In the original article, there was an error. The introduction incorrectly stated that work by Lundberg et al., 2013, 2014, de Souza et al., 2013, and Kazior et al., 2016 demonstrated reduced lean mass gains in the concurrent (resistance plus endurance) exercise trained group compared to resistance alone. This has been amended below. These papers were discussed in the correct context throughout the rest of the manuscript.
A correction has been made to Introduction, Paragraph 1:
Combining resistance- and endurance-based exercise training, or ‘concurrent exercise training,’ has previously been shown to impair strength and power adaptations compared to resistance training undertaken in isolation (Hickson, 1980; Craig et al., 1991; Hennessy and Watson, 1994; Kraemer et al., 1995; Dolezal and Potteiger, 1998; Bell et al., 2000; Häkkinen et al., 2003; Mikkola et al., 2012; Fyfe et al., 2016, 2018) and is referred to as the ‘interference effect.’ Notably, the result of concurrent exercise training on ‘interferences’ to lean mass gains relative to resistance training alone appear equivocal, with some studies showing greater gains in lean mass compared to resistance training alone (Kraemer et al., 1995; Bell et al., 2000; Rønnestad et al., 2012; Lundberg et al., 2013, 2014; Tomiya et al., 2017; Fyfe et al., 2018), while others have observed comparable (de Souza et al., 2013) or smaller gains in lean mass compared to resistance training alone (Sale et al., 1990; Timmons et al., 2018; Spiliopoulou et al., 2019). As such, understanding the ability of skeletal muscle to simultaneously adapt to divergent training stimuli is a topic that has received considerable attention (Nader, 2006; Wilson et al., 2012; Hamilton and Philp, 2013; Baar, 2014; Fyfe et al., 2014; Perez-Schindler et al., 2015; Murach and Bagley, 2016; Varela-Sanz et al., 2016; Coffey and Hawley, 2017; Doma et al., 2017; Berryman et al., 2018; Eddens et al., 2018; Fyfe and Loenneke, 2018; Hughes et al., 2018). Though the underlying cause of discrepancies in the degree of muscle hypertrophy achieved with concurrent versus resistance training remains unclear, it has recently been proposed that the potential for myofibre hypertrophy in response to chronic concurrent exercise training may be limited by satellite cell content (Babcock et al., 2012).
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
BaarK. (2014). Using Molecular Biology to Maximize Concurrent Training. Sports Med Auckl Nz44, 117–125. 10.1007/s40279-014-0252-0
2
BabcockL.EscanoM.D'LugosA.ToddK.MurachK.LudenN. (2012). Concurrent aerobic exercise interferes with the satellite cell response to acute resistance exercise. AJP Regul Integr Comp Physiol302, R1458–R1465.
3
BellG. J.SyrotuikD.MartinT. P.BurnhamR.QuinneyH. A. (2000). Effect of concurrent strength and endurance training on skeletal muscle properties and hormone concentrations in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol81, 418–427. 10.1007/s004210050063
4
BerrymanN.MujikaI.BosquetL. (2018). Concurrent Training for Sports Performance: The Two Sides of the Medal. Int J Sports Physiol Perform.14, 1–22.
5
CoffeyV. G.HawleyJ. A. (2017). Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract?J Physiol595, 2883–2896. 10.1113/jp272270
6
CraigB. W.LucasJ.PohlmanR.StellingH. (1991). The Effects of Running, Weightlifting and a Combination of Both on Growth Hormone Release. J Strength Cond Res. 5, 198–203. 10.1519/00124278-199111000-00005
7
de SouzaE. O.TricoliV.RoschelH.BrumP. C.BacurauA. V. N.FerreiraJ. C. B.et al. (2013). Molecular adaptations to concurrent training. Int J Sports Med34, 207–213.
8
DolezalB. A.PotteigerJ. A. (1998). Concurrent resistance and endurance training influence basal metabolic rate in nondieting individuals. J Appl Physiol85, 695–700. 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.2.695
9
DomaK.DeakinG. B.BentleyD. J. (2017). Implications of Impaired Endurance Performance following Single Bouts of Resistance Training: An Alternate Concurrent Training Perspective. Sports Med. 47, 2187–2200. 10.1007/s40279-017-0758-3
10
EddensL.van SomerenK.HowatsonG. (2018). The Role of Intra-Session Exercise Sequence in the Interference Effect: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Sports Med Auckl NZ48, 177–188. 10.1007/s40279-017-0784-1
11
FyfeJ. J.BartlettJ. D.HansonE. D.SteptoN. K.BishopD. J. (2016). Endurance Training Intensity Does Not Mediate Interference to Maximal Lower-Body Strength Gain during Short-Term Concurrent Training. Front. Physiol7:487.
12
FyfeJ. J.BishopD. J.BartlettJ. D.HansonE. D.AndersonM. J.GarnhamA. P.et al. (2018). Enhanced skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis, yet attenuated mTORC1 and ribosome biogenesis-related signalling, following short-term concurrent versus single-mode resistance training. Sci Rep 8, 560.
13
FyfeJ. J.BishopD. J.SteptoN. K. (2014). Interference between Concurrent Resistance and Endurance Exercise: Molecular Bases and the Role of Individual Training Variables. Sports Med44, 743–762. 10.1007/s40279-014-0162-1
14
FyfeJ. J.LoennekeJ. P. (2018). Interpreting Adaptation to Concurrent Compared with Single-Mode Exercise Training: Some Methodological Considerations. Sports Med48, 289–297. 10.1007/s40279-017-0812-1
15
HäkkinenK.AlenM.KraemerW. J.GorostiagaE.IzquierdoM.RuskoH.et al. (2003). Neuromuscular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training versus strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol89, 42–52. 10.1007/s00421-002-0751-9
16
HamiltonD. L.PhilpA. (2013). Can AMPK mediated suppression of mTORC1 explain the concurrent training effect?Cell Mol Exerc Physiol2, e4.
17
HennessyL. C.WatsonA. W. S. (1994). The Interference Effects of Training for Strength and Endurance Simultaneously. J Strength Cond Res8, 12. 10.1519/00124278-199402000-00003
18
HicksonR. C. (1980). Interference of strength development by simultaneously training for strength and endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol45, 255–263. 10.1007/bf00421333
19
HughesD. C.EllefsenS.BaarK. (2018). Adaptations to Endurance and Strength Training. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med8, a029769.
20
KaziorZ.WillisS. J.MobergM.AprĂ³W.CalbetJ. A. L.HolmbergH.-C.et al. (2016). Endurance Exercise Enhances the Effect of Strength Training on Muscle Fiber Size and Protein Expression of Akt and mTOR. PLoS One11:e0149082. 10.1371/journal.pone.0149082
21
KraemerW. J.PattonJ. F.GordonS. E.HarmanE. A.DeschenesM. R.ReynoldsK.et al. (1995). Compatibility of high-intensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol.78, 976–989. 10.1152/jappl.1995.78.3.976
22
LundbergT. R.Fernandez-GonzaloR.GustafssonT.TeschP. A. (2013). Aerobic exercise does not compromise muscle hypertrophy response to short-term resistance training. J Appl Physiol114, 81–89. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01013.2012
23
LundbergT. R.Fernandez-GonzaloR.TeschP. A. (2014). Exercise-induced AMPK activation does not interfere with muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training in men. J Appl Physiol116, 611–620. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01082.2013
24
MikkolaJ.RuskoH.IzquierdoM.GorostiagaE.HäkkinenK. (2012). Neuromuscular and Cardiovascular Adaptations During Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training in Untrained Men. Int J Sports Med33, 702–710. 10.1055/s-0031-1295475
25
MurachK. A.BagleyJ. R. (2016). Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy with Concurrent Exercise Training: Contrary Evidence for an Interference Effect. Sports Med Auckl NZ46, 1029–1039. 10.1007/s40279-016-0496-y
26
NaderG. A. (2006). Concurrent strength and endurance training: from molecules to man. Med Sci Sports Exerc38, 1965–1970. 10.1249/01.mss.0000233795.39282.33
27
Perez-SchindlerJ.HamiltonD. L.MooreD. R.BaarK.PhilpA. (2015). Nutritional strategies to support concurrent training. Eur J Sport Sci15, 41–52. 10.1080/17461391.2014.950345
28
RønnestadB. R.HansenE. A.RaastadT. (2012). High volume of endurance training impairs adaptations to 12 weeks of strength training in well-trained endurance athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol112, 1457–1466. 10.1007/s00421-011-2112-z
29
SaleD. G.JacobsI.MacDougallJ. D.GarnerS. (1990). Comparison of two regimens of concurrent strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc22, 348–356.
30
SpiliopoulouP.ZarasN.MethenitisS.PapadimasG.PapadopoulosC.BogdanisG. C.et al. (2019). Effect of Concurrent Power Training and High-Intensity Interval Cycling on Muscle Morphology and Performance. J Strength Cond Res10.1519/JSC.0000000000003172 Online ahead of print,
31
TimmonsJ. F.MinnockD.HoneM.CoganK. E.MurphyJ. C.EganB. (2018). Comparison of time-matched aerobic, resistance, or concurrent exercise training in older adults. Scand J Med Sci Sports28, 2272–2283. 10.1111/sms.13254
32
TomiyaS.KikuchiN.NakazatoK. (2017). Moderate Intensity Cycling Exercise after Upper Extremity Resistance Training Interferes Response to Muscle Hypertrophy but Not Strength Gains. J Sports Sci Med16, 391–395.
33
Varela-SanzA.TuimilJ. L.AbreuL.BoullosaD. A. (2016). Does concurrent training intensity distribution matter?J Strength Cond Res Natl Strength Cond Assoc. 31, 181–195. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001474
34
WilsonJ. M.MarinP. J.RheaM. R.WilsonS. M. C.LoennekeJ. P.AndersonJ. C. (2012). Concurrent training: a meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res Natl Strength Cond Assoc26, 2293–2307. 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31823a3e2d
Summary
Keywords
concurrent exercise, resistance exercise, endurance exercise, skeletal muscle, satellite cells
Citation
Shamim B, Camera DM and Whitfield J (2021) Corrigendum: Myofibre Hypertrophy in the Absence of Changes to Satellite Cell Content Following Concurrent Exercise Training in Young Healthy Men. Front. Physiol. 12:736848. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.736848
Received
06 July 2021
Accepted
08 July 2021
Published
28 July 2021
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
12 - 2021
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Shamim, Camera and Whitfield.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jamie Whitfield Jamie.Whitfield@acu.edu.au
This article was submitted to Striated Muscle Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.