SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Virtual Reality for Medical Annotation Tasks – A Systematic Review

Provisionally accepted
The final version of the article will be published here soon pending final quality checks
  • 1Faculty of Computer Science, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany

Virtual reality technologies are broadly used in medicine, including medical education tasks like surgery training.
Annotations are an inseparable part of many medical research and education tasks.
In this systematic review, we investigate the potential of VR for medical tasks with focus on annotation.
The questions we pursue are as follows.
(Q1) For which healthcare associated tasks do we find VR-associated investigations and which involve crowdworker-based annotation?
(Q2) To what extent are there gender-specific differences in the usage of VR?
To address these Qustions, we formulated a keyword list and inclusion/exclusion criteria for the collection of recent scientific articles according to the PRISMA Statement 2020. We queried the Medline database and include 59 free full articles available in English and published from 2017 upwards.
We inspected the abstracts of the retained articles and organized them into 6 categories that referred to VR in the medical context. We identified categories of medicine-related tasks, for which VR is used, and one category associated to cybersickness. We traced technologies used with higher priority for some tasks, and we found that gender-related investigations are more widespread for some categories than for others.
The main findings of our investigation on the role of VR for medical annotation tasks are as follows. VR was used widely for tasks associated with medicine, including medical research and healthcare, but the use of VR for annotation purposes in that context was very limited. Many of the relevant studies concerned VR in education, where annotations may refer to labeling or other enhancements of materials or may refer to exercises. The investigation of gender-related aspects was typically found in studies that encompassed the usage of VR on patients and controls, or on healthy participants in order to assess the potential and limitations of VR for specific tasks/medical assessments or treatments. To fully exploit the VR potential for tasks of medical annotation, especially for the creation of ground truth datasets and similar resources, more research is needed, especially on the interplay of annotator demographics and accessibility to VR technologies.

Keywords: Immersive Virtual Reality (VR), Medical annotation, eye movement monitoring, Wearabe sensors, Eye-tracking, head-mounted display (HMD), crowdsourcing, Gender specific differences

Received: 30 May 2021; Accepted: 19 May 2022.

Copyright: © 2022 Rother and Spiliopoulou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mx. Anne Rother, Faculty of Computer Science, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany