinsic reinforcement signals during recognition memory: relationship to response bias and dysregulation in schizophrenia. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 5:81. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00081
Citation: Gasbarri A and Tomaz C (2012) Memory and motivational/emotional processes. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6:71. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00071
Received: 11 October 2012; Accepted: 16 October 2012;
Published online: 02 November 2012.
Edited by:
Carmen Sandi, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, SwitzerlandReviewed by:
Carmen Sandi, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2012 Gasbarri and Tomaz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
*Correspondence: antonella.gasbarri@cc.univaq.it