Original Research ARTICLE
Pharmacodynamic Evaluation and PK/PD-Based Dose Prediction of Tulathromycin: A Potential New Indication for Streptococcus suis Infection
- 1National Risk Assessment Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance of Animal Original Bacteria, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
- 2Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
Tulathromycin is the first member of the triamilide antimicrobial drugs that has been registered in more than 30 countries. The goal of this study is to provide a potential new indication of tulathromycin for Streptococcus suis infections. We investigated the pharmacokinetic and ex vivo pharmacodynamics of tulathromycin against experimental S. suis infection in piglets. Tulathromycin demonstrated a relatively long elimination half-life (74.1 h) and a mean residence time of 97.6 h after a single intramuscular administration. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and bactericidal concentration in serum were markedly lower than those in broth culture, with Mueller–Hinton broth/serum ratios of 40.3 and 11.4, respectively. The post-antibiotic effects were at 1.27 h (1× MIC) and 2.03 h (4× MIC) and the post-antibiotic sub-MIC effect values ranged from 2.47 to 3.10 h. The ratio of the area under the concentration–time curve divided by the MIC (AUC/MIC) correlated well with the ex vivo antimicrobial effectiveness of tulathromycin (R2 = 0.9711). The calculated AUC12h/MIC ratios in serum required to produce the net bacterial stasis, 1-log10 and 2-log10 killing activities were 9.62, 18.9, and 32.7, respectively. Based on the results of Monte Carlo simulation, a dosage regimen of 3.56 mg/kg tulathromycin was estimated to be effective, achieving for a bacteriostatic activity against S. suis infection over 5 days period. Tulathromycin may become a potential option for the treatment of S. suis infections.
Streptococcus suis is one of the most important pathogens in the swine industry causing septicemia, meningitis, septic arthritis, and pneumonia, leading to large economic losses worldwide (Feng et al., 2014; Goyette-Desjardins et al., 2014). In addition, S. suis is an emerging zoonotic agent responsible for the severe systemic infections with high morbidity and mortality rates in humans, especially in people who are in close occupational contact with pigs and pork products (Gurung et al., 2015). Over the past decades, the number of reported cases of S. suis infections has significantly increased in humans, with two large outbreaks in humans in 1998 and 2005 in China (Li et al., 2010). More importantly, a concise solution for streptococcosis on pig farms is not available and the effective antimicrobials are still needed to control S. suis infections (Van Hout et al., 2016). In general, penicillin is used to treat and control infections due to S. suis. However, penicillin-resistant strains and strains highly resistant to other β-lactam antibiotics have been reported (Lun et al., 2007). Therefore, novel antibiotics or effective treatment strategies against S. suis infections are urgently needed.
Tulathromycin is a long acting, semi-synthetic macrolide antibiotic, developed for the treatment and control of bacterial respiratory diseases in cattle and swine (El Badawy et al., 2014). The list of approved indications by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) includes Mannheimia haemolytica, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, and Pasteurella multocida (Evans, 2005). Additionally, tulathromycin is also registered for the treatment of interdigital necrobacillosis caused by Porphyromonas levii (Villarino et al., 2013). Of note, label indications may vary between countries and may be regionally updated (Villarino et al., 2013). However, tulathromycin is currently not indicated for S. suis infections. Given that tulathromycin has activity against a wide range of respiratory associated pathogens and other macrolides are used for treatment of Streptococcus pneumoniae, we wanted to further investigate its ex vivo activity of tulathromycin against S. suis infections. We especially wanted to include S. suis capsular serotype 2 strains because these are the most virulent and dominant pathogenic serotypes in severe infections in both swine and humans globally (Lun et al., 2007; Feng et al., 2014). Moreover, we studied the effect of varying testing matrices on susceptibility, the post-antibiotic effect (PAE) and post-antibiotic sub-MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) effect (PA-SME) of tulathromycin against S. suis. This finding could provide a framework for setting the basis for new treatment strategies and for the discovery of new macrolides with further applications in veterinary and human medicine (Villarino et al., 2013).
Materials and Methods
Animals and Experimental Design
Eight healthy castrated crossbred piglets (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire; four males, four females) weighing 20.5–23.6 kg were used for a two-period crossover study. The piglets were allowed ad libitum access to water and antibiotic-free food. They were maintained in accordance with National Standards for Laboratory Animals of China (GB 14925-2010). The animal experiment procedures were approved by the Animal Research Committees of South China Agricultural University. Each piglet received tulathromycin (Draxxin Pfizer Animal Health, Sandwich, Kent, United Kingdom) at a single dose of 2.5 mg/kg by intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) injections.
Sampling Procedures and Analysis of Tulathromycin
Blood samples (5 mL volume) were collected by venipuncture of the anterior vena cava into vacutainers (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Oxford, Oxon, United Kingdom) lacking anticoagulant, and stored in the dark. All samples were centrifuged at 3000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatants stored at -80°C prior to assay for drug concentration and for measurement of ex vivo antimicrobial activity.
All frozen serum samples were thawed at room temperature. Roxithromycin (0.20 μg/mL) was added as internal standard (Wang et al., 2012). For drug extraction, 0.5 mL sample aliquots were transferred to centrifuge tubes, and then mixed with 0.5 mL of acetonitrile. After vortexing (1 min) and centrifugation (12,000 × g, 10 min), the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm nylon syringe filter. The drug levels in serum were determined by a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (Agilent 1200 HPLC system; API 4000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer) as previously reported (Wang et al., 2012). The limit of quantification and detection were 0.01 and 0.005 μg/mL, respectively. The correlation coefficient (R) was above 0.999 in the linear range of 0.01–0.5 μg/mL. All serum samples that had concentrations above 0.5 μg/mL were diluted proportionally with control serum prior to extraction with acetonitrile. The recoveries of tulathromycin were >85%, and relative standard deviations (SDs) for both interday and intraday were <10% at all tested concentrations. In addition, the protein binding of tulathromycin was determined at spiked concentrations of 0.05, 0.5, and 5 μg/mL using ultrafiltration methods as our previously reported (Zhou et al., 2015).
Tulathromycin time–concentration data in serum of individual piglets were analyzed using WinNonlin non-compartmental modeling (Version 6.1, Pharsight, St. Louis, MO, United States). The maximal drug concentration (Cmax) was determined directly from the data with Tmax defined as the time of the first occurrence of Cmax. The linear trapezoidal rule was used to calculate area under the concentration–time curve (AUC). Additional PK parameters such as terminal half-life (T1/2λz), total body clearance (Cl), volume of distribution at steady state (Vss), and mean residence time (MRT) were also determined. The absolute bioavailability (F) of tulathromycin was calculated according to the standard equations (Zhou et al., 2015): F% = AUCIM/AUCIV × 100%. All PK parameters are presented as mean ± SD.
In Vitro Susceptibility Testing
Sixteen strains of S. suis isolated from swine suffering septicemia and pneumonia were used in this study. Routine determinations of MIC and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of tulathromycin against these isolates were conducted using a broth microdilution technique in accordance with CLSI methods (CLSI, 2008). The standard solution of tulathromycin was prepared in 0.0015 M citrate buffer, with pH adjusted to 7.0 with 0.015 M citric acid or 0.02 M NaOH. For determination of MICs in Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB), calf serum collected commercially from animals <2 years old was supplemented at 5% (v/v) as required. MIC was defined as the lowest drug concentration of tulathromycin that inhibited the visible bacterial growth in medium (Zhou et al., 2016). MBCs in MHB and serum were determined using the spot-plate technique to obtain a 3-log10 reduction in bacterial count relative to the initial inoculum (Illambas et al., 2013). In addition, to determine the influence of test matrix on MICs, the tulathromycin MIC for S. suis ATCC 43765 was further determined in MHB, 100% serum and varying proportions of serum (25, 50, and 75%) mixed with MHB. All experiments were performed three times on separate occasions to ensure reproducibility.
Antimicrobial Activities of Tulathromycin and PAEs
In vitro time–kill curves of tulathromycin against S. suis ATCC 43765 were established using the broth clinical method as previously described (Lees et al., 2016). Briefly, tulathromycin concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 16× MIC for S. suis were prepared in pre-warmed MHB. For control growth curves, MHB lacking drug was used. The bacteria were diluted in MHB to 106 CFU/mL and then incubated in an orbital shaking incubator at 37°C for 24 h. Aliquots of 50 μL of each culture were sampled and the viable counts (CFU/mL) were determined by 10-fold serial dilutions and spot-plate counts after incubation for 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 h. The lowest detectable count was 40 CFU/mL. Each concentration was performed in triplicate to ensure reproducibility.
Ex vivo killing curves were determined as per above using the serum samples obtained from piglets at all time points from 0 to 360 h after IM dosing with an initial inoculum of 106 CFU/mL of S. suis. Serum sample were pre-filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane to clear any possible bacterial contamination (Zhou et al., 2016).
In addition, the PAEs and PA-SMEs of tulathromycin were performed by a combination of spectrophotometric method and viable count method as our previously reported (Zhou et al., 2016). The optical density was converted into the amount of organisms based upon the preliminary standard curve (Supplementary Figure S1). The PAE and PA-SME were calculated as follows (Spivey, 1992; Zhou et al., 2016): PAE = T -C; PA-SME = TPA -C, where T and TPA is the time required for viable counts of bacteria to increase by 1-log10 CFU in drug removal phase and sub-MIC-treated phase, respectively; C is the time for untreated control.
PK/PD Modeling and Data Analysis
Based on in vitro MIC data and in vivo PK parameters, surrogate markers of antibacterial efficacy; i.e., the ACU12h/MIC over 12 h, was calculated for each tulathromycin concentration using the ex vivo killing curves. PK/PD modeling was used to describe the relationship between ex vivo AUC12h/MIC in serum and the antimicrobial effect measured as changes in log10 CFU after 12 h incubation. This model was established using the sigmoid Emax model that derived from the Hill equation (Toutain and Lees, 2004; Zhou et al., 2016): E = E0 + (Emax -E0) × CeN/(EC50N + CeN), where E0 is the log10 change in visible counts of drug-free control, Emax is the maximal antibacterial effect, EC50 is the PK/PD index target producing a 50% of maximal effect, Ce is the PK/PD index (AUC12h/MIC), and N is the Hill coefficient that represented the slope of dose–response curve. All data were analyzed using the non-linear WinNonlin regression program (Version 6.1, Pharsight). The coefficients of determination (R2) were used to estimate the variance associated with regression modeling with the PK/PD index. In addition, AUC12h/MIC targets corresponding to the net bacterial stasis, 1-log10 and 2-log10 reductions in bacterial counts after 12 h incubation were calculated by the Emax model for S. suis infection in serum.
Dose Regimen Prediction
Although tulathromycin is currently not indicated for S. suis infections, the approved dose regimen (2.5 mg/kg) for M. haemolytica and P. multocida seems not to be adequate to cover the overall MIC variabilities. In order to deduce a more rational dose regimen potentially for the treatment of S. suis infections, a 10,000-subject Monte Carlo simulation (Oracle Crystal Ball; Oracle Corporation, Redwood Shores, CA, United States) was employed to predict the dose distributions as follows (Toutain et al., 2002, 2016):
Where the dose regimen is the given amount to produce a specific antibacterial activity over 5 days; Cl is the body clearance (L/kg/5 day); SF is a scaling factor, obtained by dividing the PK/PD index target, in this case, AUC12h/MIC, by 12 h, resulting in a SF of 0.8 for a bacteriostatic activity. F is the bioavailability, and fu is the free drug fraction.
The MIC distribution was obtained from our own laboratory in combination with data from some previous studies (El Garch et al., 2016; Sweeney et al., 2017). In general, only susceptible S. suis would be successfully treated with tulathromycin and should therefore be considered to calculate a potential dose regimen. Owing to no CLSI breakpoint available for tulathromycin against S. suis, we selected all the MICs equal to or less than 64 μg/mL, which was the recently reported MIC90 value of tulathromycin for S. suis isolated from pigs in the United States and Canada 2011–2015 (Sweeney et al., 2017).
Pharmacokinetics of Tulathromycin in Piglets
After a single IM dosing, the peak concentration (Cmax) of tulathromycin (0.82 ± 0.25 μg/mL) was reached at 0.23 ± 0.14 h. The drug concentrations of tulathromycin in serum exceeded 0.10 μg/mL up to 48 h and were still detectable (mean; 0.01 μg/mL) at 360 h (Figure 1). The IM bioavailability of tulathromycin was 78.3 ± 19.2%, and the serum terminal half-life (T1/2λz) and MRT after IV dosing (2.5 mg/kg) were 69.4 and 89.3 h, respectively. These were fairly long and resulted from both a large volume of distribution (Vss; 11.3 L/kg) and a low body clearance (Cl; 115 mL/kg/h) (Table 1).
FIGURE 1. The time–concentration profiles of tulathromycin in porcine serum following a single IV or IM administration of 2.5 mg/kg (n = 8).
TABLE 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters of tulathromycin in porcine serum after single intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) administrations at 2.5 mg/kg.a
The protein binding of tulathromycin in porcine serum ranged from 32.3 to 39.1% at spiked levels of 0.05, 0.5, and 5 μg/mL, with a mean binding rate of 36.3%. The results indicated that the free/unbound fraction of tulathromycin in serum would be approximately 63.7%.
MICs and MBCs of Tulathromycin for S. suis Isolates
The test matrix influenced the susceptibility of tulathromycin for S. suis isolates. The MIC and MBC values determined in MHB were significantly higher than those determined in porcine serum, with MHB/serum ratios of 40.3 and 11.4, respectively (Table 2). The MBC/MIC ratios ranged from 2.46 to 8.75 for both test matrixes. For all the porcine S. suis isolates used for this study, the tulathromycin MICs in serum were in the range of 0.007–0.5 μg/mL, with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 0.06 and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively.
TABLE 2. Tulathromycin MIC and MBC values (μg/mL) and summary of test medium effect on MICs and MBCs for S. suis isolates (n = 16).a
To further compare the matrix effects, the tulathromycin MIC for S. suis ATCC 43765 was determined in porcine serum and in MHB supplemented to contain 25, 50, and 75% serum. The 25% serum incorporated in MHB reduced MICs more than threefold compared to that determined in 100% MHB. When increasing supplementation with serum further to 50 and 75%, an overall decrease in MIC values for S. suis ATCC 43765 of at least 10-folds was observed, resulting in MICs as low as 0.04–0.08 μg/mL compared to a consistent MIC of 1 μg/mL under the standard condition (Table 3). A visible concentration-dependent decrease in MICs was observed with increasing proportions of serum mixed with MHB.
TABLE 3. Tulathromycin MICs (mg/L) for S. suis ATCC 43765 in MHB and 25, 50, 75, and 100% porcine serum.a,b
Antimicrobial Activities of Tulathromycin and PAEs
We performed in vitro time–kill curves of tulathromycin in the range of 0.25–16 multiples of MIC against S. suis. Tulathromycin at 0.25 and 0.5× MIC produced only a slight inhibition of bacterial growth compared to control. However, persistent growth inhibition was observed when the bacteria were exposed to 1 μg/mL tulathromycin. At 2–8× MIC, the higher drug concentrations could not lead to a more rapid and greater reduction, indicating a time-dependent killing pattern for S. suis. Additionally, the bacterial counts were reduced by roughly 4-log10 CFU/mL after 9 h exposure to tulathromycin at 16× MIC (Figure 2A).
FIGURE 2. (A) In vitro time–kill curves of tulathromycin against S. suis ATCC 43765 in the MHB medium (MICMHB = 1 μg/mL); (B) ex vivo inhibition of bacterial growth in porcine serum before and after IM administration of tulathromycin (MICserum = 0.031 μg/mL). Numerical values on the right for each panel are tulathromycin concentrations in serum.
In serum collected up to 192 h, tulathromycin exerted effective growth inhibition or bactericidal effects after 12 h of incubation. However, no bactericidal activity was obtained for serum collected at 264 or 360 h, and these were followed by a 1.2-log10 CFU regrowth. Despite the lower MIC achieved in serum, there was a somewhat slower rate of killing in serum compared with the same multiples of MIC in MHB. Even for serum collected at 0.5 h (about 16× MICserum), a reduction in bacterial counts to the detection limit was not achieved after 12 h of incubation (Figure 2B).
Removal of the tulathromycin after drug exposure for 1 h resulted in delayed regrowth (PAE) that ranged from 1.27 and 2.03 h (Figure 3). However, a longer persistent suppression of bacterial regrowth for S. suis was observed during the sub-MIC-treated phase (Supplementary Figure S2), with PA-SMEs of 2.47–3.10 h.
FIGURE 3. PAE and PA-SME values (h) of tulathromycin against S. suis ATCC 43765. The PA-SMEs were determined after initial exposure to tulathromycin at 4× MIC. The error bars represent SD (n = 3).
PK/PD Analysis and Dose Regimen Prediction
Data derived from PK/PD modeling of the ex vivo antibacterial activities showed a steep concentration–effect curve with the maximal bactericidal effects (Emax) of 3.9-log10 CFU reduction in bacterial counts (Figure 4). The calculated AUC12h/MIC values in serum required to produce the net bacterial stasis, 1-log10 and 2-log10 killing activities were 9.62, 18.9, and 32.7, respectively (Table 4).
FIGURE 4. Plots of ex vivo AUC/MIC ratios versus the change of bacterial counts between 0 and 12 h (log10 CFU/mL) against S. suis ATCC 43765 in the porcine serum. The line represents the curve of predicted values based on the sigmoid Emax equation, and the points represent serum samples collected at time points from 0 to 360 h.
TABLE 4. PK/PD analysis of data acquired from ex vivo time–kill studies of tulathromycin against S. suis in porcine serum.
Tulathromycin should be administered as a single dose able to cover at least 5 days activity that required a mean Cl/F of 15.1 L/kg. After intramuscular dosing of tulathromycin in piglets, the ex vivo AUC12h/MIC target associated with net bacterial stasis was 9.62 h. This is equivalent to consider that a bacteriostatic activity can be obtained with a serum drug concentration equal to 0.8-folds the MIC. The distribution of tulathromycin MIC in broth matrix was transformed into vector equivalent MICs in serum by a scaling factor of 40.3 to take into account the serum effect (Figure 5). The unbound fraction is of 63.7. Accordingly, based on the results of Monte Carlo simulation, for a cumulative probability of target attainment of 90%, the predicted dose was 3.56 mg/kg (Figure 6), which was estimated to be effective to achieve a bacteriostatic activity against S. suis isolates over 5 days period.
FIGURE 5. The MIC distribution for tulathromycin against S. suis (n = 441). The isolates were obtained from our own laboratory in combination with data from some previous studies (El Garch et al., 2016; Sweeney et al., 2017). All reported MIC in broth matrix was transformed into equivalent MICs in serum by a scaling factor of 40.3 to take into account the serum effect.
FIGURE 6. The non-cumulative (A) and cumulative (B) distributions of tulathromycin doses for S. suis, as predicted by a PK/PD model for a duration of 5 days activity in terms of probability of target attainment (PTA). The vertical bar indicates the computed target dose at the cumulative PTA of 90%. Dose (0–12 mg/kg) is indicated on the x-axis.
Tulathromycin is an effective veterinary-specific antibiotic for the treatment of swine and cattle respiratory diseases caused by A. pleuropneumoniae and P. multocida, with the MIC90 values of 16 and 2 μg/mL, respectively (Benchaoui et al., 2004; Villarino et al., 2014). Although previous studies have demonstrated the AUC/MIC ratio was the predictive PK/PD index that best correlated with the antimicrobial activity of tulathromycin (Evans, 2005; Villarino et al., 2013), there is a paucity of pharmacodynamic studies of tulathromycin against S. suis to provide a comparison to the current studies. To our knowledge, this is the first study designed to evaluate the ex vivo antimicrobial activity and PK/PD relationships of tulathromycin against S. suis. In this study, tulathromycin demonstrated time-dependent bactericidal activity against S. suis. After a 2.5 mg/kg IM administration, tulathromycin is characterized by a rapid rate of absorption and large systemic availability, with a high absolute bioavailability of 78.3%. Of note, in general, the local inflammation caused by infections may significantly interfere with the kinetics of drug distribution and protein binding in plasma (Dello et al., 1988; Gajda et al., 2016). Likewise, the prior pharmacokinetics study of tulathromycin in pigs with pulmonary inflammation revealed markedly longer elimination half-lives in plasma and in lung (126 and 165 h, respectively) (Gajda et al., 2016). However, rapidly distribution and long persistence of tulathromycin in lung tissues do not indicated a direct relationship of the effective drug concentrations associated with located pathogens (Villarino et al., 2014). The pharmacokinetics of free tulathromycin in pulmonary and bronchial epithelial lining fluids should be further evaluated.
The clinical efficacy of tulathromycin may be underestimated by the in vitro MIC measurements. Consistent with other macrolides, tulathromycin MICs measured in a biologic matrix (serum) was markedly lower than that determined in the artificial matrix (defined broth medium) (Barry and Fuchs, 1991; Godinho, 2008). This finding is supported by a similar result from a previous study using calf serum in which the presence of 50% serum during the MIC test decreased MICs by 12-fold for M. haemolytica and ninefold for P. multocida (Lees et al., 2016). For S. suis isolates, our results demonstrated that incremental supplementation of culture matrix with serum resulted in noticeable shifts to lower MICs by at least 5-log2 dilution steps. This increased susceptibility response in porcine serum was analogous to that produced by tildipirosin, a novel macrolide, which produced progressive reductions in MICs with increasing amounts of serum for six bacterial species harvested from pigs (Rose et al., 2013). Additionally, an early antibacterial activity study in human serum demonstrated that the killing rate of erythromycin against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus was increased in the presence of serum (Pruul and McDonald, 1992).
In general, macrolides poorly diffuse across the outer membrane of most Gram-negative bacteria (Nikaido, 1998; Buyck et al., 2012). The mechanism for markedly increased susceptibility of S. suis to tulathromycin in porcine serum is probably related to the downregulation of oprM and increased permeability of bacterial outer-membrane when grown in biological fluids (Pruul and McDonald, 1992; Buyck et al., 2012). Consistent with this view, the previous in vitro susceptibility study of clarithromycin showed a considerable enhancement of antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa in RPMI 1640 medium and other eukaryotic cell culture media as compared with the conventionally used broths (Buyck et al., 2012). More recently, the similar negative clinical consequence was observed when testing activity of macrolide and ketolide was assessed in CA-MHB, suggesting that measuring MICs in RPMI-1640 could be easily implemented to phenotypically detect acquired resistance to macrolides in P. aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients (Mustafa et al., 2017). In this case, serum MIC is more predictive to provide a reasonable surrogate for studies of in vivo antimicrobial activity when the objective is to establish a rational dosing regimen.
Tulathromycin is the first member of a novel subclass of macrolides known as triamilides, which can be positively charged at the appropriate pH (Villarino et al., 2013). The antimicrobial activity of tulathromycin may be in theory related to the matrix pH. Consistently, results from previous studies determining the effect of pH on MICs indicated greater potency of tulathromycin (lower MIC) against M. haemolytica and P. multocida as pH increased in the range of 7.0–8.2 (two extremes of pH in extracellular fluids under physiological conditions) (Lees et al., 2016). Therefore, matrix pH seems likely to be another important factor accounting for markedly augmented activity in porcine serum compared with MHB (Dalhoff et al., 2005; Lees et al., 2016). In addition, as reported for other macrolides, tulathromycin may tend to be accumulated within lysosomes due to the relatively higher pKa (>8.6) and acidic environment of lysosomes (Villarino et al., 2013). However, given that the MICs of some pathogens are inversely related to pH, the intracellular activity of tulathromycin is probably limited (Tulkens, 1991; Villarino et al., 2013).
Similar with other macrolides, tulathromycin is considered a bacteriostatic agent against S. aureus and E. coli (Villarino et al., 2013). However, in this study, an in vitro bactericidal activity was noted at four- or eightfolds the MIC for S. suis. The further PK/PD-based modeling suggested that animal dose regimens should supply AUC12h/MIC of tulathromycin at least 9.62 to achieve a net bacteriostatic activity against S. suis. Based on the free drug AUC12h of 5.86 μg⋅h/mL in piglets, it is apparent that the current approved dose (2.5 mg/kg) could not achieve such PD target for S. suis infection with a MICserum of ≥0.6 μg/mL (i.e., MICMHB of 24 μg/mL). Therefore, tulathromycin, if used for the treatment of S. suis infection, would benefit from larger doses than are commonly used in clinical practice.
The present study investigated for the first time the ex vivo antimicrobial activities and PK/PD relationships of tulathromycin against S. suis in piglet serum. Based on the PK data and MIC distribution, we predicted the dosage distribution of tulathromycin, and estimated an appropriate dose (3.56 mg/kg) for a bacteriostatic activity against S. suis infection over 5 days period. The marked differences in MIC values between artificial media and serum highlight the importance of matrix effects on susceptibility testing. Additionally, our findings suggested that PD evaluation data for tulathromycin should be derived in biological fluids such as serum for preparing the dosage regimens for clinical therapeutic use.
X-PL conceived of this study and participated in its design and coordination. Y-FZ and H-MP designed the experiment and drafted the manuscript. Y-FZ, H-MP, and M-XB carried out the animal experiments and time–kill curve studies. Y-HL and JS participated in the data analysis and revision of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0501404), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (S2012030006590), and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and the Innovative Research Team in the University of Ministry of Education of China (IRT13063). Y-FZ received grants from Graduate Student Overseas Study Program of South China Agricultural University (2017LHPY027).
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2017.00684/full#supplementary-material
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Benchaoui, H. A., Nowakowski, M., Sherington, J., Rowan, T. G., and Sunderland, S. J. (2004). Pharmacokinetics and lung tissue concentrations of tulathromycin in swine. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 27, 203–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2004.00586.x
Buyck, J. M., Plesiat, P., Traore, H., Vanderbist, F., Tulkens, P. M., and Van Bambeke, F. (2012). Increased susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to macrolides and ketolides in eukaryotic cell culture media and biological fluids due to decreased expression of oprM and increased outer-membrane permeability. Clin. Infect. Dis. 55, 534–542. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis473
CLSI (2008). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals; Approved Standard CLSI Document M31-A3, 3rd Edn. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
Dalhoff, A., Schubert, S., and Ullmann, U. (2005). Effect of pH on the in vitro activity of and propensity for emergence of resistance to fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and a ketolide. Infection 33(Suppl. 2), 36–43. doi: 10.1007/s15010-005-8206-y
Dello, C. P., Belpaire, F. M., De Rick, A., and Fraeyman, N. H. (1988). Influence of inflammation on serum concentration, molecular heterogeneity and drug binding properties of canine alpha-1-acid glycoprotein. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 11, 71–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1988.tb00123.x
El Badawy, S. A., Amer, A. M., Constable, P. D., and Guda, A. (2014). Effect of tulathromycin on abomasal emptying rate in healthy lactating goats. Small Rumin. Res. 121, 395–399. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.06.008
El Garch, F., De Jong, A., Simjee, S., Moyaert, H., Klein, U., Ludwig, C., et al. (2016). Monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility of respiratory tract pathogens isolated from diseased cattle and pigs across Europe, 2009-2012: VetPath results. Vet. Microbiol. 194, 11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.04.009
Feng, Y., Zhang, H., Wu, Z., Wang, S., Cao, M., Hu, D., et al. (2014). Streptococcus suis infection: an emerging/reemerging challenge of bacterial infectious diseases? Virulence 5, 477–497. doi: 10.4161/viru.28595
Gajda, A., Bladek, T., Jablonski, A., and Posyniak, A. (2016). The influence of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae infection on tulathromycin pharmacokinetics and lung tissue disposition in pigs. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 39, 176–182. doi: 10.1111/jvp.12259
Goyette-Desjardins, G., Auger, J. P., Xu, J., Segura, M., and Gottschalk, M. (2014). Streptococcus suis, an important pig pathogen and emerging zoonotic agent-an update on the worldwide distribution based on serotyping and sequence typing. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 3:e45. doi: 10.1038/emi.2014.45
Gurung, M., Tamang, M. D., Moon, D. C., Kim, S. R., Jeong, J. H., Jang, G. C., et al. (2015). Molecular basis of resistance to selected antimicrobial agents in the emerging zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 53, 2332–2336. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00123-15
Illambas, J., Potter, T., Cheng, Z., Rycroft, A., Fishwick, J., and Lees, P. (2013). Pharmacodynamics of marbofloxacin for calf pneumonia pathogens. Res. Vet. Sci. 94, 675–681. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.12.012
Lees, P., Illambas, J., Potter, T. J., Pelligand, L., Rycroft, A., and Toutain, P. L. (2016). A large potentiation effect of serum on the in vitro potency of tulathromycin against Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 40, 419–428. doi: 10.1111/jvp.12372
Li, W., Ye, C., Jing, H., Cui, Z., Bai, X., Jin, D., et al. (2010). Streptococcus suis outbreak investigation using multiple-locus variable tandem repeat number analysis. Microbiol. Immunol. 54, 380–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2010.00228.x
Mustafa, M. H., Khandekar, S., Tunney, M. M., Elborn, J. S., Kahl, B. C., Denis, O., et al. (2017). Acquired resistance to macrolides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients. Eur. Respir. J. 49, 1601847. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01847-2016
Nikaido, H. (1998). The role of outer membrane and efflux pumps in the resistance of gram-negative bacteria. Can we improve drug access? Drug Resist. Updat. 1, 93–98. doi: 10.1016/S1368-7646(98)80023-X
Pruul, H., and McDonald, P. J. (1992). Potentiation of antibacterial activity of azithromycin and other macrolides by normal human serum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36, 10–16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.1.10
Rose, M., Menge, M., Bohland, C., Zschiesche, E., Wilhelm, C., Kilp, S., et al. (2013). Pharmacokinetics of tildipirosin in porcine plasma, lung tissue, and bronchial fluid and effects of test conditions on in vitro activity against reference strains and field isolates of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 36, 140–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2012.01397.x
Sweeney, M. T., Lindeman, C., Johansen, L., Mullins, L., Murray, R., Senn, M. K., et al. (2017). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida, Streptococcus suis, and Bordetella bronchiseptica isolated from pigs in the United States and Canada, 2011 to 2015. J. Swine Health Prod. 25, 106–120.
Toutain, P. L., Del Castillo, J. R. E., and Bousquet-Mélou, A. (2002). The pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic approach to a rational dosage regimen for antibiotics. Res. Vet. Sci. 73, 105–114. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(02)00039-5
Toutain, P. L., and Lees, P. (2004). Integration and modelling of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data to optimize dosage regimens in veterinary medicine. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 27, 467–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2004.00613.x
Toutain, P. L., Potter, T., Pelligand, L., Lacroix, M., Illambas, J., and Lees, P. (2016). Standard PK/PD concepts can be applied to determine a dosage regimen for a macrolide: the case of tulathromycin in the calf. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 40, 16–27. doi: 10.1111/jvp.12333
Van Hout, J., Heuvelink, A., and Gonggrijp, M. (2016). Monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis in the Netherlands, 2013-2015. Vet. Microbiol. 194, 5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.03.014
Wang, X., Tao, Y. F., Huang, L. L., Chen, D. M., Yin, S. Z., Ihsan, A., et al. (2012). Pharmacokinetics of tulathromycin and its metabolite in swine administered with an intravenous bolus injection and a single gavage. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 35, 282–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2011.01322.x
Zhou, Y. F., Yu, Y., Sun, J., Tao, M. T., Zhou, W. J., Li, X., et al. (2016). Ex vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship of valnemulin against Clostridium perfringens in plasma, the small intestinal and caecal contents of rabbits. Anaerobe 39, 150–157. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.04.005
Zhou, Y. F., Zhao, D. H., Yu, Y., Yang, X., Shi, W., Peng, Y. B., et al. (2015). Pharmacokinetics, bioavailability and PK/PD relationship of cefquinome for Escherichia coli in Beagle dogs. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 38, 543–548. doi: 10.1111/jvp.12225
Keywords: tulathromycin, new indication, Streptococcus suis, PK/PD modeling, dose prediction
Citation: Zhou Y-F, Peng H-M, Bu M-X, Liu Y-H, Sun J and Liao X-P (2017) Pharmacodynamic Evaluation and PK/PD-Based Dose Prediction of Tulathromycin: A Potential New Indication for Streptococcus suis Infection. Front. Pharmacol. 8:684. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00684
Received: 18 June 2017; Accepted: 13 September 2017;
Published: 27 September 2017.
Edited by:Salvatore Salomone, University of Catania, Italy
Reviewed by:Nadezhda A. German, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United States
Pierre-Louis Toutain, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, France
Copyright © 2017 Zhou, Peng, Bu, Liu, Sun and Liao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiao-Ping Liao, email@example.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work.