Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Predictive Toxicology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1363139
This article is part of the Research Topic Advances and Applications of Predictive Toxicology in Knowledge Discovery, Risk Assessment, and Drug Development View all 3 articles

Assessing the Immunogenicity Risk of Salmon Calcitonin Peptide Impurities Using In Silico and In Vitro Methods

Provisionally accepted
Brian J. Roberts Brian J. Roberts 1Aimee E. Mattei Aimee E. Mattei 1Kristina E. Howard Kristina E. Howard 2James L. Weaver James L. Weaver 2Hao Liu Hao Liu 2Sandra Lelias Sandra Lelias 1William Martin William Martin 1Daniela Verthelyi Daniela Verthelyi 2Eric Pang Eric Pang 2Katie Edwards Katie Edwards 3Anne S. De Groot Anne S. De Groot 1*
  • 1 EpiVax (United States), Providence, Rhode Island, United States
  • 2 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
  • 3 Calspan-University of Buffalo Research Center (CUBRC), Buffalo, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Advances in synthetic peptide synthesis have enabled rapid and cost-effective peptide drug manufacturing. For this reason, peptide drugs that were first produced using recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology are now being produced using solid and liquid phase peptide synthesis. While peptide synthesis has some advantages over rDNA expression methods, new peptide-related impurities may be generated during synthesis that differ from the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). These impurity byproducts of the original peptide sequence feature amino acid insertions, deletions and side chain modifications that may alter the immunogenicity risk profile of the drug product. Impurities resulting from synthesis have become the special focus of regulatory review and approval for human use as outlined in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research guidance document, “ANDAs for Certain Highly Purified Synthetic Peptide Drug Products That Refer to Listed Drugs of rDNA Origin”, published in 2021. This case study illustrates how in silico and in vitro methods can be applied to assess the immunogenicity risk of impurities that may be present in synthetic generic versions of the salmon calcitonin (SCT) drug product. Sponsors of generic drug ANDA should consider careful control of these impurities (for example, keeping the concentration of the immunogenic impurities below the cut-off recommended by FDA regulators). Twenty example SCT impurities were analyzed using in silico tools and assessed as having slightly more or less immunogenic risk potential relative to the SCT API peptide. Class II HLA binding assays provided independent confirmation that a 9-mer sequence present in the C-terminus of SCT binds promiscuously to multiple HLA DR alleles, while T cell assays confirmed expected T cell responses to SCT and selected impurities. In silico analysis combined with in vitro assays that directly compare the API to each individual impurity peptide may be a useful approach to assessing the potential immunogenic risk posed by peptide impurities that are present in generic drug products.

    Keywords: Salmon Calcitonin, Peptide Drug, Impurity, Immunogenicity, Computational Immunology, T-cell epitope, HLA binding, T-cell assay Abbreviations: ADA, Anti-drug antibodies, ANDA, Abbreviated New Drug Application, API, active pharmaceutical ingredient, FDA, food and drug administration, rDNA, Recombinant DNA, RLD, Reference Listed Drug, SCT, Salmon Calcitonin

    Received: 29 Dec 2023; Accepted: 10 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Roberts, Mattei, Howard, Weaver, Liu, Lelias, Martin, Verthelyi, Pang, Edwards and De Groot. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Anne S. De Groot, EpiVax (United States), Providence, Rhode Island, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.