ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 05 June 2025

Sec. Artificial Intelligence in Neurology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1567525

Evaluating the value of machine learning models for predicting hematoma expansion in acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage based on CT imaging features of hematomas and surrounding oedema

Tianyu Yang,Tianyu Yang1,2Zhen ZhaoZhen Zhao3Yan GuYan Gu1Shengkai YangShengkai Yang2Yonggang ZhangYonggang Zhang1Lei LiLei Li1Ting WangTing Wang2Zhongchang Miao
Zhongchang Miao1*
  • 1Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, China
  • 2Department of Radiology, Affiliated Binhai Hospital, Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University, Yancheng, China
  • 3Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Functional Imaging, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

Objective: This study evaluates the utility of artificial intelligence (AI) for automated segmentation of intracranial hematomas and surrounding oedema in non-contrast computed tomography (CT) images. Additionally, it aims to extract imaging features for developing machine learning models to predict hematoma expansion in acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH).

Methods: Data from 183 patients with acute spontaneous hemorrhage, treated at Lianyungang Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University between January 2020 and December 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into training (n = 128) and testing (n = 55) sets in a 7:3 ratio. CT images were segmented using United Imaging uAI software and both imaging features and clinical characteristics were extracted. Independent risk factors were identified through univariate analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Machine learning algorithms were applied to construct predictive models for hematoma expansion. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC).

Results: Eight feature parameters were extracted from the CT images. The comprehensive model achieved an AUC of 0.9027, with a sensitivity of 0.8235 and specificity of 0.8831. A simplified model utilizing four imaging features yielded an AUC of 0.8897, with a sensitivity of 0.7451 and specificity of 0.9221, slightly underperforming compared to the comprehensive model. Incorporating the subjective ‘swirl sign’, identified as the most significant feature in univariate analysis, into the simplified model enhanced its performance. This optimized model achieved an AUC of 0.9524, with a sensitivity of 0.9412 and specificity of 0.9091, surpassing both the comprehensive and simplified models.

Conclusion: The optimized model, based on CT imaging features of hematomas and surrounding oedema, offers a practical and reliable tool for predicting hematoma expansion in sICH. Its robust performance supports its utility in emergency settings to guide clinical decision-making effectively.

1 Introduction

Cerebrovascular diseases are among the leading causes of mortality in urban and rural populations in China, with haemorrhagic stroke accounting for approximately 20–30% of all stroke cases (1). Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), the most common subtype of haemorrhagic stroke (2), is frequently associated with early hematoma expansion (HE), a critical factor contributing to rapid neurological deterioration and poor clinical outcomes (3). Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have facilitated the development of predictive models for hematoma expansion using radiomics and deep learning techniques (4, 5). However, the clinical utility of these models has been hindered by non-real-time data processing and non-intuitive outputs. Leveraging advancements in AI-based image segmentation, this study aims to employ automated segmentation of baseline non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans to extract critical imaging features. These features are then utilized to develop a machine learning model for the rapid and efficient identification of hematoma expansion risks, enhancing decision-making in emergency settings.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study population

This retrospective study of patients with sICH admitted to The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between January 2020 and December 2023. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Age greater than 18 years; (2) Diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage confirmed via non-contrast head CT; (3) Initial head CT performed within 6 h of symptom onset, followed by a follow up CT within 24 h; (4) Availability of complete clinical and laboratory records. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Presence of arteriovenous malformation, aneurysm, brain tumor or haemorrhagic transformation from cerebral infarction; (2) Lack of follow-up CT or prior surgical intervention before the first follow-up CT; (3) CT artifacts precluding accurate evaluation; (4) Recent anticoagulant therapy or history of coagulopathy. Patients were classified into expansion and non-expansion groups based on post-recheck CT findings for hematoma expansion, defined as either a ≥ 33% relative increase in baseline hematoma volume or an absolute increase of ≥ 6 mL. Cases were randomly divided into training (n = 128) and testing (n = 55) sets using the random number generator in the Shukun Research Platform, maintaining a 7:3 ratio. A total of 183 patients with sICH were enrolled in the study. Among them, 86 patients exhibited hematoma expansion, while 97 patients showed no evidence of hematoma expansion (Figure 1).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flow chart for sICH patients.

2.2 Imaging protocol

Head imaging was performed using multi-slice spiral CT scanners (Discovery CT750, GE Healthcare, USA). Patients were positioned supine with a head-first orientation. Scans covered the skull base to the vertex, with a tube voltage of 120 kV, tube current of 200 mA, slice thickness of 5 mm, matrix size of 512 × 512 and thin-layer reconstruction at 1.25 mm.

2.3 Hematoma imaging segmentation and feature extraction

Baseline and follow-up CT images were retrieved from the PACS system in DICOM format and analyzed using United Imaging uAI software. The software automatically segmented hematomas within the brain parenchyma, surrounding oedema, midline structures and other intracranial regions, providing quantitative data, including hemorrhage diameters (short and long), hematoma volume, surrounding oedema volume, ventricular hematoma volume, midline shift and hematoma volume changes (Figure 2). The accuracy of automatic segmentation was reviewed by a senior neuroradiologist with 10 years of experience, who also identified baseline CT imaging features, including irregular shape, hypodensities, swirl sign, black hole sign, blend sign, satellite sign, island sign and fluid level (610).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of imaging feature segmentation. (A) Initial non-contrast CT scan images of the brain at 2 h after onset; (B) Follow-up CT scan images at 6 h, showing hematoma expansion. Red area: hematoma within the brain parenchyma and its volume; Blue solid line: long and short diameters of the hematoma; Yellow dashed line area: volume of surrounding oedema; Yellow solid line area: hematoma within the ventricles; Green solid line: degree of midline shift. The image in panel A shows the presence of the ‘swirl sign’ within the hematoma.

Demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, history of hypertension and diabetes, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score and laboratory parameters (white blood cell count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], platelet count, blood glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, prothrombin time, PT activity, international normalized ratio [INR], activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT], thrombin time, fibrinogen and D-dimer), were collected for subsequent analysis.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Data analysis was conducted using the Shukun Research Platform. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate clinical and imaging features. Categorical variables were assessed using the χ2 test, normally distributed continuous variables using the t-test and non-normally distributed continuous variables using the Mann–Whitney U test. Variables with statistically significant differences in univariate analyses (p < 0.05) were further analyzed using multivariate logistic regression to identify independent risk factors for hematoma expansion. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Using the selected clinical and imaging features, predictive models were constructed in the training set employing logistic regression, random forest and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms. Model performance was assessed in the testing set by generating receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the area under the curve (AUC).

3 Results

A total of 183 patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) were included in the study and randomly divided into a training set (70%) and a testing set (30%). The training set comprised 128 cases, with 51 in the expansion group and 77 in the non-expansion group. A total of 36 features were analyzed, encompassing demographic characteristics (e.g., age, sex), clinical history, laboratory data (e.g., blood pressure, blood glucose, complete blood count, coagulation parameters) and hematoma-related imaging features (e.g., hematoma size, short-to-long diameter ratio, surrounding oedema volume, swirl sign). Detailed data are provided in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Univariate analysis for HE.

Univariate analysis revealed no significant differences in demographic or clinical laboratory variables between the expansion and non-expansion groups. However, significant differences were observed in imaging features, including initial hematoma volume, short-to-long diameter ratio, surrounding oedema volume, midline shift distance and the presence of hypodensities, swirl sign, black hole sign and island sign (p < 0.05), as shown in Table 1.

Using the eight selected imaging features, predictive models for hematoma expansion were constructed with logistic regression, random forest and SVM methods. The performance metrics, including specificity, sensitivity and AUC, for both the training and testing sets, are presented in Figure 3 and Table 2.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Logistic Regression (blue), Random Forest (green), and SVM (yellow) models specificity, sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for the integrated model in both the training and testing sets.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Specificity, sensitivity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for the integrated model in both the training and testing sets.

Among the hematoma characteristics, features such as hypodensities, swirl signs, black hole signs and island signs are subjectively assessed. Therefore, to enhance objectivity, we constructed the hematoma expansion model using four purely objective imaging indicators. The specificity, sensitivity and AUC of these models for the training and testing sets are summarized in Figure 4 and Table 3.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Logistic Regression (blue), Random Forest (green), and SVM (yellow) models specificity, sensitivity, and AUC of the ROC for the objective model in both the training and testing sets.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Specificity, sensitivity, and AUC of the ROC for the objective model in both the training and testing sets.

Additionally, based on univariate analysis, the swirl sign—identified as having the smallest p-value—was combined with the four objective imaging indicators to develop an enhanced hematoma expansion model. The specificity, sensitivity and AUC for this model in both the training and testing sets are also detailed in Table 4.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Specificity, sensitivity, and AUC of the ROC for the optimized model in both the training and testing sets.

The random forest algorithm, which demonstrated superior performance based on AUC results, was selected for further analysis. The ROC curves for the random forest model in the training and testing sets are depicted in Figure 5.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Specificity, sensitivity, and AUC of the ROC for the optimized model in both the training and testing sets.

The feature weight coefficients are displayed in Figure 6 and Table 5.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Weighting factors for each clinical characteristic in the optimized model.

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Weighting factors for each clinical characteristic in the optimized model.

4 Discussion

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) is a severe condition characterized by rapid onset and expansion, resulting in significant disability and mortality rates that profoundly affect patients’ quality of life (11). Hemorrhage expansion complicates treatment decisions, exacerbates neurological deficits and often leads to unfavorable outcomes, including death (12). Consequently, the early and accurate identification of hematoma expansion is critical for guiding clinical interventions, reducing neurological damage and improving patient prognosis.

CT remains the imaging modality of choice for sICH due to its rapid acquisition speed and high sensitivity in detecting lesions (13). Previous studies have identified several non-contrast CT imaging features, such as the island sign, black hole sign, blend sign and irregular sign, as independent predictors of hematoma expansion (8, 14). However, these features rely heavily on subjective interpretation, requiring significant expertise and experience, which limits their consistency and generalizability. Therefore, developing an objective, automated and accurate prediction model is imperative for advancing ICH management.

In this study, we utilized an AI-based image segmentation model to automate the analysis of non-contrast CT images, enabling the rapid and accurate quantification of hematoma volume, diameters and surrounding oedema. This automated approach demonstrated high reliability and effectively minimized human errors associated with slice selection and manual measurement (15).

To construct a robust prediction model, we integrated readily available clinical data, including patient history and laboratory results, with imaging features derived from CT scans. Univariate analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in demographic or laboratory variables, suggesting that these factors have limited predictive value for hematoma expansion.

Through LASSO regression, we identified eight key imaging features—initial hematoma volume, short-to-long axis ratio of the hematoma, surrounding oedema volume, midline shift distance, hypodensities, swirl sign, black hole sign and island sign—for inclusion in a ‘comprehensive model’. This model achieved an AUC of 0.9027, with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.8235 and 0.8831, respectively, indicating strong predictive performance. However, the inclusion of subjective features such as hypodensities, swirl sign, black hole sign and island sign introduced variability dependent on the diagnostician’s expertise. To enhance objectivity, we developed an ‘objective model’ by excluding subjective features and retaining only quantitative indicators: initial hematoma volume, short-to-long axis ratio, surrounding oedema volume and midline shift distance. This model achieved an AUC of 0.8897, sensitivity of 0.7451 and specificity of 0.9221, demonstrating slightly reduced predictive performance compared to the comprehensive model. Subsequently, we constructed an ‘optimized model’ by reintroducing the swirl sign—a feature with the smallest p-value in univariate analysis—alongside the four objective indicators. The optimized model achieved an AUC of 0.9524, with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.9412 and 0.9091, respectively, demonstrating superior predictive accuracy compared to the other models. On the test set, this model achieved an AUC of 0.7507, sensitivity of 0.7727 and specificity of 0.6667.

In the analysis of feature weights within the ‘optimized model’ for predicting hemorrhage expansion, the short-to-long axis ratio of the hematoma emerged as the most influential imaging feature, contributing a weight of 0.58. A larger ratio, approaching 1, correlates with a higher likelihood of expansion, reflecting a more rounded or irregular hematoma shape. This morphology suggests outward expansion and increased tension. Conversely, a smaller ratio, indicative of an elongated hematoma, implies expansion along interstitial spaces in brain tissue, associated with lower tension (16). Thus, the short-to-long axis ratio serves as a critical indicator of hematoma morphology and expansion potential. Previous studies have established a strong relationship between initial hematoma volume and ICH expansion and prognosis, with larger initial volumes associated with higher early hemorrhage rates (12). The timing of imaging relative to symptom onset further reinforces this relationship, as larger hematomas typically reflect greater instability (17). Surrounding oedema volume, another significant feature, is closely linked to hematoma size (18). Some studies also highlight its association with CTA indicators of hemorrhage expansion, suggesting that surrounding oedema volume may indirectly reflect the likelihood of hematoma expansion (19). Midline shift distance, representing the hematoma’s mass effect, correlates with hematoma volume, surrounding oedema and the rate of expansion. Consequently, it serves as an important marker of hemorrhage expansion (20).

Subjective imaging features such as hypodensities, swirl signs, black hole signs and island signs have been widely recognized as independent predictors of hemorrhage expansion. However, their interpretation is subject to significant variability, heavily reliant on clinician expertise and experience. Studies have reported substantial inter-rater variability for these features, though the swirl sign demonstrates relatively higher consistency (8). In our univariate analysis, the swirl sign showed the most statistically significant association with hemorrhage expansion. While the comprehensive model, which incorporates all four subjective features, exhibited strong predictive efficacy, the optimized model—including only the swirl sign—achieved improved performance. This enhancement is likely due to the swirl sign’s superior diagnostic consistency.

Compared to previous analogous studies (21, 22), our model demonstrates superior accuracy and incorporates AI-driven automated segmentation, significantly enhancing its clinical applicability.

Despite these promising findings, this study has limitations. It is a single-center retrospective analysis with a limited sample size, introducing potential selection bias. Additionally, the timing of CT scans relative to symptom onset was uncertain in some emergency ICH cases, potentially affecting the accuracy of initial imaging features. Future research should employ prospective, multicenter studies with larger sample sizes to validate the reliability and generalizability of the proposed model.

5 Conclusion

This study confirms the effectiveness of an objective feature model derived from non-contrast CT images in predicting hematoma expansion in spontaneous sICH. The inclusion of the swirl sign, a feature with high diagnostic consistency, further enhances the model’s predictive performance. The objective indicators-initial hematoma volume, short-to-long axis ratio of the hematoma, volume of surrounding oedema and midline shift distance-can be rapidly and accurately quantified using AI-driven image segmentation models, ensuring intuitive and reliable results.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (Approval number: LW-20241223001-01). Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the patients/participants or patients/participants' legal guardian/next of kin.

Author contributions

TY: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ZZ: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft. YG: Formal analysis, Project administration, Writing – original draft. SY: Resources, Validation, Writing – original draft. YZ: Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. LL: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft. TW: Project administration, Writing – original draft. ZM: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Science Foundation of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University (KD2024KYJJ176).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. The Writing Committee of the Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China. Report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2022: an updated summary. Biomed Environ Sci. (2023) 36:669–701. doi: 10.3967/bes2023.106

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Greenberg, SM, Ziai, WC, Cordonnier, C, Dowlatshahi, D, Francis, B, Goldstein, JN, et al. 2022 guideline for the Management of Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. (2022) 53:e282–361. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000407

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Puy, L, Parry-Jones, AR, Sandset, EC, Dowlatshahi, D, Ziai, W, and Cordonnier, C. Intracerebral haemorrhage. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2023) 9:14. doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00424-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Xie, H, Ma, S, Wang, X, and Zhang, X. Noncontrast computer tomography-based radiomics model for predicting intracerebral hemorrhage expansion: preliminary findings and comparison with conventional radiological model. Eur Radiol. (2020) 30:87–98. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06378-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zhong, JW, Jin, YJ, Song, ZJ, Lin, B, Lu, XH, Chen, F, et al. Deep learning for automatically predicting early haematoma expansion in Chinese patients. Stroke Vasc Neurol. (2021) 6:610–4. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000647

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Morotti, A, Arba, F, Boulouis, G, and Charidimou, A. Noncontrast CT markers of intracerebral hemorrhage expansion and poor outcome: a meta-analysis. Neurology. (2020) 95:632–43. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010660

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Boulouis, G, Morotti, A, Brouwers, HB, Charidimou, A, Jessel, MJ, Auriel, E, et al. Association between Hypodensities detected by computed tomography and hematoma expansion in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA Neurol. (2016) 73:961–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.1218

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Nehme, A, Ducroux, C, Panzini, MA, Bard, C, Bereznyakova, O, Boisseau, W, et al. Non-contrast CT markers of intracerebral hematoma expansion: a reliability study. Eur Radiol. (2022) 32:6126–35. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08710-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Li, Y, Ren, S, Wang, L, Mao, Y, Wu, G, Li, Q, et al. Is the CT blend sign composed of two parts of blood with different age? Neurocrit Care. (2021) 35:367–78. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01165-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Li, Q, Liu, QJ, Yang, WS, Wang, XC, Zhao, LB, Xiong, X, et al. Island sign: an imaging predictor for early hematoma expansion and poor outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. (2017) 48:3019–25. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017985

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Li, L, Poon, MTC, Samarasekera, NE, Perry, LA, Moullaali, TJ, Rodrigues, MA, et al. Risks of recurrent stroke and all serious vascular events after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: pooled analyses of two population-based studies. Lancet Neurol. (2021) 20:437–47. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00075-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. You, S, Zheng, D, Delcourt, C, Sato, S, Cao, Y, Zhang, S, et al. Determinants of early versus delayed neurological deterioration in intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. (2019) 50:1409–14. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024403

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Rindler, RS, Allen, JW, Barrow, JW, Pradilla, G, and Barrow, DL. Neuroimaging of intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. (2020) 86:E414–23. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa029

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Yang, WS, Zhang, SQ, Shen, YQ, Wei, X, Zhao, LB, Xie, XF, et al. Noncontrast computed tomography markers as predictors of revised hematoma expansion in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. J Am Heart Assoc. (2021) 10:e018248. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018248

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. He, S, Feng, Y, Grant, PE, and Ou, Y. Segmentation ability map: interpret deep features for medical image segmentation. Med Image Anal. (2023) 84:102726. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102726

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Gunda, B, Böjti, P, and Kozák, LR. Hyperacute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage during computed tomography scanning. JAMA Neurol. (2021) 78:365–6. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4355

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Al-Shahi Salman, R, Frantzias, J, Lee, RJ, Lyden, PD, Battey, TWK, Ayres, AM, et al. Absolute risk and predictors of the growth of acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol. (2018) 17:885–94. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30253-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ironside, N, Chen, CJ, Ding, D, Mayer, SA, and Connolly, ES. Perihematomal edema after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. (2019) 50:1626–33. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024965

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Rodriguez-Luna, D, Stewart, T, Dowlatshahi, D, Kosior, JC, Aviv, RI, Molina, CA, et al. Perihematomal edema is greater in the presence of a spot sign but does not predict intracerebral hematoma expansion. Stroke. (2016) 47:350–5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011295

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Zhou, Z, Wu, X, Chen, Y, Tan, Y, Zhou, Y, Huang, T, et al. The relationship between perihematomal edema and hematoma expansion in acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: an exploratory radiomics analysis study. Front Neurosci. (2024) 18:1394795. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1394795

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Tanioka, S, Yago, T, Tanaka, K, Ishida, F, Kishimoto, T, Tsuda, K, et al. Machine learning prediction of hematoma expansion in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:12452. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15400-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Tanioka, S, Aydin, OU, Hilbert, A, Ishida, F, Tsuda, K, Araki, T, et al. Prediction of hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using a multimodal neural network. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:16465. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67365-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, hematoma expansion, imaging features, machine learning models, computed tomography scan

Citation: Yang T, Zhao Z, Gu Y, Yang S, Zhang Y, Li L, Wang T and Miao Z (2025) Evaluating the value of machine learning models for predicting hematoma expansion in acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage based on CT imaging features of hematomas and surrounding oedema. Front. Neurol. 16:1567525. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1567525

Received: 14 February 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025;
Published: 05 June 2025.

Edited by:

Hsiao-Lung Chan, Chang Gung University, Taiwan

Reviewed by:

Raja Godasi, St. Luke’s Boise Medical Center, United States
Ali Al-Salahat, Creighton University, United States

Copyright © 2025 Yang, Zhao, Gu, Yang, Zhang, Li, Wang and Miao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhongchang Miao, dHl5YW5nMTBAMTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.