Abstract
Understanding the mechanism by which plants respond to cold stress and strengthen their tolerance to low temperatures is an important and challenging task in plant sciences. Experiments have established that the first step in the perception and transduction of the cold stress signal consists of a transient influx of Ca2+. This Ca2+ influx triggers the activation of a cascade of phosphorylation-dephosphorylation reactions that eventually affects the expression of C-repeat-binding factors (CBFs, notably CBF3), which were shown in many plants to control resistance to cold stress by regulating the expression of cold-regulated (COR) genes. Based on experimental observations mostly made on Arabidopsis thaliana, we build a computational model for the cold response pathway in plants, from the transduction of the cold signal via the transient influx of Ca2+ to the activation of the phosphorylation cascade leading to CBF3 expression. We explore the dynamics of this regulatory network by means of numerical simulations and compare the results with experimental observations on the dynamics of the cold response, both for the wild type and for mutants. The simulations show how, in response to cold stress, a brief Ca2+ influx, which is over in minutes, is transduced along the successive steps of the network to trigger the expression of cold response genes such as CBF3 within hours. Sometimes, instead of a single Ca2+ spike the decrease in temperature brings about a train of high-frequency Ca2+ oscillations. The model is applied to both types of Ca2+ signaling. We determine the dynamics of the network in response to a series of identical cold stresses, to account for the observation of desensitization and resensitization. The analysis of the model predicts the possibility of an oscillatory expression of CBF3 originating from the negative feedback exerted by ZAT12, a factor itself controlled by CBF3. Finally, we extend the model to incorporate the circadian control of CBF3 expression, to account for the gating of the response to cold stress by the plant circadian clock.
Introduction
Low temperature has adverse effects on the survival, growth, and development of plants (Chew and Halliday, 2010). In order to survive exposition to low temperature, plants have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to sense the seasonal, daily, and rapid fluctuations in temperature, and to adjust their physiology appropriately (Kaplan et al., 2004; Chinnusamy et al., 2006). In many temperate plants, cold acclimation increases freezing tolerance after exposure to nonfreezing low temperatures (Thomashow, 1999; Chinnusamy et al., 2007; Ding et al., 2019). It is essential to unravel the molecular mechanism of cold sensing and cold stress signal transduction to avoid damage in plants caused by low temperatures. Computational models closely related to experimental observations can prove helpful to clarify the dynamics of signal transduction pathways at the cellular level. The goal of this paper will be to present such a computational model for the cold response pathway in plants.
Experimental studies in Arabidopsis have led to the identification of key factors in the transcriptional network of the cold acclimation pathway, where three C-repeat (CRT)-binding factors (CBFs), the most commonly studied being CBF3, also known as dehydration-responsive element (DRE)-binding proteins (DREBs), play vital roles in cold acclimation (Stockinger et al., 1997; Jaglo-Ottosen et al., 1998; Liu et al., 1998; Zhao et al., 2016). These transcription factors are induced by cold stress and bind to CRT/DRE DNA regulatory elements in the promoters of a large subset of cold-regulated (COR) genes. The expression of these COR genes renders plants able to tolerate freezing stress through a variety of cellular regulatory mechanisms (Thomashow, 1999; Gilmour et al., 2004; Hannah et al., 2006; Lissarre et al., 2010; Barah et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2019).
Homologues of CBF genes have been found in different plant species, such as the Chinese cabbage Brassica campestris (Wang et al., 2014), Brassica napus (Jaglo et al., 2001), barley (Marozsán-Tóth et al., 2015), tomato (Zhang et al., 2004), and rice (Dubouzet et al., 2003). Their functions are similar to those of the Arabidopsis genes, and they are also induced in response to low temperature. Given that the components of the cold response pathway are highly conserved in many plant species and that the patterns of expression of the CBF and COR genes correspond to those observed in Arabidopsis, the model that we propose for the cold response pathway pertains not only to Arabidopsis thaliana but also to other plants.
The putative temperature sensing mechanisms are able not only to respond to temperature changes but also to activate downstream response pathways (Ruelland and Zachowski, 2010). Calcium (Ca2+), a widely studied plant second messenger, is involved in nearly every aspect of cell physiology and development (Kudla et al., 2018). Cytosolic Ca2+ alterations and oscillations in plant cells, induced by a variety of environmental stimuli, are an integral component of cell signaling, and the frequency, amplitude, and spatial localization of Ca2+ signals control the efficiency and specificity of cellular responses (Allen et al., 2001). In plants, guard cells integrate environmental and endogenous signals to regulate the aperture of stomatal pores. Cytosolic Ca2+ oscillations are essential for stomatal closure, which follows cytosolic Ca2+ elevation in guard cell (Allen et al., 2001). Relationships between temperature sensing, specifically membrane fluidity, and Ca2+ signaling have been reported (McClung and Davis, 2010). The cold response in plants that follows a cold stress is strongly dependent on a fast and transient cytosolic Ca2+ elevation (Knight et al., 1996; Örvar et al., 2000; Cook et al., 2004).
The molecular mechanisms involved in the cold signal transduction, which include the perception of the signal, the cascade of post-translational modifications triggered by the signal, and the transcriptional regulatory network underlying cold acclimation, have all been investigated at the molecular level (Hua, 2009; Shi et al., 2018). To obtain additional insights into the dynamics of the cold response, it is useful to develop a detailed computational model that incorporates the sequence of biochemical processes involved in the signaling pathway. Such a model should eventually prove useful to interpret quantitatively the available experimental findings and to guide further experimental studies. Based on the experimental observations that revealed the structure of the pathway, we build a detailed computational model with the aim of providing a framework for a quantitative description of the regulatory network that controls the plant response to cold stress. The lack of detailed quantitative experimental observations poses a challenge in regard to parameter optimization. Most observations pertain to the time course of the expression of the gene coding for CBF3 in response to cold stress, while the time course of expression of a few other genes of the pathway has also been measured. We compare the predictions of the model with the available experimental data both in wild type and mutants.
In “The Cold Response Pathway: Brief Overview of Experimental Aspects” section, we summarize the processes underlying the response of plants to cold stress. The initial signal triggered by the cold stress takes the form of a brief influx of Ca2+, which rises in seconds and is over in a few minutes. This signal activates a cascade of enzymatic reactions that leads, within a few hours, to the expression of CBF3 mRNA, which represents the major output of the pathway that is measured in experiments. Based on the regulations determined experimentally, we present, in “Modeling the Plant Response to Cold Stress” section, a computational model for the plant cold response pathway. In “Dynamics of the Response to Cold Stress: Model Predictions” section, by means of numerical simulations, we determine the dynamical evolution of the components of the network following a cold stress. The numerical results of the computational model are compared with the available experimental observations in both wild type and mutants. Under certain conditions, the model predicts the possible occurrence of an oscillatory expression of CBF3 in response to cold stress. This potential periodic phenomenon originates from the negative feedback exerted on CBF3 expression by ZAT12, a factor itself controlled by CBF3. An additional level of complexity arises from the control exerted by the plant circadian clock on the cold response pathway. The CBF3 expression under natural conditions of a light-dark (LD) cycle is indeed circadian and peaks at about ZT8, i.e., 8 h after light onset, just after the early morning peak of the proteins CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) involved in the circadian clock mechanism (Dong et al., 2011). At the end of “Dynamics of the Response to Cold Stress: Model Predictions” section, we will indicate how the model for the cold response pathway can be extended to incorporate its modulation by the circadian clock, which is responsible for the gating of the plant response to cold stress. We discuss the results in “Discussion” section where we also allude to vernalization, another plant response to cold, which, in contrast to the response leading to freezing tolerance, occurs on a much longer time scale.
The Cold Response Pathway: Brief Overview of Experimental Aspects
The plant cold signaling pathway has been extensively studied in the past two decades (Chinnusamy and Zhu, 2002; Hannah et al., 2005; Thomashow, 2010; Shi et al., 2018). The salient features of the cold response pathway used in building the computational model are presented schematically in Figure 1. Below, we present in turn the messenger molecules, the protein kiases and phosphatases, and the transcription factors involved in this pathway.
Figure 1
Cold Stress Sensing
Under cold shock, when the temperature drops from normal to chilling, the cytosolic concentration of Ca2+ ([Ca2+]) in plant cells shows a sharp rise before returning to a basal level. The steady-state cytoplasmic calcium concentration in plants is in the range of 80~250 nM (Knight et al., 1996). The [Ca2+] changes that occur during cooling are a complex function of the rate of cooling, the duration of cooling, and the magnitude of the temperature drop (Knight et al., 1996; Plieth et al., 1999). The elevation in cytosolic Ca2+ represents the primary signal, which is transmitted through Ca2+-regulated proteins, and in turn affects the phosphorylation of various proteins. The major Ca2+ sensor in plants in the cell plasma membrane is calmodulin (CaM), which is activated through the binding of Ca2+ in a cooperative manner, and ultimately regulates, via a signaling cascade, the expression of target genes (Zielinski, 1998). The decoding of different Ca2+ signatures causes the changes in gene expression that lead to the appropriate physiological responses (Knight et al., 1996; Plieth, 1999; Plieth et al., 1999).
MAPKs Signaling
Cold stress-induced Ca2+ transient changes resulting in CaM activation can be decoded by different pathways. When the plant senses low temperature by an uncharacterized Ca2+/calmodulin-regulated receptor-like kinase (CRLK), the autophosphorylation of this CRLK —particularly CRLK1—is activated. The activation of CRLK1 leads to the phosphorylation of downstream targets such as the mitogen-activated protein kinases 6 (MPK6) and 4 (MPK4), which elicits the cold response (Yang et al., 2010; Furuya et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2017). The MEKK1-MKK2-MPK4 cascade constitutively reduces the protein levels and kinase activities of MPK3 and MPK6 (Teige et al., 2004; Kong et al., 2012). The latter two kinases phosphorylate inducer of CBF expression 1 (ICE1), a transcription factor that regulates the expression of CBF genes, while the phosphorylation of ICE1 promotes its degradation (Zhao et al., 2017). The MEKK1-MKK2-MPK4 pathway constitutively suppresses MPK3 and MPK6 activities and promotes the cold response (Zhao et al., 2017).
CBF Signaling
The expression of CBF genes is required for freezing tolerance in A. thaliana (Chinnusamy et al., 2003; Agarwal et al., 2006; Doherty et al., 2009). The expression of CBF genes is positively regulated by ICE1 and negatively regulated by MYB15. These transcription factors directly interact with specific elements in the CBF promoters. MAPK/MPK cascades function upstream to regulate CBFs. The downstream ZAT12 regulon appears to be involved in negative regulation of the CBF cold response pathway (Vogel et al., 2005). The CBF3 transcript has a half-life of only 7.5 min at warm temperatures, a value that is among the shortest described for plant genes (Zarka et al., 2003).
The factor ICE1 is a major regulator that controls CBF expression and many other cold-responsive regulons (Chinnusamy et al., 2003). Indeed, ICE1 binds to MYC regulatory elements in the CBF3 promoter and, thereby, induces the expression of CBF3 during cold acclimation (Tang et al., 2020). The protein HOS1 negatively regulates ICE1 at low temperature by inducing its ubiquitination-mediated degradation (Dong et al., 2006). At normal growth temperature, HOS1 resides in the cytoplasm, while the nuclear localization of HOS1 is enhanced by cold stress (Ishitani et al., 1998; Lee et al., 2001). ICE1 degradation through the 26S proteasome pathway is induced by HOS1. MPK3/MPK6 phosphorylate and destabilize ICE1 and, thereby, negatively regulate CBF expression and the freezing tolerance in plants (Miura et al., 2007; Li et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2017; Tang et al., 2020).
MYB15, a transcriptional repressor of cold signaling, is phosphorylated by phosphorylated MPK6 (Agarwal et al., 2006). Under normal temperatures, CBF transcription is repressed by the DNA-binding of unphosphorylated MYB15 to MYB recognition elements in their promoters in the absence of ICE1 activity. In response to cold stress, MYB15 is phosphorylated by cold-activated MPK6. The phosphorylated MYB15 dissociates from CBF promoters because of its reduced DNA-binding affinity (Kim et al., 2017).
The stability of the CBF3 protein is controlled by several processes. The kinase cold-responsive protein kinase 1 (CRPK1) and the 14-3-3 protein kinases play negative roles to prevent excessive cold responses (Liu et al., 2017). Cold-induced CBF protein accumulation is compromised by the plasma membrane CRPK1-mediated phosphorylation of 14-3-3 proteins, indicating a negative feedback function in cold signal transduction from the plasma membrane. Cold stress activates, possibly through phosphorylation by a yet unknown receptor kinase, the plasma membrane-localized protein kinase CRPK1 (Liu et al., 2017; Ding et al., 2019), which phosphorylates 14-3-3 proteins in the cytoplasm, thereby triggering 14-3-3 proteins to translocate into the nucleus. We will assume that, as for CRLK1, the activating effect of cold stress on CRPK1 is mediated by CaM. In the nucleus, phosphorylated 14-3-3 proteins promote the 26S proteasome-mediated degradation of CBF proteins, thus attenuating the CBF response. As overexpression of CBFs has a strong negative impact on plant growth (Achard et al., 2008), prolonged cold stress would lead to activation of a negative loop via CRPK1 activation. In this case, CRPK1 would ensure proper adjustment of the intensity and/or duration of the cold stress response that would need to match the intensity and/or duration of the initial cold stimulus.
Modeling the Plant Response to Cold Stress
Our goal is to develop a detailed computational model for the plant response to cold stress involving the succession of biochemical events, from the initial Ca2+ influx to the rise in CBF3 that controls the expression of genes which confer tolerance to low temperatures. The model based on the experimental observations summarized above in “The Cold Response Pathway: Brief Overview of Experimental Aspects” section (where relevant references are indicated) is represented schematically in Figure 1. Arrows in blue and red denote, respectively, reactions that contribute either to enhance or to inhibit the expression of CBF3 in response to cold stress.
Starting from the top left, we can follow the reactions that are successively triggered by a cold stress. First, the decrease in temperature elicits a brief transient influx in Ca2+. This initial signal leads to the activation of CaM upon cooperative binding of Ca2+ (with a Hill coefficient of 4) to the protein. The activation of CaM brings about the activation of two protein kinases, CRLK1 (left branch) and CRPK1 (right branch). We first describe the series of reactions initiated by the activation of CRLK1. We will return afterwards to the right branch initiated by CRPK1, for which available experimental observations are not as detailed as for CRLK1.
The kinetic equations (4)–(17) governing the time evolution of the 14 state variables of the model are listed in Supplementary Material, Section 2. The list of these variables, together with their definition, are given in Supplementary Table 1, while parameter definitions and numerical values used in the numerical simulations are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
Influx of Ca2+ and Activation of Calmodulin After a Cold Shock
Cold stress increases the level of cytosolic Ca2+ in plant cells. The rise in [Ca2+] takes the form of a single brief spike, or of a train of spikes. A discrete quantitative description of [Ca2+] dynamics for the generation of a single spike after a drop in temperature was proposed by Plieth (1999). Because we focus on the dynamics of the cold response pathway, we resort to a simpler, more straightforward approach by using an instantaneous increase followed by an exponential decrease in cytosolic Ca2+. Parameters were selected so as to produce a single peak in [Ca2+] of appropriate magnitude and duration (see Supplementary Material, Section 1.1).
Sometimes the response to a cold shock takes the form of a train of Ca2+ oscillations (Allen et al., 2000, 2001). To model the effect of a train of intracellular Ca2+ spikes, as outlined in Supplementary Material, Section 1.2, we resort to a two-variable model previously proposed for signal-induced Ca2+ oscillations (Goldbeter et al., 1990; Dupont et al., 1991). This widely used, generic two-variable model shows that repetitive Ca2+ spikes may be triggered by external stimulation, when taking into account the self-amplified release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores, a process known as Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release.
The CRLK1 Branch: Promotion (and Also Inhibition) of CBF3 Production
Once activated, the protein kinase CRLK1 activates through phosphorylation the MAP kinase MPK6. As for all phosphorylation reactions considered in the model, this process is reversed by a protein phosphatase. Activated MPK6 phosphorylates and, thereby, activates the protein ICE1, which plays the major role in inducing the expression of the gene coding for CBF3. MPK6 also enhances CBF3 expression by inactivating through phosphorylation the factor MYB15, which is a repressor of the expression of CBF3. Moreover, CRLK1 also contributes to decrease CBF3 production by activating, through phosphorylation, the MAP kinase MPK4, which inhibits the activation of ICE1 by MPK6.
An additional role of CRLK1, less documented, however, raises the possibility that this kinase, once activated by CaM, may also contribute to decrease the CBF3 response and, thus, the tolerance to low temperatures. This putative action involves the cold-stimulated entry into the nucleus and concomitant activation of the factor HOS1, which mediates the ubiquitination of ICE1 and, thereby, enhances its degradation (Dong et al., 2006).
The CRPK1 Branch: Inhibition of CBF3
Most sensory systems display adaptation to constant stimuli (Koshland et al., 1982). After an initial response to a stimulus, the response decreases in time owing to the initiation of a mechanism that limits or inhibits the initial response. Such a phenomenon is also observed for the cold response pathway. We have already mentioned the inhibition exerted by MPK4 on the activation of ICE1 by MPK6: following its activation by CaM after the cold shock, CRLK1 indeed activates both the CBF3-enhancing MPK6 and the CBF3-inhibiting MPK4. The right branch in the scheme in Figure 1 provides an additional mechanism for the attenuation of the CBF3 response. Indeed, the Ca2+ influx also elicits the activation of the kinase CRPK1, likely via CaM. The active kinase CRPK1 phosphorylates and, thereby, activates the kinase 14-3-3 which, in turn, phosphorylates the CBF3 protein and marks it for degradation.
Negative Feedback of ZAT12 on CBF3 Expression
The last step in the cold response pathway consists in the induction by CBF3 of COR genes responsible for cold tolerance. The activating effect is mediated by the transcription factor ZAT12, which is synthesized in response to a rise in CBF3. However, ZAT12 additionally acts as a repressor of the expression of the gene coding for CBF3. This regulation creates a negative feedback loop between CBF3 and ZAT12 in the lower part of the pathway (Vogel et al., 2005).
Dynamics of the Response to Cold Stress: Model Predictions
Dynamics of the Pathway at 20°C
We first examine the behavior of the model at a constant temperature of 20°C. At such temperature, the concentration of Ca2+ does not change much, so that we can treat it as constant. When the cold response pathway operates under such constant temperature, for given values of the parameters, the system converges to a unique, stable steady state. By setting the Ca2+ concentration to a fixed value, we can determine this steady state numerically. Linear stability analysis performed by means of the XPP program developed by Ermentrout (2002; see http://www.math.pitt.edu/~bard/xpp/xpp.html) indicates that this steady state is stable for the parameter values listed in Supplementary Table 2, which correspond to a temperature of 20°C. The Ca2+ steady-state level is relatively low at this temperature, so that CRLK1 is predominantly in its inactive form while MPK6, MPK4, ICE1, and MYB15 are mostly unphosphorylated. The high level of active, unphosphorylated MYB15 prevents the transcription of CBF3 so that before the cold stress, CBF3 remains at a low stable steady-state level.
Dynamics Under a Single Cold Shock: Response to a Single Ca2+ Pulse
In the model, we consider the level of CBF3 mRNA expression as the output measuring the response to cold stress. The model allows us to follow in a detailed manner how all the elements of the cold response pathway, i.e., the state variables of the model, change in time after a drop in temperature, from the initial Ca2+ influx to the expression of CBF3 and ZAT12. The advantage of the model is that it permits us to follow the evolution of every state variable, as shown in Figures 2, 3, in contrast to experimental studies in which, so far, the time course has only been determined for CBF3 mRNA and ZAT12 mRNA. The accumulation and subsequence disappearance of these two mRNA species have been measured over the hours that follow the drop in temperature (Fowler and Thomashow, 2002; Chinnusamy et al., 2003).
Figure 2
Figure 3
In Figure 2, we show the time course predicted by the model, after the Ca2+ signal (A) triggered by the cold stress, for activated CRLK1 (B), phosphorylated MPK6 (MPK6P; C), phosphorylated ICE1 (ICE1P; D), MYB15 (E), phosphorylated MPK4 (MPK4P; F), nuclear HOS1 (HOS1n; G), CBF3 mRNA (H), and ZAT12 mRNA (I). In Figures 2H,I, we compare the time courses predicted for CBF3 mRNA and ZAT12 mRNA (solid curves) with experimental data (red dots for CBF3 mRNA and blue dots for ZAT12 mRNA) available for these state variables (Fowler and Thomashow, 2002; Chinnusamy et al., 2003).
The concentrations of CRLK1a (Figure 2B), MPK6P (Figure 2C), ICE1P (Figure 2D), MPK4P (Figure 2F), HOS1n (Figure 2G), CBF3 mRNA (Figure 2H), and ZAT12 mRNA (Figure 2I) all increase after the cold stress, following the transient increase in Ca2+ (Figure 2A). Because the Ca2+ influx is transient, we see that the response of the network is also transient and the variables—including Ca2+—return to the steady state that prevailed prior to the cold stress. What is striking is the difference in time scales: while the Ca2+ signal rises in a few seconds and is over in a few minutes, the increase in CBF3 mRNA peaks a few hours after the temperature drop and remains elevated for some 10 h. This represents a most significant result of our computational model, which compares well with the experimental observations, as indicated in Figure 2. Long after the concentration of Ca2+ has decreased, the concentrations of the other state variables of the model also decrease but this occurs on a time scale that becomes longer and longer as the effect of the brief transient signal of Ca2+ propagates through the successive reaction steps of the network.
As seen in Figure 2E, in contrast to the other variables plotted in the figure, the concentration of MYB15 decreases in response to the cold signal, before returning to its steady state level as Ca2+ decreases. When the amount of MYB15 reaches its trough, the inhibition of CBF3 decreases. As the amount of ICE1P concomitantly peaks (Figure 2D), the level of CBF3 mRNA rises. Both the decrease in the unphosphorylated form of MYB15 and the increase in the phosphorylated form of ICE1 are brought about by their phosphorylation by MPK6P, which follows the activation of this MAP kinase by the rise in Ca2+ (Figure 2A).
To better grasp how the dynamics of the cold response pathway unfolds in the course of time, we plot in Figure 3 on an enlarged time scale the evolution of Ca2+, CRLK1a, ICE1P, HOS1n, MPK6P, MPK4P, MYB15, CBF3 mRNA, and ZAT12 mRNA during the first 2 h (A) and 4 h (B), after the cold stress. The Ca2+ pulse, triggered by the shift to cold temperatures, starts at t = 2 h. Here, plotting the different curves on the same graph allows us to clarify the sequence of activation steps that leads to CBF3 expression in the pathway. The state variables start from their steady state levels reached before the cold stress and, after the cold signal is given, increase or decrease in response to the Ca2+ pulse. This pulse is followed, successively, by the peaks in CRLK1a, ICE1P, HOS1n, MPK6P, MPK4P, then by the trough in MYB15, and the peaks in CBF3 mRNA and ZAT12 mRNA. Some of the variables, such as Ca2+, CRLK1a, MYB15, ICE1P, MPK6P, and MPK4P, return more rapidly to their steady state than other variables which take more time to do so (see Figure 3B). The return to steady state of CBF3 mRNA, followed by ZAT12 mRNA (induced by CBF3) takes more time, because the degradation of CBF3 mRNA proceeds at a relatively slower rate at cold temperatures.
The predicted evolution of ICE1P appears to be biphasic. First ICE1P rises and peaks in advance of its upstream variables MPK6P and MPK4P, and later decreases below steady state, due to the rise in HOS1n which promotes the degradation of ICE1P. After MPK6P, MPK4P and HOS1n reach their steady state, ICE1P begins to rise again after t = 6 h (see Figure 2D), because of the input due to constant synthesis of the ICE1 protein at a rate vs1 in eq. (10), and its conversion, activated by MPK6P, into the phosphorylated form ICE1P. This slow rise continues until ICE1P reaches its steady state. We included a term for the synthesis of ICE1 to avoid the depletion of the protein and to ensure the existence of a steady state, because we take into account the degradation of ICE1P, which is enhanced by HOS1n.
The results of Figures 2 and 3 illustrate how the model schematized in Figure 1 provides us with a detailed, integrated view of the chain of molecular events that leads from the cold-induced Ca2+ pulse to the synthesis of CBF3 mRNA.
Dynamics of the Model Under Single Cold Shock: Response to a Train of Ca2+ Oscillations
In guard cells, a cold stress elicits a series of small, repetitive [Ca2+] transients, with an amplitude of about 125 nM and a period of about 150 s, associated with stomatal closure (Allen et al., 2000, 2001). The cold stress regulates the flow of Ca2+ into the cytosol, which primes the apoplast for oscillatory cycles of Ca2+ release. To model these oscillations so as to determine their effect on the dynamics of the cold response pathway, we assume in the model that the influx of Ca2+ from the apoplast is proportional to parameter β (red curve in Figures 4A,B) which measures the magnitude of the stimulus in the two-variable model for signal-induced Ca2+ oscillations (Goldbeter et al., 1990; Dupont et al., 1991).
Figure 4
In order to take into account the transient nature of the changes in Ca2+, we consider an instantaneous increase in β followed by an exponential decrease, which results in a transient train of Ca2+ oscillations (blue curves in Figures 4A,B). The expression of CBF3 mRNA in response to this train of transient spikes is determined by numerical simulations, which demonstrate the effect of a train of Ca2+ oscillations (Figures 4C,D). The simulations of the model indicate that the longer the duration of Ca2+ oscillations, the higher the magnitude of CBF3 mRNA accumulation in response to cold stress. The duration of the train of Ca2+ spikes depends on the rate of decrease in β, after the initial increase in this parameter brought about by the decrease in temperature.
What distinguishes the dynamics of the cold response to a single Ca2+ pulse or to a train of Ca2+ oscillations? To address this question, we compare the two situations in Supplementary Figure S1. The longer a train of oscillations, the larger the number of Ca2+ peaks and, therefore, the greater the magnitude of the Ca2+ signal acting on the cold response pathway. In panels A and C of Supplementary Figure S1, we numerically computed the area under the curve (AUC) corresponding to the oscillations in Ca2+ shown in Figures 4A,B; the corresponding CBF3 mRNA peaks elicited by these oscillations are shown in Figures 4C,D, and redrawn in panels B and D in Supplementary Figure S1. Then, we generated single pulses of Ca2+ with comparable AUCs, as shown in panels E and G in Supplementary Figure S1. The peaks in CBF3 mRNA produced in response to these pulses closely match those produced in response to Ca2+ oscillations with similar AUCs (compare in Supplementary Figure S1 panels F and H with panels B and D, respectively). It appears, therefore, that what governs the CBF3 response is the amount of Ca2+ liberated by the cold stress in the form of a single Ca2+ pulse or a train of Ca2+ oscillations.
Effects of Mutations in the Cold Stress Pathway
The model of the cold response pathway allows us to predict the effect of mutations in the various elements of the network and to compare the results with available experimental data. We determine the expression of CBF3 as the output when the levels of ICE1, HOS1, MYB15, and ZAT12 are altered as a result of mutations or overexpression. For the proteins for which the total amounts are assumed to be constant, to represent such mutations, we reduce the total amounts of MYB15 to 10% of the total amounts in wild type (WT), while we increase 5-fold the total WT concentration for HOS1 overexpression (OX) mutants. Moreover, the rate of synthesis of ICE1 is reduced to 20% to represent the effect of mutations, while the rate of synthesis of ZAT12 is increased 5-fold to represent the effect of overexpression. We compare the predictions of the model (solid lines, in black for the WT and in blue for the mutants) with experimental data (red dots) in Figure 5.
Figure 5
In Figure 5A, the ice1 mutation blocks the CBF3 transcripts, in agreement with experimental observations (Chinnusamy et al., 2003), while overexpression of ICE1 (ICE1-OX) significantly enhances the expression of CBF3 (Supplementary Figure S2) in agreement with the observed enhancement in cold tolerance (Chinnusamy et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2005). In contrast to ICE1, HOS1 is a negative regulator of low temperature-responsive gene transcription. HOS1 accumulates in the nucleus in response to low temperature treatments. The overexpression (HOS1-OX) leads to the degradation of ICE1P and represses the expression of CBF3 mRNA (Lee et al., 2001; Dong et al., 2006). Figure 5B indicates that in the HOS1-OX mutant, the synthesis of CBF3 mRNA is accordingly attenuated.
In contrast to ICE1, MYB15 is a repressor of CBF3. Following a cold stress, MYB15 is inactivated through phosphorylation, which leads to a rise in CBF3 transcription. Overexpression of MYB15 results in the reduced expression of CBF genes whereas its loss-of-function leads to increased expression of CBF genes in the cold (Agarwal et al., 2006). Figure 5C and Supplementary Figure S3 illustrate the enhanced CBF3 expression in the myb15 mutant.
Finally, we turn to ZAT12, which dampens the expression of the CBF cold response pathway (Vogel et al., 2005). The overexpression of ZAT12 represses the level of CBF3 mRNA when the level of ZAT12 protein increases above a threshold value. The expression of ZAT12 is itself induced by CBF3. Figure 5D shows that during the first 2 h after the cold stress, the level of CBF3 mRNA is nearly the same as in the WT because the ZAT12 protein has not yet accumulated, through induction by CBF3. Later, the higher level of the ZAT12 protein in ZAT12-OX accelerates the decrease in CBF3 because of the negative feedback exerted by ZAT12 on CBF3. As to the 14-3-3 protein, which phosphorylates CBF3, mutations in 14-3-3 reduce this phosphorylation and, hence, the expression of ZAT12 mRNA (data not shown). The situation in regard to CBF3 mRNA is, therefore, similar to that in ZAT12 mutant.
Dynamics of the Model Under Successive Cold Stresses
We focused in the previous sections on the situation where the temperature drops rapidly and produces a single transient increase in Ca2+ or a train of Ca2+ spikes. However, the temperature fluctuates seasonally, daily, as well as on a short time scale due to stochastic fluctuations. The time scale over which Ca2+ changes occur varies greatly, from rapid increases within seconds (Knight et al., 1996) to slower, 24 h daily rhythms (Dodd et al., 2006; Ruiz et al., 2018, 2020). Moreover, the CBF3 transcripts, in response to an instantaneous cold stress, vary during the day with a peak at about 8 h after dawn (ZT8) and with a trough at about ZT20. Cold-induced changes in CBF3 transcription are themselves gated by the circadian clock (Fowler et al., 2005; Bieniawska et al., 2008; Nakamichi et al., 2009; Dong et al., 2011; Jiang et al., 2020), an effect to which we will return in “Circadian Gating” section below.
The dynamics of the cold response pathway under successive cold stresses has been studied experimentally by Zarka et al. (2003). Their observations allow us to compare the predictions of the model with the results they obtained in such conditions. We represent the warm-cold cycle by a series of identical Ca2+ pulses and take into account the increased rate of CBF3 mRNA degradation at higher temperatures. The time evolution of CBF3 mRNA under different warm-cold cycles is presented in Figure 6. We tested 3 cycles characterized by a period of 3 h (90 min cold followed by 90 min warm, as in the experiments of Zarka et al., 2003; Figure 6A), 6 h (Figure 6B), and 24 h (Figure 6C), respectively. In each warm-cold cycle, we assume that Ca2+ increases transiently at the beginning of the cold interval and that the degradation rate of CBF3 mRNA rises 10-fold in the warm phase.
Figure 6
Numerical simulations indicate that the CBF3 mRNA level, which increases in response to the cold stress and diminishes due to both the end of the Ca2+ pulse and the enhanced degradation at higher temperatures, undergoes periodic variations, in phase with the warm-cold cycles. The level of CBF3 mRNA under 3 h-warm-cold cycles displays desensitization of the cold response (Zarka et al., 2003), since the amplitudes of CBF3 mRNA in each cycle gradually declines (Figure 6A). Under natural circumstances, the temperature fluctuates daily with, typically 12 h warm and 12 h cold. Figure 6C shows that the amplitude of CBF3 mRNA then remains the same in each cycle. This is due to the decay of downstream inhibitors, such as ZAT12, in the course of time, which allows CBF3 to return to high levels. In Figure 6B, the amplitudes of CBF3 mRNA in 6 h cycles drops but significantly less compared to the 3 h cycles. This suggests that the time to restore the transcription rate at maximum level is about 12 h. The corresponding value shown by the data of Figure 2B in Zarka et al. (2003) is between 8 and 24 h.
Putative CBF3 Oscillations Resulting From Negative Feedback Exerted by ZAT12
The investigation of the dynamics of the model for the plant response to cold stress has revealed, unexpectedly, the possibility of sustained oscillations in the expression of CBF3. This phenomenon, which occurs spontaneously for a restricted set of parameter values, does not need to be triggered by the Ca2+ influx that occurs upon decreasing temperature to a low level. Such oscillations are shown in Figures 7A,B for the mRNA and protein levels, respectively, both for CBF3 and ZAT12. Projecting the trajectory onto a phase plane formed by CBF3 mRNA and ZAT12 mRNA indicates that this periodic behavior corresponds to the evolution toward a closed curve known as limit cycle (Figure 7C). The conspicuous property of the limit cycle is that it can be reached regardless of initial conditions and, therefore, represents a very robust mode of oscillations. The other state variables upstream in the plant cold response pathway (see Figure 1) evolve to a stable steady state after the cold stress. Thus, the oscillations in CBF3 and ZAT12 are not observed in other proteins involved in the cold response pathway, as shown in Figure 7D.
Figure 7
What is the origin of such CBF3 oscillations? Negative feedback represents a well-known source of oscillatory behavior in biochemical systems at the cellular level, as exemplified by the molecular mechanism of the circadian clock, which involves auto-regulatory negative feedback loops on gene expression in a variety of organisms, including Drosophila, mammals, and plants (Goldbeter, 1995; De Caluwé et al., 2016). Many other examples of oscillations originate from regulatory feedback processes at the cellular level (see Goldbeter, 1996; Goldbeter et al., 2012, for reviews). Here, a negative feedback is exerted by ZAT12 on the expression of CBF3. Indeed, the expression of ZAT12 is induced by CBF3 while ZAT12 represses the expression of CBF3. This negative feedback regulation is responsible for the oscillatory expression of CBF3, which is characterized by a period of about 32 h for the parameter values considered in Figure 7. The characteristics of these oscillations are further explored in Supplementary Material, Section 4 and in Supplementary Figure S4.
That the mechanism of the oscillations relies on the negative feedback exerted by ZAT12 on CBF3 expression is shown by the observation that while CBF3 and ZAT12 oscillate, the other state variables located upstream in the cold response pathway (see Figure 1) do not display oscillations and remain at a stable steady state, as illustrated in Figure 7D. This difference is due to the fact that the regulation exerted by ZAT12 at the last step of the pathway schematized in Figure 1 does not affect the synthesis or degradation of the state variables involved in the preceding steps of the network.
What are the conditions that could favor the onset of oscillations in CBF3 expression? The stability diagram in Supplementary Figure S4D suggests that oscillations might be induced by decreasing the rate of degradation of CBF3 mRNA, vd3, when the system moves first from the stable steady state P2 to the stable steady state P3 (in which the level of CBF3 mRNA is higher, as can be seen in Supplementary Figures S4E,F, because of the reduced rate of degradation) and then to the unstable steady state P3 around which sustained oscillations occur. The same diagram in Supplementary Figure S4D shows that oscillations could also result from increasing the maximum rate of CBF3 expression vs2 at a given value of vd3. The model predicts, however, that other parameter changes may also induce oscillations, for example—as suggested by the diagram in Supplementary Figure S4B—by increasing (on the left of this diagram) or decreasing (on the right of this diagram) the maximum rate of ZAT12 mRNA degradation, vd6, or by increasing the ratio k9/v5 which measures the ratio of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation rates of ICE1. Increasing this ratio favors the rise in ICE1P, which enhances the expression of CBF3 (see scheme of the model in Figure 1). In conclusion, all parameters which directly or indirectly enhance the formation of CBF3, by increasing its synthesis or decreasing its degradation, favor the onset of oscillations, provided that the level of ZAT12 is in an appropriate range, as shown in Supplementary Figure S4B.
Circadian Gating
Many aspects of plant physiology and metabolism are controlled by the circadian clock. Unsurprisingly, the cold response was also shown to be under the circadian control (Fowler et al., 2005; Dong et al., 2011). Circadian rhythms are generated at the cellular level by a dozen of clock genes, which form a network of interlocked regulatory feedback loops (Nohales and Kay, 2016; McClung, 2019). This genetic clock is entrained by the external light-dark cycle and controls the expression of many genes, including CBF genes (Fowler et al., 2005; Dong et al., 2011). Moreover, the circadian phase at which plants were transferred to low temperature affects the level at which CBF transcripts accumulate upon cold stress (Fowler et al., 2005). That the induction of CBF genes is gated by the circadian clock was corroborated by subsequent experiments (Dong et al., 2011; Keily et al., 2013).
To account for this circadian gating in our model, we simulated the circadian clock signal by a sine function (see Supplementary Material, Section 3). This circadian variable, which could represent the level a circadian clock protein (e.g., CCA1/LHY), acts at the level of CBF3 expression, as expressed by eqs. (18)–(19); (see Supplementary Material, Section 3). In Figure 8A, we show the circadian variation in CBF3 expression controlled by the circadian clock in the absence of cold stress. Although the LD cycle is not modeled explicitly in this work, we add for clarity the 12 h:12 h LD cycle on top of the panel, with a phase set so that the peak in CBF3 mRNA occurs at ZT 8, as observed experimentally (Dong et al., 2011).
Figure 8
Our simulations show that, depending on the time at which the Ca2+ pulse triggered by the cold stress is applied, CBF3 expression can be strongly induced (Figure 8B) or not (Figure 8C). The responsiveness to cold stress is shown in Figure 8D as a function of the timing of the Ca2+ pulse initiated by the cold stress. These results support the view that the circadian clock limits the cold response to a certain window of time.
Discussion
The aim of this study was to build a detailed computational model of the pathway responsible for the plant response to cold stress, based on available experimental observations. Our work provides a theoretical framework that we used to address the dynamics of this important regulatory network in a variety of conditions. The model takes into account the results from numerous biochemical and genetic studies which showed how a cold stress activates a signaling cascade leading to the expression of COR genes, which enable plants to tolerate freezing temperatures (Thomashow, 1999; Gilmour et al., 2004; Hannah et al., 2006; Lissarre et al., 2010). The cold stress triggers a signal in the form of a brief Ca2+ spike, initiating a cascade of biochemical reactions that eventually lead to a rise in the factor CBF3, which induces the expression of COR genes after several hours. As shown in Figures 2 and 3, the model allows us to follow how the initial signal is transduced through successive steps which eventually produce the rise in CBF3. Experimentally, the plant response to cold stress is measured by the level of CBF3 mRNA transcripts which, in the wild type, peaks between 1 and 6 h after cold stress, according to different experiments (Fowler and Thomashow, 2002; Chinnusamy et al., 2003). In the model, we consider that the brief Ca2+ pulse represents the initial response to the cooling stimulus. Remarkably, this initial Ca2+ pulse, which rises in seconds and is over in minutes, results in the sequential activation of various protein kinases, and finally in the transient expression of genes over a much longer time scale, of the order of hours.
The model allows us to follow in silico the detailed chain of biochemical events that leads from the cold-induced Ca2+ signal to CBF3 expression. As done in Figures 2, 3, we can use the computational model as a magnifier to enlarge the details of the time evolution of the different variables in the model so as to disentangle their time course in the minutes and hours that follow the cold stress. Obtaining experimentally such detailed comparative information would be extremely valuable. The predictions of the computational model provide us with a framework that may prove useful to this end.
Because of the many regulatory interactions that link the biochemical variables in the cold response pathway schematized in Figure 1, the detailed sequence of events leading to CBF3 expression is sometimes difficult to predict in the absence of a computational model. Thus, in the chain of sequential activations, as shown in Figure 3, once activated by CaM CRLK1a activates the kinases MPK6 and MPK4 which exert antagonistic effects on ICE1P. Moreover, CRLK1 also activates HOS1 which controls the degradation of ICE1P. The time course of ICE1P is, therefore, controlled by the combined effects of MPK6, MPK4, and HOS1. Similarly, the time evolution of CBF3 mRNA is activated by ICE1P and inhibited by MYB15 and ZAT12, the latter being induced by CBF3. The model allows us to predict the time course of all these variables as it takes into account and integrates simultaneously all regulatory interactions in the pathway. It might be difficult to reach such a comprehensive, global view of the dynamics of the cold response pathway without a computational approach.
Rather than eliciting a single Ca2+ spike, the cold stress sometimes triggers a train of high-frequency Ca2+ oscillations (Allen et al., 2001). We determined the effect of such an oscillatory signal on the response of the model for the cold response pathway using a generic model for Ca2+ oscillations based on the Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release mechanism (Goldbeter et al., 1990; Dupont et al., 1991). As shown in Figure 4, because it occurs on a much longer time scale the expression of CBF3 integrates the high-frequency Ca2+ spikes without reflecting each of them. The amplitude of the response thus increases with the number of spikes and, hence, with the duration of the Ca2+ oscillatory signal.
We used the model to predict the effect of mutations or overexpression of various genes in the cold response pathway. Every step in the cascade leading from the initial Ca2+ pulse to CBF3 expression is capable of affecting the response to cold stress. As shown in Figure 5 and in Supplementary Figures S2, S3, the predictions of the model agree with experimental observations as to how the expression of CBF3 is affected by mutations in or overexpression of various genes such as those coding for ICE1, HOS1, MYB15, or ZAT12. In Figure 4B, established for HOS1-OX, the experimental data for CBF3 expression (red dots) display a peak at 24 h (corresponding to time = 26 h in Figure 4B, as explained in the legend to Figure 4). This peak is also observed in the wild type; see Figure 7B in Dong et al. (2006). Such increase, which is not accounted for by the simulations of the model is, however, not always observed in the experiments; see, for example, Figure 2H in Zarka et al. (2003). It might perhaps be due to another mechanism, such as circadian gating, considered in “Circadian Gating” section.
Experimental observations indicate that CBF3 transcription displays desensitization and resensitization in response to successive cold stresses (Plieth et al., 1999; Zarka et al., 2003). Both for Ca2+ and CBF3 transcripts, when the decreasing temperature stimuli are repeated, the amplitudes of the [Ca2+] spikes and CBF3 expression levels decrease (Plieth et al., 1999). The dependence on past low temperature episodes that the plant previously encountered indicates that the [Ca2+] spikes and CBF3 transcript response to cooling or in response to a stepwise decrease of the temperature can be attenuated (Knight et al., 1996; Zarka et al., 2003). The cold-sensing mechanism resensitizes after 8–24 h at warm temperatures (Zarka et al., 2003). The results of numerical simulations of the model indicate that even in the case where the system is subjected to a series of identical Ca2+ pulses corresponding to repetitive alternations of cold and warm phases, the cold response pathway is capable of displaying by itself desensitization (Figure 6A). The phenomenon attenuates (Figure 6B) and finally disappears (Figure 6C) when the interval between successive cold phases increases sufficiently.
As with all models involving a large number of state variables and parameters, a major question arises in regard to parameterization, given that quantitative information on many parameters in such models is often scarce, if not unavailable. As exemplified by more complex models involving even greater numbers of state variables and parameters, such as those proposed for the circadian clock (Leloup and Goldbeter, 2003) or the mammalian cell cycle (Gérard and Goldbeter, 2009), the computational models for cellular regulatory pathways remain useful for studying the mechanism and dynamics of these processes at the molecular and systems levels, and sometimes to predict new, counter-intuitive modes of qualitative behavior, even though precise parameter values are lacking in these models. One way of dealing with the issue of parameterization is to study numerically the dynamic behavior of the model over large ranges of parameter values. In addition, a sensitivity analysis may be performed to investigate the range of parameter values in which certain experimental observations can be reproduced (see, for example, Leloup and Goldbeter, 2004; De Caluwé et al., 2016).
As explained in detail in Section 4 of Supplementary Material, both approaches were followed in this study of the model for the cold response pathway, which contains 14 state variables and 77 parameters, not counting those related to Ca2+ and CaM. Most of these parameter values were not (yet) characterized experimentally. For example, kinetic studies have yet to be performed to yield values for the various rates of phosphorylation or dephosphorylation, for the Michaelis constants that characterize these enzyme reactions, for the activation or inhibition constants that measure the regulatory interactions, and for the total concentrations of the different molecular species involved in the pathway. For all these parameters, we made a semi-arbitrary choice, in a physiologically reasonable range, as explained in Section 4.1 of Supplementary Material.
The choice of parameter values was guided by the constraint of matching the observed characteristics of the CBF3 expression, which is the major response measured in the experiments, in regard to its amplitude, timing, and half-width. This was achieved by trial and error, i.e., by performing simulations for a large set of parameter values and selecting a set that produced (1) a CBF3 mRNA peak in a range extending from 1 to 6 h after the cold stress, as observed in different experiments (Chinnusamy et al., 2003; Zarka et al., 2003; Vogel et al., 2005; Agarwal et al., 2006; Medina et al., 2011); (2) an amplitude in the range of about 20–500 fold-increase compared to the steady state level prior to the stress (Chinnusamy et al., 2003; Zarka et al., 2003; Dong et al., 2011); and (3) a range of 3–6 h for the half-width of the peak in CBF3 expression induced by the cold signal. For the brief initial Ca2+ pulse, we chose values for the kinetic parameters ensuring that the pulse is over in minutes, as observed in the experiments (Plieth et al., 1999). For Ca2+ oscillations, we selected parameter values in eqs. (2a)–(2d) as described in Section 1.2 of Supplementary Material, so as to obtain a period of the order of 150 s as observed in plant guard cells (Allen et al., 2001). The degradation rate of CBF3 mRNA has been determined experimentally. Thus, the CBF3 transcript has a half-life of 7.5 min at warm temperatures, which gives an approximately degradation rate of CBF3 mRNA at 20°C of the order of 5.5 nM/h, while at low temperature this degradation rate is 10 times smaller, of the order of 0.55 nM/h (Zarka et al., 2003). This quantitative information was taken into account in numerical simulations of the model.
We also performed a sensitivity analysis, as detailed in Section 4.2 in Supplementary Material, to determine for each parameter, varying one at a time, the range in which the model matches experimental observations with respect to three properties of the peak of CBF3 expression elicited by a cold stress: the amplitude of the peak in CBF3 mRNA, the timing of this peak, and the half-width, measuring the duration of the response. This analysis allows us to determine which parameters might be targeted experimentally to modify most effectively the amplitude, timing, or half-width of the peak in CBF3 expression elicited by the cold stress.
An additional interest of the computational model is to reveal the possibility of new modes of behavior, such as oscillations in CBF3 expression, which, so far, have not been observed experimentally, and to investigate the effect of coupling the plant cold response pathway to the circadian clock. In a certain range of parameter values, the model indeed predicts the possible occurrence of sustained oscillations in the expression of CBF3. The phenomenon is accompanied by oscillations in ZAT12 but not in the other state variables of the network. The mechanism of CBF3 oscillations involves the negative feedback exerted by ZAT12 on the expression of CBF3. Numerical simulations indicate, as shown in “Putative CBF3 Oscillations Resulting From Negative Feedback Exerted by ZAT12” section and Supplementary Figure S4, that oscillations are favored by a high level of phosphorylated ICE1, which acts as inducer of CBF3. Besides augmenting the stability of CBF3 mRNA, enhancing the level of phosphorylated ICE1 might, therefore, be a promising approach for investigating the possibility of an oscillatory expression of the genes that control the plant response to cold stress. The possible physiological significance of such oscillations in CBF3 expression and their very occurrence nevertheless remain an open question, given that they only occur for appropriate parameter values and that so far they have not been observed experimentally. Besides these ZAT12-controlled oscillations, the cold response pathway is subjected to periodic alternations between cold and warm periods and to control by the endogenous plant circadian clock, which appears to gate the plant response to cold stress, as shown in “Circadian Gating” section and Figure 8. Because of their tight coupling through CBF3, ZAT12-controlled oscillations, if they occur, might well synchronize with these endogenous and exogenous circadian variations.
Incorporation of the effect of the circadian clock on CBF3 expression into the model allowed us to account for circadian gating of the response to a drop in temperature. We represented the circadian input phenomenologically by means of a sine function multiplying the rate of CBF3 mRNA synthesis. It would be possible to replace this description by using a compact model for the plant circadian clock (De Caluwé et al., 2016) in which CCA1 and LHY are treated explicitly as variables. This would allow us to test more directly the effect of different photoperiods as well as the effect of mutations in clock genes on the plant response to cold stress. In support of experimental observations (Fowler et al., 2005; Dong et al., 2011), the results of Figure 8 indicate that the operation of the cold response pathway is gated by the circadian clock. Experimentally, the maximum expression of CBF3 occurs during the day, several hours before the L to D transition. This timing does not correspond to the time at which the cold stress is expected to occur in physiological conditions, which should be in late evening or at night. The same remark holds for the results of Figure 8, which indicate that in the model also the window of maximum responsiveness of the cold response pathway is largely confined to the L phase. The results predict that in a portion of the LD cycle, the reaction of the plant cold response pathway to a Ca2+ pulse is negligible. From a physiological point of view, we would not expect the cold response pathway to operate optimally if the cold stress arrives at such phases. In discussing the relative timing of the system’s response with respect to the cold stress, we should keep in mind that a delay likely exists between the rise in CBF3 expression and the build-up of the cellular response to cold stress. A large number of COR genes must indeed be induced by CBF3, and their translation into the corresponding proteins takes time, while additional delays should arise from the time taken by these proteins to organize cold acclimation and freezing tolerance at the cellular level.
Besides the pathway responsible for resistance to a cold stress, plants display a separate cold-dependent response, which occurs on a time scale of weeks or months. This major cold-dependent physiological process, known as vernalization, is the phenomenon by which prolonged cold exposure leads to the silencing of a floral repressor gene (Song et al., 2012), thereby allowing the plant to delay its flowering until after the winter season. This epigenetic process has been modeled mathematically in terms of bistability in the flower-control regulatory system (Angel et al., 2011). Here, we focused on modeling the rapid response of plants to a cold stress that leads, after a few hours, to freezing tolerance. Although they appear to be largely independent and occur on widely different time scales, some experimental observations provide evidence (Diallo et al., 2010; Feng et al., 2017) for cross-talk between the two cold-dependent signaling pathways.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
XY, XH, and AG designed the study. RZ, AG, and DG built the computational model. RZ and DG performed numerical simulations. RZ and AG wrote the manuscript. RZ, DG, XH, XY, and AG contributed to discussing the results and to finalizing the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
XY was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11171155, no. 11871268) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (no. BK20171370). XH was supported by the Key Projects of National Key Research and Development Plan (2017YFD0101803), the State Key Program of Natural Science Foundation of China (31330067), and the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-23-A-06). RZ was supported by the scholarship from China Scholarship Council (file no. 201706850036) during his stay at the Université Libre de Bruxelles (Brussels, Belgium). DG acknowledges support from the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S.-FNRS, Belgium), CDR no J.0076.19.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank the referees for fruitful suggestions and Chunzhao Zhao for a helpful discussion. Part of this work was performed during the participation of RZ in the program “Certificat international de formation à la recherche doctorale” at the Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB, Brussels, Belgium).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.591073/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AchardP.GongF.CheminantS.AllouaM.HeddenP.GenschikP. (2008). The cold-inducible CBF1 factor-dependent signaling pathway modulates the accumulation of the growth-repressing DELLA proteins via its effect on gibberellin metabolism. Plant Cell20, 2117–2119. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.058941
2
AgarwalM.HaoY.KapoorA.DongC.FujiiH.ZhengX.et al. (2006). A R2R3 type MYB transcription factor is involved in the cold regulation of CBF genes and in acquired freezing tolerance. J. Biol. Chem.281, 37636–37645. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605895200
3
AllenG. J.ChuS. P.HarringtonC. L.SchumacherK.HoffmannT.TangY. Y.et al. (2001). A defined range of guard cell calcium oscillation parameters encodes stomatal movements. Nature411, 1053–1057. doi: 10.1038/35082575
4
AllenG. J.ChuS. P.SchumacherK.ShimazakiC. T.VafeadosD.KemperA.et al. (2000). Alteration of stimulus-specific guard cell calcium oscillations and stomatal closing in Arabidopsis det3 mutant. Science289, 2338–2342. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5488.2338
5
AngelA.SongJ.DeanC.HowardM. (2011). A Polycomb-based switch underlying quantitative epigenetic memory. Nature476, 105–108. doi: 10.1038/nature10241
6
BarahP.JayaveluN. D.RasmussenS.NielsenH. B.MundyJ.BonesA. (2013). Genome-scale cold stress response regulatory networks in ten Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. BMC Genomics14, 722–737. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-722
7
BieniawskaZ.EspinozaC.SchlerethA.SulpiceR.HinchaD. K.HannahM. A. (2008). Disruption of the Arabidopsis circadian clock is responsible for extensive variation in the cold-responsive transcriptome. Plant Physiol.147, 263–279. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.118059
8
ChewY. H.HallidayK. J. (2010). A stress-free walk from Arabidopsis to crops. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.22, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.11.011
9
ChinnusamyV.OhtaM.KanrarS.LeeB.HongX.AgarwalM.et al. (2003). ICE1: a regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev.17, 1043–1054. doi: 10.1101/gad.1077503
10
ChinnusamyV.ZhuJ. K. (2002). Molecular genetic analysis of cold-regulated gene transcription. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.357, 877–886. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1076
11
ChinnusamyV.ZhuJ. H.ZhuJ. K. (2006). Gene regulation during cold acclimation in plants. Physiol. Plant.126, 52–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00596.x
12
ChinnusamyV.ZhuJ. H.ZhuJ. K. (2007). Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants. Trends Plant Sci.12, 444–451. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.07.002
13
CookD.FowlerS.FiehnO.ThomashowM. F. (2004). A prominent role for the CBF cold responsive pathway in configuring the low-temperature metabolome of Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.101, 15243–15248. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406069101
14
De CaluwéJ.XiaoQ.HermansC.VerbruggenN.LeloupJ. -C.GonzeD. (2016). A compact model for the complex plant circadian clock. Front. Plant Sci.7:74. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00074
15
DialloA.KaneN.AgharbaouiZ.BadawiM.SarhanF. (2010). Heterologous expression of wheat VERNALIZATION 2 (TaVRN2) gene in Arabidopsis delays flowering and enhances freezing tolerance. PLoS One5:e8690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008690
16
DingY.ShiY.YangS. (2019). Advances and challenges in uncovering cold tolerance regulatory mechanisms in plants. New Phytol.222, 1690–1704. doi: 10.1111/nph.15696
17
DoddA. N.JakobsenM. K.BakerA. J.TelzerowA.HouS.LaplazeL.et al. (2006). Time of day modulates low-temperature Ca2+ signals in Arabidopsis. Plant J.48, 962–973. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02933.x
18
DohertyC. J.Van BuskirkH. A.MyersS. J.ThomashowM. F. (2009). Roles for Arabidopsis CAMTA transcription factors in cold-regulated gene expression and freezing tolerance. Plant Cell21, 972–984. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.063958
19
DongC.AgarwalM.ZhangY.XieQ.ZhuJ. K. (2006). The negative regulator of plant cold responses, HOS1, is a RING E3 ligase that mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of ICE1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.103, 8281–8286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602874103
20
DongM. A.FarréE. M.ThomashowM. F. (2011). Circadian clock-associated 1 and late elongated hypocotyl regulate expression of the C-repeat binding factor (CBF) pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.108, 7241–7246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103741108
21
DubouzetJ. G.SakumaY.ItoY.KasugaM.DubouzetE. G.MiuraS.et al. (2003). OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L., encode transcription activators that function in drought-, high-salt- and cold-responsive gene expression. Plant J.33, 751–763. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01661.x
22
DupontG.BerridgeM. J.GoldbeterA. (1991). Signal-induced Ca2+ oscillations: properties of a model based on Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release. Cell Calcium12, 73–85. doi: 10.1016/0143-4160(91)90010-c
23
ErmentroutB. (2002). Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynamical systems: A guide to XPPAUT for researchers and students.Philadelphia: SIAM.
24
FengY.YinY.FeiS. (2017). BdVRN1 expression confers flowering competency and is negatively correlated with freezing tolerance in Brachypodium distachyon. Front. Plant Sci.8:1107. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01107
25
FowlerS. G.CookD.ThomashowM. F. (2005). Low temperature induction of Arabidopsis CBF1, 2, and 3 is gated by the circadian clock. Plant Physiol.137, 961–968. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.058354
26
FowlerS.ThomashowM. F. (2002). Arabidopsis transcriptome profiling indicates that multiple regulatory pathways are activated during cold acclimation in addition to the CBF cold response pathway. Plant Cell14, 1675–1690. doi: 10.1105/tpc.003483
27
FuruyaT.MatsuokaD.NanmoriT. (2013). Phosphorylation of Arabidopsis thaliana MEKK1 via Ca2+ signaling as a part of the cold stress response. J. Plant Res.126, 833–840. doi: 10.1007/s10265-013-0576-0
28
GérardC.GoldbeterA. (2009). Temporal self-organization of the cyclin/Cdk network driving the mammalian cell cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.106, 21643–21648. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903827106
29
GilmourS. J.FowlerS. G.ThomashowM. F. (2004). Arabidopsis transcriptional activators CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 have matching functional activities. Plant Mol. Biol.54, 767–781. doi: 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000040902.06881.d4
30
GoldbeterA. (1995). A model for circadian oscillations in the Drosophila period protein (PER). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.261, 319–324. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0153
31
GoldbeterA. (1996). Biochemical oscillations and cellular rhythms: The molecular bases of periodic and chaotic behavior.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32
GoldbeterA.DupontG.BerridgeM. J. (1990). Minimal model for signal-induced Ca2+ oscillations and for their frequency encoding through protein phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.87, 1461–1465. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.4.1461
33
GoldbeterA.GérardC.GonzeD.LeloupJ. -C.DupontG. (2012). Systems biology of cellular rhythms. FEBS Lett.586, 2955–2965. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.07.041
34
HannahM. A.HeyerA. G.HinchaD. K. (2005). A global survey of gene regulation during cold acclimation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet.1:e26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010026
35
HannahM. A.WieseD.FreundS.FiehnO.HeyerA. G.HinchaD. K. (2006). Natural genetic variation of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.142, 98–112. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.081141
36
HuaJ. (2009). From freezing to scorching, transcriptional responses to temperature variations in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.12, 568–573. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.07.012
37
IshitaniM.XiongL.LeeH.StevensonB.ZhuJ. K. (1998). HOS1, a genetic locus involved in cold-responsive gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell10, 1151–1161. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.7.1151
38
JagloK. R.KleffS.AmundsenK. L.ZhangX.HaakeV.ZhangJ. Z.et al. (2001). Components of the Arabidopsis C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element binding factor cold-response pathway are conserved in Brassica napus and other plant species. Plant Physiol.127, 910–917. doi: 10.1104/pp.010548
39
Jaglo-OttosenK. R.GilmourS. J.ZarkaD. G.SchabenbergerO.ThomashowM. F. (1998). Arabidopsis CBF1 overexpression induces COR genes and enhances freezing tolerance. Science280, 104–106. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5360.104
40
JiangB.ShiY.PengY.JiaY.YanY.DongX.et al. (2020). Cold-induced CBF3-PIF3 interaction enhances freezing tolerance by stabilizing the phyB themosensor in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant13, 894–906. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.04.006
41
KaplanF.KopkaJ.HaskellD. W.ZhaoW.SchillerK. C.GatzkeN.et al. (2004). Exploring the temperature-stress metabolome of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.136, 4159–4168. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.052142
42
KeilyJ.MacGregorD. R.SmithR. W.MillarA. J.HallidayK. J.PenfieldS. (2013). Model selection reveals control of cold signaling by evening-phased components of the plant circadian clock. Plant J.76, 247–257. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12303
43
KimS. H.KimH. S.BahkS.AnJ.YooY.KimJ. Y.et al. (2017). Phosphorylation of the transcriptional repressor MYB15 by mitogen-activated protein kinase 6 is required for freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res.45, 6613–6627. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx417
44
KnightH.TrewavasA. J.KnightM. R. (1996). Cold calcium signaling in Arabidopsis involves two cellular pools and a change in calcium signature after acclimation. Plant Cell8, 489–503. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.3.489
45
KongQ.QuN.GaoM.ZhangZ.DingX.YangF.et al. (2012). The MEKK1-MKK1/MKK2-MPK4 kinase cascade negatively regulates immunity mediated by a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell24, 2225–2236. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.097253
46
KoshlandD. E.GoldbeterA.StockJ. B. (1982). Amplification and adaption in regulatory and sensory systems. Science217, 220–225. doi: 10.1126/science.7089556
47
KudlaJ.BeckerD.GrillE.HedrichR.HipplerM.KummerU.et al. (2018). Advances and current challenges in calcium signaling. New Phytol.218, 414–431. doi: 10.1111/nph.14966
48
LeeB.HendersonD. A.ZhuJ. K. (2005). The Arabidopsis cold-responsive transcriptome and its regulation by ICE1. Plant Cell17, 3155–3175. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035568
49
LeeH.XiongL.GongZ.IshitaniM.StevensonB.ZhuJ. K. (2001). The Arabidopsis HOS1 gene negatively regulates cold signal transduction and encodes a RING finger protein that displays cold-regulated nucleo–cytoplasmic partitioning. Genes Dev.15, 912–924. doi: 10.1101/gad.866801
50
LeloupJ. -C.GoldbeterA. (2003). Toward a detailed computational model for the mammalian circadian clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.100, 7051–7056. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1132112100
51
LeloupJ. -C.GoldbeterA. (2004). Modeling the mammalian circadian clock: sensitivity analysis and multiplicity of oscillatory mechanisms. J. Theor. Biol.230, 541–562. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.04.040
52
LiH.DingY.ShiY.ZhangX.ZhangS.GongZ.et al. (2017). MPK3- and MPK6-mediated ICE1 phosphorylation negatively regulates ICE1 stability and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell43, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.09.025
53
LissarreM.OhtaM.SatoA.MiuraK. (2010). Cold-responsive gene regulation during cold acclimation in plants. Plant Signal. Behav.5, 948–952. doi: 10.4161/psb.5.8.12135
54
LiuY.DangP.LiuL.HeC. (2019). Cold acclimation by the CBF-COR pathway in a changing climate: lessons from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep.38, 511–519. doi: 10.1007/s00299-019-02376-3
55
LiuZ.JiaY.DingY.ShiY.LiZ.GuoY.et al. (2017). Plasma membrane CRPK1-mediated phosphorylation of 14-3-3 proteins induces their nuclear import to fine-tune CBF signaling during cold response. Mol. Cell66, 117.e5–128.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.016
56
LiuQ.KasugaM.SakumaY.AbeH.MiuraS.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK.et al. (1998). Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain, separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell10, 1391–1406. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.8.1391
57
Marozsán-TóthZ.VashegyiI.GalibaG.TóthB. (2015). The cold response of CBF genes in barley is regulated by distinct signaling mechasnims. J. Plant Physiol.181, 42–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.04.002
58
McClungC. R. (2019). The plant circadian oscillator. Biology8:14. doi: 10.3390/biology8010014
59
McClungC. R.DavisS. J. (2010). Ambient thermometers in plants: from physiological outputs towards mechanisms of thermal sensing. Curr. Biol.20, R1086–R1092. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.035
60
MedinaJ.CataláR.SalinasJ. (2011). The CBFs: three Arabidopsis transcription factors to cold acclimate. Plant Sci.180, 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.06.019
61
MiuraK.JinJ. B.LeeJ.YooC. Y.StirmV.MiuraT.et al. (2007). SIZ1-mediated sumoylation of ICE1 controls CBF3/DREB1A expression and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell19, 1403–1414. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048397
62
NakamichiN.KusanoM.FukushimaA.KitaM.ItoS.YamashinoT.et al. (2009). Transcript profiling of an Arabidopsis PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR arrhythmic triple mutant reveals a role for the circadian clock in cold stress response. Plant Cell Physiol.50, 447–462. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp004
63
NohalesM. A.KayS. A. (2016). Molecular mechanisms at the core of the plant circadian oscillator. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.23, 1061–1069. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3327
64
ÖrvarB. L.SangwanV.OmannF.DhindsaR. S. (2000). Early steps in cold sensing by plant cells: the role of actin cytoskeleton and membrane fluidity. Plant J.23, 785–794. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00845.x
65
PliethC. (1999). Temperature sensing by plants: calcium-permeable channels as primary sensors—a model. J. Membr. Biol.172, 121–127. doi: 10.1007/s002329900590
66
PliethC.HansenU.KnightH.KnightM. R. (1999). Temperature sensing by plants: the primary characteristics of signal perception and calcium response. Plant J.18, 491–497. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00471.x
67
RuellandE.ZachowskiA. (2010). How plants sense temperature. Environ. Exp. Bot.69, 225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.05.011
68
RuizM. C. M.HubbardK. E.GardnerM. J.JungH. J.AubryS.HottaC. T.et al. (2018). Circadian oscillations of cytosolic free calcium regulate the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Nat. Plants4, 690–698. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0224-8
69
RuizM. C. M.JungH. J.WebbA. A. R. (2020). Circadian gating of dark-induced increases in chloroplast- and cytosolic-free calcium in Arabidopsis. New Phytol.225, 1993–2005. doi: 10.1111/nph.16280
70
ShiY.DingY.YangS. (2018). Molecular regulation of CBF signaling in cold acclimation. Trends Plant Sci.23, 623–637. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.04.002
71
SongJ.AngelA.HowardM.DeanC. (2012). Vernalization—a cold-induced epigenetic switch. J. Cell Sci.125, 3723–3731. doi: 10.1242/jcs.084764
72
StockingerE. J.GilmourS. J.ThomashowM. F. (1997). Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 encodes an AP2 domain-containing transcription activator that binds to the C repeat/DRE, a cis-acting DNA regulatory element that stimulates transcription in response to low temperature and water deficit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.94, 1035–1040. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.3.1035
73
TangK.ZhaoL.RenY.YangS.ZhuJ.ZhaoC. (2020). The transcription factor ICE1 functions in cold stress response by binding to the promoters of CBF and COR genes. J. Integr. Plant Biol.62, 258–263. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12918
74
TeigeM.ScheiklE.EulgemT.DócziR.IchimuraK.ShinozakiK.et al. (2004). The MKK2 pathway mediates cold and salt stress signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol. Cell15, 141–152. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.023
75
ThomashowM. F. (1999). Plant cold acclimation: freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.50, 571–599. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.571
76
ThomashowM. F. (2010). Molecular basis of plant cold acclimation: insights gained from studying the CBF cold response pathway. Plant Physiol.154, 571–577. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.161794
77
VogelJ. T.ZarkaD. G.Van BuskirkH. A.FowlerS. G.ThomashowM. F. (2005). Roles of the CBF2 and ZAT12 transcription factors in configuring the low temperature transcriptome of Arabidopsis. Plant J.41, 195–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02288.x
78
WangZ.WangF.TangJ.HuangZ.XiongA.HouX. (2014). C-repeat binding factor gene family identified in non-heading Chinese cabbage is functional in abiotic and biotic stress response but different from that in Arabidopsis. Acta Physiol. Plant.36, 3217–3229. doi: 10.1007/s11738-014-1688-4
79
YangT.AliG. S.YangL.DuL.ReddyA. S. N.PoovaiahB. W. (2010). Calcium/calmodulin-regulated receptor-like kinase CRLK1 interacts with MEKK1 in plants. Plant Signal. Behav.5, 991–994. doi: 10.4161/psb.5.8.12225
80
ZarkaD. G.VogelJ. T.CookD.ThomashowM. F. (2003). Cold induction of Arabidopsis CBF genes involves multiple ICE (inducer of CBF expression) promoter elements and a cold-regulatory circuit that is desensitized by low temperature. Plant Physiol.133, 910–918. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.027169is
81
ZhangX.FowlerS. G.ChengH.LouY.RheeS. Y.StockingerE. J.et al. (2004). Freezing-sensitive tomato has a functional CBF cold response pathway, but a CBF regulon that differs from that of freezing-tolerant Arabidopsis. Plant J.39, 905–919. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02176.x
82
ZhaoC.WangP.SiT.HsuC. C.WangL.ZayedO.et al. (2017). MAP kinase cascades regulate the cold response by modulating ICE1 protein stability. Dev. Cell43, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.09.024
83
ZhaoC.ZhangZ.XieS.SiT.LiY.ZhuJ. -K. (2016). Mutational evidence for the critical role of CBF transcription factors in cold acclimation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.171, 2744–2759. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00533
84
ZielinskiR. E. (1998). Calmodulin and calmodulin-binding proteins in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.49, 697–725. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.697
Summary
Keywords
cold response pathway, cold tolerance, C-repeat-binding factor, computational model, systems biology, plant cold acclimation
Citation
Zhang R, Gonze D, Hou X, You X and Goldbeter A (2020) A Computational Model for the Cold Response Pathway in Plants. Front. Physiol. 11:591073. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.591073
Received
03 August 2020
Accepted
16 October 2020
Published
05 November 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited by
Jianhua Xing, University of Pittsburgh, United States
Reviewed by
Xiaojun Tian, Arizona State University, United States; Kevin P. Vincent, University of California, San Diego, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Zhang, Gonze, Hou, You and Goldbeter.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Albert Goldbeter, agoldbet@ulb.ac.beXiong You, youx@njau.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Systems Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.