@ARTICLE{10.3389/fneur.2019.00639, AUTHOR={Vikane, Eirik and Frøyland, Kaia and Næss, Hanne Langseth and Aßmus, Jörg and Skouen, Jan Sture}, TITLE={Predictors for Psychological Distress 2 Months After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury}, JOURNAL={Frontiers in Neurology}, VOLUME={10}, YEAR={2019}, URL={https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2019.00639}, DOI={10.3389/fneur.2019.00639}, ISSN={1664-2295}, ABSTRACT={Objective: To predict psychological distress at 2 months for patients with mild traumatic brain injury.Method: A prospective cohort study of 162 patients with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) admitted consecutively to an outpatient clinic at Haukeland University Hospital, Norway. Demographic data were obtained from Statistics Norway and injury characteristics were obtained from the hospital records. Sick leave data from the last year before the injury were obtained from The Norwegian Labor and Welfare Service. Self-report questionnaires were used to obtain history about earlier disease and symptom profiles. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) detecting states of depression and anxiety were used as the dependent variable in a stepwise linear regression. Pre-injury factors and injury-related factors were examined as potential predictors for HAD.Results: In the first steps we observed a significant association between HAD at 2 months and education, whiplash associated disorder (WAD), and earlier sick listed with a psychiatric diagnosis. In the final step there was an association only between HAD and self-reported anxiety and WAD. There were no associations between HAD and injury-characteristics like severity at Glasgow Coma Scale or intracranial injury.Conclusion: Patients with low education, earlier psychiatric diagnosis, self-reported earlier anxiety and WAD were more likely to develop a psychological distress after a MTBI. These findings should be taken into consideration when treating patients with MTBI.} }