An overview of preclinical models of traumatic brain injury (TBI): relevance to pathophysiological mechanisms

Abstract

Background:

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting millions annually worldwide. Although the majority of TBI patients return to premorbid baseline, a subset of patient can develop persistent and often debilitating neurocognitive and behavioral changes. The etiology of TBI within the clinical setting is inherently heterogenous, ranging from sport related injuries, fall related injuries and motor vehicle accidents in the civilian setting, to blast injuries in the military setting.

Objective:

Animal models of TBI, offer the distinct advantage of controlling for injury modality, duration and severity. Furthermore, preclinical models of TBI have provided the necessary temporal opportunity to study the chronic neuropathological sequelae of TBI, including neurodegenerative sequelae such as tauopathy and neuroinflammation within the finite experimental timeline. Despite the high prevalence of TBI, there are currently no disease modifying regimen for TBI, and the current clinical treatments remain largely symptom based. The preclinical models have provided the necessary biological substrate to examine the disease modifying effect of various pharmacological agents and have imperative translational value.

Methods:

The current review will include a comprehensive survey of well-established preclinical models, including classic preclinical models including weight drop, blast injury, fluid percussion injury, controlled cortical impact injury, as well as more novel injury models including closed-head impact model of engineered rotational acceleration (CHIMERA) models and closed-head projectile concussive impact model (PCI). In addition to rodent preclinical models, the review will include an overview of other species including large animal models and Drosophila.

Results:

There are major neuropathological perturbations post TBI captured in various preclinical models, which include neuroinflammation, calcium dysregulation, tauopathy, mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, axonopathy, as well as glymphatic system disruption.

Conclusion:

The preclinical models of TBI continue to offer valuable translational insight, as well as essential neurobiological basis to examine specific disease modifying therapeutic regimen.

1 Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health problem, as there are approximately 1,600,000–3,800,000 concussions/mild TBI being reported annually in the United States (Peterson et al., 2019; Sanchez et al., 2021). The vast majority of TBI cases are concussions/mild TBIs (mTBIs) (Langlois et al., 2006). The remaining TBI subtypes include moderate and severe TBIs, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality and accounting for one in every three deaths due to injury (Abdelmalik et al., 2019). The majority of mTBI patients recover within 10–14 days, but as per results of the recent Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study, 13.5% of participants with mTBI experience poor cognitive outcome and persistent postconcussive symptoms (Schneider et al., 2022). TBI is a highly heterogeneous medical condition, with widely variant mechanism of injury, including falls, motor vehicle accidents, sport related concussions, as well as assaults and blast injuries in a combat setting (Blennow et al., 2016). TBI involves a complex structural and neuropathological cascade, and is mechanistically conceptualized to occur in a primary and secondary injury phase (Davis, 2000; Xiong et al., 2013). The primary injury is the result of direct mechanical impact involving structural deficits and leading to contusions, blood vessel damage and subsequent hemorrhage, as well as axonal shearing injuries (Gaetz, 2004; Cernak, 2005). The secondary injury, which could start within minutes post-injury, a delayed complex process leading to chronic neuropathological changes, including metabolic perturbation, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, diffuse axonal injuries, neurovascular changes, and could ultimately involve neurodegenerative process, depending on the severity of injury (Greve and Zink, 2009; Cornelius et al., 2013). The clinical TBI cases are inherently heterogenous due to variation of location, nature and severity of the primary injury, as well as age, premorbid medical conditions, genetic background including APOE4, as well as injury specific parameters (Covington and Duff, 2021). Animal models of TBI offers a number of distinct advantages, which include relatively homogenous mechanism of injury, uniformity in age, sex and genetic background, as well as predetermined injury parameters corresponding to the designated injury severity (Xiong et al., 2013). Given the relatively limited animal life span, one can examine the chronic neuropathological sequelae, as well as the neurobehavioral deficits. Furthermore, animal models provide a unique biological substrate to study potential disease modifying therapeutic regimen for chronic neurobehavioral and neuropathological sequelae of TBI (Tang et al., 2020). The current review provides a comprehensive overview of animal TBI models including rodent models, as well as Drosophila and large animal models. The rodent animal models included in this study are the fluid percussion injury (FPI) model (Xiong et al., 2013), weight drop injury (WDI) model (Feeney et al., 1981), controlled cortical impact (CCI) model (Dixon et al., 1991), penetrating ballistic-like brain injury (PBBI) model (Williams et al., 2005), blast injury (BI) model (Cernak et al., 2011), as well as more novel rodent injury models, including closed-head impact model of engineered rotational acceleration (CHIMERA) model (Namjoshi et al., 2014), and closed-head projectile concussive impact (PCI) model (Leung et al., 2014). The Drosophila models include the high impact trauma (HIT) model (Katzenberger et al., 2013), Barekat’s Bead Ruptor Homogenizer model (Barekat et al., 2016), and the Drosophila closed head injury (CHI) models (Alphen et al., 2018). Also included in this review, is a brief overview of large animal models, including ferrets (Lighthall, 1988), pigs (Duhaime et al., 2000), swine (Duhaime, 2006), primates (King et al., 2010), as well as sheep (Dutchke et al., 2016). In addition, there is a brief overview of combined model of injury of TBI and chronic stress model, which have real clinical relevance in both civilian and military population (Fesharaki-Zadeh et al., 2020). There is a final overarching discussion on the key neuropathological changes post TBI, which include neuroinflammation, calcium dysregulation, DAI, as well as glymphatic system perturbations (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

2 Animal models of TBI

There are currently 4 cardinal animal preclinical models of TBI used, which include fluid percussion injury model (FPI), weight drop injury model (WDI), controlled cortical impact injury (CCI), and blast/diffuse brain injury model (Chiu et al., 2016; Younger et al., 2019; Figure 1).

2.1 Fluid percussion injury model (FPI) model

In the FPI model, animals undergo craniotomy to expose a portion of the dura, prior to injury being conducted using a fluid pulse (Xiong et al., 2013). The FPI model has been established as one of the most widely used methods of inducing injury and has been used in a variety of animal species including rabbit (Härtl et al., 1997), dog and sheep (Millen et al., 1985), cat (Povlishock et al., 1983), pig (Armstead and Kurth, 1994), and especially rodents including mouse (Carbonell et al., 1998) and rats (Thompson et al., 2005). The injury involves a locally diffuse injury involving cortical contusion and diffuse subcortical neuronal injury, induced by a pendulum striking a piston at the end of a saline-filled cannula (Ma et al., 2019). The exposed dura of brain is subsequently impacted via a rapidly accelerating rod, with preset depth of impact. The rod is controlled by a pneumatic piston or an electromagnetic actuator (Dixon et al., 1991). Depending the location of injury relative to sagittal suture, FPI could be further subdivided into lateral FPI (LFPI) vs. central FPI (CFPI) (Xiong et al., 2013). The LPFI has the advantage of contrasting the extent of neuronal injury in the ipsilateral (injured site) and contralateral (non-injured) side of the brain (Hicks et al., 1996).

The injury typically leads to direct damage to the blood brain barrier (BBB), cortical tissue loss, acute hematoma and neuronal injury (Ma et al., 2019). Focal TBI typically leads to primary axotomy along with ischemic and destructive neuronal changes, while diffuse TBI results in diffuse axonal injury, referred to as traumatic axonal injury (TAI) in the preclinical TBI model setting. Indeed TAI can occur in the absence of focal contusion or hemorrhage (Kelley et al., 2007). The pathophysiological alterations in FPI are correlated with the pressure transients, in which upper mild, moderate or severe types of pressure impulse leads to focal and diffuse injury, whereas the lower threshold of mild pressure impulse results in diffuse injury (O’Connor et al., 2011). A mild TBI is typically defined at the pressure range of 0.9–1.5 atm (13–22 psi) (Griesbach et al., 2009; Shultz et al., 2011), moderate TBI is at 1.6–2.5 atm (23–37 psi) (Li et al., 2015; Chitturi et al., 2018), and severe injury involving pressure above 2.5 atm (37 psi) (D’Ambrosio et al., 2004; Vitarbo et al., 2004).

The FPI models have been utilized to simulate clinical TBI, without skull fracture, and involving edema, hemorrhage, and cortical gray matter changes (Thompson et al., 2005). The primary injury in FPI models involves contusion, shearing/stretching of cortical tissue, subdural hematoma and hemorrhage (Alder et al., 2011). The secondary injury mechanism involves activation of inflammatory glial cells and neuronal cell death, or neurodegenerative changes that can start as early as seconds post-injury at the ipsilateral side of the injury, and occurring mostly at the cortical sites of injury, hippocampus, thalamus, striatum and amygdala (Liu et al., 2010; Ma et al., 2019).

As stated prior, FPI models provide the capacity to induced mild, moderate or severe TBI injuries (Kinoshita et al., 2002; Ma et al., 2019). The suppression time of reflexes such as pinna, cornea, and righting has been established as a marker of neurological assessment in animal model immediately post FPI (Schmidt and Grady, 1993). The righting reflex is commonly used an indicator of injury severity in animal models. The neurobehavioral domains that are commonly assessed in FPI include the functional outcomes of motor, cognition, and depression or anxiety-like behaviors. The injury induced motor deficits in rodents have been assessed by beam balance, beam walking test, ladder rung walk test, as well as inclined plane test, rotating pole test, rope grip, and rota-rod test (Hicks et al., 1996; Alessandri et al., 2002; Clough et al., 2007; Gold et al., 2013). In FPI models, the location of craniotomy plays a key role in determining the extent of cognitive deficits. A small shift of 1–2 mm craniotomy location from the midline FPI can significantly alter the cognitive outcome, as such midline FPI has been reported to produce more severe cognitive impairments than the LFPI (Vink et al., 2001; Ma et al., 2019). Cognitive deficits in FPI models have been widely reported in rodent blunt TBI models, based on performance on Morris water maze (MWM) (Deng-Bryant et al., 2016). Anxiety like symptoms have been reported in mild LFPI injured animals, as measured by increase in plus maze time spent in open arms at 24 h post-injury compared to sham controls, with diminishing effect at 4 weeks post-injury (Shultz et al., 2011). Depression like phenotype has also been reported in moderate LFPI models, as measured by novelty suppressed feeding, forced swim, and social interaction test (Kuo et al., 2013).

One of the potential limitations of the use of the FPI model, is the current lack of standardized parameters, including peak pressures, and duration of injuries across laboratories, and introduce an inherent variability in the injury outcome measures (Lyeth, 2016). There are also intrinsic challenges and complications including the potential for infection, given the requirement for craniectomy using the FPI model (Lifshitz et al., 2016).

2.2 Weight drop injury model (WDI)

The WDI model utilizes the gravitational forces of a free-falling weight to induce focal or diffuse brain injury (Feeney et al., 1981; Ma et al., 2019). There are a number of distinct WDI models, which include Feeney’s WDI, Shohami WDI, Shapira WDI and Marmarou WDI (Shapira et al., 1988; Foda and Marmarou, 1994). There are two distinct ways to vary the severity of injury, which includes altering the weight and height of the object used in WDI (Kalish and Whalen, 2016).

Feeney’s WDI involves the delivery of impact to the intact dura, via a craniotomy resulting in cortical contusions, hemorrhagic lesions, BBB damage, infiltration of immune cells and activation of glial cells (Dail et al., 1981; Feeney et al., 1981; Uhl et al., 1994; Bellander et al., 1996; Mikawa et al., 1996; Holmin et al., 1997; Morales et al., 2005). In the Feeney’s model, injuries generally follow a specific pattern, commencing with hemorrhaging in the white matter region near the injury site, progressing to the formation of a necrotic cavity within 24 h, and subsequently expanding and evolving over the following 2 weeks (Dail et al., 1981; Feeney et al., 1981; Xiong et al., 2013). Past studies involving rats have documented enduring deficits that persist for more than 90 days (Feeney et al., 1981; Gasparovic et al., 2001).

The Shohami WDI model is a closed head injury (CHI), which is induced using a weight-drop impact on one side of the unprotected skull (Shapira et al., 1988; Shohami et al., 1988). This injury leads to blood-barrier disruption, cerebral edema, persistent neurological deficits, and neuronal loss (Kalish and Whalen, 2016). A neurological severity score (NSS), has been utilized to assess for motor and cognitive deficits post-injury (Shapira et al., 1993). The NSS score closely approximates the degree of neuropathological severity (Shapira et al., 1993).

A closed head WDI model was developed by Shapira et al. (1988), which was further modified by Chen et al. (1996), by fixing of head of the animal on a hard platform for further modification of acceleration diffuse injury (Shapira et al., 1988; Chen et al., 1996).

The Marmarou WDI is distinct from Shohami, Feeny, or Shapira’s models, as it simulates diffuse acceleration injury, representing a diffuse brain injury seen in falls or car accidents (Marmarou et al., 1994), resulting in mild to severe hemorrhage, cell loss, diffuse axonal injury, and astrogliosis (Albert-Weissenberger et al., 2012). The Marmarou model was designed to simulate motor vehicle accidental injuries caused by rotational injuries following linear acceleration injuries ultimately leading to diffuse/traumatic axonal injury (TAI) (Wang et al., 2010). In this model, death may result from potential respiratory depression, and the utilization of mechanical ventilation has proven to be an effective method for lowering post-injury mortality rates (Foda and Marmarou, 1994; Marmarou et al., 1994).

The Wayne state model, developed by Kane et al. (2012), uses a 95 g weight dropped from a height of 1 m onto the head of an anesthetized mouse, in a suspended position on an aluminum foil (Kane et al., 2012). The authors examined mice after repeated injuries, and reported reproducible cognitive deficits due to injury (Kalish and Whalen, 2016). There was reported active gliosis, and elevated tau phosphorylation, in the absence of significant microglial activation, β-amyloid deposition, BBB compromise, or cortical white matter loss (Kane et al., 2012).

A permutation of Marmarous WDI model is the Maryland model, which involves frontal acceleration, as well as lateral impact on a helmet-protected head to mimic football related injuries (Kilbourne et al., 2009; Viano et al., 2009; Ma et al., 2019). WDI injury severity, though less systematically studied, is correlated with weight and height (Ma et al., 2019). To assess the degree of neurological impairment, the NSS is frequently employed (Flierl et al., 2009; Yarnell et al., 2016). The NSS is designed to assess for neurological impairment, alertness, and seeking behavior, and its score is highly correlated with severity of brain injury (Xiong et al., 2013). The WDI model leads to learning and memory deficits, as measured by passive avoidance, Y/T maze, radial water maze, novel object recognition, fear conditioning, MWM, and Barnes maze. For affective behavior testing, elevated plus maze or zero maze and social testing have been commonly utilized, with mixed outcome (Bodnar et al., 2019).

The WDI models effectively simulate focal or diffuse TBIs and provides the capacity to induce graded DAIs. Given the potential for rebound impacts and variations in impact velocity, the WDI model inherently exhibits a certain degree of heterogeneity (Ma et al., 2019). The major advantage of the WDI model is its ability to provide a simple and relatively inexpensive way to reproduce graded DAI. However, there is also a risk of rebound impact and variation of impact velocity, in turn limiting the accuracy of injury severity (Ma et al., 2019). There are inherent limitations to the WDI model, which includes variations in direct vs. indirect impact to the skull, impact location, mobility of the head, the surface on which the animal is positioned, as well as projectile shape and material (Bodnar et al., 2019).

2.3 Controlled cortical impact model (CCI)

In the CCI model, the brain is impacted via surgically exposed dura by a rapidly accelerated rod with preset computer guided depth of impact (Ma et al., 2019). The rod comes in different size and shape variation depending on species involved, and is manipulated by a pneumatic piston or an electromagnetic actuator (Dixon et al., 1991). The impact leads to blood-brain barrier damage, cortical encephalomalacia, and subdural hematoma. The distinct advantage of the CCI model is the ease of which mechanical factors, including time, velocity and depth of impact, can be manipulated (Mao et al., 2006; Wang and Ma, 2010). The CCI model leads to significant cortical contusion and neurodegenerative changes within the ipsilateral cortical site. The CCI model has also been modified into closed skull injury, as well as repetitive mild TBI model (rmTBI) (Smith and Hall, 1996; Tang et al., 2020). The newer iterations of the CCI model, has expanded our collective understanding of cellular, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of brain injury, by controlling parameters such as depth and velocity of impact (Osier and Dixon, 2016; Fesharaki-Zadeh et al., 2020).

The CCI model utilizes the stereotaxic apparatus and electromagnetic actuator to simulate a range of immune-histological and behavioral outcomes due to mild, moderate and severe TBI injuries. Depth and velocity of the impactor are the cardinal parameters determining the severity of injury in the CCI model (Yu et al., 2009; Washington et al., 2012). The depth of injury is an especially robust parameter to manipulate the severity of injury, ranging from mild to severe. Washington et al. (2012) simulated brain injury at depth of 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm, and 2.5 mm and a preset velocity of 5.25 m/s, to produce a model of mild, moderate and severe TBI. A similar study by Wang et al. (2016), used different velocity (velocity of 3.5 m/s) and depth (0.2, 1.0, and 1.2 mm, respectively) parameters to induce mild, moderate and severe TBI. The neurological deficits in CCI injury in rodents, including deficits in spatial memory tasks such as MWM, is highly correlated with severity of injury (Marklund and Hillered, 2011). Neurocognitive deficits post CCI injury has also been shown to be persistent up to one year post-injury due to great heterogeneity of proposed CCI models, there are recent efforts to standardize the injury parameters (Siebold et al., 2018). Another distinct advantage of the CCI model, is a lack of risk of rebound injuries (Xiong et al., 2013).

2.4 Penetrating ballistic-like brain injury model

Penetrating ballistic-like brain injury (PBBI) is induced by transmission of projectiles with accompanying high energy and shock waves, leading to formation of temporary cavity in the brain (Williams et al., 2005). The injury sequelae is dependent on the specific anatomical path of the projectile, as well as the corresponding energy discharge (Williams et al., 2006a,b). Experimental PBBI simulate gunshot wounds, and have been conducted in cats, as well as rodents (Carey et al., 1989, 1990; Davis et al., 2010).

Penetrating ballistic-like brain injury (PBBI) injury leads to significant gray and white matter damage, brain edema, seizures, cortical spreading depression and accompanying neuroinflammation, and subsequent neurocognitive and sensorimotor impairment (Williams et al., 2007). There are more novel, non-fatal variation of PBBI model that involve a modified air rifle using a pellet (Plantman et al., 2012). This injury model leads to cavity formation, white matter degeneration, hemorrhage, edema and accompanying gliosis. To simulate the ballistic effect of the injury, a PBBI rat model has been developed to represent immediate and subacute changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) (Wei et al., 2010), as well as BBB permeability changes and brain edema. Persistent neurofunctional changes include persistent motor deficits, as measured by performance on balance beam and rotarod task, and cognitive changes, reflected by spatial learning impairment in MWM task (Shear et al., 2010, 2011), which are correlated with injury severity. Similar to other animal brain injury models, the PBBI model leads to parenchymal edema, increased ICP, white matter injury and persistent inflammation (Williams et al., 2006a,2007). PBBI has also been shown to lead to activation of inflammasome, based on expressions of IL-1β, and IL-18 (Lee et al., 2018). Distinctly, PBBI model leads to extensive intracerebral hemorrhage due to penetrating nature of injury. The PBBI model has the unique capacity to capture the temporal ballistic brain injury, and can effectively simulate moderate to severe brain trauma in a combat setting (Xiong et al., 2013).

2.5 Blast injury model

Many military servicemen have experienced blast injuries, without overt TBI (Warden, 2006; Benzinger et al., 2009). Blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI) has been called the “signature wound” of the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts. While it has been mostly a significant military based health issue, it can certainly be a civilian health threat (Hicks et al., 2010). There are many iterations of bast wave animal models, mostly involving rodents (Bauman et al., 2009; de Lanerolle et al., 2011). The blast injury utilizes a compression-driven shock tube, and animals are placed inside a Kevlar thoracic protective vest, which in turn encases the thorax and part of the abdomen and significantly reduces air blast mortality, and diminished axonal fiber degeneration (Long et al., 2009). The most basic form of blast wave has been described as Friedlander waveform in the driven chamber, quantified by a pressure sensor, and can vary based on distance from membrane, as well as angle of the tubing (Cernak et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2016). Blast injury has a distinct pathophysiological pattern, which include diffuse cerebral edema, extreme hyperemia, delayed vasospasm, as well as DAI, as reported in rats studies (Garman et al., 2011).

Prior studies using low intensity blast injury, have also reported increases in ICP and persistent cognitive deficits, including social recognition, spatial memory and motor coordination (Säljö et al., 2009). Blast-exposed mice have been reported to display phosphorylated tauopathy, myelinated axonopathy, microvasculopathy, persistent and chronic neuroinflammation in the absence of overt tissue damage and hemorrhage (Goldstein). Head immobilization also plays a major role, as it has been shown to prevent blast injury-induced memory and neurobehavioral deficits (Bhattacharjee, 2008). Clinically, blast injuries have been described previously as “shell shock.” The survivors of the blast injury presented with symptoms of insomnia, vertigo, and persistent memory deficits, with 36% of the group displaying abnormal electroencephalogram (EEG) signals (Cernak et al., 1999). Blast injuries are proposed to involve transferred kinetic energy, leading to low-frequency stress waves, involving rapid physical movement, in turn leading to displacement and deformation of the medium (Cernak, 2015).

Given the prevalence and nature of mTBI in a combat setting, there is an urgent need to explore the underlying pathophysiology of low-intensity blast (LIB)-induced brain injury. The LIB model typically utilizes exposure to magnitude 46.6 kPA and a maximum of 8.7 PSI (aka 60 kPA)/ms blast, as opposed to > 100 kPA in the case of moderate to high intensity blast (Song et al., 2018a,2019). Despite the lack of mortality or gross macroscopic injuries, there are measurable neurobehavioral deficits, diminished mitochondrial fission-fusion activities, bioenergetic failure, increased oxidative stress, diminished levels of mitophagy, acute increase in compensatory respiratory activity, as well as axonal myeline injury (Song et al., 2018c). The myelinated axonal injury has been more pronounced in the subacute 7 days post-injury (DPI), as opposed to the chronic 30 DPI (Song et al., 2018b). A single LIB exposure has been shown to lead to increased levels of total tau, p-tau, and/or Aβ. Furthermore, the density of asymmetrical synapses was significantly diminished in the cortex of blast animals. Synaptic loss could be the secondary effect of diffuse axonal injury, and as shown in a rat model of CCI (Gao et al., 2011), it could be more of an initial acute/subacute response, as per prior studies (Scheff et al., 2005).

2.6 Closed-head impact model of engineered rotational acceleration (CHIMERA) model

Closed-head impact model of engineered rotational acceleration (CHIMERA) is a relatively novel model of TBI. The model was developed to simulate the majority of clinical mild TBI cases (Namjoshi et al., 2014). CHIMERA model is uniquely designed to integrate biomechanical, behavioral and neuropathological analyses using a preset defined energy with unconstrained head motion. CHIMERA model has shown excellent reproducibility using two impacts separated by 24 h, as captured by comparable repeated measures of head trajectory, linear velocity and acceleration, head displacement, angular velocity and acceleration and angle of impact on two consecutive days. A major limitation of CHI and CCI models is that the injury parameters including mechanical loading, method used for mechanical loading, and animal’s head response to injury are often not well-controlled, and these factors in turn lead to considerable experimental variation in neurobehavioral, and immunohistological outcomes. Repeated CHIMERA based injuries was reported to lead to prolonged loss of righting reflex, neurocognitive and motor deficits, as well as anxiety-like behavior. The repeated CHIMERA brains showed measurable inflammatory response based on heightened IL1β and TNFα signals, as well as enhanced tau phosphorylation (Namjoshi et al., 2014). Namjoshi et al. (2014, 2017), reported CHIMERA induced increases in righting time, neurological severity, as well as persistent motor deficits and anxiety like behavior. Furthermore, the authors reported post-TBI persistent microgliosis, based on heightened Iba1 levels, in several major white matter tracts including the optic tract, olfactory nerve layer, corpus callosum, and brachium of superior colliculus. There was also a reported significant astrocytic activation in the corpus callosal area, based on enhanced GFAP signal. There were also significant energy dose-dependent increases in axonal damage in the major white tracts based on increased silver staining update, which demonstrated a persistent increase over the 14 days following the injury within the corpus callosal tracts. However, there were no reported significant changes in total tau, phosphorylated tau, or the ratio of phosphorylated tau:total tau (Namjoshi et al., 2017).

Closed-head impact model of engineered rotational acceleration (CHIMERA) model has offered versatility in terms of controlled severity of injury, ranging from 0.7 joules simulating a mild TBI model to 2.5 joules simulating a more severe injury types, based on robust acute neurological deficits, enhanced plasma total tau and neurofilament-light levels, increased pro-inflammatory markers, microgliosis and BBB compromise (Bashir et al., 2020). Repeated CHIMERA model has been shown to be a useful translational model for chronic neurobehavioral sequelae of rmTBI, including profound inhibition of extinction of fear memories, consistent with features of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as well as chronic microgliosis, axonal injury and astrogliosis (Cheng et al., 2019). Analogous repetitive CHIMERA model in rats has been reported to result in impulsivity using delayed discounting task, as well as neuropathological changes comprised of white matter inflammation, tau immunoreactivity and degeneration involving the optic tract and corpus callosum, and prominent gray matter gliosis in the olfactory tubercle (Vonder Haar et al., 2019). A higher intensity CHIMERA model, “modCHIMERA,” using two injury severity levels 1.7 and 2.1 joules, resulted in persistent neurobehavioral deficits, including decreased spontaneous behavior, spatial learning and memory deficits, and socialization at 1 month, as well as significant microglial activation in cortical and subcortical areas including hippocampus and lateral septal nucleus (LSN) and significant axonal injury manifested by increased β-APP accumulation in the major white matter tracts including corpus callosum (CC), anterior commissure (AC), hippocampal commissure (HC), and fimbria (Sauerbeck et al., 2018). CHIMERA model has also been more recently applied to gyrencephalic ferrets, also reporting axonal injury based on enhanced APP signal, and neurofilament M (RMO) levels, as well as increase in tau phosphorylation AT180 at the base of the sulci by using a higher intensity impact, in turn offering a possible CTE animal simulation (Krieg et al., 2023).

2.7 Closed-head projectile concussive impact (PCI)

The projectile concussive impact (PCI) model was developed at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR), which simulates a closed-head impact (Chen et al., 2012; Leung et al., 2014; Michalovicz et al., 2023). The PCI device is comprised of an elevated platform, which can be adjusted to different heights, and situated above a heating unit. In order to launch a projectile, microcentrifuge tubes filled with dry ice and tightly sealed. The capped tubes are vertically inserted into the heating unit. Upon applying heat to the microcentrifuge tubes, it triggers a rapid sublimation of the dry ice, resulting in a mounting of internal pressure, in turn forcing the cap to burst off the tube and launch as an intact projectile (Chen et al., 2012). The severity of PCI model can be adjusted based on the material and mass of the ball-bearing projectile. One of the primary advantages of the PCI model is the ability to inherent ability to control, reproduce and quantify the mechanical forces used to induce the injury. Additional distinct advantages of the PCI model include high throughput capacity, relatively basic design and ease of fabrication (Leung et al., 2014). Rodents undergoing PCI injury, have shown to have more neurobehavioral deficits using a revised neurobehavioral severity scale (NSS-R), as well as delayed righting reflex, up to 30 min depending on the severity of the injury (Leung et al., 2014). Depending of the severity of injury (mild vs. severe TBI), varying degree of neuroinflammation can be induced, with the severe TBI (sTBI) inducing a significant rise in inflammatory cytokine mRNAs in multiple cortical regions including the hippocampi and cerebellum within 6 h of injury, along with pronounced gliosis. In addition, elevated level of cortisol, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), indicative of a weakened blood brain barrier, as well as decreased level of acetylcholine has been reported. The mTBI model was shown to have an intermediate level of neuroinflammatory state (Michalovicz et al., 2023). Due to likely combined linear and rotational injury, there are reported acute increases in ß-APP staining, indicative of tissue deformation and DAI (Leung et al., 2014).

Although the majority of animal TBI models have focused on rodent models, other animal models provide their own unique vantage points, as described in the following section. Additional TBI models include Drosophila, as well as large animal models as described. The Drosophila model offers the advantage of studying a complex phenomenon in relatively narrow time span, whereas the large animal models offer a potentially closer proximation to clinical TBI studies. The following section offers a brief overview of these major TBI models.

3 Drosophila models of TBI

Drosophila melanogaster fly model provides a unique substrate to study TBI. The fly genome is comprised of 13500 genes, with approximately 70% of genes also recognized in human brain diseases (Jeibmann and Paulus, 2009). The Drosophila brain is quite similar with that of mammals, with analogous neuronal population groups and neurotransmitters (McGurk et al., 2015), in turn providing the necessary biological substrate to study neurodegenerative diseases such as Huntington’s disease, motor neuron disease, as well as Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Moloney et al., 2010). There are a number of notable advantages that the fly TBI model would provide, which include the ability to use a large number of animals, which can be both rapidly and relatively inexpensively examined to assess for correlations between injures and outcomes, studying the underlying molecular and genetic pathways that are activated post-injury, as well as studying the relevant outcomes over the entire lifespan of the flies (Katzenberger et al., 2013). The fly brain is organized into three distinct regions, including the protocerebrum, deutocerebrum and tritocerebrum, which are analogous regions to forebrain, midbrain and hindbrain in humans (Reichert, 2005).

Katzenberger et al. have developed a “high-impact trauma” (HIT) device, which is comprised of a metal spring attached at one end to a wooden board, with the free end position over a polyurethane pad. There is a standard plastic vial, which contains unanesthetized flies, which are position at the bottom of the vial by the aid of a stationary cotton ball, in tun connected to the free end of the spring. Once the spring is deflected and released, the vial would impact the polyurethane pad, resulting in delivery of a mechanical force as the flies contact the vial and rebound (Katzenberger et al., 2013). There is an inherent lack of penetrating injuries and randomness of the injured region, which also simulate a closed-head TBI in human population. The HIT device can also be adjusted by varying the extent of the spring deflection or number of strikes. Compared to uninjured flies, flies that received one strike had a significantly reduced median as well as maximum lifespan, with additional strikes leading to further diminution of median and maximum lifespan, in turn suggesting subthreshold injuries can indeed lead to long term secondary injury consequences. The authors also reported significantly worse neurodegenerative outcomes in older flies, manifested by appearance of vacuolar lesions in the brain neuropil region. There were no discernible mortality difference between the male and female flies (Katzenberger et al., 2013). These findings are concordant with the previously reported lack of difference of long term mortality outcome between male and female TBI patients (Coimbra et al., 2003).

In addition to the HIT model, Barekat et al. (2016) introduced an alternative model of Drosophila TBI using the Omni Bead Ruptor-24 Homogenizer platform. The injury parameters used included intensity [meters/second, (m/s)], duration (s), and number of injury bouts. The Bead Ruptor Homogenizer model was also shown to induce altered sleep/awakening cycle-related behavior, concordant to what has been reported in the clinical population (Barekat et al., 2016).

An additional Drosophila model was designed by Allada lab, using Drosophila closed head injury (dCHI) (Alphen et al., 2018). The dCHI involves delivery of preset, non-penetrating strikes to the heads of un-anesthetized flies, using the forward movement of a brass block. The Drosophila to be injured is immobilized and placed in a modified 200 ml pipette in front of the block. The dCHI model induces analogous TBI phenotype, including increased motor deficits, neuronal cell death, increased mortality, and altered sleep/wake cycle (Alphen et al., 2018). A modified dTBI model involves using a piezoelectric actuator that rapidly compresses the head of Drosophila with precision (Saikumar et al., 2020). dTBI caused dose dependent and long-lasting neurological deficits, including deficits in righting reflex, climbing, and diminished life span. There was associated neurohistological characteristic hallmarks of injury including disruption of the glial process, oxidative stress, as well as increased brain vacuolization (Saikumar et al., 2020).

4 Large animal models of TBI

Rodent TBI models cannot adequately address the appropriate modeling for biomechanical and physiological parameters of injury, given the fact that rodents have largely lissencephalic brains, whereas humans have gyrencephalic brains. The presence of gyri can significantly affect the movement of the brain within the skull, and lead to more brain deformation (Finnie, 2001; Vink, 2018). The maximum mechanical stress in brain injuries is experienced far away from the surface of the brain, and at the depth of the sulci, which is also concordant with the neuropathological description of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), defined by tau phosphorylation deposits in the peri-vascular and sulci regions (Barrio et al., 2015; McKee et al., 2015).

The majority of earlier large animal studies involved models with direct brain deformation in an attempt to replicate clinical TBI (Vink, 2018). One such model was the fluid percussion injury (FPI) used in cats (Sullivan et al., 1976), with its subsequent use in dogs, and sheep (Millen et al., 1985), swine (Solomon et al., 2011), as well as rabbits (Härtl et al., 1997) and finally rodents (Dixon et al., 1987; McIntosh et al., 1987). There was a subsequent development of an alternative model, using controlled cortical impact (CCI) utilized in ferrets (Lighthall, 1988), pigs (Duhaime et al., 2000; Manley et al., 2006), swine (Zheng et al., 2014) primates (King et al., 2010), as well as sheep (Dutchke et al., 2016). CCI models in piglets have also been utilized in order to assess for peripheral biomarkers, as well as translational interventions (Margulies et al., 2015). The primate CCI model, involved impact to the right frontal cortex, with reported neuronal loss, vascular disruption, edema and resultant inflammatory process. The non-human primate studies also provide means of assessment for fine motor and sensory outcomes, which are not available in rodent models. Blast injury was first utilized in rabbits to study cardiac and lung function post-injury (Clemedson and Hultman, 1958), prior to its use to model TBI (Cernak, 2015). Penetrating craniocerebral gunshot wounds (PCGWs) have also been modeled in cats (Carey et al., 1989, 1990), primates (Crockard et al., 1977), as well as rats (Nakao et al., 2010). Given the high mortality rate of PCGW model, an alternative bilateral frontal lobe PCGW was also established in swine, with a lowered mortality rate (Lu et al., 2015).

Rotational injury is a well-known mechanism of TBI, as previously explored (Smith et al., 1997; Smith et al., 2000). There is a well-established and clinically relevant swine model of concussion, which induces evolving axonal injury using a HYGE device, a pneumatic actuator able to convert linear motion to angular (rotational) motion (Song et al., 2022). The swine rotational injury was demonstrated to involve significant axonal pathology, characterized by swollen axonal bulbs with neurofilament accumulation (Browne et al., 2011). The HYGE Swine TBI model led to significant loss of voltage gated sodium channels (NaChs), and their associated anchoring proteins at the nodes of Ranvier (NOR). Furthermore, there were significant accumulation of amyloid precursor protein (APP) across the white matter (Song et al., 2022). The swine TBI model offers a robust translational simulation for DAI (Cullen et al., 2016; Zhan et al., 2022).

There are a few challenges involving the use of large animals for TBI studies, which include a relatively larger expense, in terms of both cost, as well as holding facilities. There is also the need for higher level of care for larger animals, given their inherent longer life span, in turn, requiring more specialized care, both before and after trauma. However, the study of TBI in large animals provide an advantageous perspective of closer cortical injury simulation to the clinical population, as well as the possibility of unique neurodevelopmental studies post-TBI (Duhaime, 2006; Pareja et al., 2016; Vink, 2018).

5 Combined stress and TBI models

Risk factors associated with worsened clinical outcomes post TBI include older age at the time of injury, limited educational background, lower socioeconomic status, as well as prior psychiatric illnesses including PTSD, depression and anxiety (Lupien et al., 2009; Nugent et al., 2011; Sanchez et al., 2021). Prior studies have also shown that TBI increases the probability of PTSD (Bryant, 2011; Yurgil et al., 2014; Spadoni et al., 2018), as well as depression (Rosenthal et al., 1998; Maller et al., 2010; Lavoie et al., 2017) and anxiety (Moore et al., 2006; Mallya et al., 2015; Osborn et al., 2016). There are a number of combined preclinical stress and TBI models that have been proposed (Kwon et al., 2011; Xing et al., 2013; Ojo et al., 2014; Sierra-Mercado et al., 2015; Davies et al., 2016; Fesharaki-Zadeh et al., 2020). Fesharaki-Zadeh et al. (2020) examined the interaction of TBI and PTSD, using the preclinical models of closed head injury and Chronic Variable Stress, respectively. The result of the study demonstrated an asymmetrical and synergistic relationship between TBI and PTSD. More specifically PTSD proceeding TBI (CVS → CHI) lead to a more severe phenotype, based on performance on various neurobehavioral assays. Furthermore, the CVS → CHI group had heightened degree of inflammation, based on Iba1 immunohistological signal in hippocampal regions, with strong degree of correlation between heightened neuroinflammation and neurobehavioral deficits (Fesharaki-Zadeh et al., 2020; Figure 2). These findings are also in parallel with the larger paradigm of the global neuroinflammatory effects of chronic stress proceeding TBI.

FIGURE 2

There is a growing body of preclinical and clinical literature reporting worse neurocognitive and neurodegenerative outcomes in animals exposed to early life stress prior to TBI injury (Diaz-Chávez et al., 2020; Catale et al., 2021; Sanchez et al., 2021; Catale et al., 2022), with the clinical literature reporting mixed results (Lajud et al., 2021). The result of worsened outcome due to chronic stress could be the result of activation of HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal), as well as SNS (sympathetic nervous system) (Nusslock and Miller, 2016), and microglial activation (Kosten et al., 2012; Nusslock and Miller, 2016; van Bodegom et al., 2017; Johnson and Kaffman, 2018). Chronic stress either in the form of stress exposure prior to TBI or in the neurodevelopmental setting, would “prime” a neuroinflammatory response prior to injury, and in turn lead to more severe neurobehavioral and neurodegenerative outcome (Nusslock and Miller, 2016; Tang et al., 2020). A recent study involved prevention of microglial/macrophage activation using GW2580 treatment, a microglial activation inhibitor without microglial ablation. The rodents treated with GW2580, had significantly improved outcome based on overall reduced microglial/macrophage activation, diminished mortality and improved functional recovery and outcome (Catale et al., 2021). These results suggest that early treatment focused on neuroinflammation, could play a key role in modifying the probability of developing neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer’s disease and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) (Fesharaki-Zadeh, 2023). The asymmetrical synergistic interaction of chronic stress and TBI has been utilized to create models of repetitive mild TBI and chronic stress to simulate neurodegenerative tauopathy like CTE, and examine potential disease modifying therapeutic using Fyn kinase inhibition via modulation of tau phosphorylation (Tang et al., 2020; Figure 3).

FIGURE 3

6 Neuropathological sequelae of TBI

Over the last few decades, the neuropathology of TBI-related degeneration is beginning to be deciphered in postmortem human tissue. Critical insights have been gleaned from rodent TBI and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) models, especially region-, circuit-, and cell-type specific molecular abnormalities that trigger the pathological sequelae. In particular, epidemiological and clinical studies have revealed shared pathological features between repeated mild TBI and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Blennow et al., 2016; Washington et al., 2016; Mendez, 2017), culminating in the development of dementia, including increased risk for cerebral atrophy, CTE and even Parkinson’s disease (PD). For example, analysis of large cohorts of individuals during lifetime have revealed that single mild TBI was associated with ∼20% greater risk for the development of dementia (Fann et al., 2018). These studies have reinforced the notion that TBI is not merely an acute event but has long-term ramifications that is associated with chronic disability (Wilson et al., 2017). The pathological alterations in TBI and CTE include the manifestation of hyperphosphorylation of tau leading to the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) as a result of mitochondrial dysregulation, calcium dysfunction, and activation of inflammatory cascades, involving cortical sulci and perivascular regions in the early stages, and more global parenchymal areas in the more advanced stages (McKee et al., 2015). The following sections will highlight recent developments in the field pertinent to these areas.

6.1 Tau pathology

Tau is microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) that plays a critical role in the movement of cargo proteins throughout neurons and stabilization of microtubules, particularly within neurons. Under pathological conditions, tau is subject to several post-translational modifications (PTMs) including phosphorylation. Hyperphosphorylation of tau results in disassociation of tau from microtubules, translocation to dendrites within neurons, oligomerization and the generation of intracellular NFTs. Studies have revealed that even a single episode of TBI in ∼30% of subjects led to the NFT pathology and the onset of dementia (Johnson et al., 2012; Zanier et al., 2018). Histological examination of CTE patients with repeated trauma has revealed focal perivascular accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau as NFTs within neurons, neuropil threads and astrocytic tangles, with a heightened propensity within the depths of cortical sulci. Clinically, patients with CTE, originally referred to as “punch-drunk syndrome” or “dementia pugilistica,” are characterized by mood and behavioral disorders and cognitive impairment (McKee et al., 2010; Omalu, 2014). The presence of phosphorylated tau lesions has been categorized as the minimum threshold requirement for CTE diagnosis. The general histopathological pattern of NFTs in CTE include several brain areas, including the neocortex, thalamus, brainstem and rarely, spinal cord. Pathology emerges focally and in discrete patches in the sulci of the neocortex, oftentimes in the superior and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, but increasing in prevalence and spreading to temporal and parietal cortices as the degeneration progresses. With advanced stage of disease, NFTs are expressed extensively with the most intense staining pattern in the sulci with neuronal loss, accompanied by white matter pathology, glial tau pathology and gliosis, exhibiting a distinct pattern. The magnitude of tau pathology in TBI and CTE has been found to be correlated with age, duration and severity of head impact injuries, clinical signs and symptoms and survival after injury.

However, the spatial and temporal progression of NFT pathology in CTE is distinct and different from AD. In AD, tau pathology first arises in the brainstem nuclei projecting broadly to the cerebral cortex (e.g., noradrenergic locus coeruleus) and in the cerebral cortex emerges in the transentorhinal region (TRE) and then in superficial cellular layers of the entorhinal region (ER) early in the course of the illness inducing degeneration (Braak et al., 2011; Braak and Del Tredici, 2014). Tau pathology then extends to deeper layers of the ER and arises in the interconnected hippocampal formation and association cortices, sparing primary sensory and motor fields untouched until late-stage disease. Recent cryo-EM studies have revealed that the 3D conformation of tau filaments in CTE is distinctly different from AD and Pick’s disease, suggesting that the mechanisms that lead to tau trafficking and aggregation might be uniquely different in various types of dementia (Falcon et al., 2019). Furthermore, there is a general absence of tau in perivascular astrocytes in sulcal depths in AD.

Several studies in human and in rodent TBI models are beginning to unravel the phosphorylation PTM landscape, compared to other forms of dementia. The studies have revealed shared and unique p-tau epitopes on tau in patients with acute and repeated TBI. For example, histopathological studies in CTE patients have highlighted phosphorylation at Thr175, Ser422, Ser199, Ser202, Thr205 and Thr231 as important in the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration (Mufson et al., 2016; Puvenna et al., 2016; Moszczynski et al., 2018). However, future studies are needed to delineate the presence of p-tau epitopes that are emerging as fluid-based biomarkers in AD, e.g., Thr181 and Thr217, early, soluble p-tau sites that cause detachment of tau from microtubules, e.g., Ser214, and other p-tau sites that enhance tau seeding capacity, e.g., Ser262. In addition to phosphorylation, additional studies need to dissect the contribution of other PTM, such as acetylation and ubiquitination, and how they uniquely predispose alterations in the conformational state of tau to mediate propagation within afflicted brain circuits. Animal models of TBI/CTE in conjunction with postmortem human studies will be crucial for these future directions for the field.

In addition to tau pathology, there is the concurrence of other pathological phenomena in TBI/CTE, including beta-amyloid plaques, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Lewy body disease, and TDP-43 proteinopathy which has been shown to increase in likelihood across age-span (Stein and Crary, 2020). These pathological alterations persist for months to years after acute TBI, suggesting that physical insults could trigger a pathogenic sequence of events that culminate in behavioral impairments (Goldstein et al., 2012; Johnson et al., 2012, 2013).

6.2 Calcium dysregulation

Calcium signaling is widely recognized as a critical determinant of synaptic plasticity, acting as a second messenger to regulate a myriad of physiological processes and intracellular signal transduction pathways. Several lines of evidence have revealed that calcium dysregulation in neurons has been hypothesized as key etiological driver of neuropathology in TBI. Calcium entry within neurons occurs through multiple sources: (1) receptor-operated calcium channels (ROCs), e.g., N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, that are activated by endogenous ligand glutamate, which drives calcium influx from the extracellular space into the cytosol; (2) voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) that under depolarized conditions, e.g., as a result of Na⁺ entry through ion channels or due to Ca²⁺ influx through ROCs; (3) calcium-induced calcium release from intracellular stores located on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). This occurs through inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP₃)-sensitive Ca²⁺ stores, and ryanodine-sensitive Ca²⁺ stores. IP₃-sensitive Ca²⁺ stores can be activated by G protein-coupled receptors such as Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) or muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, which activates phospholipase C (PLC), which in turn cleaves phosphatidylinositol biphosphate (PIP₂), causing the release of diacylglycerol (DAG) and IP₃. In addition to the canonical mechanisms, additional pathways include store-operated or second-messenger-operated channels (SOCs/SMOCs) that drive calcium influx when intracellular calcium levels are diminished. Another source of calcium occurs through transient receptor potential channels (TRPCs) that are located on the plasma membrane which are thought to contribute to calcium induced calcium release (CICR) in neurons. Due to the multiple routes that permit the elevation of calcium within intracellular compartments, there are several homeostatic mechanisms to constrain calcium within specific subcellular compartments. This includes calcium-binding proteins, e.g., calbindin and parvalbumin, to sequester excessive Ca²⁺ within the cytosol. There are mechanisms that also promote extrusion of Ca²⁺ from the intracellular space to the extracellular space via membrane pumps such as the plasma membrane Ca²⁺-ATPase (PMCA), and the Na⁺/Ca²⁺ exchanger which is activated by elevated levels of Ca²⁺ and is dependent on the Na⁺ gradient, regulated by the membrane Na⁺/K⁺ ATPase. Finally, intracellular organelles such as the ER, including specialized pumps such as the sarcoplasmic–endoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺-ATPase (SERCA) on the ER membrane, and mitochondria play important roles in buffering excessive calcium, but calcium overload in these organelles can abrogate their function.

Mechanical injury from TBI can produce shearing forces that can alter the biophysical properties of calcium channels that regulate intracellular calcium influx. For example, experimental studies in vivo in TBI models and in vitro studies have revealed greater permeability of calcium-regulatory channels following mechanical injury. The upregulation of calcium conductance within neurons is likely a key mediator of secondary damage resulting in activation of signaling pathways that perturb calcium homeostasis. Consistent with this idea, acute and chronic injury in TBI is associated with activation of calcium-dependent cysteine proteases such as calpain-2, which is induced by high levels of intracellular calcium (Liu et al., 2014; Kobeissy et al., 2015). The activation of calpain-2 is associated with numerous downstream consequences, including the cleavage of cytoskeletal proteins into stable proteolytic fragments that can be captured as fluid-based biomarkers (Saatman et al., 2010). Activated calpains can aberrantly cleave several proteins that are critical for the integrity of neurons, such as spectrin, tubulin, tau, microtubule-associated protein, and neurofilaments (Wang and Po-Wai, 1994). Calpain-2 activation might exacerbate tau pathology as TBI mouse models have revealed calpain-2 activation resulted in increased tyrosine phosphorylation of kinase c-Abl at Tyr245, resulting in increased kinase activity and phosphorylation of tau at Tyr394 (Wang et al., 2017). Likewise, RNA-sequencing analyses in postmortem human studies have yielded evidence of a downregulation of PPP3CA, which encodes for calcium-dependent calmodulin-stimulated protein phosphatase, in patients with CTE compared to healthy subjects, and these patterns were inversely correlated with phosphorylation of tau at Ser202/Thr205 (Seo et al., 2017).

Calpains can alter synaptic plasticity by degrading membrane proteins such as glutamate receptors and transporters and can also modulate the function of protein kinases and phosphates. Calpain activation might play an important role in pathological cascades such as diffuse axonal injury, as calpain-mediated proteolysis of spectrin has been detected acutely after injury. Assessment of calpain-mediated N-terminal fragment of spectrin in fluid-based measures such as blood were found to be acutely elevated after injury and predicted the long-term functional effects of the injury in patients with TBI, including professional athletes suffering from concussions (Siman et al., 2013, 2015). Recent studies have revealed that calpain-2 conditional knockout mice are protected against the pathological consequences of repeated mild TBI and that genetic deletion or pharmaceutical inhibition of calpain-2 prevented alterations in the subcellular localization of TDP-43.

Elevation in intracellular calcium in TBI is also associated with activation of caspases, another family of cysteine proteases. Caspase activation following trauma can lead to the proteolytic processing of several proteins that could result in the onset of apoptotic cascades and associated downstream pathological consequences. Sufficient buildup of intracellular calcium also results in the activation of endonucleases following TBI, which can induce DNA damage by altering heterochromatin configurations within the nucleus (Trump and Berezesky, 1995; McConkey and Orrenius, 1996). Furthermore, injury results in the activation of phospholipases, such as PLC and cPLA₂ that leads to the generation of arachidonic acid, which in turn can increase membrane permeability and elevate levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This is turn can lead to cellular damage by peroxidation of lipid membranes, DNA and various signaling proteins (Dhillon et al., 1995, 1999). Following brain injury, results have suggested an increase in expression of DAG and protein kinase C (PKC), key drivers of secondary calcium signaling, which can directly interact with ROCs and VGCCs to further amplify calcium influx into the intracellular space within neurons. Concomitant data have purported that signaling via G protein-coupled receptors that increase Ca²⁺ by IP3 generation appears to be dysregulated after TBI in vivo (Delahunty et al., 1995) and with in vitro studies using mechanical injury paradigms (Rzigalinski et al., 1998; Weber et al., 1999). Similarly, calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) expression levels are increased following TBI, which in turn, can alter the permeability of glutamate receptors, alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptors (AMPARs), within the synaptic active zone. The multiple mechanisms that exacerbate calcium dysfunction within neurons in TBI lead to impairments in synaptic plasticity as indicated by various studies showing deficits in long term potentiation (LTP) in TBI mouse models (Sick et al., 1998; Albensi et al., 2000; Sanders et al., 2000; Albensi, 2001; Schwarzbach et al., 2006). These studies highlight how calcium signaling is perturbed under conditions of TBI to impair physiological properties of neurons.

6.3 Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress

A key driver of downstream injury cascades in TBI involves mitochondrial impairments and the generation of oxidative stress (Hakiminia et al., 2022). This is mediated, at least in part, by exacerbated intracellular calcium signaling via TBI-induced events, but could be by intrinsic abnormalities in mitochondria. For example, the structural and functional integrity of mitochondria are compromised in TBI, as indicated by disruptions in the electron transfer chain and mitochondrial membrane potential. Mitochondrial dynamics involving fission and fusion events are abrogated in TBI, resulting in a decrease in mitochondrial size and elevated dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) localization to mitochondria (Fischer et al., 2016). This in turn, causes mitochondrial depolarization and depleted ATP production, compromising mitochondrial function within neurons (Ladak et al., 2019). Suppression of Drp1 with mitochondrial division inhibitor-1, rescued the decrement in mitochondrial length, thereby preventing hippocampal neuron apoptosis, and enhancing cognition in TBI (Fischer et al., 2016). Excessive intracellular calcium results in calcium overload of mitochondria, subsequently resulting in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS).

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) can induce a myriad of pathophysiological events, including the synthesis and release of inflammatory cytokines, compromising the integrity of the blood-brain barrier, and with more pronounced changes causing widespread pathological changes, including cerebral perfusion, ischemia and edema (Mendes Arent et al., 2014; Najem et al., 2018). The activation of these deleterious pathways can invoke apoptotic and necroptosis pathways. For example, TBI is associated with the upregulation of necroptosis pathways, such as receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3) and mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) (Liu et al., 2018; Ni et al., 2019). Inhibition of necroptosis pathways with necrostatin-1 attenuated tissue damage and enhanced functional outcomes in the controlled cortical impact TBI model deficient in TNF-α and Fas (You et al., 2008). Histopathological analysis in postmortem human tissue in TBI patients in the peri-ischemic zone (PIZ) of traumatic cerebral contusions has further defined increases in Bax, Bcl-2 and caspase-3 (Nathoo et al., 2004). Furthermore, postmortem evaluations in the pericontusional zone of TBI patients revealed an upregulation of apoptosis with TUNEL-positive staining, and these alterations were associated with poorer prognosis after TBI (Miñambres et al., 2008). The destabilization of mitochondria and generation of oxidative stress could ultimately also promote disruptions in the autophagy-lysosomal pathways (Clark et al., 2008; Lai et al., 2008).

6.4 Activation of inflammatory pathways

The inflammatory mechanisms that result from acute and chronic brain injury is mediated by both innate and adaptive immune system responses. Although the temporal sequence and the involvement of specific components of the immune system are currently under investigation, several preclinical studies in rodent TBI models have illuminated the role of specific cell-types in the cascade. Following acute injury, cytokines, chemokines, and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are thought to involve recruitment of various key cell-types. This directly involves the recruitment of neutrophils that constrain the site of injury and facilitate the elimination of damaged cells and cellular debris. This is associated with the recruitment of microglia and astrocytes acutely to perform neuroprotective roles, oftentimes within 3–5 days post-injury. At later time points, T and B cells are involved to partake in restorative roles (McKee and Lukens, 2016).

Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are released under conditions of cellular stress to initiate an inflammatory cascade. This involves the activation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) inducing kinase (Lee et al., 2013), in conjunction with key proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 (Hang et al., 2005). Studies in rat models of TBI and in human subjects have shown high expression of High Mobility Group Box 1 protein (HMGB1), a protein that binds to TLR4 and propels activation of inflammatory pathways (Gao et al., 2012). Intriguingly, anti-HMGB1 targeting therapies are being pursued as a mechanism to attenuate inflammatory pathways and ameliorate the breakdown of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) following injury (Okuma et al., 2012). This is accompanied by the upregulation of pathways that mediate antigen presentation [e.g., major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II], phagocytosis related pathways such as C3, C4 and FCGR4, CD86 (Lagraoui et al., 2012), pathways that promote pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-10, IL-6, IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-1β) and chemokines expression (e.g., CXCL4, CCL4, CCL2). For example, studies in TBI have shown IL-1β is upregulated in subjects with serious injuries for 24 h, and correlated with decreased long-term functional outcomes (Hayakata et al., 2004). Studies in rodents have shown that antagonism of IL-1β results in a reduction in anatomical and functional consequences of neuroinflammation (Jones et al., 2005). Similar studies conducted for IL-18 have identified this cytokine as being expressed early in TBI and administration of a specific inhibitor for IL-18 in mice showed a significantly improved neurological recovery by 7 days, accompanied by attenuated intracerebral IL-18 levels (Yatsiv et al., 2002). Findings have shown that early administration of anti-inflammatory cytokines, e.g., IL-10 and TGF-β, can ameliorate the neurological effects in different TBI models (Knoblach and Faden, 1998; Maas et al., 2008). Furthermore, a critical driver of inflammation involves inflammasome activation in TBI (Liu et al., 2013), and studies in human subjects have shown that inflammasome components are detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are associated with worse clinical outcomes (Adamczak et al., 2012).

6.5 Neurodegeneration involving diffuse axonal injury (DAI)

Postmortem studies in human subjects have revealed diffuse axonal injury (DAI) as a common neuropathological feature of exacerbated TBI, including Wallerian-like degeneration following injury with white matter atrophy. In recent studies, human and animal studies have also linked DAI as a key pathological substrate of concussion (Smith and Meaney, 2000; Meaney and Smith, 2011; Johnson et al., 2013; Smith et al., 2013). TBI has been shown to generate toxic tau epitopes and Aβ in degenerating axons, although the precise molecular mechanisms that lead to these interactive phenomena have yet to be elucidated (Goldstein et al., 2012; Johnson et al., 2012; Tagge et al., 2018). Physical injury has been hypothesized to create shearing forces that abrogate the function of the cytoskeleton network, eventually inducing microstructural breaks that reduce the efficacy of axonal transport. This could lead to the mislocalization of key components of Aβ generation in the axonal swellings, including amyloid precursor protein (APP) and enzymes that cleave APP such as beta secretase 1 and presenilin 1. This is believed to lead to the intracellular production of Aβ that is released to produce extracellular Aβ plaques. Similarly, mechanical shearing forces can lead to detachment of pathogenic tau from microtubules which mediates hyperphosphorylation and aggregation of cis phosphorylated tau.

6.6 Glymphatic system disruption

The brain clearance involves the removal of waste via multiple, overlapping networks which include active and passive transport via the blood brain barrier, diffusion and the glymphatic system. The glymphatic system is comprised of subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid flowing into the brain adjacent to arteries, mixing with the brain interstitial fluid (ISF) with subsequent outflow along cerebral venous system (Butler et al., 2023). Compromised glymphatic system clearance has been associated with toxic protein accumulation, including Aβ and tau, in turn potentially leading to development of Alzheimer’s disease (Tarasoff-Conway et al., 2015). The clearance of toxins and waste is particularly compromised in TBI, in which various neuronal debris including Aβ and tau have to be cleared. Such disruption has formed one of the correlational hypotheses linking TBI and increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease and various neurodegenerative disorders (Johnson et al., 2010). A novel imaging technique, referred to as diffusion tensor imaging along perivascular spaces (DTI-ALPS), has been utilized to assess glymphatic system disruption post TBI. DTI-ALPS based findings post subacute TBI support a correlation between disease severity based on blood levels of neurofilament light protein (NfL), a highly sensitive TBI biomarker, and glymphatic system disruption (Butler et al., 2023). The role of aquaporin 4 (AQP4) in immediate brain damage within 72 h of injury has been examined and shown to be altered in rodent TBI studies, in turn suggesting its role in ISF transport (Liu et al., 2020). Recent evidence also shows the glymphatic exchange to be significantly enhanced during sleep, and suppressed during normal wakefulness hours (Xie et al., 2013). These findings support a potential bidirectional relationship between TBI, sleep disruption and glymphatic clearance (Piantino et al., 2019). The emerging studies linking TBI, glymphatic disruption, sleep and risk of neurodegenerative disorders support a complex dynamic association between specific trauma induced physiological perturbation and chronic neuropathological changes. Hence the glymphatic system integrity and functioning post-injury would likely serve as a robust biomarker of TBI severity and a predictive marker for potential neurodegenerative sequelae (Peters and Lyketsos, 2023).

7 Conclusion and perspective

As per Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), TBI resulted in 223,000 hospitalizations and 64,300 deaths in 2020 (Peterson et al., 2022). As TBI remains to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, there is increasing demand on enhancing our collective understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and chronic neuropsychiatric sequelae post TBI. Given the inherent complexity and heterogeneity of TBI, the animal models of TBI have created an essential biological substrate in which various biomechanical parameters, including severity of injury and timeline of the injury and post-injury analysis, could be controlled, manipulated and comprehensively studied. Moreover, the animal models of TBI have created the opportunity to examine various disease modifying therapeutic agents with significant translational value. As there are currently no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and specific regimen for TBI induced neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric sequelae (Fesharaki-Zadeh, 2023), there is an ever-increasing necessity for evolving the current TBI models with the ultimate goal of the closest possible and accurate disease simulation. The development of recent TBI models, including CHIMERA, is one such pertinent case. The evolving field of biomarker studies of TBI in conjunction with expanding studies of animal models of TBI, would provide a necessary complementary development that would provide the essential translational tool for future novel therapeutic modalities.

References

• 1

  AbdelmalikP. A.DraghicN.LingG. S. F. (2019). Management of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.Transfusion591529–1538.

  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AdamczakS.De DaleG.BullockM. R.DietrichW. D.KeaneR. W. (2012). Inflammasome proteins in cerebrospinal fluid of brain-injured patients as biomarkers of functional outcome: Clinical article.J. Neurosurg.1171119–1125. 10.3171/2012.9.JNS12815

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AlbensiB. (2001). Models of brain injury and alterations in synaptic plasticity.J. Neurosci. Res.65279–283. 10.1002/jnr.1151

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AlbensiB.SullivanP.ThompsonM.ScheffS.MattsonM. (2000). Cyclosporin ameliorates traumatic brain-injury-induced alterations of hippocampal synaptic plasticity.Exp. Neurol.162385–389. 10.1006/exnr.1999.7338

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  Albert-WeissenbergerC.VárrallyayC.RaslanF.KleinschnitzC.SirénA.-L. (2012). An experimental protocol for mimicking pathomechanisms of traumatic brain injury in mice.Exp. Transl. Stroke Med.41–5. 10.1186/2040-7378-4-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  AlderJ.FujiokaW.LifshitzJ.CrockettD. P.Thakker-VariaS. (2011). Lateral fluid percussion: Model of traumatic brain injury in mice.JoVE54:e3063.

  • Google Scholar

• 7

  AlessandriB.RiceA.LevasseurJ.DeFordM.HammR.BullockM. (2002). Cyclosporin A improves brain tissue oxygen consumption and learning/memory performance after lateral fluid percussion injury in rats.J. Neurotrauma.19829–841. 10.1089/08977150260190429

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  AlphenB. V.StewartS.IwanaszkoM.XuF.BangE.RozenfeldS.et al (2018). Glial immune-related pathways as mediators of closed head TBI effects on behavior in Drosophila.bioRxiv [Preprint].10.1101/422535

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  ArmsteadW. M.KurthC. D. (1994). Different cerebral hemodynamic responses following fluid percussion brain injury in the newborn and juvenile pig.J. Neurotrauma11487–497.

  • Google Scholar

• 10

  BarekatA.GonzalezA.MauntzR.KotzebueR.MolinaB.El-MecharrafieN.et al (2016). Using Drosophila as an integrated model to study mild repetitive traumatic brain injury.Sci. Rep.6:25252. 10.1038/srep25252

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BarrioJ. R.SmallG. W.WongK.-P.HuangS.-C.LiuJ.MerrillD. A.et al (2015). In vivo characterization of chronic traumatic encephalopathy using [F-18] FDDNP PET brain imaging.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.112E2039–E2047.

  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BashirA.AbebeZ.McInnesK.ButtonE.TatarnikovI.ChengW.et al (2020). Increased severity of the CHIMERA model induces acute vascular injury, sub-acute deficits in memory recall, and chronic white matter gliosis.Exp. Neurol.324:113116. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113116

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BaumanR.LingG.TongL.JanuszkiewiczA.AgostonD.DelanerolleN.et al (2009). An introductory characterization of a combat-casualty-care relevant swine model of closed head injury resulting from exposure to explosive blast.J. Neurotrauma26841–860. 10.1089/neu.2008.0898

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  BellanderB.von HolstH.FredmanP.SvenssonM. (1996). Activation of the complement cascade and increase of clusterin in the brain following a cortical contusion in the adult rat.J. Neurosurg.85468–475. 10.3171/jns.1996.85.3.0468

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  BenzingerT.BrodyD.CardinS.CurleyK.MintunM.MunS.et al (2009). Blast-related brain injury: Imaging for clinical and research applications: Report of the 2008 st. Louis workshop.J. Neurotrauma262127–2144. 10.1089/neu.2009.0885

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  BhattacharjeeY. (2008). Neuroscience. Shell shock revisited: Solving the puzzle of blast trauma.Science319406–408. 10.1126/science.319.5862.406

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  BlennowK.BrodyD.KochanekP.LevinH.McKeeA.RibbersG.et al (2016). Traumatic brain injuries.Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers2:16084. 10.1038/nrdp.2016.84

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  BodnarC. N.RobertsK. N.HigginsE. K.BachstetterA. D. (2019). A systematic review of closed head injury models of mild traumatic brain injury in mice and rats.J. Neurotrauma361683–1706. 10.1089/neu.2018.6127

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  BraakH.Del TrediciK. (2014). Neuroanatomy and Pathology of Sporadic Alzheimer’s Disease.Cham: Springer.

  • Google Scholar

• 20

  BraakH.ThalD. R.GhebremedhinE.DelT. K. (2011). Stages of the pathologic process in Alzheimer disease: Age categories from 1 to 100 years.J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.70960–969. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e318232a379

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  BrowneK. D.ChenX.-H.MeaneyD. F.SmithD. H. (2011). Mild traumatic brain injury and diffuse axonal injury in swine.J. Neurotrauma281747–1755.

  • Google Scholar

• 22

  BryantR. (2011). Post-traumatic stress disorder vs traumatic brain injury.Dial. Clin. Neurosci.13251–262. 10.31887/DCNS.2011.13.2/rbryant

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  ButlerT.ZhouL.OzsahinI.WangX.GarettiJ.ZetterbergH.et al (2023). Glymphatic clearance estimated using diffusion tensor imaging along perivascular spaces is reduced after traumatic brain injury and correlates with plasma neurofilament light, a biomarker of injury severity.Brain Commun.5:fcad134. 10.1093/braincomms/fcad134

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  CarbonellW.MarisD.McCallT.GradyM. (1998). Adaptation of the fluid percussion injury model to the mouse.J. Neurotrauma15217–229. 10.1089/neu.1998.15.217

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  CareyM. E.SarnaG. S.FarrellJ. B. (1990). Brain edema following an experimental missile wound to the brain.J. Neurotrauma713–20. 10.1089/neu.1990.7.13

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  CareyM. E.SarnaG. S.FarrellJ. B.HappelL. T. (1989). Experimental missile wound to the brain.J. Neurosurg.71754–764.

  • Google Scholar

• 27

  CataleC.BisicchiaE.CarolaV.ViscomiM. (2021). Early life stress exposure worsens adult remote microglia activation, neuronal death, and functional recovery after focal brain injury.Brain Behav. Immun.9489–103. 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.02.032

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  CataleC.CarolaV.ViscomiM. T. (2022). Early life stress-induced neuroinflammation and neurological disorders: A novel perspective for research.Neural Regen. Res.17:1971. 10.4103/1673-5374.335152

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  CernakI. (2005). Animal models of head trauma.NeuroRx2410–422. 10.1602/neurorx.2.3.410

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  CernakI. (2015). “Blast injuries and blast-induced neurotrauma: Overview of pathophysiology and experimental knowledge models and findings,” in Brain Neurotrauma: Molecular, Neuropsychological, and Rehabilitation Aspects, ed.KobeissyF. H. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press).

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  CernakI.MerkleA.KoliatsosV.BilikJ.LuongQ.MahotaT.et al (2011). The pathobiology of blast injuries and blast-induced neurotrauma as identified using a new experimental model of injury in mice.Neurobiol. Dis.41538–551. 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.10.025

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  CernakI.SavicJ.IgnjatovicD.JevticM. (1999). Blast injury from explosive munitions.J. Trauma Acute Care Surg.4796–103.

  • Google Scholar

• 33

  ChenY.ConstantiniS.TrembovlerV.WeinstockM.ShohamiE. (1996). An experimental model of closed head injury in mice: Pathophysiology, histopathology, and cognitive deficits.J. Neurotrauma13557–568. 10.1089/neu.1996.13.557

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  ChenZ.LeungL.MountneyA.LiaoZ.YangW.LuX.et al (2012). A novel animal model of closed-head concussive-induced mild traumatic brain injury: Development, implementation, and characterization.J. Neurotrauma29268–280. 10.1089/neu.2011.2057

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  ChengW.MartensK.BashirA.CheungH.StukasS.GibbsE.et al (2019). CHIMERA repetitive mild traumatic brain injury induces chronic behavioural and neuropathological phenotypes in wild-type and APP/PS1 mice.Alzheimers Res. Ther.11:6. 10.1186/s13195-018-0461-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  ChitturiJ.LiY.SanthakumarV.KannurpattiS. S. (2018). Early behavioral and metabolomic change after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury in the developing brain.Neurochem. Int.12075–86. 10.1016/j.neuint.2018.08.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  ChiuC.LiaoY.YangL.WangJ.TweedieD.KarnatiH.et al (2016). Neuroinflammation in animal models of traumatic brain injury.J. Neurosci. Methods27238–49. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.06.018

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  ClarkR.BayirH.ChuC.AlberS.KochanekP.WatkinsS. (2008). Autophagy is increased in mice after traumatic brain injury and is detectable in human brain after trauma and critical illness.Autophagy488–90. 10.4161/auto.5173

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  ClemedsonC.-J.HultmanH. (1958). Cardiac output in early phase of blast injury in rabbits.Am. J. Physiol. Legacy Content194601–606. 10.1152/ajplegacy.1958.194.3.601

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  CloughR.NeeseS.SherillL.TanA.DukeA.RooseveltR.et al (2007). Cortical edema in moderate fluid percussion brain injury is attenuated by vagus nerve stimulation.Neuroscience147286–293. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.04.043

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  CoimbraR.HoytD. B.PotenzaB. M.FortlageD.Hollingsworth-FridlundP. (2003). Does sexual dimorphism influence outcome of traumatic brain injury patients? The answer is no!J. Trauma Acute Care Surg.54689–700. 10.1097/01.TA.0000058314.31655.5F

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  CorneliusC.CrupiR.CalabreseV.GrazianoA.MiloneP.PennisiG.et al (2013). Traumatic brain injury: Oxidative stress and neuroprotection.Antioxid. Redox Signal.19836–853. 10.1089/ars.2012.4981

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  CovingtonN. V.DuffM. C. (2021). Heterogeneity is a hallmark of traumatic brain injury, not a limitation: A new perspective on study design in rehabilitation research.Am. J. Speech Lang. Pathol.30974–985.

  • Google Scholar

• 44

  CrockardH. A.BrownF. D.JohnsL. M.MullanS. (1977). An experimental cerebral missile injury model in primates.J. Neurosurg.46776–783.

  • Google Scholar

• 45

  CullenD.HarrisJ.BrowneK.WolfJ.DudaJ.MeaneyD.et al (2016). A porcine model of traumatic brain injury via head rotational acceleration.Methods Mol. Biol.1462289–324. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3816-2_17

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  DailW. G.FenneyD. M.MurrayH. M.LinnR. T.BoyesonM. G. (1981). Responses to cortical injury: II. Widespread depression of the activity of an enzyme in cortex remote from a focal injury.Brain Res.21179–89. 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90068-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  D’AmbrosioR.FairbanksJ. P.FenderJ. S.BornD. E.DoyleD. L.MillerJ. W. (2004). Post-traumatic epilepsy following fluid percussion injury in the rat.Brain127304–314.

  • Google Scholar

• 48

  DaviesD.OlsonD.MeyerD.SchollJ.WattM.ManzerraP.et al (2016). Mild traumatic brain injury with social defeat stress alters anxiety, contextual fear extinction, and limbic monoamines in adult rats.Front. Behav. Neurosci.10:71. 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00071

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  DavisA. (2000). Mechanisms of traumatic brain injury: Biomechanical, structural and cellular considerations.Crit. Care Nurs. Q.231–13. 10.1097/00002727-200011000-00002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  DavisA. R.ShearD. A.ChenZ.LuX.-C. M.TortellaF. C. (2010). A comparison of two cognitive test paradigms in a penetrating brain injury model.J. Neurosci. Methods18984–87. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.03.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  de LanerolleN.BandakF.KangD.LiA. Y.DuF.SwaugerP.et al (2011). Characteristics of an explosive blast-induced brain injury in an experimental model.J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.701046–1057. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e318235bef2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  DelahuntyM.JiangJ. Y.BlackR. T.LyethB. G. (1995). Differential modulation of carbachol and trans-ACPD-stimulated phosphoinositide turnover following traumatic brain injury.Neurochem. Res.20405–411. 10.1007/BF00973095

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  Deng-BryantY.LeungL.CaudleK.TortellaF.ShearD. (2016). Cognitive evaluation using morris water maze in neurotrauma.Methods Mol. Biol.1462539–551. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3816-2_29

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  DhillonH.CarbaryT.DoseJ.DempseyR.PrasadM. (1995). Activation of phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate signal transduction pathway after experimental brain injury: A lipid study.Brain Res.698100–106. 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00840-m

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  DhillonH. S.CarmanH. M.PrasadR. M. (1999). Regional activities of phospholipase C after experimental brain injury in the rat.Neurochem. Res.24751–755.

  • Google Scholar

• 56

  Diaz-ChávezA.LajudN.RoqueA.ChengJ.Meléndez-HerreraE.Valdéz-AlarcónJ.et al (2020). Early life stress increases vulnerability to the sequelae of pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.Exp. Neurol.329:113318. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113318

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  DixonC.CliftonG.LighthallJ.YaghmaiA.HayesR. L. (1991). A controlled cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury in the rat.J. Neurosci. Methods39253–262. 10.1016/0165-0270(91)90104-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  DixonC.LyethB.PovlishockJ.FindlingR.HammR.MarmarouA.et al (1987). A fluid percussion model of experimental brain injury in the rat.J. Neurosurg.67110–119. 10.3171/jns.1987.67.1.0110

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  DuhaimeA. (2006). Large animal models of traumatic injury to the immature brain.Dev. Neurosci.28380–387. 10.1159/000094164

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  DuhaimeA.MarguliesS.DurhamS.O’RourkeM.GoldenJ.MarwahaS.et al (2000). Maturation-dependent response of the piglet brain to scaled cortical impact.J. Neurosurg.93455–462. 10.3171/jns.2000.93.3.0455

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  DutchkeJ.AndersonR.SandozB.FinnieJ.ManavisJ.NishimotoT.et al (2016). “A biomechanical model of traumatic contusional injury produced by controlled cerebrocortical indentation in sheep,” in Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference 2016, Switzerland, 354–368.

  • Google Scholar

• 62

  FalconB.ZivanovJ.ZhangW.MurzinA.GarringerH.VidalR.et al (2019). Novel tau filament fold in chronic traumatic encephalopathy encloses hydrophobic molecules.Nature568420–423. 10.1038/s41586-019-1026-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  FannJ. R.RibeA. R.PedersenH. S.Fenger-GrønM.ChristensenJ.BenrosM. E.et al (2018). Long-term risk of dementia among people with traumatic brain injury in Denmark: A population-based observational cohort study.Lancet Psychiatry5424–431. 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30065-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  FeeneyD. M.BoyesonM. G.LinnR. T.MurrayH. M.DailW. G. (1981). Responses to cortical injury: I. Methodology and local effects of contusions in the rat.Brain Res.21167–77.

  • Google Scholar

• 65

  Fesharaki-ZadehA. (2023). Navigating the complexities of traumatic encephalopathy Syndrome (TES): Current state and future challenges.Biomedicines11: 3158. 10.3390/biomedicines11123158

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  Fesharaki-ZadehA.MiyauchiJ.St Laurent-ArriotK.TsirkaS.BergoldP. (2020). Increased behavioral deficits and inflammation in a mouse model of co-morbid traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder.ASN Neuro12:1759091420979567. 10.1177/1759091420979567

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  FinnieJ. (2001). Animal models of traumatic brain injury: A review.Aust. Vet. J.79628–633. 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10785.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  FischerT.HylinM.ZhaoJ.MooreA.WaxhamM.DashP. (2016). Altered mitochondrial dynamics and TBI pathophysiology.Front. Syst. Neurosci.10:29. 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00029

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  FlierlM. A.StahelP. F.BeauchampK. M.MorganS. J.SmithW. R.ShohamiE. (2009). Mouse closed head injury model induced by a weight-drop device.Nat. Protocols41328–1337.

  • Google Scholar

• 70

  FodaM. A. A.-E.MarmarouA. (1994). A new model of diffuse brain injury in rats: Part II: Morphological characterization.J. Neurosurg.80301–313. 10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0301

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  GaetzM. (2004). The neurophysiology of brain injury.Clin. Neurophysiol.1154–18. 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00258-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  GaoT. L.YuanX. T.YangD.DaiH. L.WangW. J.PengX.et al (2012). Expression of HMGB1 and RAGE in rat and human brains after traumatic brain injury. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 72, 643–649. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823c54a6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  GaoX.DengP.XuZ.ChenJ. (2011). Moderate traumatic brain injury causes acute dendritic and synaptic degeneration in the hippocampal dentate gyrus.PLoS One6:e24566. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024566

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  GarmanR.JenkinsL.SwitzerR.IIIBaumanR.TongL.SwaugerP.et al (2011). Blast exposure in rats with body shielding is characterized primarily by diffuse axonal injury.J. Neurotrauma28947–959. 10.1089/neu.2010.1540

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  GasparovicC.ArfaiN.SmidN.FeeneyD. (2001). Decrease and recovery of N-acetylaspartate/creatine in rat brain remote from focal injury.J. Neurotrauma18241–246. 10.1089/08977150151070856

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  GoldE.SuD.López-VelázquezL.HausD.PerezH.LacuestaG.et al (2013). Functional assessment of long-term deficits in rodent models of traumatic brain injury.Regen. Med.8483–516. 10.2217/rme.13.41

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  GoldsteinL.FisherA.TaggeC.ZhangX.VelisekL.SullivanJ.et al (2012). Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in blast-exposed military veterans and a blast neurotrauma mouse model.Sci. Transl. Med.4:134ra60. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003716

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  GreveM. W.ZinkB. J. (2009). Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A journal of translational and personalized medicine.J. Transl. Pers. Med.7697–104.

  • Google Scholar

• 79

  GriesbachG. S.HovdaD. A.Gomez-PinillaF. (2009). Exercise-induced improvement in cognitive performance after traumatic brain injury in rats is dependent on BDNF activation.Brain Res.1288105–115. 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.045

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  HakiminiaB.AlikiaiiB.KhorvashF.MousaviS. (2022). Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction following traumatic brain injury: From mechanistic view to targeted therapeutic opportunities.Fundam Clin. Pharmacol.36612–662. 10.1111/fcp.12767

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  HangC. H.ShiJ. X.LiJ. S.WuW.YinH. X. (2005). Concomitant upregulation of nuclear factor-kB activity, proinflammatory cytokines and ICAM-1 in the injured brain after cortical contusion trauma in a rat model.Neurol India53312–317. 10.4103/0028-3886.16930

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  HärtlR.MedaryM.RugeM.ArforsK.GhajarJ. (1997). “Blood-brain barrier breakdown occurs early after traumatic brain injury and is not related to white blood cell adherence,” in Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium: Brain Edema X, (San Diego, CA: Springer), 240–242.

  • Google Scholar

• 83

  HayakataT.ShiozakiT.TasakiO.IkegawaH.InoueY.ToshiyukiF.et al (2004). Changes in CSF S100B and cytokine concentrations in early-phase severe traumatic brain injury.Shock22102–107. 10.1097/01.shk.0000131193.80038.f1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  HicksR.FertigS.DesrocherR.KoroshetzW.PancrazioJ. (2010). Neurological effects of blast injury.J. Trauma681257–1263. 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d8956d

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  HicksR.SoaresH.SmithD.McintoshT. (1996). Temporal and spatial characterization of neuronal injury following lateral fluid-percussion brain injury in the rat.Acta Neuropathol.91236–246.

  • Google Scholar

• 86

  HolminS.SchallingM.HöjebergB.NordqvistA.SkeftrunaA.MathiesenT. (1997). Delayed cytokine expression in rat brain following experimental contusion.J. Neurosurg.86493–504. 10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0493

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  JeibmannA.PaulusW. (2009). Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism of brain diseases.Int. J. Mol. Sci.10407–440. 10.3390/ijms10020407

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  JohnsonF. K.KaffmanA. (2018). Early life stress perturbs the function of microglia in the developing rodent brain: New insights and future challenges.Brain Behav. Immun.6918–27. 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.06.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  JohnsonV.StewartJ.BegbieF.TrojanowskiJ.SmithD.StewartW. (2013). Inflammation and white matter degeneration persist for years after a single traumatic brain injury.Brain136(Pt 1), 28–42. 10.1093/brain/aws322

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  JohnsonV. E.StewartW.SmithD. H. (2010). Traumatic brain injury and amyloid-β pathology: A link to Alzheimer’s disease?Nat. Rev. Neurosci.11361–370.

  • Google Scholar

• 91

  JohnsonV. E.StewartW.SmithD. H. (2012). Widespread tau and amyloid-beta pathology many years after a single traumatic brain injury in humans.Brain Pathol.22142–149.

  • Google Scholar

• 92

  JonesN.PriorM.Burden-TehE.MarsdenC.MorrisP.MurphyS. (2005). Antagonism of the interleukin-1 receptor following traumatic brain injury in the mouse reduces the number of nitric oxide synthase-2-positive cells and improves anatomical and functional outcomes.Eur. J. Neurosci.2272–78. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04221.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  KalishB. T.WhalenM. J. (2016). Weight drop models in traumatic brain injury.Methods Protocols1462193–209.

  • Google Scholar

• 94

  KaneM.Angoa-PérezM.BriggsD.VianoD.KreipkeC.KuhnD. (2012). A mouse model of human repetitive mild traumatic brain injury.J. Neurosci. Methods20341–49. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.09.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  KatzenbergerR.LoewenC.WassarmanD.PetersenA.GanetzkyB.WassarmanD. A. A. (2013). Drosophila model of closed head traumatic brain injury.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.110E4152–E4159. 10.1073/pnas.1316895110

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  KelleyB. J.LifshitzJ.PovlishockJ. T. (2007). Neuroinflammatory responses after experimental diffuse traumatic brain injury.J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.66989–1001.

  • Google Scholar

• 97

  KilbourneM.KuehnR.TosunC.CaridiJ.KeledjianK.BochicchioG.et al (2009). Novel model of frontal impact closed head injury in the rat.J. Neurotrauma262233–2243. 10.1089/neu.2009.0968

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  KingC.RobinsonT.DixonC. E.RaoG. R.LarnardD.NemotoC. E. (2010). Brain temperature profiles during epidural cooling with the ChillerPad in a monkey model of traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma27, 1895–1903. 10.1089/neu.2009.1178

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  KinoshitaK.ChatzipanteliK.VitarboE.TruettnerJ. S.AlonsoO. F.DietrichW. D. (2002). Interleukin-1β messenger ribonucleic acid and protein levels after fluid-percussion brain injury in rats: Importance of injury severity and brain temperature.Neurosurgery51195–203.

  • Google Scholar

• 100

  KnoblachS. M.FadenA. I. (1998). Interleukin-10 improves outcome and alters proinflammatory cytokine expression after experimental traumatic brain injury.Exp. Neurol.153143–151. 10.1006/exnr.1998.6877

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  KobeissyF. H.LiuM. C.YangZ.ZhangZ.ZhengW.GlushakovaO.et al (2015). Degradation of βII-spectrin protein by calpain-2 and caspase-3 under neurotoxic and traumatic brain injury conditions.Mol. Neurobiol.52696–709.

  • Google Scholar

• 102

  KostenT. A.KimJ. J.LeeH. J. (2012). Early life manipulations alter learning and memory in rats.Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.361985–2006.

  • Google Scholar

• 103

  KriegJ.LeonardA.TunerR.CorriganF. (2023). Characterization of traumatic brain injury in a gyrencephalic ferret model using the novel closed head injury model of engineered rotational acceleration (CHIMERA).Neurotrauma Rep.4761–780. 10.1089/neur.2023.0047

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  KuoJ.ChengY.ChenY.ChioC.GeanP. (2013). Involvement of extracellular signal regulated kinases in traumatic brain injury-induced depression in rodents.J. Neurotrauma301223–1231. 10.1089/neu.2012.2689

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  KwonS.KovesdiE.GyorgyA.WingoD.KamnakshA.WalkerJ.et al (2011). Stress and traumatic brain injury: A behavioral, proteomics, and histological study.Front. Neurol.2:12. 10.3389/fneur.2011.00012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  LadakA.EnamS.IbrahimM. T. A. (2019). Review of the molecular mechanisms of traumatic brain injury.World Neurosurg.131126–132. 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.039

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  LagraouiM.LatocheJ.CartwrightN.SukumarG.DalgardC.SchaeferB. (2012). Controlled cortical impact and craniotomy induce strikingly similar profiles of inflammatory gene expression, but with distinct kinetics.Front. Neurol.3:155. 10.3389/fneur.2012.00155

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  LaiY.HickeyR.ChenY.BayirH.SullivanM.ChuC.et al (2008). Autophagy is increased after traumatic brain injury in mice and is partially inhibited by the antioxidant gamma-glutamylcysteinyl ethyl ester.J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.28540–550. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600551

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  LajudN.RoqueA.ChengJ. P.BondiC. O.KlineA. E. (2021). Early life stress preceding mild pediatric traumatic brain injury increases neuroinflammation but does not exacerbate impairment of cognitive flexibility during adolescence.J. Neurotrauma38411–421. 10.1089/neu.2020.7354

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  LangloisJ. A.Rutland-BrownW.ThomasK. E. (2006). Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States; Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths.Atlanta, GI: Centers for D isease Control and Prevention

  • Google Scholar

• 111

  LavoieS.SechristS.QuachN.EhsanianR.DuongT.GotlibI.et al (2017). Depression in men and women one year following Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): A TBI model systems study.Front. Psychol.8:634. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00634

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  LeeH.LeeS.ChoI. H.LeeS. J. (2013). Toll-like receptors: Sensor molecules for detecting damage to the nervous system.Curr. Protein Pept. Sci.1433–42. 10.2174/1389203711314010006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  LeeS.GajavelliS.SpurlockM.AndreoniC.de Rivero VaccariJ.BullockM.et al (2018). Microglial inflammasome activation in penetrating ballistic-like brain injury.J. Neurotrauma351681–1693. 10.1089/neu.2017.5530

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  LeungL.LarimoreZ.HolmesL.CartagenaC.MountneyA.Deng-BryantY.et al (2014). The WRAIR projectile concussive impact model of mild traumatic brain injury: Re-design, testing and preclinical validation.Ann. Biomed. Eng.421618–1630. 10.1007/s10439-014-1014-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  LiY.KorgaonkarA.SwietekB.WangJ.ElgammalF.ElkabesS.et al (2015). Toll-like receptor 4 enhancement of non-NMDA synaptic currents increases dentate excitability after brain injury.Neurobiol. Dis.74240–253. 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.11.021

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  LifshitzJ.RoweR.GriffithsD.EvilsizorM.ThomasT.AdelsonP.et al (2016). Clinical relevance of midline fluid percussion brain injury: Acute deficits, chronic morbidities and the utility of biomarkers.Brain Inj.301293–1301. 10.1080/02699052.2016.1193628

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  LighthallJ. (1988). Controlled cortical impact: A new experimental brain injury model.J. Neurotrauma51–15. 10.1089/neu.1988.5.1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  LiuE.SunL.ZhangY.WangA.YanJ. (2020). Aquaporin4 knockout aggravates early brain injury following subarachnoid hemorrhage through impairment of the glymphatic system in rat brain.Acta Neurochir. Suppl.12759–64. 10.1007/978-3-030-04615-6_10

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  LiuH. D.LiW.ChenZ. R.HuY. C.ZhangD. D.ShenW.et al (2013). Expression of the NLRP3 inflammasome in cerebral cortex after traumatic brain injury in a rat model.Neurochem. Res.382072–2083. 10.1007/s11064-013-1115-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  LiuS.YinF.ZhangJ.QianY. (2014). The role of calpains in traumatic brain injury.Brain Inj.28133–137.

  • Google Scholar

• 121

  LiuY.CardamoneL.HoganR.GregoireM.WilliamsJ.HicksR.et al (2010). Progressive metabolic and structural cerebral perturbations after traumatic brain injury: An in vivo imaging study in the rat.J. Nucl. Med.511788–1795. 10.2967/jnumed.110.078626

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  LiuZ.-M.ChenQ.-X.ChenZ.-B.TianD.-F.LiM.-C.WangJ.-M.et al (2018). RIP3 deficiency protects against traumatic brain injury (TBI) through suppressing oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis: Dependent on AMPK pathway.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.499112–119. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.02.150

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  LongJ.BentleyT.WessnerK.CeroneC.SweeneyS.BaumanR. (2009). Blast overpressure in rats: Recreating a battlefield injury in the laboratory.J. Neurotrauma26827–840. 10.1089/neu.2008.0748

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  LuH.WangL.ZhongW.QiR.LiN.YouW.et al (2015). Establishment of swine-penetrating craniocerebral gunshot wound model.J. Surg. Res.199698–706. 10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  LupienS.McEwenB.GunnarM.HeimC. (2009). Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.10434–445. 10.1038/nrn2639

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  LyethB. (2016). Historical review of the fluid-percussion TBI Model.Front. Neurol.7:217. 10.3389/fneur.2016.00217

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  MaX.AravindA.PfisterB.ChandraN.HaorahJ. (2019). Animal models of traumatic brain injury and assessment of injury severity.Mol. Neurobiol.565332–5345. 10.1007/s12035-018-1454-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  MaasA. I.StocchettiN.BullockR. (2008). Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults.Lancet Neurol.7728–741.

  • Google Scholar

• 129

  MallerJ. J.ThomsonR. H.LewisP. M.RoseS. E.PannekK.FitzgeraldP. B. (2010). Traumatic brain injury, major depression, and diffusion tensor imaging: Making connections.Brain Res. Rev.64213–240. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.04.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  MallyaS.SutherlandJ.PongracicS.MainlandB.OrnsteinT. (2015). The manifestation of anxiety disorders after traumatic brain injury: A review.J. Neurotrauma32411–421. 10.1089/neu.2014.3504

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  ManleyG.RosenthalG.LamM.MorabitoD.YanD.DeruginN.et al (2006). Controlled cortical impact in swine: Pathophysiology and biomechanics.J. Neurotrauma23128–139. 10.1089/neu.2006.23.128

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  MaoH.ZhangL.YangK. H.KingA. I. (2006). Application of a finite element model of the brain to study traumatic brain injury mechanisms in the rat.Stapp Car Crash J.50583–600

  • Google Scholar

• 133

  MarguliesS.KilbaughT.SullivanS.SmithC.PropertK.ByroM.et al (2015). Establishing a clinically relevant large animal model platform for TBI therapy development: Using cyclosporin A as a case study.Brain Pathol.25289–303. 10.1111/bpa.12247

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  MarklundN.HilleredL. (2011). Animal modelling of traumatic brain injury in preclinical drug development: Where do we go from here?Br. J. Pharmacol.1641207–1229. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01163.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  MarmarouA.FodaM.van den BrinkW.CampbellJ.KitaH.DemetriadouK. (1994). A new model of diffuse brain injury in rats. Part I: Pathophysiology and biomechanics.J. Neurosurg.80291–300. 10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0291

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  McConkeyD. J.OrreniusS. (1996). The role of calcium in the regulation of apoptosis.J. Leukoc Biol.59775–783.

  • Google Scholar

• 137

  McGurkL.BersonA.BoniniN. (2015). Drosophila as an in vivo model for human neurodegenerative disease.Genetics201377–402. 10.1534/genetics.115.179457

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  McIntoshT.NobleL.AndrewsB.FadenA. (1987). Traumatic brain injury in the rat: Characterization of a midline fluid-percussion model.Cent. Nerv. Syst. Trauma4119–134. 10.1089/cns.1987.4.119

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  McKeeA.GavettB.SternR.NowinskiC.CantuR.KowallN.et al (2010). TDP-43 proteinopathy and motor neuron disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy.J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.69918–929. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181ee7d85

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  McKeeA. C.SteinT. D.KiernanP. T.AlvarezV. E. (2015). The neuropathology of chronic traumatic encephalopathy.Brain pathology25350–364.

  • Google Scholar

• 141

  McKeeC. A.LukensJ. R. (2016). Emerging roles for the immune system in traumatic brain injury.Front. Immunol.7:556. 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00556

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  MeaneyD. F.SmithD. H. (2011). Biomechanics of concussion.Clin. Sports Med.3019–31.

  • Google Scholar

• 143

  Mendes ArentA.de SouzaL.WalzR.DafreA. (2014). Perspectives on molecular biomarkers of oxidative stress and antioxidant strategies in traumatic brain injury.BioMed Res. Int.2014:723060. 10.1155/2014/723060

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  MendezM. (2017). What is the relationship of traumatic brain injury to dementia?J. Alzheimers Dis.57667–681. 10.3233/JAD-161002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  MichaloviczL. T.KellyK. A.CraddockT. J.O’CALLAGHANJ. P. (2023). A projectile concussive impact model produces neuroinflammation in both mild and moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.Brain Sci.13:623. 10.3390/brainsci13040623

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  MikawaS.KinouchiH.KamiiH.GobbelG.ChenS.CarlsonE.et al (1996). Attenuation of acute and chronic damage following traumatic brain injury in copper, zinc-superoxide dismutase transgenic mice.J. Neurosurg.85885–891. 10.3171/jns.1996.85.5.0885

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  MillenJ. E.GlauserF. L.FairmanR. P. (1985). A comparison of physiological responses to percussive brain trauma in dogs and sheep.J. Neurosurg.62587–591. 10.3171/jns.1985.62.4.0587

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  MiñambresE.BallesterosM.MayorgaM.MarinM.MuñozP.FigolsJ.et al (2008). Cerebral apoptosis in severe traumatic brain injury patients: An in vitro, in vivo, and postmortem study.J. Neurotrauma25581–591. 10.1089/neu.2007.0398

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  MoloneyA.SattelleD. B.LomasD. A.CrowtherD. C. (2010). Alzheimer’s disease: Insights from Drosophila melanogaster models.Trends Biochem. Sci.35228–235.

  • Google Scholar

• 150

  MooreE.Terryberry-SpohrL.HopeD. (2006). Mild traumatic brain injury and anxiety sequelae: A review of the literature.Brain Inj.20117–132. 10.1080/02699050500443558

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  MoralesD.MarklundN.LeboldD.ThompsonH.PitkanenA.MaxwellW.et al (2005). Experimental models of traumatic brain injury: Do we really need to build a better mousetrap?Neuroscience136971–989. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.030

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  MoszczynskiA.StrongW.XuK.McKeeA.BrownA.StrongM. (2018). Pathologic Thr175 tau phosphorylation in CTE and CTE with ALS.Neurology90e380–e387. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004899

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  MufsonE.PerezS.NadeemM.MahadyL.KanaanN.AbrahamsonE.et al (2016). Progression of tau pathology within cholinergic nucleus basalis neurons in chronic traumatic encephalopathy: A chronic effects of neurotrauma consortium study.Brain Inj.301399–1413. 10.1080/02699052.2016.1219058

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  NajemD.RennieK.Ribecco-LutkiewiczM.LyD.HaukenfrersJ.LiuQ.et al (2018). Traumatic brain injury: Classification, models, and markers.Biochem. Cell Biol.96391–406. 10.1139/bcb-2016-0160

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  NakaoK.-I.KibayashiK.TakiT.KoyamaH. (2010). Changes in the brain after intracerebral implantation of a lead pellet in the rat.J. Neurotrauma271925–1934.

  • Google Scholar

• 156

  NamjoshiD.ChengW.BashirA.WilkinsonA.StukasS.MartensK.et al (2017). Defining the biomechanical and biological threshold of murine mild traumatic brain injury using CHIMERA (Closed Head Impact Model of Engineered Rotational Acceleration).Exp. Neurol.29280–91. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.03.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  NamjoshiD. R.ChengW. H.McinnesK. A.MartensK. M.CarrM.WilkinsonA.et al (2014). Merging pathology with biomechanics using CHIMERA (Closed-Head Impact Model of Engineered Rotational Acceleration): A novel, surgery-free model of traumatic brain injury.Mol. Neurodegen.91–18. 10.1186/1750-1326-9-55

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  NathooN.NarotamP.AgrawalD.ConnollyC.van DellenJ.BarnettG.et al (2004). Influence of apoptosis on neurological outcome following traumatic cerebral contusion.J. Neurosurg.101233–240. 10.3171/jns.2004.101.2.0233

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  NiH.RuiQ.LinX.LiD.LiuH.ChenG. (2019). 2-BFI provides neuroprotection against inflammation and necroptosis in a rat model of traumatic brain injury. Front. Neurosci. 13:674. 10.3389/fnins.2019.00674

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  NugentN.TyrkaA.CarpenterL.PriceL. (2011). Gene-environment interactions: Early life stress and risk for depressive and anxiety disorders.Psychopharmacology214175–196. 10.1007/s00213-010-2151-x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  NusslockR.MillerG. E. (2016). Early-life adversity and physical and emotional health across the lifespan: A neuroimmune network hypothesis.Biol. Psychiatry8023–32. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.05.017

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  O’ConnorW. T.SmythA.GilchristM. D. (2011). Animal models of traumatic brain injury: A critical evaluation.Pharmacol. Ther.130106–113.

  • Google Scholar

• 163

  OjoJ.GreenbergM.LearyP.MouzonB.BachmeierC.MullanM.et al (2014). Neurobehavioral, neuropathological and biochemical profiles in a novel mouse model of co-morbid post-traumatic stress disorder and mild traumatic brain injury.Front. Behav. Neurosci.8:213. 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00213

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  OkumaY.LiuK.WakeH.ZhangJ.MaruoT.DateI.et al (2012). Anti-high mobility group box-1 antibody therapy for traumatic brain injury.Ann. Neurol.72373–384. 10.1002/ana.23602

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  OmaluB. (2014). Chronic traumatic encephalopathy.Prog. Neurol Surg.2838–49. 10.1159/000358761

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  OsbornA. J.MathiasJ. L.Fairweather-SchmidtA. K. (2016). Prevalence of anxiety following adult traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis comparing measures, samples and postinjury intervals.Neuropsychology30:247. 10.1037/neu0000221

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  OsierN. D.DixonC. E. (2016). The controlled cortical impact model: Applications, considerations for researchers, and future directions.Front. Neurol.7:134. 10.3389/fneur.2016.00134

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  ParejaJ.KeeleyK.DuhaimeA.DodgeC. (2016). Modeling pediatric brain trauma: Piglet model of controlled cortical impact.Methods Mol. Biol.1462345–356. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3816-2_19

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  PetersM. E.LyketsosC. G. (2023). The glymphatic system’s role in traumatic brain injury-related neurodegeneration.Mol. Psychiatry282707–2715. 10.1038/s41380-023-02070-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  PetersonA. B.ThomasK. E.ZhouH. (2022). Surveillance Report of Traumatic Brain Injury-related Deaths by Age Group, Sex, and Mechanism of Injury—United States, 2018 and 2019.Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • Google Scholar

• 171

  PetersonA. B.XuL.DaughertyJ.BreidingM. J. (2019). Surveillance Report of Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, United States, 2014.Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

  • Google Scholar

• 172

  PiantinoJ.LimM.NewgardC.IliffJ. (2019). Linking traumatic brain injury, sleep disruption and post-traumatic headache: A potential role for glymphatic pathway dysfunction.Curr. Pain Headache Rep.23:62. 10.1007/s11916-019-0799-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  PlantmanS.NgK. C.LuJ.DavidssonJ.RislingM. (2012). Characterization of a novel rat model of penetrating traumatic brain injury.J. Neurotrauma291219–1232.

  • Google Scholar

• 174

  PovlishockJ.BeckerD.ChengC.VaughanG. (1983). Axonal change in minor head injury.J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.42225–242. 10.1097/00005072-198305000-00002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  PuvennaV.EngelerM.BanjaraM.BrennanC.SchreiberP.DadasA.et al (2016). Is phosphorylated tau unique to chronic traumatic encephalopathy? Phosphorylated tau in epileptic brain and chronic traumatic encephalopathy.Brain Res.1630225–240. 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.11.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  ReichertH. (2005). A tripartite organization of the urbilaterian brain: Developmental genetic evidence from Drosophila.Brain Res. Bull.66491–494. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2004.11.028

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  RosenthalM.ChristensenB.RossT. (1998). Depression following traumatic brain injury.Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.7990–103. 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90215-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  RzigalinskiB. A.WeberJ. T.WilloughbyK. A.EllisE. F. (1998). Intracellular free calcium dynamics in stretch-injured astrocytes.J. Neurochem.702377–2385. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70062377.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 179

  SaatmanK.CreedJ.RaghupathiR. (2010). Calpain as a therapeutic target in traumatic brain injury.Neurotherapeutics731–42. 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.11.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  SaikumarJ.ByrnsC. N.HemphillM.MeaneyD. F.BoniniN. M. (2020). Dynamic neural and glial responses of a head-specific model for traumatic brain injury in Drosophila.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.11717269–17277. 10.1073/pnas.2003909117

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181

  SäljöA.SvenssonB.MayorgaM.HambergerA.BolouriH. (2009). Low-level blasts raise intracranial pressure and impair cognitive function in rats.J. Neurotrauma261345–1352.

  • Google Scholar

• 182

  SanchezC.TitusD.WilsonN.FreundJ.AtkinsC. (2021). Early life stress exacerbates outcome after traumatic brain injury.J. Neurotrauma38555–565. 10.1089/neu.2020.7267

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 183

  SandersM.SickT.Perez-PinzonM.DietrichW.GreenE. (2000). Chronic failure in the maintenance of long-term potentiation following fluid percussion injury in the rat.Brain Res.86169–76. 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)01986-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  SauerbeckA.FanizziC.KimJ.GangolliM.BaylyP.WellingtonC.et al (2018). modCHIMERA: A novel murine closed-head model of moderate traumatic brain injury.Sci. Rep.8:7677. 10.1038/s41598-018-25737-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  ScheffS.PriceD.HicksR.BaldwinS.RobinsonS.BrackneyC. (2005). Synaptogenesis in the hippocampal CA1 field following traumatic brain injury.J. Neurotrauma22719–732. 10.1089/neu.2005.22.719

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  SchmidtR. H.GradyM. S. (1993). Regional patterns of blood–brain barrier breakdown following central and lateral fluid percussion injury in rodents.J. Neurotrauma10415–430. 10.1089/neu.1993.10.415

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 187

  SchneiderA.HuieJ.BoscardinW.NelsonL.BarberJ.YaffeK.et al (2022). Cognitive outcome 1 year after mild traumatic brain injury: Results from the TRACK-TBI study.Neurology98e1248–e1261. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200041

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 188

  SchwarzbachE.BonislawskiD.XiongG.CohenA. (2006). Mechanisms underlying the inability to induce area CA1 LTP in the mouse after traumatic brain injury.Hippocampus16541–550. 10.1002/hipo.20183

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189

  SeoJ. S.LeeS.ShinJ. Y.HwangY. J.ChoH.YooS. K.et al (2017). Transcriptome analyses of chronic traumatic encephalopathy show alterations in protein phosphatase expression associated with tauopathy.Exp. Mol. Med.49:e333. 10.1038/emm.2017.56

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 190

  ShapiraY.SettonD.ArtruA.ShohamiE. (1993). Blood-brain barrier permeability, cerebral edema, and neurologic function after closed head injury in rats.Anesth. Analg.77141–148. 10.1213/00000539-199307000-00028

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 191

  ShapiraY.ShohamiE.SidiA.SofferD.FreemanS.CotevS. (1988). Experimental closed head injury in rats: Mechanical, pathophysiologic, and neurologic properties.Crit. Care Med.16258–265. 10.1097/00003246-198803000-00010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192

  ShearD.LuX.BombardM.PedersenR.ChenZ.DavisA.et al (2010). Longitudinal characterization of motor and cognitive deficits in a model of penetrating ballistic-like brain injury.J. Neurotrauma271911–1923. 10.1089/neu.2010.1399

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 193

  ShearD.LuX.PedersenR.WeiG.ChenZ.DavisA.et al (2011). Severity profile of penetrating ballistic-like brain injury on neurofunctional outcome, blood-brain barrier permeability, and brain edema formation.J. Neurotrauma282185–2195. 10.1089/neu.2011.1916

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 194

  ShohamiE.ShapiraY.CotevS. (1988). Experimental closed head injury in rats: Prostaglandin production in a noninjured zone.Neurosurgery22859–863.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 195

  ShultzS. R.MacfabeD. F.FoleyK. A.TaylorR.CainD. P. (2011). A single mild fluid percussion injury induces short-term behavioral and neuropathological changes in the Long–Evans rat: Support for an animal model of concussion.Behav. Brain Res.224326–335. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.06.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 196

  SickT. J.Pérez-PinzónM. A.FengZ.-Z. (1998). Impaired expression of long-term potentiation in hippocampal slices 4 and 48 h following mild fluid-percussion brain injury in vivo.Brain Res.785287–292. 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)01418-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 197

  SieboldL.ObenausA.GoyalR. (2018). Criteria to define mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury in the mouse controlled cortical impact model.Exp. Neurol.31048–57. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2018.07.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 198

  Sierra-MercadoD.McAllisterL.LeeC.MiladM.EskandarE.WhalenM. (2015). Controlled cortical impact before or after fear conditioning does not affect fear extinction in mice.Brain Res.1606133–141. 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.031

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 199

  SimanR.GiovannoneN.HantenG.WildeE.McCauleyS.HunterJ.et al (2013). Evidence that the blood biomarker SNTF predicts brain imaging changes and persistent cognitive dysfunction in mild TBI patients.Front. Neurol.4:190. 10.3389/fneur.2013.00190

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 200

  SimanR.ShahimP.TegnerY.BlennowK.ZetterbergH.SmithD. (2015). Serum SNTF increases in concussed professional ice hockey players and relates to the severity of postconcussion symptoms.J. Neurotrauma321294–1300. 10.1089/neu.2014.3698

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 201

  SmithD.ChenX.XuB.McIntoshT.GennarelliT.MeaneyD. (1997). Characterization of diffuse axonal pathology and selective hippocampal damage following inertial brain trauma in the pig.J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.56822–834.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 202

  SmithD.NonakaM.MillerR.LeoniM.ChenX.AlsopD.et al (2000). Immediate coma following inertial brain injury dependent on axonal damage in the brainstem.J. Neurosurg.93315–322. 10.3171/jns.2000.93.2.0315

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 203

  SmithD. H.HicksR.PovlishockJ. T. (2013). Therapy development for diffuse axonal injury.J. Neurotrauma30307–323.

  • Google Scholar

• 204

  SmithD. H.MeaneyD. F. (2000). Axonal damage in traumatic brain injury.Neuroscientist6483–495.

  • Google Scholar

• 205

  SmithS. L.HallE. D. (1996). Mild pre-and posttraumatic hypothermia attenuates blood-brain barrier damage following controlled cortical impact injury in the rat.J. Neurotrauma131–9. 10.1089/neu.1996.13.1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 206

  SolomonD.KimB.ScultetusA.ArnaudF.AukerC.FreilichD.et al (2011). The effect of rFVIIa on pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in serum and cerebrospinal fluid in a swine model of traumatic brain injury.Cytokine5420–23. 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.12.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 207

  SongH.ChenM.ChenC.CuiJ.JohnsonC. E.ChengJ.et al (2019). Proteomic analysis and biochemical correlates of mitochondrial dysfunction after low-intensity primary blast exposure.J. Neurotrauma361591–1605. 10.1089/neu.2018.6114

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 208

  SongH.CuiJ.SimonyiA.JohnsonC. E.HublerG. K.DepalmaR. G.et al (2018a). Linking blast physics to biological outcomes in mild traumatic brain injury: Narrative review and preliminary report of an open-field blast model.Behav. Brain Res.340147–158. 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.08.037

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 209

  SongH.KonanL. M.CuiJ.JohnsonC. E.HublerG. K.DepalmaR. G.et al (2018b). Nanometer ultrastructural brain damage following low intensity primary blast wave exposure.Neural Regen. Res.13:1516. 10.4103/1673-5374.237110

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 210

  SongH.KonanL. M.CuiJ.JohnsonC.LangenderferM.GrantD.et al (2018c). Ultrastructural brain abnormalities and associated behavioral changes in mice after low-intensity blast exposure.Behav. Brain Res.347148–157. 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.03.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 211

  SongH.McEwanP.Ameen-AliK.TomasevichA.Kennedy-DietrichC.PalmaA.et al (2022). Concussion leads to widespread axonal sodium channel loss and disruption of the node of Ranvier.Acta Neuropathol.144967–985. 10.1007/s00401-022-02498-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 212

  SpadoniA.HuangM.SimmonsA. (2018). Emerging approaches to neurocircuits in PTSD and TBI: Imaging the interplay of neural and emotional trauma.Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci.38163–192. 10.1007/7854_2017_35

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 213

  SteinT. D.CraryJ. F. (2020). Chronic traumatic encephalopathy and neuropathological comorbidities.Semin. Neurol.40384–393.

  • Google Scholar

• 214

  SullivanH.MartinezJ.BeckerD.MillerJ.GriffithR.WistA. (1976). Fluid-percussion model of mechanical brain injury in the cat.J. Neurosurg.45521–534.

  • Google Scholar

• 215

  TaggeC.FisherA.MinaevaO.Gaudreau-BalderramaA.MoncasterJ.ZhangX.et al (2018). Concussion, microvascular injury, and early tauopathy in young athletes after impact head injury and an impact concussion mouse model.Brain141422–458. 10.1093/brain/awx350

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 216

  TangS.Fesharaki-ZadehA.TakahashiH.NiesS.SmithL.LuoA.et al (2020). Fyn kinase inhibition reduces protein aggregation, increases synapse density and improves memory in transgenic and traumatic Tauopathy.Acta Neuropathol. Commun.8:96. 10.1186/s40478-020-00976-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 217

  Tarasoff-ConwayJ. M.CarareR. O.OsorioR. S.GlodzikL.ButlerT.FieremansE.et al (2015). Clearance systems in the brain-implications for Alzheimer disease.Nat. Rev. Neurol.11457–470. 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.119

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 218

  ThompsonH.LifshitzJ.MarklundN.GradyM.GrahamD.HovdaD.et al (2005). Lateral fluid percussion brain injury: A 15-year review and evaluation.J. Neurotrauma2242–75. 10.1089/neu.2005.22.42

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 219

  TrumpB. F.BerezeskyI. K. (1995). Calcium-mediated cell injury and cell death.FASEB J.9219–228.

  • Google Scholar

• 220

  UhlM.BiagasK.GrundlP.BarmadaM.SchidingJ.NemotoE.et al (1994). Effects of neutropenia on edema, histology, and cerebral blood flow after traumatic brain injury in rats.J. Neurotrauma11303–315. 10.1089/neu.1994.11.303

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 221

  van BodegomM.HombergJ.HenckensM. (2017). Modulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis by early life stress exposure.Front. Cell. Neurosci.11:87. 10.3389/fncel.2017.00087

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 222

  VianoD. C.HambergerA.BolouriH.SäljöA. (2009). Concussion in professional football: Animal model of brain injury—part 15.Neurosurgery641162–1173. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000345863.99099.C7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 223

  VinkR. (2018). Large animal models of traumatic brain injury.J. Neurosci. Res.96527–535. 10.1002/jnr.24079

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 224

  VinkR.MullinsP.TempleM.BaoW.FadenA. (2001). Small shifts in craniotomy position in the lateral fluid percussion injury model are associated with differential lesion development.J. Neurotrauma18839–847. 10.1089/089771501316919201

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 225

  VitarboE.ChatzipanteliK.KinoshitaK.TruettnerJ.AlonsoO.DietrichW. (2004). Tumor necrosis factor alpha expression and protein levels after fluid percussion injury in rats: The effect of injury severity and brain temperature.Neurosurgery55416–24; discussion 424–5. 10.1227/01.neu.0000130036.52521.2c

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 226

  Vonder HaarC.MartensK.BashirA.McInnesK.ChengW.CheungH.et al (2019). Repetitive closed-head impact model of engineered rotational acceleration (CHIMERA) injury in rats increases impulsivity, decreases dopaminergic innervation in the olfactory tubercle and generates white matter inflammation, tau phosphorylation and degeneration.Exp. Neurol.31787–99. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.02.012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 227

  WangH.DuanZ.WuF.XieL.ZhangH.MaY. B. (2010). A new rat model for diffuse axonal injury using a combination of linear acceleration and angular acceleration.J. Neurotrauma27707–719. 10.1089/neu.2009.1071

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 228

  WangH.-C.MaY.-B. (2010). Experimental models of traumatic axonal injury.J. Clin. Neurosci.17157–162.

  • Google Scholar

• 229

  WangK. K.Po-WaiY. (1994). Calpain inhibition: An overview of its therapeutic potential.Trends Pharmacol. Sci.15412–419.

  • Google Scholar

• 230

  WangX.GaoX.MichalskiS.ZhaoS.ChenJ. (2016). Traumatic brain injury severity affects neurogenesis in adult mouse hippocampus.J. Neurotrauma33721–733.

  • Google Scholar

• 231

  WangY.HallR.LeeM.Kamgar-ParsiA.BiX.BaudryM. (2017). The tyrosine phosphatase PTPN13/FAP-1 links calpain-2, TBI and tau tyrosine phosphorylation.Sci. Rep.7:11771. 10.1038/s41598-017-12236-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 232

  WardenD. (2006). Military TBI during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.J. Head Trauma Rehabil.21398–402. 10.1097/00001199-200609000-00004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 233

  WashingtonP.ForcelliP.WilkinsT.ZappleD.ParsadanianM.BurnsM. (2012). The effect of injury severity on behavior: A phenotypic study of cognitive and emotional deficits after mild, moderate, and severe controlled cortical impact injury in mice.J. Neurotrauma292283–2296. 10.1089/neu.2012.2456

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 234

  WashingtonP. M.VillapolS.BurnsM. P. (2016). Polypathology and dementia after brain trauma: Does brain injury trigger distinct neurodegenerative diseases, or should they be classified together as traumatic encephalopathy?Exp. Neurol.275381–388.

  • Google Scholar

• 235

  WeberJ.RzigalinskiB.WilloughbyK.MooreS.EllisE. (1999). Alterations in calcium-mediated signal transduction after traumatic injury of cortical neurons.Cell Calcium26289–299. 10.1054/ceca.1999.0082

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 236

  WeiG.LuX.-C. M.YangX.TortellaF. C. (2010). Intracranial pressure following penetrating ballistic-like brain injury in rats.J. Neurotrauma271635–1641.

  • Google Scholar

• 237

  WilliamsA.HartingsJ.LuX.RolliM.DaveJ.TortellaF. (2005). Characterization of a new rat model of penetrating ballistic brain injury.J. Neurotrauma22313–331. 10.1089/neu.2005.22.313

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 238

  WilliamsA.WeiH.DaveJ.TortellaF. (2007). Acute and delayed neuroinflammatory response following experimental penetrating ballistic brain injury in the rat.J. Neuroinflamm.4:17. 10.1186/1742-2094-4-17

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 239

  WilliamsA. J.HartingsJ. A.LuX.-C. M.RolliM. L.TortellaF. C. (2006a). Penetrating ballistic-like brain injury in the rat: Differential time courses of hemorrhage, cell death, inflammation, and remote degeneration.J. Neurotrauma231828–1846. 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1828

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 240

  WilliamsA. J.LingG.TortellaF. (2006b). Severity level and injury track determine outcome following a penetrating ballistic-like brain injury in the rat.Neurosci. Lett.408183–188. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.08.086

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 241

  WilsonL.StewartW.Dams-O’ConnorK.Diaz-ArrastiaR.HortonL.MenonD.et al (2017). The chronic and evolving neurological consequences of traumatic brain injury.Lancet Neurol.16813–825. 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30279-X

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 242

  XieL.KangH.XuQ.ChenM. J.LiaoY.ThiyagarajanM.et al (2013). Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain.Science342373–377.

  • Google Scholar

• 243

  XingG.BarryE.BenfordB.GrunbergN.LiH.WatsonW.et al (2013). Impact of repeated stress on traumatic brain injury-induced mitochondrial electron transport chain expression and behavioral responses in rats.Front. Neurol.4:196. 10.3389/fneur.2013.00196

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 244

  XiongY.MahmoodA.ChoppM. (2013). Animal models of traumatic brain injury.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.14128–142.

  • Google Scholar

• 245

  YarnellA.BarryE.MountneyA.ShearD.TortellaF.GrunbergN. (2016). The revised neurobehavioral severity scale (NSS-R) for rodents.Curr. Protoc. Neurosci.759.52.1–9.52.16. 10.1002/cpns.10

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 246

  YatsivI.Morganti-KossmannM.PerezD.DinarelloC.NovickD.RubinsteinM.et al (2002). Elevated intracranial IL-18 in humans and mice after traumatic brain injury and evidence of neuroprotective effects of IL-18-binding protein after experimental closed head injury.J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.22971–978. 10.1097/00004647-200208000-00008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 247

  YouZ.SavitzS.YangJ.DegterevA.YuanJ.CunyG.et al (2008). Necrostatin-1 reduces histopathology and improves functional outcome after controlled cortical impact in mice.J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.281564–1573. 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.44

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 248

  YoungerD.MuruganM.Rama RaoK.WuL.ChandraN. (2019). Microglia receptors in animal models of traumatic brain injury.Mol. Neurobiol.565202–5228. 10.1007/s12035-018-1428-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 249

  YuS.KanekoY.BaeE.StahlC.WangY.van LoverenH.et al (2009). Severity of controlled cortical impact traumatic brain injury in rats and mice dictates degree of behavioral deficits.Brain Res.1287157–163. 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.067

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 250

  YurgilK.BarkauskasD.VasterlingJ.NievergeltC.LarsonG.SchorkN.et al (2014). Association between traumatic brain injury and risk of posttraumatic stress disorder in active-duty Marines.JAMA Psychiatry71149–157. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.3080

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 251

  ZanierE.BertaniI.SammaliE.PischiuttaF.ChiaravallotiM.VeglianteG.et al (2018). Induction of a transmissible tau pathology by traumatic brain injury.Brain1412685–2699. 10.1093/brain/awy193

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 252

  ZhanX.OeurA.LiuY.ZeinehM. M.GrantG. A.MarguliesS. S.et al (2022). Translational models of mild traumatic brain injury tissue biomechanics.Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng.24:100422.

  • Google Scholar

• 253

  ZhengZ.MorykwasM.CampbellD.McGeeM.HollingsworthC.AdamsF.et al (2014). Mechanical tissue resuscitation at the site of traumatic brain injuries reduces the volume of injury and hemorrhage in a swine model.Neurosurgery75152–62; discussion 161–2. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000341

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar