ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Volume 11 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.592003
Early Neurological Deterioration Despite Recanalization in Basilar Artery Occlusion Treated by Endovascular Therapy
- 1Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- 2Department of Neurology, Peking University Shougang Hospital, Beijing, China
- 3Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- 4Department of Neurology, Tangshan Gongren Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Tangshan, China
- 5China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
- 6Center of Stroke, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China
Background: We aim to identify the risk factors of early neurological deterioration (END) despite successful recanalization and explore the association of END with 90-day outcomes in acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) treated by endovascular therapy (EVT).
Methods: A prospectively registered consecutive cohort of BAO patients with successful recanalization by EVT in a tertiary stroke center during a 6-year period was reviewed. END was defined as an National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score increase ≥4 points, or death, from baseline to 24 h after EVT. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors of END. The 90-day outcomes between END and non-END groups were compared by Pearson's χ2 test.
Results: END was observed in 21 of 148 patients included in this study. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with progressive or fluctuating symptoms had a higher risk of END than those with symptoms of acute attack (OR 5.52, 95% CI 1.73–17.63), and NIHSS score and puncture-to-recanalization time (PTR), as continuous variables, were also significantly associated with END. Using a generalized additive model with spline smoothing function, we observed a linear relationship between PTR (increased by 1 h) and END (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.45–4.57), and a non-linear relationship between NIHSS score and END. Only when the NIHSS score was ≥23 points was it related to END (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6–0.9). In addition, patients with END had a lower proportion of 90-day favorable outcome (19.0 vs. 59.1%, p < 0.01) and higher mortality (33.3 vs. 13.4%, p = 0.048) than those with non-END.
Conclusion: Mode of stroke onset, NIHSS score, and PTR may help to identify BAO patients with a higher risk of END after EVT. Moreover, END may affect the 90-day outcomes of these patients.
Ischemic stroke due to acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) accounts for about 1% of all ischemic strokes (1), but it is often associated with either severe neurological impairment or high mortality rate (2, 3). During the past several years, a number of new generation devices for endovascular revascularization have been introduced for BAO, and they seem to have more promising potential for achieving a high rate of revascularization than intravenous thrombolysis (4). However, poor clinical outcomes, despite successful revascularization, are still present in a large percentage of patients with acute BAO (5). The futile recanalization rate can be as much as 47% (6).
END is an index for the worsening of neurological symptoms, which could be caused by symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, malignant edema, and early recurrent stroke (7). According to different severity thresholds and the time scales between assessments, the incidence of END varies widely from study to study. The typical definition of END (8, 9) is an increase ≥4 points in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) or death within the first 24 h after stroke, and END affects stroke patients' long-term outcomes (10–12).
Early studies mainly focused on END in patients who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Certain clinical as well as radiological variables were found to be strongly associated with END, which include the site of occlusion, initial hypoperfusion, infarct volume, NIHSS score on admission, and 24-h recanalization (7, 13). However, only a few studies have investigated the risk factors and their role in END prognosis in stroke patients after endovascular treatment (EVT), and no studies have investigated END in patients with acute BAO after successful recanalization.
The primary aim of this study was to identify the clinical factors associated with END and to clarify the effects of END on 3-month stroke outcomes.
A prospectively registered cohort of patients with acute BAO (n = 187) treated by EVT (including stent-retriever thrombectomy and/or intra-arterial thrombolysis and/or emergency angioplasty) within 24 h of BAO onset at Beijing Tiantan Hospital between January 2012 and July 2018 was established. Subjects included only those with successful recanalization. Informed consent was obtained from all patients, or their legally authorized representatives, before EVT, and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital. All data were anonymized, and the identities of patients were protected.
The time of BAO onset was described by the patients or witnesses; if unknown, it was considered to be the last time the patient was well. In patients with mild symptoms followed by sudden onset of decreased consciousness, the time of deterioration in clinical status was taken as the estimated time of BAO onset. Successful recanalization was defined as modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade (mTICI score) ≥2b. Intravenous treatment with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) before EVT was acceptable, in accordance with the current guidelines of the Chinese Society of Neurology/Chinese Stroke Society. Patients with a premorbid modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of >3 were excluded from this study.
Demographic and Clinical Assessments
Patient's baseline and clinical characteristics (e.g., demographic data, NIHSS score, laboratory test results, neurovascular images, stroke subtypes, operative information, and perioperative management) and functional outcomes (e.g., mRS score) within 90 days were prospectively collected.
Neurological deficits of all patients were assessed by NIHSS score at baseline, 24 ± 2 h, 7 ± 1 days (or at discharge, whichever occurred first), and at any time of neurological deterioration. The mRS score was assessed at 7 ± 1 days (or at discharge, whichever occurred first) and 90 ± 7 days. Only neurologists trained and qualified to use the NIHSS and mRS recorded the scores.
Neurovascular image [CT plus CT angiography (CTA) and/or magnetic resonance (MR) plus MR angiography] were performed at baseline, within 24 h, and 7 days (or before discharge, whichever occurred first). Additional CT and/or MR were examined at any time of neurological deterioration. The imaging findings were interpreted by two independent trained radiologists blinded to the clinical data. A third experienced senior radiologist participated in the resolution of any disagreement.
Clinical functional outcomes according to the mRS were assessed at 90 days. A follow-up blinded to baseline information was carried out through telephone interviews by trained interviewers based on a standardized interview protocol. In this study, the outcome measures included functional independence, favorable outcomes, as well as death within 90 days after the procedure. Functional independence was defined as an mRS score ≤ 2, and favorable outcome as an mRS score ≤ 3, in accordance with the BASICS definition (3).
Definition of END
With reference to earlier studies (8, 9), we modified the definition to define early neurological deterioration (END) after successful recanalization as an increase of ≥4 points in NIHSS score from baseline NIHSS score, or death, within 24 h after successful recanalization.
Study data were collected on standard forms, evaluated for completeness, and double keyed into an EpiData statistics data document. Baseline and outcome data were presented as mean (SD) and/or median [interquartile range (IQR)] for continuous variables. Frequency and/or proportion were used for categorical variables. In univariate analysis, independent-samples t-test and/or the non-parametric test (Mann–Whitney U-test) were used to compare means and/or medians, whereas Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare frequencies and/or proportions. All factors achieving p < 0.1 on univariate analyses were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model to identify clinically relevant risk factors for END. Generalized additive models were used to visually assess the relationships between the continuous covariates (e.g., NIHSS, PTR) and the risk of END. We further applied a two-piecewise linear regression model to examine the threshold effect of the continuous covariates on END using a smoothing function. The threshold level (e.g., turning point) was determined using trial and error, including selecting of turning points along with a pre-defined interval and then choosing the turning point that gave the maximum model likelihood. We also conducted a log-likelihood ratio test comparing the one-line linear regression model with a two-piecewise linear model. All tests were two tailed and statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed with the statistical software package R (http://www.R-project.org, The R Foundation) and Empowerstats (http://www.empowerstats.com; X&Y Solutions, Boston, MA, United States).
Between January 2012 and July 2018, 187 consecutive patients with BAO underwent emergency EVT. Because of delayed treatment (>24 h) and unclear onset time, eight patients were excluded, and six patients with significant pre-stroke disability (mRS score >3) were excluded. In addition, 25 patients who did not achieve successful recanalization (mTICI score 2b−3) were also excluded. Finally, 148 eligible patients were included in the analysis (Figure 1). The median age (IQR) was 60 (54–67) years; 122 cases (82.4%) were male, and the median NIHSS score was 24 points (IQR, 10–34 points). A total of 118 cases (79.7%) were treated by mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers, and median onset-to-puncture time (OTP) was 6.5 h (IQR, 4.6–9.0 h). During a 90-day follow-up, the proportions of functional independence (mRS score ≤ 2), favorable outcome (mRS ≤ 3), and death were 39.9% (59 cases), 53.4% (79 cases), and 16.2% (24 cases), respectively.
Figure 1. Flow chart outlining patient inclusion steps. END indicates early neurological deterioration; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.
END occurred in 21 patients (14.2%). The extent of deterioration was from 4 to 10 points in 11 patients, 11–20 points in six patients, ≥21 points in two patients, and two patients died within 24 h. Patients were divided into two groups based on those with END or not, and their clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Identification of Risk Factors for END
The pretreatment and procedural variables are presented in Table 1. In univariate analysis, patients with END had a higher percentage of hypertension (90.5 vs. 66.9%, p = 0.03), while no other vascular risk factors (sex distribution, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, previous stroke, smoking status) were identified as risk factors for END. Compared with patients with abrupt symptoms, patients with non-abrupt symptoms were more likely to suffer END (p = 0.02) and the median NIHSS score in patients with END was lower (p = 0.03). Moreover, there was a significant difference (p = 0.01) in the medial PTR between patients with END (median, 2.0; IQR: 1.5–2.5) and those without END (median, 1.0; IQR: 1.0–2.0). The proportion of intraprocedural complications in the END group was higher than that in the non-END group, and the difference has a significant trend (p = 0.053). No findings in the neurovascular imaging factors (occlusion site, ASITN/SIR collateral status, tandem lesion, and stroke type) were associated with END, and operative information such as the type of anesthesia, use of stent retriever, as well as angioplasty method was also similar in both groups. There were no differences in presenting systolic blood pressure and laboratory test results between patients with and without END.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for those relevant confounders with p ≤ 0.1 in univariate analysis. The results showed that mode of stroke onset (OR 5.52; 95% CI 1.73–17.63), PTR (p < 0.01), and baseline NIHSS score (p < 0.01) were independently associated with END (Table 2).
Table 2. Multiple logistic regression analysis for risk factors with early neurological deterioration after successful recanalization.
Two-Piecewise Linear Regression Model for NIHSS Score and PTR
Figure 2 shows smooth curves of the END by baseline NIHSS score and PTR. The smoothed curve showed that END was increasing linearly with PTR, whereas the relationship of END and NIHSS score was not simply linear, as a turning point could be seen at 23 (LLR test, p < 0.01), after adjusting for confounders including mode of stroke onset and PTR. In the group with NIHSS score >23, the odds ratio of END with age was 0.7 (95% CI 0.6–0.9; p < 0.01), but there was no significant relationship between END and NIHSS score when NIHSS score < 23 (p = 0.41; Table 3).
Figure 2. (A) Smooth curve fitting of 24-h END incidence and baseline NIHSS score (points). Red lines represent the spline plots of baseline NIHSS score and blue dotted lines represent the 95% CIs of the spline plots. Adjusted factors: mode of stroke onset and PTR. (B) Smooth curve fitting of 24-h END incidence and PTR (per hour). Red lines represent the spline plots of PTR and blue dotted lines represent the 95% CIs of the spline plots. Adjusted factors: mode of stroke onset and baseline NIHSS score.
Table 3. Threshold effect analysis of NIHSS score on 24-hour END incidence using piecewise linear regression.
Post-Treatment Factors Associated With END
Post-treatment factors associated with END within 24 h and 7 days are shown in Table 4. There was a trend for significance for ICH within 24 h, higher in the END group (p = 0.08). However, END showed no association with extensive brainstem infarction and re-occlusion. END group had a significantly higher rate of symptomatic ICH within 24 h (<0.01) and 7 days (<0.01). According to the follow-up clinical outcomes within 24 h and within 7 days, patients who more frequently experienced END had hernia than those without END (p = 0.02). Among END patients, NIHSS score at 24 h (<0.01) and 7 days (<0.01) was significantly higher.
Comparison of 90-Day Outcomes Between END and Non-END Groups
Finally, the incidence rates of functional independence (14.3 vs. 44.1%, p = 0.01) and favorable outcome (19 vs. 59.1%, p = 0.001) at 3 months were much less prevalent in the END group than in the non-END group, and the mortality within 3 months was significantly increased in the END group (33.3 vs. 13.4%, p = 0.048; Figure 3).
Figure 3. mRS scores at 90 days for patients with END vs. Non-END. END indicates early neurological deterioration; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.
The main findings of the study are as follows: (1) patients with progressive or fluctuating symptoms at stroke onset were more likely to suffer END; (2) “puncture to recanalization time” (PTR) is an independent risk factor associated with END in BAO; (3) we observed a non-linear relationship between NIHSS score and END.
Previous studies indicated that END was present in 10–38% of patients after IV rt-PA (15–18), and in 35.2–40.2% of patients after endovascular recanalization (18, 19). A recent meta-analysis showed that the pooled incidence of END, defined as a ≥4-point increase in NIHSS score between admission and at 24 h, was about 11.0% (20). END was seen in 13.5% of the patients in our study, the reason for the relatively low percentage possibly being we only included those who were successfully recanalized.
We found that the relationship between NIHSS score and END was not linear. The explanations for this finding may be that in our cohort, there were 76 patients with baseline NIHSS score ≥23 points, among which 60 patients (78.9%) had a score ≥30 points. As a result, the NIHSS score was hard to increase more than 4 points. This may be due to a ceiling effect, which prevented the high scores from increasing further (21). As we can see from our results, patients with higher NIHSS scores ≥23 points had a lower incidence of END, which was in contrast to some previous studies (11, 16) but consistent with several other studies (20, 22). Low NIHSS scores do not always represent mild ischemic symptoms (23) and mild stroke patients with symptomatic arterial occlusion were easier to develop END (24). Moreover, the BASICS study (25) suggested that prognostic power of 24- to 48-h NIHSS was higher than baseline NIHSS for 1-month poor outcome (area under the curve, 0.92 vs. 0.75) and mortality (area under the curve, 0.85 vs. 0.72). Therefore, END that reflects changes in neurological condition 24 h after surgery can serve as a better and more suitable surrogate of baseline NIHSS to predict long-term outcomes.
Time is one of the most important aspects of the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and any delays in starting treatment will result in a worse outcome. PTR is an important time metric and some studies have shown that it is independently associated with 90-day outcomes (26, 27). Our findings suggested that PTR is an independent risk factor associated with END, which is in line with previous studies that showed an association between PTR and clinical outcomes (27, 28). PTR was significantly longer in the END group than in the non-END group; the possible reasons may be that (1) in our study, the rate of interventional complications in the END group was significantly higher, and Spiotta (27) has suggested that interventional complications are associated with increased procedure time. (2) According to our analysis, 11 patients (52.3%) in the END group experienced ≥2 times of stent pass, which indicates that vascular anatomy is highly sophisticated and thus the operation could be demanding. (3) The third possible explanation for this could be the characteristics of the thrombus. With larger or longer clots, it may require multiple attempts with different devices, which inherently involves a time penalty in the process (29, 30). (4) Patients with ICAS or tandem lesions tend to be refractory to thrombectomy treatment (31, 32), and rescue treatments such as angioplasty and/or stenting are often needed after thrombectomy to achieve good outcomes (14), which in turn prolonged the procedure time. (5) Finally, in some cases, some patients had to change from local anesthesia to general anesthesia during the procedure time, which also increased PTR.
The relatively low frequency of END in patients with an abrupt mode of onset is not an unexpected finding. It is easy to conceive that a cardiac embolus leads to acute occlusion of a major cerebral artery, giving rise to a sudden onset of neurological deficits. Furthermore, significant stenoses in intracranial arteries were found to be more frequent in progressive ischemic strokes in a previous study (33). Several studies have shown that intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) displays a unique risk factor profile as well as technical challenges for endovascular reperfusion therapy (34) and it has relatively poor functional outcomes compared with embolic occlusion (35). Furthermore, the onset time is less precise in patients with fluctuating symptoms as patients with acute symptoms, so that the delay is underestimated.
Our study demonstrated that END was associated with symptomatic hemorrhage and hernia within 7 days and was also associated with poor outcome at 3 months. Similar findings have been consistently reported in previous studies (10, 18). There is no significant correlation between extensive brainstem infarction and END. The possible reason may that we adapted two imaging techniques (CT/MRI), which led to the heterogeneity of PMI scores.
The impact of END on long-term outcome warrants standardized treatment protocols to reduce procedural time in endovascular treatment, thus possibly lowering the risk of END.
Our study has some limitations. First, this study is a retrospective analysis of a database in a single center, and the proportion of general anesthesia employed in this study is relatively higher, so, although it is prospectively maintained, its generalizability may be limited. Second, our study used the most commonly used definition of NIHSS score increase ≥4 after vascular recanalization as END, and this cannot completely reflect the severity and deterioration of posterior circulation infarction, although there is no alternative superior method. Third, due to incomplete imaging data, we were unable to classify and analyze the etiology of END. Finally, the sample size of the END group was relatively small, which may have resulted in low test efficiency, and thus the overlooking of some risk factors.
In conclusion, our study highlights the importance of PTR in the interventional management of acute BAO. In contrast to many non-modifiable predictors of outcome in stroke, such delays can be greatly improved with appropriate systemic changes. Time guidelines and standardized treatment protocols should aim to reduce procedural times in endovascular treatment, thereby possibly improving outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
XZ and XT: conceptualization, methodology, data analysis, and article drafting. XS, FG, and DM: data curation and coordination. YW and ZM: supervision and obtaining funding. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
This study was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant no. 2016YFC1301501), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant no. 2019M650773), Hebei Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission (Grant no. 20181258), Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (Grant no. Z18110000171837), theNatural Science Foundation of Beijing (Grant no. 7172070), The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 81825007), Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program (Grant no. BJJWZYJH01201910025030), The Thirteenth-Five Key Development and Research Plan by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (Grant no. 2017YFC1307900), Beijing Science and Technology Plan by Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Grant no. D171100003017001), Beijing Excellent Talents Training and Supporting-Top Youth Team by Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission (Grant no. 2016000021223TD03); Youth Beijing Scholar Program; Beijing Talent Project-Class A: Innovation and Development (Grant no. 2018A12); National Ten-Thousand Talent Plan—Leadership of Scientific and Technological Innovation.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
2. Arnold M, Nedeltchev K, Schroth G, Baumgartner RW, Remonda L, Loher TJ, et al. Clinical and radiological predictors of recanalisation and outcome of 40 patients with acute basilar artery occlusion treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2004) 75:857–62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.020479
3. Schonewille WJ, Wijman CA, Michel P, Rueckert CM, Weimar C, Mattle HP, et al. Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the basilar artery international cooperation study (BASICS): a prospective registry study. Lancet Neurol. (2009) 8:724–30. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70173-5
4. Kumar G, Shahripour RB, Alexandrov AV. Recanalization of acute basilar artery occlusion improves outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. (2015) 7:868–74. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011418
5. Singer OC, Berkefeld J, Nolte CH, Bohner G, Haring HP, Trenkler J, et al.Mechanical recanalization in basilar artery occlusion: the ENDOSTROKE study. Ann Neurol. (2015) 77:415–24. doi: 10.1002/ana.24336
6. Hussein HM, Saleem MA, Qureshi AI. Rates and predictors of futile recanalization in patients undergoing endovascular treatment in a multicenter clinical trial. Neuroradiology. (2018) 60:557–63. doi: 10.1007/s00234-018-2016-2
7. Seners P, Turc G, Oppenheim C, Baron JC. Incidence, causes and predictors of neurological deterioration occurring within 24 h following acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review with pathophysiological implications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2015) 86:87–94. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308327
8. Tisserand M, Seners P, Turc G, Legrand L, Labeyrie MA, Charron S, et al. Mechanisms of unexplained neurological deterioration after intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke. (2014) 45:3527–34. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006745
9. Seners P, Hurford R, Tisserand M, Turc G, Legrand L, Naggara O, et al. Unexplained Early neurological deterioration after intravenous thrombolysis associated with thrombus extension? Stroke. (2017) 48:348–52. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015414
10. Helleberg BH, Ellekjaer H, Indredavik B. Outcomes after early neurological deterioration and transitory deterioration in acute ischemic stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2016) 42:378–86. doi: 10.1159/000447130
11. Simonsen CZ, Schmitz ML, Madsen MH, Mikkelsen IK, Chandra RV, Leslie-Mazwi T, et al. Early neurological deterioration after thrombolysis: clinical and imaging predictors. Int J Stroke. (2016) 11:776–82. doi: 10.1177/1747493016650454
12. Kim JT, Heo SH, Yoon W, Choi KH, Park MS, Saver JL, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with acute minor stroke receiving rescue IA therapy following early neurological deterioration. J Neurointerv Surg. (2016) 8:461–5. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011690
13. Seners P, Baron JC. Revisiting 'progressive stroke': incidence, predictors, pathophysiology, and management of unexplained early neurological deterioration following acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol. (2018) 265:216–25. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8490-3
14. Jia B, Feng L, Liebeskind D, Huo X, Gao F, Ma N, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy and rescue therapy for intracranial large artery occlusion with underlying atherosclerosis. J Neurointerv Surg. (2018) 10:746–50. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013489
15. Dávalos A, Toni D, Iweins F, Lesaffre E, Bastianello S, Castillo J. Neurological deterioration in acute ischemic stroke: potential predictors and associated factors in the European cooperative acute stroke study (ECASS) I. Stroke. (1999) 30:2631–6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.30.12.2631
16. James B, Chang AD, McTaggart RA, Hemendinger M, Mac Grory B, Cutting SM, et al. Predictors of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage in patients with an ischaemic stroke with neurological deterioration after intravenous thrombolysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2018) 89:866–9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-317341
17. Martin AJ, Dale N, Imray CHE, Roffe C, Smith CJ, Tian F, et al. The association between early neurological deterioration and whole blood purine concentration during acute stroke. Biomark Res. (2019) 7:7. doi: 10.1186/s40364-019-0158-y
18. Zhang YB, Su YY, He YB, Liu YF, Liu G, Fan LL. Early neurological deterioration after recanalization treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective study. Chin Med J. (2018) 131:137–43. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.222343
19. Kim JM, Bae JH, Park KY, Lee WJ, Byun JS, Ahn SW, et al. Incidence and mechanism of early neurological deterioration after endovascular thrombectomy. J Neurol. (2019) 266:609–15. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-09173-0
21. Seners P, Turc G, Tisserand M, Legrand L, Labeyrie MA, Calvet D, et al. Unexplained early neurological deterioration after intravenous thrombolysis: incidence, predictors, and associated factors. Stroke. (2014) 45:2004–9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005426
22. Mori M, Naganuma M, Okada Y, Hasegawa Y, Shiokawa Y, Nakagawara J, et al. Early neurological deterioration within 24 hours after intravenous rt-PA therapy for stroke patients: the stroke acute management with urgent risk factor assessment and improvement rt-PA Registry. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2012) 34:140–6. doi: 10.1159/000339759
23. Martin-Schild S, Albright K, Tanksley J, Pandav V, Jones E, Grotta J, et al. Zero on the NIHSS does not equal the absence of stroke. Ann Emerg Med. (2011) 57:42–5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.06.564
24. Kim JT, Park MS, Chang J, Lee JS, Choi KH, Cho KH. Proximal arterial occlusion in acute ischemic stroke with low NIHSS scores should not be considered as mild stroke. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e70996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070996
25. Rangaraju S, Jovin TG, Frankel M, Schonewille WJ, Algra A, Kappelle LJ, et al. Neurologic examination at 24 to 48 hours predicts functional outcomes in basilar artery occlusion stroke. Stroke. (2016) 47:2534–40. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014567
26. Hassan AE, Shariff U, Saver JL, Goyal M, Liebeskind D, Jahan R, et al. Impact of procedural time on clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving endovascular treatment. J Neurointerv Surg. (2019) 11:984–8. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014576
27. Spiotta AM, Vargas J, Turner R, Chaudry MI, Battenhouse H, Turk AS. The golden hour of stroke intervention: effect of thrombectomy procedural time in acute ischemic stroke on outcome. J Neurointerv Surg. (2014) 6:511–6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010726
28. Kass-Hout T, Kass-Hout O, Sun CJ, Kass-Hout TA, Nogueira R, Gupta R. Longer procedural times are independently associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke undergoing thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. (2016) 8:1217–20. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012157
29. Dutra BG, Tolhuisen ML, Alves H, Treurniet KM, Kappelhof M, Yoo AJ, et al. Thrombus imaging characteristics and outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment. Stroke. (2019) 50:2057–64. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024247
30. Yoo A, Khatri P, Mocco J, Zaidat O, Gupta R, Frei D, et al. Impact of thrombus length on outcomes after intra-arterial aspiration thrombectomy in the THERAPY trial. Stroke. (2017) 48:1895–900. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016253
31. Kim YW, Hong JM, Park DG, Choi JW, Kang DH, Kim YS, et al. Effect of intracranial atherosclerotic disease on endovascular treatment for patients with acute vertebrobasilar occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2016) 37:2072–78. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4844
32. Hwang Y, Kim Y, Kang D, Kim Y, Liebeskind D. Impact of target arterial residual stenosis on outcome after endovascular revascularization. Stroke. (2016) 47:1850–7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013046
33. Tei H, Uchiyama S, Ohara K, Kobayashi M, Uchiyama Y, Fukuzawa M. Deteriorating ischemic stroke in 4 clinical categories classified by the oxfordshire community stroke project. Stroke. (2000) 31:2049–54. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.31.9.2049
34. Tsang ACO, Orru E, Klostranec JM, Yang IH, Lau KK, Tsang FCP, et al. Thrombectomy outcomes of intracranial atherosclerosis-related occlusions. Stroke. (2019) 50:1460–6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024889
Keywords: basilar artery, acute stroke, revascularization, prognostic factor, endovascular treatment
Citation: Zhong X, Tong X, Sun X, Gao F, Mo D, Wang Y and Miao Z (2020) Early Neurological Deterioration Despite Recanalization in Basilar Artery Occlusion Treated by Endovascular Therapy. Front. Neurol. 11:592003. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.592003
Received: 06 August 2020; Accepted: 15 October 2020;
Published: 19 November 2020.
Edited by:Johannes Boltze, University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Reviewed by:Tiina Sairanen, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Finland
Daniel Kaiser, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Germany
Copyright © 2020 Zhong, Tong, Sun, Gao, Mo, Wang and Miao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
†These authors have contributed equally to this work