Skip to main content

GENERAL COMMENTARY article

Front. Neurol., 30 April 2014
Sec. Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology

KIR4.1 Antibodies as Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis

\r\n      Marie Wunsch*Marie Wunsch*Damiano M. RovitusoDamiano M. RovitusoStefanie Kuerten\r\n   Stefanie Kuerten
  • Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany

A commentary on

Potassium channel KIR4.1 as an immune target in multiple sclerosis
by Srivastava R, Aslam M, Kalluri SR, Schirmer L, Buck D, Tackenberg B, et al. N Engl J Med (2012) 367:115–23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110740

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease caused by the infiltration of autoreactive lymphocytes into the central nervous system (CNS). The influence of B cells has been underestimated for a long time. Recently, it has become more apparent that B cells can fundamentally contribute to the pathogenesis of MS in terms of antigen presentation, co-stimulation, cytokine production, ectopic lymphoneogenesis, and antibody secretion (13). Along these lines, B cell depletion in MS patients with a relapsing-remitting disease course was able to reduce inflammatory brain lesions and clinical relapses (4) and B cell activation influences T cell polarization in the animal model of MS (5). Great effort has been made to utilize B cells for dividing patients into subgroups and to predict treatment responses in individual patients to specific drugs (6). Especially the detection of autoantibodies against CNS antigens is a crucial research subject due to its capability to be used as disease-specific biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of MS.

To this end, in a clinical study published in 2012 in the New England Journal of Medicine, Srivastava and colleagues screened serum samples aiming to identify CNS-specific antibodies in MS (7). The authors identified the glial potassium channel KIR4.1 as one of the serum antibody targets in MS patients. Subsequently, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) large-scale screening with 397 MS patients, 329 persons with other neurological diseases, and 59 healthy donors was performed. Antibodies against KIR4.1 were observed in 46.9% of patients with MS, but were essentially absent in people with other neurological diseases and healthy donors. Based on these data, Srivastava et al. concluded that KIR4.1 is a CNS-specific target of the autoantibody response in a subgroup of patients with MS.

We would like to carefully raise the possibility that the serum IgG reactivity against KIR4.1 might present an epiphenomenon and there could be an additional target for autoreactive B cells beyond the CNS. It has to be considered that KIR4.1 is not only expressed in the CNS, but also on parietal cells of the gastric mucosal epithelium (8). The KIR4.1 channel expression is essential for the parietal cell control of acid secretion (9, 10). It is well known that there is a connection between the gastrointestinal immune response and CNS autoimmunity (11, 12). There are several possible mechanisms including molecular mimicry, determinant spreading, or bystander activation explaining the link between gastrointestinal immune response and MS (13). As recently published by Banati et al. (11), antibodies against parietal cells are also present in the sera of patients with MS. The presence of anti-parietal cell antibodies was most frequently associated with gastrointestinal complaints of the MS patients (11). Thus, it is possible that an impaired gastric mucosa, which can appear in cases of a frequent corticosteroid therapy, could extensively expose the parietal cell KIR4.1 to B cells. Corticosteroids augment gastroduodenal permeability and high doses are associated with macroscopic mucosal lesions (14).

Therefore, we consider it as necessary to include the history of gastrointestinal complaints in the anamnesis of the study subjects before defining KIR4.1 as a CNS target of serum antibodies. In the setting of patients with an initial demyelinating event who have not received corticosteroids, one could readily exclude an impact of the MS medication on the gut. Finding anti-KIR4.1 antibodies in such patients in combination with gut impairments could raise the possibility that the gut itself is also a target of the autoimmune process.

While further investigations are awaited to clearly analyze the impact of immune responses against antigens of gastric parietal cells on the finding of KIR4.1-reactive antibodies in patients with MS, the diagnostic potential of serum KIR4.1 antibodies may be highly clinically relevant. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of the initial findings of serum KIR4.1 antibodies in a subgroup of MS patients should be confirmed in studies from independent researchers.

Furthermore, the pathogenicity of KIR4.1 antibodies needs to be clarified. Only 2 of 19 serum IgG positive MS patients also had detectable levels of KIR4.1 antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (7). By analogy, aquaporin-4 antibodies were not readily detected in the CSF in neuromyelitis optica patients (15). Immunhistochemical investigations by Lennon et al. (16) showed that serum aquaporin-4 antibodies in patients with neuromyelitis optica bind to CNS tissue as well as to parietal cells of the gastric mucosa (16). However, it is beyond doubt that aquaporin-4 antibodies are highly pathogenic in neuromyelitis optica since they were studied extensively. Kinoshita and colleagues have demonstrated the pathogenic role of aquaporin-4 antibodies in vivo (17). They obtained serum IgG from patients with neuromyelitis optica and detected astrocytic damage in rats after passive transfer of aquaporin-4 containing IgG. In vivo experiments of this kind could delineate whether KIR4.1 antibodies are only a disease marker or if they play a central pathogenic role. To this end, KIR4.1 antibody containing serum could be injected into mice and subsequent histological and immunohistochemical investigations could show potential resulting pathological effects in CNS and gut. Furthermore, astrocytes should be incubated with KIR4.1 antibody containing serum and cell viability assays may demonstrate whether KIR4.1-reactive IgG induces astrocytic cytotoxicity.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Howell OW, Reeves CA, Nicholas R, Carassiti D, Radotra B, Gentleman SM, et al. Meningeal inflammation is widespread and linked to cortical pathology in multiple sclerosis. Brain (2011) 134:2755–71. doi:10.1093/brain/awr182

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

2. Kuerten S, Schickel A, Kerkloh C, Recks MS, Addicks K, Ruddle NH, et al. Tertiary lymphoid organ development coincides with determinant spreading of the myelin-specific T cell response. Acta Neuropathol (2012) 124:861–73. doi:10.1007/s00401-012-1023-3

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

3. Magliozzi R, Howell O, Vora A, Serafini B, Nicholas R, Puopolo M, et al. Meningeal B-cell follicles in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis associate with early onset of disease and severe cortical pathology. Brain (2007) 130:1089–104. doi:10.1093/brain/awm038

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

4. Hauser SL, Waubant E, Arnold DL, Vollmer T, Antel J, Fox RJ, et al. B-cell depletion with rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med (2008) 358:676–88. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0706383

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

5. Weber MS, Prod’homme T, Patarroyo JC, Molnarfi N, Karnezis T, Lehmann-Horn K, et al. B-cell activation influences T-cell polarization and outcome of anti-CD20 B-cell depletion in central nervous system autoimmunity. Ann Neurol (2010) 68:369–83. doi:10.1002/ana.22081

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

6. Bielekova B, Martin R. Development of biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Brain (2001) 127:1463–78. doi:10.1093/brain/awh176

CrossRef Full Text

7. Srivastava R, Aslam M, Kalluri SR, Schirmer L, Buck D, Tackenberg B, et al. Potassium channel KIR4.1 as an immune target in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med (2012) 367:115–23. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1110740

CrossRef Full Text

8. Hirst BH. K+ recycling and gastric acid secretion. J Physiol (2002) 540:1. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2002.017632

CrossRef Full Text

9. Kaufhold MA, Krabbenhöft A, Song P, Engelhardt R, Riederer B, Fährmann M, et al. Localization, trafficking, and significance for acid secretion of parietal cell Kir4.1 and KCNQ1 K+ channels. Gastroenterology (2008) 134:1058–69. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.033

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

10. Song P, Groos S, Riederer B, Feng Z, Krabbenhöft A, Manns MP, et al. Kir4.1 channel expression is essential for parietal cell control of acid secretion. J Biol Chem (2011) 286:14120–8. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.151191

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

11. Banati M, Csecsei P, Koszegi E, Nielsen HH, Suto G, Bors L, et al. Antibody response against gastrointestinal antigens in demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. Eur J Neurol (2013) 20(11):1492–5. doi:10.1111/ene.12072

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

12. Hughes LE, Smith PA, Bonell S, Natt RS, Wilson C, Rashid T, et al. Cross-reactivity between related sequences found in Acinetobacter sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, myelin basic protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol (2003) 144:105–15. doi:10.1016/S0165-5728(03)00274-1

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

13. Wucherpfennig KW. Mechanisms for the induction of autoimmunity by infectious agents. J Clin Invest (2001) 108:1097–104. doi:10.1172/JCI200114235

CrossRef Full Text

14. Kiziltas S, Imeryüz N, Gürcan T, Siva A, Saip S, Dumankar A, et al. Corticosteroid therapy augments gastroduodenal permeability to sucrose. Am J Gastroenterol (1998) 93:2420–5. doi:10.1016/S0002-9270(98)00578-4

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

15. Jarius S, Franciotta D, Paul F, Ruprecht K, Bergamaschi R, Rommer PS, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid antibodies to aquaporin-4 in neuromyelitis optica and related disorders: frequency, origin, and diagnostic relevance. J Neuroinflammation (2010) 7:52. doi:10.1186/1742-2094-7-52

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

16. Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, Verkman AS, Hinson SR. IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J Exp Med (2005) 202:473–7. doi:10.1084/jem.20050304

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

17. Kinoshita M, Nakatsuji Y, Kimura T, Moriya M, Takata K, Okuno T, et al. Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody induces astrocytic cytotoxicity in the absence of CNS antigen-specific T cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2010) 394:205–10. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.02.157

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text

Keywords: CNS antigen, epiphenomenon, KIR4.1, parietal cells, MS

Citation: Wunsch M, Rovituso DM and Kuerten S (2014) KIR4.1 antibodies as biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Front. Neurol. 5:62. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00062

Received: 01 July 2013; Accepted: 14 April 2014;
Published online: 30 April 2014.

Edited by:

Hans-Peter Hartung, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Germany

Reviewed by:

Finn Sellebjerg, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Bruce A. C. Cree, University of California San Francisco, USA

Copyright: © 2014 Wunsch, Rovituso and Kuerten. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: marie.wunsch@uni-wuerzburg.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.