EDITORIAL article

Front. Physiol., 02 June 2015

Sec. Membrane Physiology and Membrane Biophysics

Volume 6 - 2015 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2015.00172

Editorial: Membrane domains as new drug targets

  • Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Netherlands

Our understanding of the plasma membrane of eukaryotic cells has profoundly changed over the past 40 years (Kusumi et al., 2012). It is now well-understood that at the plasma membrane lipids and proteins are not randomly distributed, but are highly organized in discrete membrane domains with specific compositions such as lipid rafts, tetraspanin-enriched microdomains, caveolae or cortical actin-dependent membrane compartments (Cambi and Lidke, 2012; Kusumi et al., 2012). Membrane domains act as dedicated platforms for a whole range of cellular functions, such as cell proliferation, adhesion, migration, and intracellular trafficking, thus being appealing targets for drug treatment. This possibility has sprouted in numerous research efforts to identify and characterize drugs that selectively target membrane domains. Drugs may block or promote cellular functions by inducing, stabilizing, or disrupting the integrity or structure of these membrane domains.

This Review Topic provides a timely overview of the latest insights in the pharmaceutical potential of membrane domains, both protein- and lipid-based. Beckmann and colleagues highlight current research studies and clinical trials revolving around the inhibition of ceramide domain formation by antidepressants targeting the enzyme acid sphingomyelinase (ASM) (Beckmann et al., 2014). Considering the involvement of ASM-depending ceramide domains in several diseases including cancer (Petersen et al., 2013), infectious diseases (Grassme et al., 2003) and major depression (Gulbins et al., 2013), the impact of drugs that inhibit ASM activity is potentially broad (Kornhuber et al., 2010).

Milovanovic and Jahn review the roles of microdomains in neurobiology focusing on the molecular mechanisms mediating domain organization at the presynaptic membrane (Milovanovic and Jahn, 2015). The organization of SNARE proteins in membrane domains for localized vesicle docking, release and retrieval is a highly studied topic. SNARE proteins catalyze the final fusion steps of the neurotransmitter containing synaptic vesicles with the plasma membrane (Jahn and Scheller, 2006; Hong and Lev, 2014) and are the main targets of the Clostridial neurotoxins, which are widely used in the clinic as muscle relaxants (Rossetto et al., 2014). The authors not only provide an overview of the mechanisms that contribute to the clustering of SNARE proteins (van den Bogaart et al., 2013), but also integrate these into a single and elegant model describing the organization of SNAREs in membrane domains at the presynaptic membrane.

Navarro and co-workers discuss the therapeutic potential of targeting caveolae (Shvets et al., 2014) for treatment of cardiovasculature diseases, including atherosclerosis and pulmonary arterial hypertension (Navarro et al., 2014). Caveolae function in transcytosis of cholesterol-rich lipoproteins across endothelium of blood vessels and in the regulation of the activities of various ion channels and G-protein coupled receptors. Navarro and colleagues also review the connection between caveolae and Parkinson and Alzheimer diseases, where caveola are affected, and discuss how this may relate to the etiology and pathophysiology of these neurodegenerative diseases. The authors discuss potential strategies for developing drugs that selectively target caveolae.

Tetraspanins belong to the superfamily of four-transmembrane proteins that interact in cis with other membrane proteins and intracellular proteins forming so-called “tetraspanin microdomains” (Tarrant et al., 2003). These have attracted much attention as potential drug targets since recent studies have demonstrated that tetraspanins not only organize proteins in the plasma membrane, but also that they can directly regulate signaling pathways (Levy and Shoham, 2005; Lapalombella et al., 2012; van Spriel et al., 2012). Tetraspanin expression by tumor cells has been related to tumor progression and metastasis (Wright et al., 2004; Zoller, 2009; Hemler, 2014).

Ailane et al. describe the potency of targeting the tetraspanin Co-029/Tspan8 on colorectal tumor cells (Ailane et al., 2014). The expression profile of Tspan8 is largely restricted to squamous epithelial cells in the digestive tract, capillary endothelial cells, nerves, and muscle cells. Tspan8 over-expression has been documented in different carcinomas which relates to an increased metastatic capacity of tumor cells and poor prognosis (reviewed in Zoller, 2009). Here, the effect of a Tspan8 antibody on colorectal cancer cells was investigated in tumor cell lines and in a xenogeneic mouse model. Although no effect on tumor cell proliferation or apoptosis induction was found in vitro, antibody treatment of tumor-bearing mice resulted in significantly delayed tumor growth. Binding of the Tspan8 antibody to the tumor cells may modify their response to the tumor microenvironment possibly by disrupting the assembly of tetraspanin microdomains containing integrins, growth factor receptors, and/or signaling molecules.

The effectiveness of tetraspanin targeting in hematological malignancies is concisely reviewed by the group of Muthusamy (Beckwith et al., 2015). CD37 is highly expressed by B cells, B cell lymphomas and some leukemias. The historical view of tetraspanins as membrane organizers or scaffolds may be incomplete as it has recently been shown that CD37 has direct signaling capacities (Lapalombella et al., 2012). The intracellular tails of CD37 contain ITAM-like and ITIM-like motifs that may recruit PI3K and SHP-1. Coupling of CD37 to the Akt survival pathway has been shown in CD37-deficient mice that have defects in humoral immunity (van Spriel et al., 2012). Excitingly, several CD37-targeting therapeutics have been developed which are currently under evaluation in clinical trials in patients with B cell malignancies (Zhao et al., 2007; Heider et al., 2011; Deckert et al., 2013).

The use of transmembrane proteins as target for intracellular drug delivery is an exciting possibility discussed by Popov-Čeleketić and Van Bergen en Henegouwen, who elaborate on the role of cancer-specific growth factor receptor domains in receptor-mediated endocytosis (Popov-Celeketic and van Bergen En Henegouwen, 2014). Focusing on the epidermal growth factor receptor, the authors discuss how membrane receptor clustering and internalization can be exploited to target cancer cells using classical antibodies (Okines et al., 2011) and nanobodies (Heukers et al., 2014) conjugated to cytotoxic pharmaceutical agents.

Together, we believe our Review Topic provides an exciting overview of the various targeting and effector strategies of drugs that selectively target membrane domains. This synergistic overview brings together previously detached research fields and disciplines. Given the increasing appreciation of the fundamental importance of membrane domains in cellular function, we hope that this overview will foster the development or optimization of new pharmaceutical strategies for a wide range of human diseases and disorders.

Statements

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the colleagues who contributed to this review topic. ABvS is supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-ALW VIDI Grant 864.11.006) and the Dutch Cancer Society (KUN2014-6845). GvdB is funded by a fellowship from the Radboudumc, the Human Frontier Science Program, and the European Research Council (Starting Grant 336479). AC is supported by the HFSP (Grant RGP0027/2012) and the European Union (Nanovista FP7-ICT-2011-7, grant No. 288263).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    AilaneN.GrecoC.ZhuY.Sala-ValdesM.BillardM.CasalI.et al. (2014). Effect of an anti-human Co-029/tspan8 mouse monoclonal antibody on tumor growth in a nude mouse model. Front. Physiol. 5:364. 10.3389/fphys.2014.00364

  • 2

    BeckmannN.SharmaD.GulbinsE.BeckerK. A.EdelmannB. (2014). Inhibition of acid sphingomyelinase by tricyclic antidepressants and analogons. Front. Physiol. 5:331. 10.3389/fphys.2014.00331

  • 3

    BeckwithK. A.ByrdJ. C.MuthusamyN. (2015). Tetraspanins as therapeutic targets in hematological malignancy: a concise review. Front. Physiol. 6:91. 10.3389/fphys.2015.00091

  • 4

    CambiA.LidkeD. S. (2012). Nanoscale membrane organization: where biochemistry meets advanced microscopy. ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 139149. 10.1021/cb200326g

  • 5

    DeckertJ.ParkP. U.ChicklasS.YiY.LiM.LaiK. C.et al. (2013). A novel anti-CD37 antibody-drug conjugate with multiple anti-tumor mechanisms for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Blood122, 35003510. 10.1182/blood-2013-05-505685

  • 6

    GrassmeH.JendrossekV.RiehleA.von KurthyG.BergerJ.SchwarzH.et al. (2003). Host defense against Pseudomonas aeruginosa requires ceramide-rich membrane rafts. Nat. Med. 9, 322330. 10.1038/nm823

  • 7

    GulbinsE.PalmadaM.ReichelM.LuthA.BohmerC.AmatoD.et al. (2013). Acid sphingomyelinase-ceramide system mediates effects of antidepressant drugs. Nat. Med. 19, 934938. 10.1038/nm.3214

  • 8

    HeiderK. H.KieferK.ZenzT.VoldenM.StilgenbauerS.OstermannE.et al. (2011). A novel Fc-engineered monoclonal antibody to CD37 with enhanced ADCC and high proapoptotic activity for treatment of B-cell malignancies. Blood118, 41594168. 10.1182/blood-2011-04-351932

  • 9

    HemlerM. E. (2014). Tetraspanin proteins promote multiple cancer stages. Nat. Rev. Cancer14, 4960. 10.1038/nrc3640

  • 10

    HeukersR.van Bergen en HenegouwenP. M.OliveiraS. (2014). Nanobody-photosensitizer conjugates for targeted photodynamic therapy. Nanomedicine10, 14411451. 10.1016/j.nano.2013.12.007

  • 11

    HongW.LevS. (2014). Tethering the assembly of SNARE complexes. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 3543. 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.09.006

  • 12

    JahnR.SchellerR. H. (2006). SNAREs–engines for membrane fusion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 631643. 10.1038/nrm2002

  • 13

    KornhuberJ.TripalP.ReichelM.MuhleC.RheinC.MuehlbacherM.et al. (2010). Functional Inhibitors of Acid Sphingomyelinase (FIASMAs): a novel pharmacological group of drugs with broad clinical applications. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 26, 920. 10.1159/000315101

  • 14

    KusumiA.FujiwaraT. K.ChaddaR.XieM.TsunoyamaT. A.KalayZ.et al. (2012). Dynamic organizing principles of the plasma membrane that regulate signal transduction: commemorating the fortieth anniversary of Singer and Nicolson's fluid-mosaic model. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28, 215250. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100809-151736

  • 15

    LapalombellaR.YehY. Y.WangL.RamanunniA.RafiqS.JhaS.et al. (2012). Tetraspanin CD37 directly mediates transduction of survival and apoptotic signals. Cancer Cell21, 694708. 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.03.040

  • 16

    LevyS.ShohamT. (2005). The tetraspanin web modulates immune-signalling complexes. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5, 136148. 10.1038/nri1548

  • 17

    MilovanovicD.JahnR. (2015). Organization and dynamics of SNARE proteins in the presynaptic membrane. Front. Physiol. 6:89. 10.3389/fphys.2015.00089

  • 18

    NavarroG.Borroto-EscuelaD. O.FuxeK.FrancoR. (2014). Potential of caveolae in the therapy of cardiovascular and neurological diseases. Front. Physiol. 5:370. 10.3389/fphys.2014.00370

  • 19

    OkinesA.CunninghamD.ChauI. (2011). Targeting the human EGFR family in esophagogastric cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 492503. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.45

  • 20

    PetersenN. H.OlsenO. D.Groth-PedersenL.EllegaardA. M.BilginM.RedmerS.et al. (2013). Transformation-associated changes in sphingolipid metabolism sensitize cells to lysosomal cell death induced by inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase. Cancer Cell24, 379393. 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.08.003

  • 21

    Popov-CeleketicD.van Bergen En HenegouwenP. M. (2014). Membrane domain formation-a key factor for targeted intracellular drug delivery. Front. Physiol. 5:462. 10.3389/fphys.2014.00462

  • 22

    RossettoO.PirazziniM.MontecuccoC. (2014). Botulinum neurotoxins: genetic, structural and mechanistic insights. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 535549. 10.1038/nrmicro3295

  • 23

    ShvetsE.LudwigA.NicholsB. J. (2014). News from the caves: update on the structure and function of caveolae. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 29, 99106. 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.04.011

  • 24

    TarrantJ. M.RobbL.van SprielA. B.WrightM. D. (2003). Tetraspanins: molecular organisers of the leukocyte surface. Trends Immunol. 24, 610617. 10.1016/j.it.2003.09.011

  • 25

    van den BogaartG.LangT.JahnR. (2013). Microdomains of SNARE proteins in the plasma membrane. Curr. Top. Membr. 72, 193230. 10.1016/b978-0-12-417027-8.00006-4

  • 26

    van SprielA. B.de KeijzerS.van der SchaafA.GartlanK. H.SofiM.LightA.et al. (2012). The tetraspanin CD37 orchestrates the alpha(4)beta(1) integrin-Akt signaling axis and supports long-lived plasma cell survival. Sci. Signal. 5, ra82. 10.1126/scisignal.2003113

  • 27

    WrightM. D.MoseleyG. W.van SprielA. B. (2004). Tetraspanin microdomains in immune cell signalling and malignant disease. Tissue Antigens64, 533542. 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2004.00321.x

  • 28

    ZhaoX.LapalombellaR.JoshiT.CheneyC.GowdaA.Hayden-LedbetterM. S.et al. (2007). Targeting CD37-positive lymphoid malignancies with a novel engineered small modular immunopharmaceutical. Blood110, 25692577. 10.1182/blood-2006-12-062927

  • 29

    ZollerM. (2009). Tetraspanins: push and pull in suppressing and promoting metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer9, 4055. 10.1038/nrc2543

Summary

Keywords

plasma membrane, microdomains, membrane lipids, lipid rafts, tetraspanin enriched microdomain, membrane receptors

Citation

van Spriel AB, van den Bogaart G and Cambi A (2015) Editorial: Membrane domains as new drug targets. Front. Physiol. 6:172. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00172

Received

29 April 2015

Accepted

20 May 2015

Published

02 June 2015

Volume

6 - 2015

Edited by

Mario L. Diaz, Universidad de La Laguna, Spain

Reviewed by

Raquel Marin, Universidad de La Laguna, Spain

Copyright

*Correspondence: Alessandra Cambi,

This article was submitted to Membrane Physiology and Membrane Biophysics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics