Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Oncol., 23 May 2024
Sec. Cancer Molecular Targets and Therapeutics
This article is part of the Research Topic Novel Therapeutic Targets of Gastric Carcinogenesis: from Basic Research to Drug Development and Clinical Application View all 5 articles

Editorial: Novel therapeutic targets of gastric carcinogenesis: from basic research to drug development and clinical application

Chenchen Niu*Chenchen Niu1*Dong Ren*Dong Ren1*Bella Lingjia Liu*Bella Lingjia Liu2*
  • 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
  • 2Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States

Introduction

In 2020, gastric cancer (GC) was reported as the 5th most common cancer and the 4th leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1). The survival rate of GC patients remains low despite the progress of cancer treatments (2). Current therapeutic strategies which have proven efficacy for GC include systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, immunotherapy, and target therapy (3). Micro-satellite instability (MSI), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), tumor mutation burden, and Epstein-Barr virus are useful biomarkers for selecting patients for immunotherapy and targeted therapy (3). Drugs of targeted therapy have been used for treating different molecular subtypes of GC including trastuzumab targeting HER2, ramucirumab targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) (4), cetuximab targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (5), dovitinib and AZD4547 targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) (6).

A better understanding of the pathogenesis of GC at molecular level will help identify additional novel therapeutic targets for drug development and optimize the existing treatment to become more effective. The aim of the proposed Research Topic “Novel therapeutic targets of gastric carcinogenesis: from basic research to drug development and clinical application” is to provide updates and new findings regarding the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies for GC.

Overview of the articles included in this Research Topic

Runt-associated transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) plays an essential role during the osteoblast differentiation and bone development and distributes widely in different tissues (7). It has been reported that RUNX2 is closely related to the proliferation, invasion, and bone metastasis of multiple malignancies including osteosarcoma, breast cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer, and GC (8). Several mechanisms have been studied to reveal how RUNX2 promotes the progression of GC including up-regulating the chemokine receptor CXCR4 (9), enhancing NID1 signaling (10), regulating COL1A1 (11), YAP1 (12) and FN1 expression (13). MGAT5, also known as N-acetylglucosamino transferase V, can remodel the tumor microenvironment and accelerate tumor cell growth and metastasis (14, 15). MMP13 has been reported to be activated in GC and as a downstream target of RUNX2 in breast cancer (16, 17). Wang et al. revealed a significant positive correlation between MGAT5, MMP13, and RUNX2 expression through the investigation of the GC samples in the database. They used JASPAR analysis to find one potential binding site of RUNX2 in the promoter regions of MGAT5 and MMP13 and demonstrated that RUNX2 could regulate the expression of MGAT5 and MMP13 respectively in the human GC cell lines. In addition, in vivo assay demonstrated that RUNX2 silencing could decrease the tumor size and cancer metastasis through decreasing the expression levels of MGAT5 and MMP13.

Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 is currently considered an oncogene and plays a crucial role in tumorigenesis (18) which makes STAT3 an attractive therapeutic target for cancer therapy. Liu et al. used structure-based virtual screening complemented by molecular dynamics simulations to identify ten small molecules with potential STAT3 inhibitory activity. The biological assays demonstrated that the three of the ten compounds (compounds 4, 7, and 10) could suppress the proliferation of three types of GC cell lines. Among the three candidates compound 4 had the most potent efficacy. It could displace the specific STAT3-SH2 binding peptide in vitro, had the dose-dependent inhibitory action on the phosphorylation of STAT3 at Tyr-705 triggered by IL-6, and was able to disrupt the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) pathways. The group will continue working on the structural optimization of compound 4 for developing a novel STAT3 inhibitor for the treatment of GC.

Systemic chemotherapy is the standard first line therapy for patients with HER2 negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC) (19). Because the overall survival time of most patients with AGC is within 12 months of diagnosis, it is important to develop a predictive model to evaluate the treatment’s efficacy and prognosis which can help optimize the treatment plan (20). Yang et al. did a prospective study to investigate the predictive value of the clinicopathologic features together with laboratory hematologic indicators including multiple immune-inflammatory biomarkers such as serum vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and c-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) in HER2-negative AGC. They established an immune-inflammation-based predictive model for OS, and for the effectiveness of the first-line chemotherapy and the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients. The model was integrated with the indicators in the blood and became more clinical applicable. It provided a novel approach for screening the primary chemotherapy-resistant populations.

Approximately 17–20% of patients with GC have the HER2 protein overexpression, especially in intestinal-type gastric cancer and cancers of the proximal stomach or the gastroesophageal junction (21). Anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab is the only molecular targeted drug approved by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the first-line treatment of HER2 positive AGC (22). However, the high rate of resistance limits its clinical benefits (22). The mechanism of trastuzumab resistance in GC is not well understood. The disruption of circadian rhythm can induce or increase the risk of cancer by altering tumor suppressors and oncogenes (23). Wang et al. did an extensive and detailed review on the studies related to how circadian clock regulating the progression of cancer, circadian clock as a drug target in cancer therapy, the metabolic rhythm reprogramming as a possible mechanism accounting for trastuzumab resistance. The study published in Cancer Research in 2022 demonstrated trastuzumab-resistant GC cells had high glycolytic activity controlled by hexokinase 2 (HK2)-dependent glycolysis with a circadian pattern and proved a metformin-based chronotherapy could overcome trastuzumab resistance in HER2 positive AGC (22).

Conclusion

In summary, articles in this Research Topic provided the progress of basic research for the novel mechanism of the pathogenesis of GC to identify potential therapeutic targets, the mechanism for the trastuzumab resistance in HER2 positive GC which could be overcome by metformin-based chronotherapy, and an immune-inflammation-based predictive model for treatment effectiveness and prognosis. Further understanding the pathogenesis of GC is necessary and will potentially lead to the development of personalized prevention and treatment approaches to benefit the patients.

Author contributions

CN: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Conceptualization. DR: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Conceptualization. BL: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Conceptualization.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Arnold M, Rutherford MJ, Bardot A, Ferlay J, Andersson TM, Myklebust TA, et al. Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995–2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. (2019) 20:1493–505. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30456-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Joshi SS, Badgwell BD. Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:264–79. doi: 10.3322/caac.21657

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. De Vita F, Borg C, Farina G, Geva R, Carton I, Cuku H, et al. Ramucirumab and paclitaxel in patients with gastric cancer and prior trastuzumab: subgroup analysis from RAINBOW study. Future Oncol. (2019) 15:2723–31. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0243

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Lordick F, Luber B, Lorenzen S, Hegewisch-Becker S, Folprecht G, Woll E, et al. Cetuximab plus oxaliplatin/leucovorin/5-fluorouracil in first-line metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). Br J Cancer. (2010) 102:500–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605521

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Inokuchi M, Fujimori Y, Otsuki S, Sato Y, Nakagawa M, Kojima K. Therapeutic targeting of fibroblast growth factor receptors in gastric cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract. (2015) 2015:796380. doi: 10.1155/2015/796380

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Komori T. Runx2, an inducer of osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation. Histochem Cell Biol. (2018) 149:313–23. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1640-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Bernal C, Otalora A, Canas A, Barreto A, Prieto K, Montecino M, et al. Regulatory role of the RUNX2 transcription factor in lung cancer apoptosis. Int J Cell Biol. (2022) 2022:5198203. doi: 10.1155/2022/5198203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Guo ZJ, Yang L, Qian F, Wang YX, Yu X, Ji CD, et al. Transcription factor RUNX2 up-regulates chemokine receptor CXCR4 to promote invasive and metastatic potentials of human gastric cancer. Oncotarget. (2016) 7:20999–1012. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.v7i15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Zhou S, Zhang S, Wang L, Huang S, Yuan Y, Yang J, et al. BET protein inhibitor JQ1 downregulates chromatin accessibility and suppresses metastasis of gastric cancer via inactivating RUNX2/NID1 signaling. Oncogenesis. (2020) 9:33. doi: 10.1038/s41389-020-0218-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Li Y, Sun R, Zhao X, Sun B. RUNX2 promotes Malignant progression in gastric cancer by regulating COL1A1. Cancer biomark. (2021) 31:227–38. doi: 10.3233/CBM-200472

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Guo Z, Zhou K, Wang Q, Huang Y, Ji J, Peng Y, et al. The transcription factor RUNX2 fuels YAP1 signaling and gastric cancer tumorigenesis. Cancer Sci. (2021) 112:3533–44. doi: 10.1111/cas.15045

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Han C, Jin L, Ma X, Hao Q, Lin H, Zhang Z. Identification of the hub genes RUNX2 and FN1 in gastric cancer. Open Med (Wars). (2020) 15:403–12. doi: 10.1515/med-2020-0405

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Granovsky M, Fata J, Pawling J, Muller WJ, Khokha R, Dennis JW. Suppression of tumor growth and metastasis in Mgat5-deficient mice. Nat Med. (2000) 6:306–12. doi: 10.1038/73163

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Huang B, Wu Q, Ge Y, Zhang J, Sun L, Zhang Y, et al. Expression of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V in gastric cancer correlates with metastasis and prognosis. Int J Oncol. (2014) 44:849–57. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2248

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Sheibani S, Mahmoudian RA, Abbaszadegan MR, Chamani J, Memar B, Gholamin M. Expression analysis of matrix metalloproteinase-13 in human gastric cancer in the presence of Helicobacter Pylori infection. Cancer biomark. (2017) 18:349–56. doi: 10.3233/CBM-160127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Gomathi K, Rohini M, Partridge NC, Selvamurugan N. Regulation of transforming growth factor-beta1-stimulation of Runx2 acetylation for matrix metalloproteinase 13 expression in osteoblastic cells. Biol Chem. (2022) 403:305–15. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2021-0292

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ashrafizadeh M, Zarrabi A, Orouei S, Zarrin V, Rahmani Moghadam E, Zabolian A, et al. STAT3 pathway in gastric cancer: signaling, therapeutic targeting and future prospects. Biol (Basel). (2020) 9(6):126. doi: 10.3390/biology9060126

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yao Y, Deng R, Liao D, Xie H, Zuo J, Jia Y, et al. Maintenance treatment in advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. (2020) 22:2206–12. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02379-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wagner AD, Syn NL, Moehler M, Grothe W, Yong WP, Tai BC, et al. Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2017) 8:CD004064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Li F, Meng G, Tan B, Chen Z, Ji Q, Wang X, et al. Relationship between HER2 expression and tumor interstitial angiogenesis in primary gastric cancer and its effect on prognosis. Pathol Res Pract. (2021) 217:153280. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2020.153280

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Wang J, Huang Q, Hu X, Zhang S, Jiang Y, Yao G, et al. Disrupting circadian rhythm via the PER1-HK2 axis reverses trastuzumab resistance in gastric cancer. Cancer Res. (2022) 82:1503–17. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1820

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Lee Y. Roles of circadian clocks in cancer pathogenesis and treatment. Exp Mol Med. (2021) 53:1529–38. doi: 10.1038/s12276-021-00681-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: gastric cancer, carcinogenesis, therapeutic targets, drug development, clinical application

Citation: Niu C, Ren D and Liu BL (2024) Editorial: Novel therapeutic targets of gastric carcinogenesis: from basic research to drug development and clinical application. Front. Oncol. 14:1431520. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1431520

Received: 12 May 2024; Accepted: 15 May 2024;
Published: 23 May 2024.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Massimo Broggini, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IRCCS), Italy

Copyright © 2024 Niu, Ren and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Bella Lingjia Liu, bella.lingjialiu@gmail.com; Chenchen Niu, chenchn1@hs.uci.edu; Dong Ren, dren3@hs.uci.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.