impact factorComing 2018

Frontiers reaches 6.4 on Journal Impact Factors

General Commentary ARTICLE

Front. Oncol., 08 April 2015 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00088

Commentary on: “A multi-institutional experience in pediatric high grade glioma”

  • Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy

A commentary on

A multi-institutional experience in pediatric high-grade glioma
by Walston S, Hamstra DA, Oh K, Woods G, Guiou M, Olshefski RS, et al. Front Oncol (2015) 5:28. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00028

This multi-institutional retrospective study evaluates the association of clinical, pathological, and treatment characteristics with their outcomes. Their results show total resection and receiving chemotherapy adjuvant to radiation or chemoradiation are most strongly related with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. For higher risk incompletely resected patients, temozolomide (TMZ) use and treatment intensification with concurrent chemoradiation, adjuvant chemotherapy, and higher radiation dose were associated with improved outcomes. It is a well written and conducted paper about a remarkable challenge to neurosurgeon and pediatric oncologists. Little progress has been made in the outcome of these tumors in the last four decades. Outcome remains dismal with <20% of patients surviving (1). The degree of surgical resection is one of the most important clinical prognostic factors known in children with supratentorial high-grade gliomas (HGGs), independent of location, histology, and age as the authors show (2).

Chemotherapy was first introduced into the treatment schema for children with newly diagnosed HGG in 1970s. One the first randomized study was CCG-943 trial, in which children with newly diagnosed HGG were randomized to receive either focal radiation therapy alone to a dose of 54 Gy or the same radiotherapy with a combination of concomitant and maintenance chemotherapy. Patients randomized to receive chemotherapy were given weekly vincristine during radiation followed by eight maintenance chemotherapy cycles consisting of prednisone, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) each given approximately 6 weeks apart (3). This important study showed that treatment with chemotherapy prolonged the survival and event-free survival. The Children’s Cancer Group (CCG) study-945 showed that children with HGG who underwent a surgical resection of 90% or greater had a PFS of 35 ± 7% as compared to a 5-year PFS of 17 ± 4% in patients who did not (4). The authors did not refer any benefit to the treatment of high-grade astrocytomas in children with eight-drugs in 1-day chemotherapy compared with CCNU, vincristine, and prednisone. Extent of tumor resection and histopathologic diagnosis were significant prognostic variables (4). The CCG-945 trial also looked at a variety of molecular and cytogenetic markers in an effort to better define prognostic variables in pediatric HGG.

Currently, the efficacy of chemotherapeutic compounds against pediatric brain tumors is unsatisfactory. Efficacy of TMZ has generally been found to be non-superior to other chemotherapeutic agents in pediatric HGG, and various studies in children have shown no benefit over conventional treatment (5). Cilengitide was well tolerated in pediatric HGG, yet had modest anti-tumor activity as a single agent (6). However, cilengitide in combination with radiation and chemotherapy, TMZ, has shown synergistic activity (7). Phase I or II studies of small molecules that target specific pathways or proteins in the cancer cells such as gefitinib (8), imatinib (9), cloretazine (10), tipifarnib (11), erlotinib (12), and nimotuzumab (13) disclosed no efficacy, despite occasional remarks of stable disease (1). Recently, fractionated schedules of drug administration using smaller doses than the maximum tolerated dose (metronomic schedules) have been reported that might enhance the antiangiogenic activity of some chemotherapeutic agents (14). Metronomic chemotherapy shows potential advantages in pediatric brain tumors treatment, including primary effect on the host cells of the tumor microenvironment, the possibility of greater long-term efficacy and tolerability than conventional cytotoxic therapy (14).

In recent years, important advances in the comprehension of the molecular characteristics of HGG in pediatric age have been made. Initial genomic studies of pediatric HGG disclosed significant differences compared to tumors from adult patients suggesting the existence of molecularly diverse subsets within pediatric cohorts. Data about the interactions between genetic alterations and changes in DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, and gene expression contribute to explain pathogenesis of malignant gliomas. Adult HGG are characterized by IDH1, PTEN, and/or EGFR aberrations; whereas pediatric HGG often harbors PDGFR amplification. PDGFR amplification or overexpression represents the most common abnormality of HGG in pediatric patients (15). BRAF and CDKN2A mutations have been reported to characterize HGG in a subset of pediatric patients, although BRAF abnormalities are not as frequently as described in childhood low-grade glioma (15). Schwartzentruber et al. reported in a large cohort of gliomas of various grades and histologies H3F3A mutations to be prevalent in children and young adults affected by malignant gliomas (16). Mutations of genes H3F3A and HIST1H3B are epigenetic and play a role in chromatin remodeling (17). Mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 are exceptional in pediatric patients but occur in the majority of adult patients with HGG. A study of pediatric primary HGG from the Children’s Oncology Group observed IDH1 mutations in 7 of 43 tumors. Remarkably, all of these IDH1 mutations occurred in children ≥14 years old, with none occurring in younger children. No IDH2 mutations were observed (18). IDH1 mutations at codon 132 strongly differentiate adult secondary from primary glioblastoma, with frequencies of 85% compared with 5%. Paugh et al. sequenced IDH1 exon 4, containing codon 132, from 78 pediatric HGGs and 11 pediatric low-grade gliomas, and no codon 132 mutations were detected (15).

The recent genomic groundbreaking work added tremendously to our understanding of the mutational landscape of pediatric HGG, bringing to light new, potentially targetable pathways, and promise of more effective therapies. In light of these observations, new trials and emerging data about pediatric HGG could improve the outcome of HGG in children and young adults.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. MacDonald TJ, Aguilera D, Kramm CM. Treatment of high-grade glioma in children and adolescents. Neuro Oncol (2011) 13:1049–58. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nor092

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Adamski J, Tabori U, Bouffet E. Advances in the management of paediatric high-grade glioma. Curr Oncol Rep (2014) 16:414. doi:10.1007/s11912-014-0414-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Sposto R, Ertel IJ, Jenkin RD, Boesel CP, Venes JL, Ortega JA, et al. The effectiveness of chemotherapy for treatment of high grade astrocytoma in children: results of a randomized trial. A report from the childrens cancer study Group. J Neurooncol (1989) 7:165–77. doi:10.1007/BF00165101

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Finlay JL, Boyett JM, Yates AJ, Wisoff JH, Milstein JM, Geyer JR, et al. Randomized phase III trial in childhood high-grade astrocytoma comparing vincristine, lomustine, and prednisone with the eight-drugs-in-1-day regimen. Childrens cancer group. J Clin Oncol (1995) 13(1):112–23.

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Nicholson HS, Kretschmar CS, Krailo M, Bernstein M, Kadota R, Fort D, et al. Phase 2 study of temozolomide in children and adolescents with recurrent central nervous system tumors: a report from the children’s oncology group. Cancer (2007) 110:1542–50. doi:10.1002/cncr.22961

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. MacDonald TJ, Vezina G, Stewart CF, Turner D, Pierson CR, Chen L, et al. Phase II study of cilengitide in the treatment of refractory or relapsed high-grade gliomas in children: a report from the children’s oncology group. Neuro Oncol (2013) 15(10):1438–44. doi:10.1093/neuonc/not058

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Nabors LB, Mikkelsen T, Hegi ME, Ye X, Batchelor T, Lesser G, et al. A safety run-in and randomized phase 2 study of cilengitide combined with chemoradiation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (NABTT 0306). Cancer (2012) 118:5601–7. doi:10.1002/cncr.27585

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Geyer JR, Stewart CF, Kocak M, Broniscer A, Phillips P, Douglas JG, et al. A phase I and biology study of gefitinib and radiation in children with newly diagnosed brain stem gliomas or supratentorial malignant gliomas. Eur J Cancer (2010) 46:3287–93. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.005

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Pollack IF, Jakacki RI, Blaney SM, Hancock ML, Kieran MW, Phillips P, et al. Phase I trial of imatinib in children with newly diagnosed brainstem and recurrent malignant gliomas: a pediatric brain tumor consortium report. Neuro Oncol (2007) 9:145–60. doi:10.1215/15228517-2006-031

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Gururangan S, Turner CD, Stewart CF, O’Shaughnessy M, Kocak M. Phase I trial of VNP40101M (cloretazine) in children with recurrent brain tumors: a pediatric brain tumor consortium study. Clin Cancer Res (2008) 14(4):1124–30. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4242

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Fouladi M, Nicholson HS, Zhou T, Laningham F, Helton KJ, Holmes E, et al. A phase II study of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor, tipifarnib, in children with recurrent or progressive high-grade glioma, medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor, or brainstem glioma: a children’s oncology group study. Cancer (2007) 110:2535–41. doi:10.1002/cncr.23078

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Broniscer A, Baker SJ, Stewart CF, Merchant TE, Laningham FH, Schaiquevich P, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic studies of erlotinib administered concurrently with radiotherapy for children, adolescents, and young adults with high-grade glioma. Clin Cancer Res (2009) 15:701–7. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1923

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Cabanas R, Saurez G, Rios M, Alert J, Reyes A, Valdes J. Treatment of children with high grade glioma with nimotuzumab: a 5-year institutional experience. MAbs (2013) 5(2):202–7. doi:10.4161/mabs.22970

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Robison NJ, Campigotto F, Chi SN, Manley PE, Turner CD, Zimmerman MA, et al. A phase II trial of a multi-agent oral antiangiogenic (metronomic) regimen in children with recurrent or progressive cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer (2014) 61:636–42. doi:10.1002/pbc.24794

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Paugh BS, Qu C, Jones C, Liu Z, Adamowicz-Brice M, Zhang J, et al. Integrated molecular genetic profiling of pediatric high-grade gliomas reveals key differences with the adult disease. J Clin Oncol (2010) 28(18):3061–8. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.26.7252

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Schwartzentruber J, Korshunov A, Liu XY, Jones DT, Pfaff E, Jacob K, et al. Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma. Nature (2012) 482(7384):226–31. doi:10.1038/nature10833

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Sturm D, Bender S, Jones DT, Lichter P, Grill J, Becher O, et al. Paediatric and adult glioblastoma: multiform (epi)genomic culprits emerge. Nat Rev Cancer (2014) 14(2):92–107. doi:10.1038/nrc3655

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Pollack IF, Hamilton RL, Sobol RW, Nikiforova MN, Lyons-Weiler MA, LaFramboise WA, et al. IDH1 mutations are common in malignant gliomas arising in adolescents: a report from the children’s oncology group. Childs Nerv Syst (2011) 27:87–94. doi:10.1007/s00381-010-1264-1

Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: pediatric high-grade glioma, chemotherapy, pediatric cancer, radiotherapy, molecular target therapy

Citation: Caffo M (2015) Commentary on: “A multi-institutional experience in pediatric high grade glioma”. Front. Oncol. 5:88. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00088

Received: 05 February 2015; Accepted: 24 March 2015;
Published online: 08 April 2015.

Edited by:

André O. Von Bueren, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany

Reviewed by:

Jason Fangusaro, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and Feinberg School of Medicine, USA
Mariko D. DeWire, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, USA

Copyright: © 2015 Caffo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: mcaffo@unime.it