Impact Factor 3.138

The world's most-cited Neurosciences journals

General Commentary ARTICLE

Front. Behav. Neurosci., 04 January 2017 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00245

Commentary: Knowledge Acquisition during Exam Preparation Improves Memory and Modulates Memory Formation

Emma L. James* and Scott A. Cairney
  • Department of Psychology, University of York, York, UK

A commentary on
Knowledge Acquisition during Exam Preparation Improves Memory and Modulates Memory Formation

by Brod, G., Lindenberger, U., Wagner, A. D., and Lee Shing, Y. (2016). J. Neurosci. 36, 8103–8111. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0045-16.2016

New memories are rarely formed as individual representations, but are stored in the context of cognitive schemas: mental frameworks within which we can organize and interpret related information (Bartlett, 1932). At school, for example, we acquire basic knowledge about the locations of different countries. This geographical schema then assists us later in life when learning about new countries, their locations, and cultural similarities. As our global knowledge grows, the learning and integration of new geographical information becomes increasingly efficient, and we can make inferences regarding the world around us.

Schematic influences on learning can be understood in the context of dual systems models of memory (e.g., van Kesteren et al., 2012; McClelland, 2013). These models propose that new information is rapidly encoded by hippocampal networks, but becomes gradually integrated into the neocortex for long-term storage. However, where this new information is related to a schema, it benefits from existing neural connections and can thus be integrated more efficiently than unrelated information.

Several recent studies have examined the neural mechanisms underlying schematic learning by generating artificial schema in the laboratory (e.g., Hennies et al., 2016). While informative and well-controlled, this method is unable to address how we utilize real-world knowledge that is not bound to the context of an experiment. Understanding whether the neural mechanisms underpinning schema-based learning are similar in relation to natural variations in existing knowledge remains a key research question. Gaining insights into the automaticity with which we can capitalize upon our existing knowledge in different settings from which it is acquired may have important implications for education.

In a recent study, Brod et al. (2016) capitalized upon the advancing knowledge of medical students to gain more naturalistic insights into the neural basis of schema-relevant learning. While undergoing fMRI, participants learned a series of faces paired with either names or medical diagnoses (low or high relevance to medical knowledge, respectively). Immediately afterwards, outside of the scanner, they were re-presented with each face and asked to identify the associated name/diagnosis. This procedure enabled Brod et al. to identify patterns of neural activity at learning that predicted successful memory retrieval at test. Furthermore, this procedure was carried out with novel pairs both before and after 3 months of study for a medical exam, providing a measurable change in medical knowledge across the two time points. Brod et al. hypothesized that this increase in knowledge would reduce learning demands of the anterior hippocampus (AHc), a region that binds multiple neural inputs into integrated memory representations (Davachi, 2006).

Indeed, AHc activity decreased during successful schema-relevant (vs. schema-irrelevant) learning between the first and second time points. Two further analyses supported the role of schematic knowledge in driving this change. First, the decrease in AHc activity was positively correlated with overall gains in medical knowledge. Second, functional connectivity between the AHc and left middle temporal gyrus, a key semantic knowledge region (Binder et al., 2009), increased across time points, but only for schema-relevant learning. Collectively, these findings suggest that the AHc is less engaged in forming new memories when there is more schematic knowledge to support learning.

Brod et al.'s approach will be particularly valuable in developmental research, where understanding how poor levels of existing knowledge affect further learning is a crucial issue (Stanovich, 1986). Previous work has suggested that the AHc undergoes substantial development throughout the school years (Ghetti and Bunge, 2012). Anatomically, Gogtay et al. (2006) showed that AHc volume decreases between 4 and 25 years of age, and this structural change has been recently linked to children's increasing propensity for binding elements across multiple learning episodes (Schlichting et al., 2016). Functionally, Ghetti et al. (2010) observed age-related increases in AHc engagement during memory encoding. These concurrent decreases in anatomical volume and increases in functional activity may be best conceptualized as a fine-tuning of AHc learning mechanisms throughout development (Schlichting et al., 2016). Understanding how such changes affect the automaticity with which children access schematic knowledge will have important implications for memory theories and educational practice. Incorporating schema-consistent learning into teaching strategies could facilitate learning in the classroom, and drawing more explicit connections to existing knowledge may help to bring this benefit to children earlier in development.

Combining realistic, schema-based learning paradigms with sleep research will also provide new insights into the neurobiological mechanisms of memory. Sleep supports memory consolidation (Rasch and Born, 2013), and slow-wave sleep (SWS) in particular has been linked to the integration of memories within schematic knowledge (Lewis and Durrant, 2011). Research on this topic has been primarily focused on memory retrieval (Hennies et al., 2016). Given the evidence that prior schematic knowledge facilitates learning (Brod et al., 2016), it will be important to understand how AHc engagement at encoding impacts on the subsequent role of sleep in memory integration. Interestingly, children exhibit a higher proportion of SWS than adults (Ohayon et al., 2004), and this has been linked to a stronger capacity for overnight memory consolidation (Wilhelm et al., 2013). In the context of schema-based learning, enhanced SWS in childhood might support the integration of new information into existing knowledge where AHc encoding mechanisms are not yet fully developed.

The periods of intensive study typically required for experimental manipulations of schematic knowledge raise a number of potential ethical concerns in developmental settings: they are time-demanding, resource-intensive, and involve learning material irrelevant to the curriculum. The paradigm offered by Brod et al. provides developmental neuroscientists with a practical solution for these issues, whereby school topics can be incorporated into studies of schema-based learning. Although this approach does not benefit from the experimental control offered by laboratory-based studies, it would enable assessments of large groups of children, reducing demands on additional learning time while gaining fundamental insights into real-world memory processes.

In summary, Brod et al. (2016) demonstrated that schematic knowledge reduces AHc demands during memory formation in the context of real-world learning. These findings raise important questions regarding learning mechanisms where the AHc is still undergoing development, and provide practical directions for studying these mechanisms in educational settings.

Author Contributions

EJ and SC contributed equally to conceptualizing and writing the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Aidan Horner and Sophie-Heloise Bennett for comments on this manuscript.

References

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: An Experimental and Social Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

Google Scholar

Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., and Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb. Cortex 19, 2767–2796. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brod, G., Lindenberger, U., Wagner, A. D., and Shing, Y. L. (2016). Knowledge acquisition during exam preparation improves memory and modulates memory formation. J. Neurosci. 36, 8103–8111. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0045-16.2016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davachi, L. (2006). Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16, 693–700. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghetti, S., and Bunge, S. A. (2012). Neural changes underlying the development of episodic memory during middle childhood. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2, 381–395. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.05.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ghetti, S., DeMaster, D. M., Yonelinas, A. P., and Bunge, S. A. (2010). Developmental differences in medial temporal lobe function during memory encoding. J. Neurosci. 30, 9548–9556. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3500-09.2010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Gogtay, N., Nugent, T. F. III., Herman, D. H., Ordonez, A., Greenstein, D., Hayashi, K. M., et al. (2006). Dynamic mapping of normal human hippocampal development. Hippocampus 16, 664–672. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20193

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hennies, N., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Kempkes, M., Cousins, J. N., and Lewis, P. A. (2016). Sleep spindle density predicts the effect of prior knowledge on memory consolidation. J. Neurosci. 36, 3799–3810. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3162-15.2016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lewis, P. A., and Durrant, S. J. (2011). Overlapping memory replay during sleep builds cognitive schemata. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 343–351. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.06.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L. (2013). Incorporating rapid neocortical learning of new schema-consistent information into complementary learning systems theory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 142, 1190–1210. doi: 10.1037/a0033812

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohayon, M. M., Carskadon, M. A., Guilleminault, C., and Vitiello, M. V. (2004). Meta-analysis of quantitative sleep parameters from childhood to old age in healthy individuals: developing normative sleep values across the human lifespan. Sleep 27, 1255–1273.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Rasch, B., and Born, J. (2013). About sleep's role in memory. Physiol. Rev. 93, 681–766. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00032.2012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schlichting, M. L., Guarino, K. F., Schapiro, A. C., Turk-Browne, N. B., and Preston, A. R. (2016). Hippocampal structure predicts statistical learning and associative inference abilities during development. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 29, 37–51. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Read. Res. Q. 22, 360–407. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Kesteren, M. T., Ruiter, D. J., Fernández, G., and Henson, R. N. (2012). How schema and novelty augment memory formation. Trends Neurosci. 35, 211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2012.02.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilhelm, I., Rose, M., Imhof, K. I., Rasch, B., Buchel, C., and Born, J. (2013). The sleeping child outplays the adult's capacity to convert implicit into explicit knowledge. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 391–393. doi: 10.1038/nn.3343

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: memory, learning, schemas, hippocampus, development, sleep

Citation: James EL and Cairney SA (2017) Commentary: Knowledge Acquisition during Exam Preparation Improves Memory and Modulates Memory Formation. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 10:245. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00245

Received: 28 November 2016; Accepted: 16 December 2016;
Published: 04 January 2017.

Edited by:

Oliver T. Wolf, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany

Reviewed by:

Ines Wilhelm, Psychiatric Hospital University Zürich, Switzerland

Copyright © 2017 James and Cairney. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Emma L. James, elj504@york.ac.uk