Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 21 October 2021
Sec. Epilepsy

Occult Autoimmune Background for Epilepsy—The Preliminary Study on Antibodies Against Neuronal Surface Antigens

\nEdyta Dziadkowiak
Edyta Dziadkowiak1*Helena MoreiraHelena Moreira2Katarzyna Buska-MachKatarzyna Buska-Mach3Magdalena SzmyrkaMagdalena Szmyrka4S&#x;awomir BudrewiczSławomir Budrewicz1Ewa BargEwa Barg2Marta JanikMarta Janik3Anna Pokryszko-DraganAnna Pokryszko-Dragan1
  • 1Department of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
  • 2Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
  • 3Euroimmun Poland, Wroclaw, Poland
  • 4Department of Rheumatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland

Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the incidence of antibodies against neuronal surface antigens (NSA-ab) in patients with different types of epilepsy, in comparison with the subjects diagnosed with immune-mediated disorders.

Methods: Forty patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) of unknown origin, 16 with post-stroke epilepsy, and 23 with systemic autoimmune disorders (SAD) with CNS involvement were included. NSA-ab were sought in serum using indirect immunofluorescence method. Relationships were analyzed between presence of NSA-ab and clinical presentation.

Results: NSA-ab was detected in the sera from five patients: anti-DPPX in one patient, anti-AMPAR1/R2 in two, anti-LGI1 in one and, in one case, both anti-CASPR2 and DPPX IgG. Out of these five patients, three represented the SAD subgroup and two the DRE subgroup. None of the patients with post-stroke epilepsy was positive for NSA-ab.

Significance: Autoimmune etiology is worth considering in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy of unknown origin. The presence of NSA-ab in patients with systemic autoimmune disorders may be caused by unspecifically enhanced autoimmune reactivity. NSA-ab seem not to be related to epilepsy resulting from ischemic brain injury.

Introduction

Epilepsy affects up to 1.0% of the world population, and its effective management still constitutes a challenge. In recent years, there has been a significant expansion in our understanding of heterogeneous etiology of the epilepsy, underpinned by advances in modern neuroimaging and genetic testing. In 2017, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Classification of the Epilepsies recognized a range of etiologic groups, with autoimmune background regarded for the first time as an independent cause for epilepsy (1).

Systemic autoimmune diseases with involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) and epilepsy co-occur frequently. Some isolated autoimmune CNS disorders have been also identified with seizures as one of their core symptoms (2, 3). IgG autoantibodies against proteins on the neuronal surface (NSA-ab) are considered as main pathogens and markers in these disorders. NSA-ab include antibodies against voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC) complex (leucine-rich glioma inactivated (1LGI1), contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2), N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), gamma-amino-butyric B receptor (GABABR), alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR), a subtype of glutamate receptor, dipeptidyl-peptidase-like protein 6 (DPPX), a regulatory protein of the Kv4.2 potassium channels (3, 4). Apart from NSA-ab, antibodies targeted against intracellular antigens (Hu, Ma, CV2, amphiphysin, Delta/Notch-like EGF-related receptor, Sox1, and glutamic acid decarboxylase) may also account for a specific group of immune-mediated CNS orders, usually of paraneoplastic origin and infrequently associated with epileptic seizures (5). Currently, the antibodies that target molecules on the surface of neurons seem most relevant in epileptology, although the full spectrum of autoantibody-related epilepsies is yet to be understood (6). Other autoantibodies target intracellular antigens, such as those directed against the enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and onconeuronal antibodies.

The process of epileptogenesis may be mediated by NSA-ab through different pathways. They are hypothesized to mediate neuronal dysfunction (via ion channels and/or membrane receptors activity) or to be directly involved in inflammatory or ischemic damage to the cerebral structures (4, 6, 7). It is also presumed that these antibodies rather act as markers of the pathological process than actively contribute to CNS injury. Better recognition of putative autoimmune background for seizures and identification of the patients probable to have such an etiology of epilepsy seems substantial to optimize the diagnostic and treatment strategies.

In view of that, we aimed at investigating incidence of NSA-ab comparatively in the groups of patients with epilepsy of unknown origin, with symptomatic post-stroke epilepsy, and with systemic autoimmune disorders affecting CNS. Our second goal was to analyze relationships between the presence of NSA-ab and clinical presentation.

Materials

The study comprised 79 patients (35 men, 44 women, average aged 45, 6 years), hospitalized or consulted at the Department of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, in the years 2018–2019, who were selected on the basis of the documented diagnosis and course of the disease.

Three specific subgroups of patients were determined as follows:

(1) The patients diagnosed with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) of unknown origin. DRE was recognized, according to the ILAE definition, based on failure to achieve sustained seizure freedom with adequate trials of two well-tolerated and appropriately chosen and used AED schedules (whether as monotherapies or in combination) (8). Exclusion criteria in this subgroup included structural changes in the brain in magnetic resonance (MRI) and a history and evidence of infectious, immune-mediated, metabolic disorders or substance abuse as potential background for epilepsy.

(2) The patients with post-stroke epilepsy (PSE), defined as two or more unprovoked epileptic seizures following stroke, which occurred more than 2 weeks after its acute phase, and in the absence of other obvious causes or a history of prestroke epilepsy (911). Patients with PSE and stroke in the course of systemic autoimmune disease were assigned to subgroup 3.

(3) The patients diagnosed with immune-mediated systemic autoimmune disorders (SAD) with symptoms and signs of the nervous system involvement. SAD comprised systemic lupus erythematosus (diagnosed according to SLICC 2012 classification criteria) (12), antiphospholipid syndrome (Sydney classification criteria) (13), primary Sjogren syndrome (14), and undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD)—disorders that share clinical and serological manifestations with definite SAD but do not fulfill any of the specific classification criteria (15).

Characteristics of the Studied Subgroups

The age and gender structure of numbers of patients assigned to subgroups (1)–(3), are presented in the Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Age and gender structure of the studied subgroups.

Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

The classification of the seizures according to standardized diagnostic (revised) guidelines by the International League Against Epilepsy. Five patients had more than one type of seizure. Table 2 shows the distribution of patients by epilepsy type.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Types of epilepsy in subjects with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Duration of DRE ranged from 6 to 16 years (median of 7.4 years). Having experienced three to five failed attempts of anti-epileptic treatment regimen, all the patients with DRE were currently undergoing polytherapy with two or three AEDs (Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. AED combinations in patients with DRE.

Post-stroke Epilepsy

This subgroup involved 16 patients: 13 with previous ischemic stroke and 3 with previous hemorrhagic one, confirmed with CT scan. All the strokes were located in the cerebral cortex: hemorrhagic ones—in the right hemisphere, ischemic strokes—in the left (11 cases) or right (5 cases) hemisphere.

In 56% (9/16 patients), seizures occurred within 12 months after the stroke, and in the remaining 7/16 patients, they occurred within a longer period. Duration of PSE ranged from 2 to 38 years (mean: 6.0 years). Patients, 7/16, had focal seizures (Table 4).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Types of epilepsy in subjects with post-stroke epilepsy.

All the patients with PSE were undergoing monotherapy: in 12 cases with levetiracetam, in 3 with carbamazepine, and in 1 with sodium valproate.

Immune-Mediated Disorders

Twenty-three patients were diagnosed with SAD-−12 with systemic lupus erythematosus, 8 with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), 1 with systemic lupus erythematosus and secondary Sjogren syndrome, and 2 patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease. Neuropsychiatric manifestations included cognitive impairment, TIA/strokes, transverse myelitis, polyneuropathy, tension headache, depression, and psychosis. EEG was abnormal in 12 patients. All the patients were undergoing immunosuppressive treatment.

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to their participation in the study. The study protocol was approved by the Bioethics Committee at Wroclaw Medical University.

Methods

In all the patients, presence of NAbs was investigated using the IIFT Autoimmune Encephalitis Mosaic 6 test (EUROIMMUN), BD Vacutainer® Plus Plastic Serum Tubes (BD, Poland). In the patients from subgroups 1 and 2, blood sample was collected at least 24 h after a recent epileptic seizure, and in the subjects with IME, it was collected prior to the first infusion of intravenous immunoglobulins.

Blood Sample

Blood was collected into BD Vacutainer® Plus Plastic Serum Tubes (BD, Poland). The blood samples were centrifuged at 500 × g for 15 min. The serum was transferred to a polypropylene tube and stored at 4°C until the time of analysis. For longer storage, the serum samples were frozen at −20°C. The analysis was routinely carried out within 2 weeks of blood collection.

Evaluation of Antineuronal Antibodies in Serum

The presence of human IgG immunoglobulins against neuronal surface antigens in the serum of patients was assessed by indirect immunofluorescence methods using the IIFT Autoimmune Encephalitis Mosaic 6 test kit (EUROIMMUN, Poland). The test enables qualitative or semiquantitative determination of six antineuronal antibodies against glutamate receptor—type NMDA and type AMPA1/2, CASPR2, LGI1, DPPX, and GABAB receptors (GABARB1/B2).

Positive samples were re-analyzed at a 1:100 dilution. The results were evaluated as positive or negative.

In the patients seropositive for NSA-ab, clinical presentation and other diagnostic findings were thoroughly analyzed.

Results

NSA-ab was detected in the sera from five (6, 3%) patients: in two patients anti-AMPAR1/R2, in one patient anti-CASPR2, in two patients anti-DPPX, in one patient anti-LGI1. In one case, both anti-CASPR2 and DPPX IgG were found. Out of these five patients, three represented subgroup 3 (diagnosed with SLE) and two represented subgroup 1 (DRE). None of the patients with PSE (subgroup 2) was positive for the studied Ig (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Detection of human antineuronal antibodies in the serum of patients using indirect immunofluorescence methods (IIFT Autoimmune Encephalitis Mosaic 6 test, EUROIMMUN, Poland). Slides were evaluated using fluorescence microscopy with excitation filter 450–490 nm, color separator 510 nm, blocking filter 515 nm, and optical magnification of × 400 (AMPAR 1/2, CASPR2, DPPX, GABARB1/B2, LGI1; ×200 (NMDAR). Positive staining: (a1, b1) anti-AMPAR1/R2 positive; (c5) anti-LGI1 positive; (d3), (e3) anti-DPPX positive; (e2) anti-CASPR2 positive. Negative reaction: (a2–a6, b2–b6, c1–c4, c6, d1–d2, d4–d6, e1, e4–e6).

The clinical characteristics of the patients positive for NSA-ab were as follows.

Anti-AMPAR1/R2 Positive

This is a case of a 62-year-old man with SLE (predominant kidney involvement) and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome. At 48 years of age, he suffered from ischemic stroke and toe ischemia, and his immunological markers included ANA at a titer of 1:3,200 specified as anti-dsDNA, anti-Ro52, anti-RNP, and anti-CENP. He was positive for lupus anticoagulant; other antiphospholipid antibodies were not detected. Eight years later, he was diagnosed with epilepsy (focal seizures with motor onset and preserved awareness) and effectively treated with VPA (the last epileptic seizure occurred at 57 years of age). Brain MRI showed multiple vascular lesions within the subcortical white matter and cerebral cortex of both hemispheres, with segmental cortical atrophy. The EEG recording was normal. He was currently being treated with prednisone, azathioprine, chloroquine, and acenocoumarol.

This is a case of a 69-year-old woman with SLE and secondary antiphospholipid syndrome. She was diagnosed with lupus at the age of 50. Her SLE manifestations included arthralgia, myalgia, pleuritis, anemia, leukopenia, and kidney involvement. She had a high titer of ANA (anti-dsDNA and anti RNP)-−1:10,000, low levels of complement components C3 and C4. She was positive for lupus anticoagulant; other antiphospholipid antibodies were not detected. At the age of 54, she suffered from ischemic stroke in the right cerebellar hemisphere, without permanent neurological deficit. No epileptic seizures had been observed. The EEG recordings were normal. Clinical and electrophysiological features of polyneuropathy were found.

The patient was being treated with prednisone, chloroquine, and acenocoumarol.

Anti-LGI1 Positive

This is a case of a 57-year-old woman with SLE and secondary Sjogren syndrome. She was diagnosed at the age of 41 and presented with arthralgia, rash, photosensitivity, pleuritis, and sicca syndrome. She was positive for ANA at a titer of 1:1,000, characterized as anti-dsDNA, anti-Ro 52, anti-Ro/SSA, and anti-La/SSB. Complement levels were low, and antiphospholipid antibodies were not detected. From the age of 43, she also developed fibromyalgia. Her neuropsychiatric symptoms included cognitive impairment and depression, without history of seizures. The EEG recordings were normal. The MRI showed multifocal cortical infarcts in the both frontal and parietal lobes. She had paresthesia of the limbs, but the nerve conduction studies and electromyography showed no abnormalities. The patient was being treated with methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and methylprednisolone.

Anti-DPPX Positive

This is a case of an 18-year-old man suffering from DRE of unknown origin. Epilepsy was diagnosed at the age of 13 and defined as drug-resistant at the age of 16. Seizures (generalized onset tonic–clonic) occurred twice a month. The MRI of the brain was normal. The normal CSF result was obtained. In an EEG recording, interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) as bilateral spikes and slow waves were observed, with normal background activity.

Anti-CASPR2 and Anti-DPPX Positive

This is a case of a 60-year-old man suffering from DRE of unknown origin. Epilepsy was diagnosed at the age of 45 and defined as drug-resistant at the age of 58. Two types of seizures occurred: tonic–clonic ones with generalized onset and focal ones with non-motor (emotional) onset and preserved awareness. In addition, the patient was diagnosed with mixed personality disorder. The MR of the brain was normal. The normal CSF result was obtained. In EEG recordings, generalized (predominantly left) slowing (delta waves) of background activity was observed, without paroxysmal discharges.

Discussion

The relationships between autoimmune mechanisms and epilepsy remain unclear. The seizures are likely to be caused by a variety of mechanisms, including specific and non-specific immunity, neuronal damage, and ischemia (4, 7, 8). It is still a matter of debate, whether epilepsy may be the only clinical manifestation of autoimmune encephalitis or whether immune-mediated mechanisms may contribute to development of seizures following previous structural damage to the brain (1, 2, 16, 17). The design of our preliminary study (especially the structure of the studied subgroups) was meant to address the above theories.

In our study, NSA-ab was not found in any patient with post-stroke epilepsy. It can be therefore supposed that these antibodies do not mediate epileptogenesis in the case of structural changes in the brain (at least specifically in cerebrovascular disease). Elisak et al. (18) explored the prevalence of neural-surface antibodies and antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) in patients with chronic temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Significant levels of antibodies were detected in 8 out of 163 (5%) TLE patients, while five patients had uni- or bilateral temporal lobe lesions in MRI, and three patients had not. However, seropositive subjects had some immune-mediated comorbidities (autoimmune thyroiditis, type 1 diabetes). In six of these patients, immunotherapy was applied, and in three, it resulted in reduction of seizures. The study from Vanli-Yavuz et al. (19) showed the presence of neuronal autoantibodies in 22.5% of the patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS) and found that advanced neuroimaging findings in the extra/temporal region were significantly more frequent in the seropositive group. Ekizoglu et al. (20) reported a similar prevalence of NSA-ab (23%) in the patients with MTLE-HS, while Nóbrega-Jr et al. (21) found NSA-ab in none of 100 patients with this diagnosis. It should be highlighted that the causative relationships between mesial temporal sclerosis and epilepsy still remain unclear), including the hypothesis of hippocampal sclerosis resulting from the evolution of limbic emcephalitis (2022). According to the definition of post-stroke epilepsy, in our PSE subgroup, possible contributing comorbidities or prestroke epilepsy had been excluded, so seizures were definitely following vascular damage to the brain.

Subjects, 2 out of 40, with drug-resistant epilepsy of unknown origin were positive for NSA-ab. Gozubatik-Celik et al. (23) demonstrated the presence of neuronal autoantibodies in ca. 14% patients with focal epilepsy of unknown cause (Abs against VGKC-complex, VGCC, GAD, LGI1, CASPR2, NMDA, AMPA, and GABAB receptors), and a similar frequency (up to 20%) for epilepsy with unknown origin was reported by other authors (18, 20, 24). Recognition of immune-mediated background in cases of unknown origin of epilepsy, especially a drug-resistant one, is crucial because it allows application of targeted and possibly efficacious immunotherapy. Treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins was shown to reduce frequency of seizures in drug-resistant cases of epilepsy of various etiologies (25, 26). Especially, the subjects with Abs against neuronal cell-surface proteins are expected to respond well to such treatment (24, 27).

Seizures may occur as a clinical manifestation of autoimmune encephalitis, but are usually accompanied by other typical symptoms: cognitive decline, psychiatric disorders, and disturbed consciousness, and often resolve after effective treatment of encephalitis (7, 2837).

Except for seizures, both our patients with anti- DPPX and anti-CASPR2 Abs did not develop other clinical presentation typical for encephalitis. It is suggested that in a small percentage of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, seropositive for NSA-ab, other subtle signs of CNS involvement can be revealed after a thorough search (3). Furthermore, to verify the diagnosis of encephalitis, the presence of NSA-ab should be confirmed in CSF. In our patients, general CSF evaluation conducted at the onset of epileptic seizures (from 6 to 16 years before entering this study) revealed correct general examination of the cerebrospinal fluid; virological tests were negative. After obtaining the current results of NSA-ab in the serum, we offered these two patients specific CSF testing, but they did not give their consent to lumbar puncture.

It is worth highlighting, that three out of five patients with confirmed presence of NSA-ab were diagnosed with SLE, although only two of them presented with clinical symptoms of CNS involvement. Possible background of epilepsy in systemic autoimmune disorders may be associated with autoimmune inflammation, which crosses the blood–brain barrier and directly affects cerebral neurons, or secondary damage to the brain due to ischemic injury or calcifications (celiac disease, SLE) (38, 39). SLE is the prototype of SAD that can involve the complete spectrum of psychiatric and neurological disorders. Epilepsy may occur in 2.1–11.6% of SLE patients (4, 37). It has been shown to be associated with stroke in the course of SLE and with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA): anti-cardiolipin (aCL), lupus anticoagulants (LA), and anti-beta 2 glycoprotein 1 (3538). APLA, apart from causing microvascular thrombosis and ischemic damage to the brain, is supposed also to react directly with neuronal cells and contribute to their dysfunction, including epileptogenesis (35). However, patients with neuropsychiatric manifestation of SLE (NPSLE) were demonstrated to have elevated levels not only of APLA but also anti-ribosomal P Abs and anti-neuronal Abs (36, 38). In addition, Hirohata et al. (40) found antibodies against the linear epitope in the NR2 subunit of the NMDA receptor in the sera of 61% of patients with NPSLE (35, 38, 41). Anty-NMDAR has been also shown to be part of the anti-dsDNA antibodies. Furthermore, there is some evidence in the literature for co-occurence of NSA-ab in other inflammatory CNS disorders, e.g., the presence of anti-NMDAR, anti-VGKC or anti-GlyR Abs in the patients with sporadic forms of Creutzfeld–Jacob disease (33, 42, 43), and anti-NMDAR antibodies in patients with herpes encephalitis, or in those with previous HSV-1 infection It has been hypothesized that inflammatory brain injury exposes NMDARs and triggers autoimmune response against them (40, 4449).

There are a few hypotheses explaining the co-occurence of different types of autoAbs, irrespective of clinical presentation. First, cross-linking and internalization is a common mechanism for autoantibodies targeting ionotropic receptors (4, 5, 28). Second, due to cross-reactivity or molecular mimicry, autoimmune response may be triggered against neuronal antigens parallel to the other ones (45, 46). Finally, increase in humoral response not specific for a particular systemic autoimmune disease may result from general upregulation of the immune system (8, 17).

Our study has some limitations, including relatively small sample size and heterogeneity of the group with immune-mediated disorders, which might have affected the results. Another limitation was the determination of autoAbs only in the serum, without CSF testing. Therefore, the findings have to be interpreted very cautiously. However, the study was meant to provide some preliminary results, supporting and giving direction to further investigations. To allow a better insight in a concept of immune-mediated background for epilepsy, these should include a sensitive and specific method of testing a wide panel of NSA-ab in the serum and CSF conducted in carefully selected groups of epileptic patients.

Conclusions

Despite a small percentage of NSA-ab-positive patients in the study group, autoimmune etiology is worth considering in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy of unknown origin. The presence of NSA-ab in patients with systemic autoimmune disorders, especially without typical clinical manifestation, may be caused by unspecifically enhanced autoimmune reactivity. NSA-ab seem not to be related to epilepsy resulting from ischemic brain injury.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Bioethics Committee of Wroclaw Medical University. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

ED conceptualized and designed the study. ED and HM drafted the manuscript. ED, KB-M, MS, SB, EB, MJ, and AP-D critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. ED, HM, KB-M, and MS collected the data. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This study was supported by Wroclaw Medical University SUB.C.220.21.028.

Conflict of Interest

KB-M and MJ was employed by company Euroimmun Poland.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

NSA-ab, antibodies against neuronal surface antigens; mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis; SAD, systemic autoimmune disorders; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; NPSLE, neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus.

References

1. Scheffer IE, Berkovic S, Capovilla G, Connolly MB, French J, Guilhoto L, et al. ILAE classification of the epilepsies: position paper of the ILAE commission for classification and terminology. Epilepsia. (2017) 58:512–21. doi: 10.1111/epi.13709

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Bien C, Holtkamp M. “Autoimmune epilepsy”: encephalitis with autoantibodies for epileptologists. Epilepsy Curr. (2017) 17:134–41. doi: 10.5698/1535-7511.17.3.134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Irani S, Bien C, Lang B. Autoimmune epilepsies. Curr Opin Neurol. (2011) 24:146–53. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283446f05

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Vincent A, Crino PB. Systemic and neurologic autoimmune disorders associated with seizures or epilepsy. Epilepsia. (2011) 52:12–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03030.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Serafini A, Lukas RV, VanHaerents S, Warnke P, Tao JX, Rose S, et al. Paraneoplastic epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. (2016) 61:51–8. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.04.046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Bien C, Scheffer I. Autoantibodies and epilepsy. Epilepsia. (2011) 52:18–22.

Google Scholar

7. Bauer J, Becker AJ, Elyaman W, Peltola J, Rüegg S, Titulaer MJ, et al. Innate and adaptive immunity in human epilepsies. Epilepsia. (2017) 58:57–68. doi: 10.1111/epi.13784

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Husari KS, Dubey D. Autoimmune epilepsy. Neurotherapeutics. (2019) 16:685–702. doi: 10.1007/s13311-019-00750-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Kwan P, Arzimanoglou A, Berg AT, Brodie MJ, Allen Hauser W, Mathern G, et al. Definition of drug resistant epilepsy: consensus proposal by the ad hoc task force of the ILAE commission on therapeutic strategies. Epilepsia. (2010) 51:1069–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02397.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Hassani M, Cooray G, Sveinsson O, Cooray C. Post-stroke epilepsy in an ischemic stroke cohort-incidence and diagnosis. Acta Neurol Scand. (2020) 141:141–7. doi: 10.1111/ane.13174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Myint PK, Staufenberg EFA, Sabanathan K. Post-stroke seizure and post-stroke epilepsy. Postgrad Med J. (2006) 82:568–72. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.041426

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Zhao Y, Li X, Zhang K, Tong T, Cui R. The progress of epilepsy after stroke. Curr Neuropharmacol. (2018) 16:71–8. doi: 10.2174/1570159X15666170613083253

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcón GS, Gordon C, Merrill JT, Fortin PR, et al. Derivation and validation of the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. (2012) 64:267–86. doi: 10.1002/art.34473

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost. (2006) 4:295–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, Seror R, Criswell LA, Labetoulle M, Lietman TM, et al. 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome. a consensus and data-driven methodology involving three international patient cohorts. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2017) 69:35–45. doi: 10.1002/art.39859

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kosenkov AM, Teplov IY, Sergeev AI, Maiorov SA, Zinchenko VP, Gaidin SG. Domoic acid suppresses hyperexcitation in the network due to activation of kainate receptors of GABAergic neurons. Arch Biochem Biophys. (2019) 15:52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2019.06.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Brimberg L, Mader S, Fujieda Y, Arinuma Y, Kowal C, Volpe BT, et al. Antibodies as mediators of brain pathology. Trends Immunol. (2015) 36:709–24. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Elisak M, Krysl D, Hanzalova J, Volna K, Bien CG, Leypoldt F, et al. The prevalence of neural antibodies in temporal lobe epilepsy and the clinical characteristics of seropositive patients. Seizure. (2018) 63:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.09.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Vanli-Yavuz EN, Erdag E, Tuzun E, Ekizoglu E, Baysal-Kirac L, Ulusoy C, et al. Neuronal autoantibodies in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2016) 87:684–92. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-313146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ekizoglu E, Tuzun E, Woodhall M, Lang B, Jacobson L, Icoz S, et al. Investigation of neuronal autoantibodies in two different focal epilepsy syndromes. Epilepsia. (2014) 55:414–22. doi: 10.1111/epi.12528

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Nóbrega-Jr AW, Gregory CP, Schlindwein-Zanini R, Neves FS, Wolf P, Walz R, et al. Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis is infrequently associated with neuronal autoantibodies. Epilepsia. (2018) 59:e152–6. doi: 10.1111/epi.14534

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Bien CG, Urbach H, Schramm J, Soeder BM, Becker AJ, Voltz R, et al. Limbic encephalitis as a precipitating event in adult-onset temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. (2007) 69:1236–44. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000276946.08412.ef

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Gozubatik-Celik G, Ozkara C, Ulusoy C, Gunduz A, Delil S, Yeni N, et al. Anti-neuronal autoantibodies in both drug responsive and resistant focal seizures with unknown cause. Epilepsy Res. (2017) 135:131–6. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.06.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Tecellioglu M, Kamisli O, Kamisli S, Yucel FE, Ozcan C. Neurological autoantibodies in drug-resistant epilepsy of unknown cause. Ir J Med Sci. (2018) 187:1057–63. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1777-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Fois A, Vascotto M. Use of intravenous immunoglobulins in drug-resistant epilepsy. Childs Nerv Syst. (1990) 6:400–5. doi: 10.1007/BF00302227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Bello-Espinosa LE, Rajapakse T, Rho JM, Buchhalter J. Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in a cohort of children with drug-resistant epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol. (2015) 52:509–16. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.11.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Spatola M, Dalmau J. Seizures and risk of epilepsy in autoimmune and other inflammatory encephalitis. Curr Opin Neurol. (2017) 30:345–53. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000449

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Geis C, Planagumà J, Carreño M, Graus F, Dalmau J. Autoimmune seizures and epilepsy. J Clin Invest. (2019) 129:926–40. doi: 10.1172/JCI125178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. van Sonderen A, Ariño H, Petit-Pedrol M, Leypoldt F, Körtvélyessy P, Wandinger KP, et al. The clincial spectrum of Caspr2 antibody-associated effects. Neurology. (2016) 87:521–28. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002917

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Romoli M, Krashia P, Sen A, Franciotta D, Gastaldi M, Nobili A, et al. Hippocampal epileptogenesis in autoimmune encephalitis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. (2019) 6:2261–69. doi: 10.1002/acn3.50919

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Balint B, Jarius S, Nagel S, Haberkorn U, Probst C, Blöcker IM, et al. Progressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity and myoclonus: a new variant with DPPX antibodies. Neurology. (2014) 82:1521–28. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000372

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Nosadini M, Toldo I, Tascini B, Bien CG, Parmeggiani L, De Gaspari P, et al. LGI1 and CASPR2 autoimmunity in children: systematic literature review and report of a young girl with Morvan syndrome. J Neuroimmunol. (2019) 335:577008. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2019.577008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Rickards H, Jaco S, Lennox B, Nicholson T. Autoimmune encephalitis: a potentially treatable cause of mental disorder. Adv Psychiatr Treat. (2014) 20:92–100. doi: 10.1192/apt.bp.113.011304

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Serratrice G, Serratrice J. Continuous muscle activity, morvan's syndrome and limbic encephalitis: ionic or non ionic disorders? Acta Myol. (2011) 30:32–3.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

35. Yang J, Sun Q, Yang G. Pilomotor seizures in a patient with LGI1 encephalitis. Front Neurol. (2020) 20:61. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. d'Orsi G, Martino T, Lalla A, Claudio MTD, Carapelle E, Avolio C. Faciobrachial dystonic seizures expressed as epileptic spasms, followed by focal seizures in anti-LGI1 encephalitis: a video-polygraphic study. Epileptic Disord. (2018) 20:525–9. doi: 10.1684/epd.2018.1010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Höftberger R, van Sonderen A, Leypoldt F, Houghton D, Geschwind M, Gelfand J, et al. Encephalitis and AMPA receptor antibodies: novel findings in a case series of 22 patients. Neurology. (2015) 84:2403–12. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001682

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Colasanti T, Delunardo F, Margutti P, Vacirca D, Piro E, Siracusano A, et al. Autoantibodies involved in neuropsychiatric manifestations associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Neuroimmunol. (2009) 212:3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.05.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Fleetwood T, Cantello R, Comi C. Antiphospholipid syndrome and the neurologist: from pathogenesis to therapy. Frontiers in Neurology. (2018) 9:1001. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Hirohata S, Tanaka R. Differential expression of antibodies to NMDA receptor in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis and in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med. (2019) 13:e000359. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Shaban A, Leira EC. Neurological complications in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. (2019) 19:97. doi: 10.1007/s11910-019-1012-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Rossi M, Mead S, Collinge J, Rudge P, Vincent A. Neuronal antibodies in patients with suspected or confirmed sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2015) 86:692–4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-308695

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Prüss H, Finke C, Höltje M, Hofmann J, Klingbeil C, Probst C, et al. N-methyl-d-aspartate receptos antibodies in herpes simplex encephalitis. Ann Neurol. (2012) 72:902–11. doi: 10.1002/ana.23689

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Salovin A, Glanzman J, Roslin K, Armangue T, Lynch DR, Panzer JA. Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis and nonencephalitic HSV-1 infection. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. (2018) 5:e458. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000458

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Faust TW, Chang EH, Kowal C, Berlin R, Gazaryan IG, Bertini E. Neurotoxic lupus autoantibodies alter brain function through two distinct mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2010) 107:18569–74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006980107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Kowal C, Diamond B. Aspects of CNS lupus: mouse models of anti-NMDA receptor antibody mediated reactivity. Methods Mol Biol. (2012) 900:181–206. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-720-4_9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Ho RC, Thiaghu C, Ong H, Lu Y, Ho CS, Tam WW, et al. Meta-analysis of serum and cerebrospinal fluid autoantibodies in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev. (2016) 15:124–38. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.10.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Appenzeller S, Cendes F, Costallat LT. Epileptic seizures in systemic lupus erythematosus. Neurology. (2004) 63:1808–12. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000144178.32208.4F

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Mosca M, Tani C, Vagnani S, Carli L, Bombardieri S. The diagnosis and classification of undifferentiated connective tissue diseases. J Autoimmun. (2014) 48–9:50–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.01.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: neuronal autoantibodies, epilepsy, connective tissue disorders, epileptogenesis, autoimmune reactivity

Citation: Dziadkowiak E, Moreira H, Buska-Mach K, Szmyrka M, Budrewicz S, Barg E, Janik M and Pokryszko-Dragan A (2021) Occult Autoimmune Background for Epilepsy—The Preliminary Study on Antibodies Against Neuronal Surface Antigens. Front. Neurol. 12:660126. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.660126

Received: 28 January 2021; Accepted: 20 September 2021;
Published: 21 October 2021.

Edited by:

Yuping Wang, Capital Medical University, China

Reviewed by:

Carlo Di Bonaventura, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Lécio Figueira Pinto, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil

Copyright © 2021 Dziadkowiak, Moreira, Buska-Mach, Szmyrka, Budrewicz, Barg, Janik and Pokryszko-Dragan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Edyta Dziadkowiak, edyta.dziadkowiak@umed.wroc.pl; orcid.org/0000-0002-9618-9308

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.