Ma et al. recently proposed to relate blood pressure (P) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) for human arteries via a two-parameter, quadratic formula: P = αPWV2+β. Once α and β are determined, this formula could potentially be applied for cuff-less P measurement.
The authors (i) applied force balance to a thick-walled cylindrical tube under internal pressure and composed of elastic material characterized by the arterial strain-energy function of Fung to derive a relation between arterial cross-sectional area (A) and P; (ii) substituted this A-P relation into the Bramwell-Hill equation (, where ρ is blood density) to yield a complicated relation between PWV and P; and (iii) made approximations to arrive at the reduced formula. They imply that the PWV can be measured anywhere in the arteries (see Figures 1, 5C,D), but several aspects of their derivation appear to assume the aorta. For example, the resulting PWV in Figure 4 represents aortic values [see Figure 3 of Reference values for arterial stiffness' collaboration, 2010 and Figure 19.15 of Vlachopoulos et al., 2011].
PWV in large arteries, which are relatively sparse in smooth muscle (Burton, 1954), may best track P. However, the Fung strain-energy function cannot predict the sigmoid-shaped A-P relation of the aorta (see p. 41 of Holzapfel et al., 2000), which is most prominent in youth (Hallock and Benson, 1937) and at in situ length (Bergel, 1960). Equation (10) in the authors' paper does not have positive and negative second derivatives for physical parameters, and, as shown in Figure 1A, cannot fit renowned human aortic A-P data (Hallock and Benson, 1937) well. Holzapfel et al. proposed a histologically-based strain-energy function with more parameters to produce sigmoid-shaped A-P relations (see Figure 16a of Holzapfel et al., 2000). King proposed a physical model based on force balance in a thin-walled cylindrical tube with elastomeric wall, which could also predict sigmoid-shaped A-P relations (see Figure 2 of King, 1946). Langewouters et al. reported that a simple arctangent fits human aortic A-P data particularly well, as shown in Figure 1B (Langewouters et al., 1984). Substituting this empirical function into the Bramwell-Hill equation yields the P-PWV formula: where PWV is in m/s and P0 and P1 are unknown parameters in mmHg. While the quadratic formula predicts concave-up curves, as shown in Figure 1C, Equation (A) here predicts concave-down curves whose shape changes with aging and approaches a line at higher P and in the elderly, as shown in Figure 1D. This two-parameter formula yields predictions similar to the corresponding formula of King (see Figure 3 of King, 1947) while affording a more convenient form.
Figure 1
(A,B) Least squares fits of Equation (10) in the article of Ma et al. and two-parameter arctangent (solid-color) to human aortic cross-sectional area (A)-blood pressure (P) data (dash-black) for different age groups (Hallock and Benson, 1937). (C,D) Corresponding P-pulse wave velocity relations resulting from substituting the above model A-P relations into the Bramwell-Hill equation (, where ρ is blood density).
In the practical case, a line relation may suffice, as the P range may be limited and confounding factors such as smooth muscle contraction and pre-ejection period may have a linearizing effect. Alternatively, these non-trivial factors, which are ignored by all of the formulas, could alter the non-linear form of the relation. It may therefore make most sense to identify both the form and parameters based on measured P-PWV pairs.
In sum, evidence suggests that, in the ideal case, the P-PWV relation for at least the relevant large arteries is given by the two-parameter formula of Equation (A) rather than a quadratic.
Statements
Author contributions
MY, AC, and RM prepared the paper. J-OH edited the paper.
Funding
The preparation of this commentary was supported by a grant from the US National Institutes of Health (Grant EB018818).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BergelD. H. (1960). The visco-elastic properties of the arterial wall (Ph.D. thesis). University London,London, United Kingdom.
2
BurtonA. C. (1954). Relation of structure to function of the tissues of the wall of blood vessels. Physiol. Rev.34, 619–642. 10.1152/physrev.1954.34.4.619
3
HallockP.BensonI. C. (1937). Studies on the elastic properties of human isolated aorta. J. Clin. Invest.16, 595–602. 10.1172/JCI100886
4
HolzapfelG. A.GasserT. C.OgdenR. W. (2000). A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J. Elast.61, 1–48. 10.1007/0-306-48389-0_1
5
KingA. L. (1946). Pressure-volume relation for cylindrical tubes with elastomeric walls : the human aorta. J. Appl. Phys.17, 501–505. 10.1063/1.1707745
6
KingA. L. (1947). Waves in elastic tubes: velocity of the pulse wave in large arteries. J. Appl. Phys.18, 595–600. 10.1063/1.1697814
7
LangewoutersG. J.WesselingK. H.GoedhardW. J. A. (1984). The static elastic properties of 45 human thoracic and 20 abdominal aortas in vitro and the parameters of a new model. J. Biomech.17, 425–435. 10.1016/0021-9290(84)90034-4
8
Reference values for arterial stiffness' collaboration (2010). Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ‘establishing normal and reference values‘. Eur. Heart31, 2338–2350. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq165
9
VlachopoulosC.O'RourkeM. F.NicholsW. (2011). McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries. London: CRC Press.
Summary
Keywords
blood pressure, pulse wave velocity (PWV), hemodynamics, arterial stiffness, cuff-less blood pressure measurement
Citation
Yavarimanesh M, Chandrasekhar A, Hahn J-O and Mukkamala R (2019) Commentary: Relation Between Blood Pressure and Pulse Wave Velocity for Human Arteries. Front. Physiol. 10:1179. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01179
Received
12 July 2019
Accepted
30 August 2019
Published
12 September 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Luca Mesin, Polytechnic University of Turin, Italy
Reviewed by
Telmo Pereira, Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, Portugal; Carlo Camporeale, Polytechnic University of Turin, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Yavarimanesh, Chandrasekhar, Hahn and Mukkamala.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ramakrishna Mukkamala rama@egr.msu.edu
This article was submitted to Computational Physiology and Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.