Lisa Flem Kalheim
Per Selnes
Atle Bjørnerud
Christopher Coello
Kjetil Vegge5
Tormod Fladby- 1Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- 2Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- 3The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- 4Preclinical PET/CT, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- 5Department of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder and cause of dementia and is characterized by amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. AD has traditionally been considered to primarily affect gray matter, but multiple lines of evidence also indicate white matter (WM) pathology and associated small-vessel cerebrovascular disease. WM glucose delivery and metabolism may have implications for local tissue integrity, and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) may be helpful to assess neuroglial and axonal function in WM. Hypothesizing that affection of oligodendroglia will be associated with loss of glucose uptake, we aimed to investigate glucose metabolism in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and normal-appearing WM in patients with and without evidence of amyloid plaques. Subjects with mild cognitive impairment or subjective cognitive decline were included and dichotomized according to pathological (Aβ+) or normal (Aβ−) concentrations of cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β 1–42. A total of 50 subjects were included, of whom 30 subjects were classified as Aβ(+) and 20 subjects as Aβ(−). All subjects were assessed with MRI and FDG-PET. FDG-PET images were corrected for effects of partial voluming and normalized to cerebellar WM, before determining WMH FDG-uptake. Although there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, WMH volume, number of individual WMHs, or WMH distribution, we found significantly lower (p = 0.021) FDG-uptake in WMHs in Aβ(+) subjects (mean = 0.662, SD = 0.113) compared to Aβ(−) subjects (mean = 0.596, SD = 0.073). There were no significant group differences in the FDG-uptake in normal-appearing WM. Similar results were obtained without correction for effects of partial voluming. Our findings add to the evidence for a link between Aβ dysmetabolism and WM pathology in AD.
Introduction
Although traditionally considered two distinct entities, accumulating evidence links Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) (1). White matter (WM) hyperintensities (WMHs) of presumed vascular origin (2) are commonly recognized as markers of small-vessel CVD and have been associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD (3, 4). ApoEϵ4 alleles, a strong genetic determinant of AD risk, have been linked to both AD-related pathology (i.e., amyloid deposition) (5) and WMHs, particularly in extensive forms and combined with vascular risk factors (6, 7). However, the mechanisms linking the diseases remain unresolved (8).
Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (9) formed by abnormal deposition of extracellular amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) and intraneuronal hyperphosphorylated tau, respectively. Also, vascular Aβ deposition (amyloid angiopathy) is present in the vast majority of subjects with AD (10). The concentration of Aβ in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) decreases years before the appearance of clinical symptoms in AD (11), low levels being considered a key biomarker, and has high diagnostic accuracy for AD [reviewed in Blennow et al. (12)]. Low CSF Aβ shows inverse correlations with positive amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scans (13) and amyloid plaques demonstrated at autopsy (14), probably reflecting cortical Aβ deposition.
According to the amyloid cascade hypothesis (15, 16), Aβ dysmetabolism initiates the AD pathologic cascade resulting in neuronal loss and dysfunction, i.e., neurodegeneration. Cerebral hypometabolism, a neurodegenerative marker, results in reduced uptake of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET. In AD, mostly gray matter glucose metabolism has been studied; however, WM abnormalities are also common (17). Although vascular disease and WMHs have been associated with frontal hypometabolism (18), to our knowledge, no studies have investigated FDG-uptake in WM and WMHs in AD.
Demyelination and axonal rarefaction characterize WMHs, and we recently demonstrated reduced WMH tissue integrity in the presence of amyloid dysmetabolism, as measured by diffusion tensor imaging (19). With limited glycolytic capacity, axonal compartments depend on mitochondrial activity (20, 21). WM neuroglia metabolize glucose and subserve axonal energy requirements probably by way of lactate transfer (22), long-term energy deprivation leading to axonal dysfunction, neuronal death, and loss of oligodendrocytes (23, 24). Thus, WM glucose supply and uptake depends on neuroglial function, and FDG-PET optimized for WM may be a helpful tool to assess WM function and integrity.
We hypothesized more pronounced hypometabolism within WMHs in amyloid-positive compared to amyloid-negative subjects (here, defined by the level of CSF Aβ42). For comparison, we further analyzed FDG-PET uptake in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM).
Materials and Methods
Subjects
Subjects referred to a university hospital-based neurological outpatient memory clinic between 2005 and 2013 were routinely evaluated for study inclusion (Figure 1). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. Inclusion criteria were age 40–79 years, subjective cognitive complaints ≥6 months, and absence of dementia.
Figure 1. Inclusions and exclusions in the cohort. a5 subjects of >73 or <44 years of age were excluded to limit between-group age differences. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; Aβ, amyloid β-peptide; WMH, white matter hyperintensity.
Included subjects were classified as MCI or subjective cognitive decline (SCD) according to the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) 2 or 3 (25, 26), as determined from clinical interview and screening tests: mini–mental state examination (MMSE) (27), the neurobehavioral cognitive status examination (Cognistat) (28), I-Flex (word fluency, interference, and numeral–letter items) (29, 30). SCD was defined as GDS 2, based on published cutoffs on the listed screening tests (≥28 for MMSE, <2 for I-Flex, above mild impairment on all the items of Cognistat). MCI was defined as GDS 3, based on scores below cutoff on one or more of the screening tests (30). Subjects classified as GDS 3/MCI fulfill general criteria for MCI, as revised by Petersen et al. (31). The final diagnoses were established in consensus conferences of physicians and neurologists at a university hospital. Participants with GDS >3 and clinical dementia rating >0.5 (32) were considered demented, i.e., with evidence of significant impairment in activities of daily living, and excluded from the study. Subjects with a history of learning disabilities, established psychiatric comorbidity, anoxic brain damage, drug abuse, or solvent exposure were excluded. All participants had a standardized clinical assessment including neurological examinations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), FDG-PET, and lumbar puncture.
Cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42 <710 ng/L was considered pathological, or Aβ(+), according to our research criteria. This CSF Aβ42 cutoff has recently been validated against Flutemetamol-PET (amyloid-PET) in an extension of the current cohort (Almdahl et al., 2016, submitted). Adding variance for measurement technique places the potential variance-dependent CSF Aβ42 cutoff above 710 ng/L. To avoid including false negatives (subjects with amyloid pathology) in the control [Aβ(−)] group, subjects with CSF Aβ42 levels between 710 and 850 ng/L were excluded. Subjects with CSF Aβ42 >850 ng/L were classified as Aβ(−) and used as a control group. For the present study, data were obtained from 50 subjects selected based on CSF Aβ42 <710 or >850 ng/L and WMH volume >350 mm3, of whom 29 were females and 21 males, 30 Aβ(+), and 20 Aβ(−). Subjects with WMH volume <350 mm3 were excluded as we considered this to be the minimum volume required for valid analyses. Between-group age difference was limited by excluding subjects aged >73 and <44 years.
Based on the Norwegian Health and Research Act and the Helsinki Declaration, the study was approved by Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, South East Norway.
MRI/FDG-PET Acquisition
Magnetic resonance imaging was performed using a Siemens Espree 1.5-T scanner. A 3D magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) T1-weighted sequence was obtained (TR/TE/inversion time/flip angle = 2400/3.65/1000/8°, matrix = 240 × 192, 160 sagittal slices, thickness = 1.2 mm, in-plane resolution of 1 mm × 1.2 mm). A 2D axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) image with the following parameters was obtained: TR/TE/TI = 13,420/121/2500, 36 slices, spaced at 3.0 and 3.9 mm slice thickness.
Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT imaging was performed with a Siemens Biograph 16 PET/CT scanner. All subjects fasted at least 4 h before image acquisition and received a bolus injection of 218 MBq (±23 MBq) FDG tracer followed by 45 min of rest before being positioned head-first supine in the scanner. Prior to the PET acquisition, a low-dose CT scan for attenuation correction was acquired. Patients were scanned for 15 min in 3D mode using one bed position (axial range = 16 cm). Data were corrected for random events, dead time, attenuation (CT-derived μ-map), scatter (model based), and decay. PET volumes were reconstructed using an iterative algorithm (OSEM 2D, four iterations, eight subsets), and a post-reconstruction 3D Gaussian filter 3.5 mm full-width half maximum was applied. The axial image format was 256 × 256 (pixel size: 2.67 mm × 2.67 mm), with a slice thickness of 2.00 mm. Blood glucose at FDG injection time was measured routinely, and the subject was excluded if blood glucose concentration exceeded 8.0 mmol/L.
Image Processing
Measurement accuracy of PET imaging tracer uptake may be limited by a relatively poor scanner resolution and by reconstruction algorithm, resulting in partial voluming effects (i.e., spillover effect from high to adjacent low [18F] FDG-uptake regions). To adjust for this, and to obtain correct quantification of glucose metabolism (i.e., FDG-PET uptake), we recently developed a partial voluming correction method, applied herein (33). Whole head PET volumes were co-registered to the anatomical volume using a 6-parameter rigid body spatial registration as implemented in the Spatial Parametrical Mapping (SPM 8, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, UCL, UK) co-registration tool. PET volumes were resliced into 1 mm MRI space using a spline interpolation. For each subject, a voxel-based intensity normalization to the mean uptake in the cerebellar WM was performed. (Prior to intensity normalization, the cerebellar WM mask was eroded to avoid effects of partial voluming, inaccurate segmentation, or co-registration.) Intensity normalized volumes were used for all further analyses.
Further, the FDG-PET and structural images were co-registered to high-resolution 3D T1-weighted MRI scans for WMH segmentation and measurements (Figure 2). FDG-PET analyses and calculations were performed using The Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB) Software Library (FSL) version 5.0 (34, 35).
Figure 2. Co-registered structural MRI, WMH segmentation (cyan), and partial voluming uncorrected (A–D) and corrected (E–H) FDG-PET images.
A recently developed in-house object-based supervised machine-learning algorithm was used for automated segmentation and quantification of WMHs based on FLAIR image intensity and masks of tissue types (36). All segmentations were manually inspected for accuracy and edited when necessary. For each subject, the number of non-interconnected hyperintense areas was further determined, as well as periventricular WMH volume (≤10 mm from the ventricles). The reconstruction and segmentation of WM was performed with the FreeSurfer image analysis suite version 5.3.0 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). NAWM was defined by subtracting WMH from the total WM. FDG-PET measurements in NAWM were extracted using FSL.
Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis
Lumbar puncture was performed consecutively after inclusion, in the L3/L4 or L4/L5 interspace at a standardized time of day (around noon). CSF samples were examined for levels of Aβ42, total microtubule-associated protein Tau (T-tau), and Tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (P-tau) with commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Innogenetics, Belgium, presently Fujirebio Europe).
The procedure was carried out in accord with the manufacturers’ procedures at the national reference laboratory for these tests at the Department of Interdisciplinary Laboratory Medicine and Medical Biochemistry, Akershus University Hospital. Although measurements of CSF AD biomarkers show between-laboratory and batch-to-batch assay variability (37), the national reference laboratory is part of the European multicenter project “Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease” (BIOMARKAPD), funded by EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND), for standardization of analytical methods and laboratory procedures to increase its accuracy with regard to CSF biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases.
Statistical Analysis
Group differences in demographic and clinical features were assessed using χ2 tests for categorical data and independent-samples T-test or Mann–Whitney U test for continuous data. The WMH volume distribution was skewed and therefore logarithmically transformed prior to this analysis.
FDG-PET Uptake Differences in WMHs
The partial voluming corrected FDG-PET signal in WMHs was log-transformed prior to regression to meet the assumptions of linear regression and then adjusted for age and WMH volume. The ensuing residuals were normally distributed (as assessed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and visual inspection of the histograms) and therefore used for further statistical analyses. Conducting independent-samples T-test, we compared group differences (i.e., Aβ+ vs. Aβ−) in PET signal in WMHs with a significance level set at p < 0.05.
Associations between Potential Confounders and FDG-PET Uptake in WMHs
Linear regression analyses were carried out for both groups (i.e., Aβ+ and Aβ−). Using linear regression, we analyzed potential effects of the presence of ApoEϵ4 alleles. Although included as covariates in our main analyses, we further analyzed the effects of age and WMH volume on the FDG-PET signal in WMHs by means of linear regression with the FDG-PET signal as the dependent variable, and age and WMH volume as independent variables. In a separate linear regression model, sex was also included to assess potential associations with the FDG-uptake in WMHs.
WMH Location and Size
To assess whether our results could be influenced by group differences in WMH location (periventricular vs. subcortical) or individual WMH size, we determined the mean size of the per-subject of non-interconnected WMHs and the periventricular WMH volume. The volume measures were log-transformed prior to analyses. Individual mean WMH sizes were adjusted for age and total WMH volume, and the resulting residuals were normally distributed (assessed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and inspection of histograms). We were unable to adjust periventricular WMH volume for both age and total WMH volume because this analysis did not fulfill the assumptions of regression, i.e., the resulting residuals were not normally distributed. We therefore adjusted periventricular WMH volume for age (with resultant normally distributed residuals). Group differences were assessed with independent-samples T-test with a significance level of p < 0.05.
FDG-PET Uptake in NAWM
In comparison to effects in WMHs, we analyzed the FDG-PET signal in NAWM. The FDG-PET signal was adjusted for age and WMH volume by a linear regression model, and the resulting residuals were normally distributed as assessed by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and visual inspection of histograms. Conducting an independent-samples T-test, we compared FDG-PET signal in NAWM between the Aβ(+) and Aβ(−) group. Significance was determined by a p-value < 0.05.
All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Demographic and clinical data are shown in Table 1. Analyses revealed neither statistically significant group differences in terms of sex, age, or WMH volume nor were there significant group differences in terms of diagnoses (SCD/MCI).
Table 1. Demographic and clinical data.
FDG-PET Uptake Differences in WMHs
To investigate the effects of amyloid pathology on WMH glucose uptake, we analyzed the FDG-PET signal in WMHs in Aβ(+) and Aβ(−) subjects (Figure 3). Including potential confounders such as age and WMH volume, analyses of normalized, partial voluming corrected FDG-PET signal in WMHs revealed significantly reduced activity (p = 0.021) in Aβ(+) (mean = 0.596; SD = 0.073) relative to Aβ(−) (mean = 0.662, SD = 0.113). Cohen’s effect size value (d = −0.67) indicates moderate to high effect. Inclusion of ApoEϵ4-status as an additional covariate did not alter the findings. Our findings were also consistent in additional analyses without adjustment for age and WMH volume. When analyzing the uncorrected FDG-PET signal (i.e., without correcting for effects of partial voluming), adjusted for age and WMH volume, the significant results were consistent, i.e., significant difference (p = 0.014) when comparing Aβ(+) (mean = 0.598, SD = 0.074) and Aβ(−) subjects (mean = 0.676, SD = 0.113). Although consistent between-group differences were observed using uncorrected FDG-PET images, the intensity profiles differ slightly between corrected and uncorrected PET images (Figure 4).
Figure 3. Example of an amyloid-positive (A) vs. amyloid-negative (B) subject and the corrected FDG-PET images, WMH segmentation (color), and the metabolic profile (red line) for the selected WMH section across the brain. The color bar indicates normalized relative uptake.
Figure 4. Illustration of corrected (A) and uncorrected (B) images for effects of partial voluming. WMHs PET intensities and the metabolic profile for the selected WMH section across the brain shown in (C).
Associations between Potential Confounders and FDG-PET Uptake in WMHs
We investigated potential bias by performing linear regression analyses with different potential confounders. Results are summarized in Table 2. Linear regression analyses revealed no significant effect of sex, age, or WMH volume on the FDG-PET signal in WMHs in neither of the groups. Therefore, we did not correct for sex in our analyses. Using age and WMH volume as covariates, linear regression analyses further revealed no significant associations between ApoEϵ4-status and WMHs FDG-PET uptake in Aβ(+) or Aβ(−).
Table 2. Effects of age, WMH volume, and ApoE on the FDG-PET uptake in WMHs.
WMH Location and Size
We compared the WMH location and individual WMH size, as these factors could affect the primary analysis. With age and total WMH volume as covariates, we found no significant differences when comparing the mean per-subject size of individual WMHs (p = 0.545) of the Aβ(+) (mean = 101 mm3, SD = 67 mm3) and Aβ(−) (mean = 75 mm3, SD = 28 mm3) groups. In addition, when corrected for age, analyses of the periventricular WMH volume did not reveal significant differences (p = 0.117) between Aβ(+) (mean = 4942 mm3, SD = 6611 mm3) and Aβ(−) (mean = 2639 mm3, SD = 3532 mm3). These results were consistent also without adjustment for covariates.
FDG-PET Uptake in NAWM
The normalized FDG-PET signal in NAWM in both groups was further analyzed in comparison to the uptake in WMHs. Using age and WMH volume as covariates, we found no significant differences (p = 0.296) in NAWM when comparing Aβ(+) (mean = 0.910, SD = 0.059) and Aβ(−) (mean = 0.929, SD = 0.066). Although the FDG-PET signal was lower in the Aβ(+) group, the results remained non-significant also without adjusting for age and WMH volume.
Discussion
To our knowledge, we are the first to assess the FDG-PET signal within WMHs and also the association with amyloid pathology. The present results support an association between amyloid dysmetabolism and WMHs, as the lowest WMH metabolism is seen in cases with amyloid pathology. This was not encountered in NAWM and may therefore be construed as specific for WMHs.
Cortical hypometabolism associated with WMHs differs from the temporoparietal pattern typically seen in AD (18, 38). It has been suggested that the association between WMHs and cerebral hypometabolism reflects synaptic hypoactivity (i.e., diaschisis) as a result of CVD, rather than being related to amyloid pathology (39). However, in the present study, Aβ(+) subjects had significantly lower FDG-PET signal within WMHs compared to Aβ(−) subjects, suggesting a link between amyloid dysmetabolism and glucose utilization and metabolism. While ApoEϵ4 alleles are associated with AD and WMHs, this relationship appears to be more prominent in late-stage cases, whereas the present results suggest that amyloid is more related to initial WMH severity in terms of affected metabolism (7, 40).
The pathogenic interactions between CVD and AD are complex, and the exact mechanisms remain unclear. It has been hypothesized that vascular risk factors and resulting vascular injury, lead to cerebral hypoperfusion and impair the blood–brain barrier function (41). Consequently, acceleration of Aβ production and impairment of its clearance may occur, leading to Aβ accumulation. However, associations between CVD and AD are observed also in populations without substantial vascular comorbidities (42), supporting an underlying heterogeneity of WMHs in AD, i.e., not only related to vascular factors and small-vessel CVD.
Conversely, Aβ may be involved in the vascular alterations observed in AD, as hypothesized herein. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), characterized by amyloid deposits in leptomeningeal and cortical arteries and arterioles are associated with WMHs (43). CAA and ischemic brain injury coexist (44), and studies have shown that WMHs in AD (3), as well as in CAA (45, 46), have a predominant posterior cerebral distribution. Therefore, it is possible that vessel wall amyloid deposits may compromise perfusion and WMH metabolism in cases with low CSF Aβ.
Microscopically, the cerebral vasculature in AD presents with several pathological changes: degeneration of endothelial cells and surrounding pericytes, thickening of the capillary basement membrane, and, as the disease progresses, the cerebral blood flow (CBF) decreases (47). As glucose delivery and utilization are tightly coupled to regional CBF (48), CBF reduction may result in concurrently reduced glucose supply. The findings of more pronounced hypometabolism in the presence of amyloid pathology may therefore potentially result from amyloid-related hypoperfusion, and consequently hypometabolism, within WMHs.
The current findings are in line with our early work establishing associations between low CSF Aβ42 and WMHs, and also with our recently published data using MRI diffusion parameters to study WMH tissue integrity (19, 49). The latter data imply impaired microstructural integrity in WMHs in the presence of amyloid dysmetabolism, suggesting more pronounced oligodendroglial and axonal damage in the presence of amyloid pathology (19). Reduced glucose uptake in Aβ(+) subjects illustrate that WMH glucose metabolism is similarly affected, relating to impaired function of the WM components including neuroglia (22).
Patient cases at the SCD and MCI stages are etiologically heterogenous, also differing in FDG-uptake (50). However, subject selection to the current study is based on the CSF Aβ42 level and not on clinical diagnoses. Although the cortical FDG-PET signal in general may be lower in MCI, the proportion of SCD and MCI cases in the two study groups was similar, reducing a potential impact on our results. Therefore, and also to avoid overadjustment, patient stage was not included as a covariate in the current study.
Different spatial distribution of WMHs could be a potential bias. However, this was investigated in the same study population in a previous work (19), and no statistically significant group differences were observed in either of the cerebral lobes (i.e., frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital lobes) or cingulate. Although the phenomenon of WMH penumbra was recently described (51), as microstructural alterations were observed also in the vicinity of areas of definite WMHs, these areas was not included in our analyses but may be of interest for future studies.
The WMHs FDG-PET intensities are slightly different when comparing partial voluming corrected and uncorrected intensities (Figure 3), although the between-group differences are consistent. While the uncorrected images show a gradual metabolic reduction from the cortex toward the deeper brain regions, the corrected intensity profile demonstrates a clear-cut reduction corresponding to tissue borders (as the gray/WM border), probably giving a closer approximation to the actual cerebral metabolism. This shows that applying partial voluming correction methods, as herein, enables the use of optimized PET images (i.e., partial voluming corrected images) also for WM and WMHs analyses.
Although correction for effects of partial voluming was carried out, limitations relating to FDG-PET must also be considered when interpreting the results. Spillover from the ventricles could occur due to the large contrast between the WM and the ventricles; however, no statistically significant group differences in periventricular WMH volume were observed. In addition, in both groups there was a strong positive correlation (r > 0.960, p < 0.001) between periventricular WMH volume and the total WMH volume (a covariate in our analyses), in effect also controlling for this. Furthermore, while smaller individual WMHs may be more vulnerable to spillover from the presumptively higher FDG-uptake NAWM, we found no significant group differences in the mean size of the individual non-interconnected WMH size. As such, we consider the bias relating to these factors to be reduced.
Age, strongly related to WMHs, and WMH volume may impact on the present results, and these factors were included as covariates to remove potential bias. However, their effect on the FDG-PET signal in WMHs was non-significant, which is in line with our observations with diffusion tensor imaging (19). Hence, it is less likely our results are biased by these factors and the FDG-PET signal in WMHs may rather be influenced by amyloid-related pathology, as suggested here.
Both our earlier findings of Aβ pathology-associated reduced WMH structural integrity and the present findings of reduced WMH glucose metabolism implicate neuroglia and oligodendrocyte pathology, which could be induced by Aβ-related capillary pathology as described above. However, cortical and intraneuronal Aβ pathology could also induce neuronal and mitochondrial pathology (52), a downstream effect on neuroglia putatively making WM elements susceptible to cerebrovascular pathology in AD cases. Neuropathological and in vivo perfusion and amyloid imaging studies could serve to distinguish these hypotheses.
The limitations mentioned, together with a relatively small sample size in the current study, necessitate that findings are replicated in larger cohorts, and future studies are also warranted to further establish mechanisms linking Aβ pathology and WMHs. However, the current findings add to the pool of evidence linking CVD and AD pathomechanistically and may reflect the heterogeneity of the WMH etiopathology in AD, involving both Aβ pathology and small-vessel CVD.
Author Contributions
LK: study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, and further drafted the manuscript. AB: study concept and design, acquisition and interpretation of data (notably MRI data), and critical revision of the manuscript. CC: analysis and interpretation of data (notably PET data) and critical revision of the manuscript. TF: study concept and design, acquisition and interpretation of data, and critical revision of the manuscript. KV: acquisition and interpretation of data (notably MRI data) and revision of the manuscript. PS: study concept and design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and critical revision of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding
Study funded by The Research Council of Norway (grant reference number 217780/H10), South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (grant reference number 2013131), EU-JPND via The Research Council of Norway (grant reference number 237250).
References
1. Iadecola C. The pathobiology of vascular dementia. Neuron (2013) 80(4):844–66. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.008
2. Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels GJ, Cordonnier C, Fazekas F, Frayne R, et al. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol (2013) 12(8):822–38. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70124-8
3. Yoshita M, Fletcher E, Harvey D, Ortega M, Martinez O, Mungas DM, et al. Extent and distribution of white matter hyperintensities in normal aging, MCI, and AD. Neurology (2006) 67(12):2192–8. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000249119.95747.1f
4. Luchsinger JA, Brickman AM, Reitz C, Cho SJ, Schupf N, Manly JJ, et al. Subclinical cerebrovascular disease in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology (2009) 73(6):450–6. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b1636a
5. Liu CC, Kanekiyo T, Xu H, Bu G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: risk, mechanisms, and therapy. Nat Rev Neurol (2013) 9(2):106–18. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2012.263
6. de Leeuw FE, Richard F, de Groot JC, van Duijn CM, Hofman A, Van Gijn J, et al. Interaction between hypertension, apoE, and cerebral white matter lesions. Stroke (2004) 35(5):1057–60. doi:10.1161/01.str.0000125859.71051.83
7. Stenset V, Hofoss D, Johnsen L, Berstad AE, Negaard A, Skinningsrud A, et al. White matter lesion load increases the risk of low CSF Abeta42 in apolipoprotein E-varepsilon4 carriers attending a memory clinic. J Neuroimaging (2011) 21(2):e78–82. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2009.00444.x
8. Marnane M, Al-Jawadi OO, Mortazavi S, Pogorzelec KJ, Wang BW, Feldman HH, et al. Periventricular hyperintensities are associated with elevated cerebral amyloid. Neurology (2016) 86(6):535–43. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000002352
9. Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol (1991) 82(4):239–59. doi:10.1007/BF00308809
10. Charidimou A, Gang Q, Werring DJ. Sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy revisited: recent insights into pathophysiology and clinical spectrum. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (2012) 83(2):124–37. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2011-301308
11. Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, Shaw LM, Aisen PS, Weiner MW, et al. Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol (2010) 9(1):119–28. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70299-6
12. Blennow K, Mattsson N, Scholl M, Hansson O, Zetterberg H. Amyloid biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci (2015) 36(5):297–309. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2015.03.002
13. Fagan AM, Mintun MA, Mach RH, Lee SY, Dence CS, Shah AR, et al. Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Abeta42 in humans. Ann Neurol (2006) 59(3):512–9. doi:10.1002/ana.20730
14. Strozyk D, Blennow K, White LR, Launer LJ. CSF Abeta 42 levels correlate with amyloid-neuropathology in a population-based autopsy study. Neurology (2003) 60(4):652–6. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000046581.81650.D0
15. Hardy JA, Higgins GA. Alzheimer’s disease: the amyloid cascade hypothesis. Science (1992) 256(5054):184–5. doi:10.1126/science.1566067
16. Hardy J. The amyloid hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease: a critical reappraisal. J Neurochem (2009) 110(4):1129–34. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06181.x
17. Radanovic M, Pereira FR, Stella F, Aprahamian I, Ferreira LK, Forlenza OV, et al. White matter abnormalities associated with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a critical review of MRI studies. Expert Rev Neurother (2013) 13(5):483–93. doi:10.1586/ern.13.45
18. Pascual B, Prieto E, Arbizu J, Marti-Climent J, Olier J, Masdeu JC. Brain glucose metabolism in vascular white matter disease with dementia: differentiation from Alzheimer disease. Stroke (2010) 41(12):2889–93. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.110.591552
19. Kalheim LF, Bjornerud A, Fladby T, Vegge K, Selnes P. White matter hyperintensity microstructure in amyloid dysmetabolism. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2016). doi:10.1177/0271678x15627465
20. Court FA, Coleman MP. Mitochondria as a central sensor for axonal degenerative stimuli. Trends Neurosci (2012) 35(6):364–72. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2012.04.001
21. Beirowski B. Concepts for regulation of axon integrity by enwrapping glia. Front Cell Neurosci (2013) 7:256. doi:10.3389/fncel.2013.00256
22. Morrison BM, Lee Y, Rothstein JD. Oligodendroglia: metabolic supporters of axons. Trends Cell Biol (2013) 23(12):644–51. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2013.07.007
23. Dewar D, Underhill SM, Goldberg MP. Oligodendrocytes and ischemic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2003) 23(3):263–74. doi:10.1097/00004647-200303000-00001
24. Goldberg MP, Ransom BR. New light on white matter. Stroke (2003) 34(2):330–2. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000054048.22626.B9
25. Reisberg B, Ferris SH, de Leon MJ, Crook T. Global Deterioration Scale (GDS). Psychopharmacol Bull (1988) 24(4):661–3.
26. Auer S, Reisberg B. The GDS/FAST staging system. Int Psychogeriatr (1997) 9(Suppl 1):167–71. doi:10.1017/S1041610297004869
27. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res (1975) 12(3):189–98. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
28. Kiernan RJ, Mueller J, Langston JW, Van Dyke C. The neurobehavioral cognitive status examination: a brief but quantitative approach to cognitive assessment. Ann Intern Med (1987) 107(4):481–5. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-107-4-481
29. Royall DR, Mahurin RK, Gray KF. Bedside assessment of executive cognitive impairment: the executive interview. J Am Geriatr Soc (1992) 40(12):1221–6. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb03646.x
30. Reisberg B, Gauthier S. Current evidence for subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) as the pre-mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage of subsequently manifest Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr (2008) 20(1):1–16. doi:10.1017/s1041610207006412
31. Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, Jelic V, Fratiglioni L, Wahlund LO, et al. Mild cognitive impairment – beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on mild cognitive impairment. J Intern Med (2004) 256(3):240–6. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01380.x
32. Morris JC. Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type. Int Psychogeriatr (1997) 9(Suppl 1):173–6; discussion 177–8. doi:10.1017/S1041610297004870
33. Coello C, Willoch F, Selnes P, Gjerstad L, Fladby T, Skretting A. Correction of partial volume effect in (18)F-FDG PET brain studies using coregistered MR volumes: voxel based analysis of tracer uptake in the white matter. Neuroimage (2013) 72:183–92. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.043
34. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage (2004) 23(Suppl 1):S208–19. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
35. Woolrich MW, Jbabdi S, Patenaude B, Chappell M, Makni S, Behrens T, et al. Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL. Neuroimage (2009) 45(1 Suppl):S173–86. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.055
36. Rincon M, Selnes P, Larsson C, Fladby T, Bjørnerud A. Automatic WML segmentation and quantification using a machine learning approach. Presented at The International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 2011 May 7–13; Montréal. (2011).
37. Mattsson N, Zetterberg H, Hansson O, Andreasen N, Parnetti L, Jonsson M, et al. CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment. JAMA (2009) 302(4):385–93. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1064
38. Mosconi L. Brain glucose metabolism in the early and specific diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. FDG-PET studies in MCI and AD. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2005) 32(4):486–510. doi:10.1007/s00259-005-1762-7
39. Lo RY, Jagust WJ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Vascular burden and Alzheimer disease pathologic progression. Neurology (2012) 79(13):1349–55. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826c1b9d
40. Yip AG, McKee AC, Green RC, Wells J, Young H, Cupples LA, et al. APOE, vascular pathology, and the AD brain. Neurology (2005) 65(2):259–65. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000168863.49053.4d
41. Zlokovic BV. Neurovascular pathways to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and other disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci (2011) 12(12):723–38. doi:10.1038/nrn3114
42. Provenzano FA, Muraskin J, Tosto G, Narkhede A, Wasserman BT, Griffith EY, et al. White matter hyperintensities and cerebral amyloidosis: necessary and sufficient for clinical expression of Alzheimer disease? JAMA Neurol (2013) 70(4):455–61. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.1321
43. Haglund M, Englund E. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy, white matter lesions and Alzheimer encephalopathy – a histopathological assessment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord (2002) 14(3):161–6. doi:10.1159/000063606
44. Reijmer YD, van Veluw SJ, Greenberg SM. Ischemic brain injury in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab (2015) 36:55–71. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2015.88
45. Zhu YC, Chabriat H, Godin O, Dufouil C, Rosand J, Greenberg SM, et al. Distribution of white matter hyperintensity in cerebral hemorrhage and healthy aging. J Neurol (2012) 259(3):530–6. doi:10.1007/s00415-011-6218-3
46. Shams S, Martola J, Granberg T, Li X, Shams M, Fereshtehnejad SM, et al. Cerebral microbleeds: different prevalence, topography, and risk factors depending on dementia diagnosis – the Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol (2015) 36(4):661–6. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4176
47. Ostergaard L, Aamand R, Gutierrez-Jimenez E, Ho YC, Blicher JU, Madsen SM, et al. The capillary dysfunction hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging (2013) 34(4):1018–31. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.09.011
48. Mosconi L. Glucose metabolism in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease: methodological and physiological considerations for PET studies. Clin Transl Imaging (2013) 1(4):217–33. doi:10.1007/s40336-013-0026-y
49. Stenset V, Johnsen L, Kocot D, Negaard A, Skinningsrud A, Gulbrandsen P, et al. Associations between white matter lesions, cerebrovascular risk factors, and low CSF Abeta42. Neurology (2006) 67(5):830–3. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000234030.77831.5a
50. Song IU, Choi EK, Oh JK, Chung YA, Chung SW. Alteration patterns of brain glucose metabolism: comparisons of healthy controls, subjective memory impairment and mild cognitive impairment. Acta Radiol (2016) 57(1):90–7. doi:10.1177/0284185114566088
51. Maillard P, Fletcher E, Harvey D, Carmichael O, Reed B, Mungas D, et al. White matter hyperintensity penumbra. Stroke (2011) 42(7):1917–22. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.110.609768
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, cerebrovascular disease, white matter, PET, cerebrospinal fluid
Citation: Kalheim LF, Selnes P, Bjørnerud A, Coello C, Vegge K and Fladby T (2016) Amyloid Dysmetabolism Relates to Reduced Glucose Uptake in White Matter Hyperintensities. Front. Neurol. 7:209. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00209
Received: 05 September 2016; Accepted: 08 November 2016;
Published: 21 November 2016
Edited by:
Stefano L. Sensi, University of California Irvine, USAReviewed by:
Peng Lei, Sichuan University, ChinaHector De Jesus-Cortes, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Copyright: © 2016 Kalheim, Selnes, Bjørnerud, Coello, Vegge and Fladby. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Lisa Flem Kalheim, lisa.flem.kalheim@ahus.no