SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Evidence-Based Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Maxillary Sinus Floor Lift, Graft and Surgical Augmentation Procedures
- 1Dentistry Student Research Committee, Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
- 2BioMAT'X R&D&I Laboratory, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
- 3Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Mashhad Dental School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
- 4Surgical Oncology Research Center, Emam Reza Hospital, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
- 5Department of Oral and MaxilloFacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
- 6Programa de Doctorado en BioMedicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
- 7Centro de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica (CIIB), Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
- 8Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
Bone augmentation techniques have increasingly been indicated for re-creating adequate bone height and volume suitable for dental implant sites. This is particularly applicable in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla where sinus perforation (ruptured Schneiderian membrane) is a very common complication and sinus floor elevation or lift is frequently considered a standard procedure. The augmentation of the maxillary sinus can be performed with or without grafting biomaterials. Herein, numerous biomaterials and bone substitutes have been proposed, primarily to sustain the lifted space. In addition, cytokines and growth factors have been used to stimulate angiogenesis, enhance bone formation as well as improve healing and recovery period, either as the sole filling material or in combination with bone substitute materials. Within such, is the family of autologous blood extracts, so-called platelet concentrates, which are simply the “product” resulting from the simple centrifugation of collected whole blood samples of the patient, immediately pre-surgery. Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF), a sub-family of platelet concentrates, is a three-dimensional (3-D) autogenous biomaterial obtained, without including anti-coagulants, bovine thrombin, additives, or any gelifying agents during the centrifugation process. Today, it is safe to say that, in implant dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgery, PRFs (particularly, the pure platelet-rich fibrin or P-PRF and leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin or L-PRF sub-classes) are receiving the most attention, essentially due to their simplicity, rapidness, user-friendliness/malleability, and cost-effectiveness. Whether used as the sole “bioactive” filling/additive material or combined with bone substitutes, the revolutionary second-generation PRFs have been very often associated with promising clinical results. Hence, this review aims to provide a 10-years update on the clinical effectiveness of L-PRF when applied/used as the “sole” biomaterial in maxillary sinus augmentation procedures. An electronic search using specific keywords for L-PRF and maxillary sinus augmentation was conducted in three main databases (PubMed-MEDLINE database, Google Scholar and Cochrane library) for the period between January 2009–February 2020. The quest yielded a total of 468 articles. Based on the pre-established strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, only seven articles were deemed eligible and included in the analysis. Surprisingly, of the 5 studies which used de-proteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) in combination with L-PRF, 60% acclaimed no significant effects and only 40% declared positive effects. Of the two articles which had used allogenous bone graft, 50% declared no significant effects and 50% acclaimed positive effects. Only one study had used L-PRF as the sole grafting material and reported a positive effect. Likewise, positive effects were reported in one other study using L-PRF in combination with a collagen membrane. Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies, this review is limited by the inability to perform a proper systematic meta-analysis. Overall, most of the published studies reported impressive results of L-PRF application as a grafting material (sole or adjuvant) in maxillary sinus augmentation and dental implant restorative procedures. Yet, distinct technical processing for L-PRF preparation was noted. Hence, studies should be approached with caution. Here in, in sinus lift and treatment of Schneider membrane, the formation of mature bone remains inconclusive. More studies are eagerly awaited in order to prove the beneficial or detrimental effects of PRFs, in general and L-PRFs, in specific; especially in their tissue regenerative potential pertaining to the promotion of angiogenesis, enhancing of cell proliferation, stimulation of cell migration and autocrine/paracrine secretion of growth factors, as well as to reach a consensus or a conclusive and distinct determination of the effect of leukocytes (and their inclusion) on inflammation or edema and pain; a call for standardization in PRFs and L-PRFs composition reporting and regimenting the preparation protocols.
Albeit the momentous progresses in tissue and defect restoration, regeneration, repair and/or replacement approaches and techniques (and supplies/tools) over the last decades, the posterior maxilla continues to represent a unique and challenging site for dental implant insertion, osseointegration, survival and success, mainly due to its often poor bone quality and deficient bone volume as a result of ridge resorption, atrophy, and sinus pneumatization. While the reconstruction of the posterior maxillary bone volume can be achieved by different procedures such as Le Fort I osteotomies, onlay or inter-positional bone grafts, sinus lifts and augmentation is still considered one of the most predictable regimens. Indeed, bone augmentation techniques have increasingly been indicated for re-creating adequate bone height, volume and density suitable for dental implant sites, particularly applicable in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla where sinus perforation is a very common complication and sinus floor elevation or lift is frequently considered a standard procedure. Undeniably, a healthy (and un-ruptured) Schneiderian membrane is deemed “essential” for the successful integration of any grafting materials into the maxillary sinus and subsequently, the high survival rates for implants inserted into “augmented” sites. Here in, numerous biomaterials and bone substitutes have been proposed for application in the restoration and reconstruction of posterior maxillary bone volume and maxillary sinus floor lift procedures, mainly to sustain the lifted space. Those include (yet not limited to) autogenous/autograft, freeze-dried bone allograft, xenograft, alloplastic bone (1–3), and, recently, a noteworthy increase in the clinical application of autologous blood extracts, i.e., platelet concentrates (Figure 1A), Briefly, platelet concentrates are growth factor-rich products derived/obtained via the simple and rapid (chair-side) centrifugation of collected autologous whole blood from the patient. Such “bioactive additives” have been thus far used in sinus augmentation either as the sole filling material or in combination with other bone substitute materials (4–8). In clinically-usable preparations (surgical adjuvants), the preparation procedure may enhance, accelerate, and promote tissue (soft and hard) wound healing and regeneration (guided bone regeneration) due to the potential to allow the gathering and concentration of platelets and other therapeutic blood constituents (fibrinogen/fibrin, growth factors, leukocytes, and circulating cells) in situ. Hence, platelet concentrates do comprise bioactive properties essential for promoting the healing process(es) and period (9, 10), and remodeling of bone grafts and protection (11–13). This have led to the noted interest and increase in their application as a novel therapeutic adjuvant in dentistry and oral surgery (8, 14–22). However, despite the promising clinical observations, their overall effectiveness remains debated today. The main reasons include: contradictory clinical outcomes, insufficient high-quality evidence-based literature, and poor identification of the characteristics of the end-products (and preparation protocols) used in research studies; along with—until recently—a lack of proper nomenclature to typify these concentrates (23–27). In fact, in 2009, the first “classification” consensus (7) was published, categorizing four particular platelet concentrate sub-families relying on differences in biological components (fibrin and cell), properties (gelification), and possible applications: pure platelet-rich plasma (P-PRP), leukocyte and platelet-rich plasma (L-PRP), pure platelet-rich fibrin (P-PRF), and leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). Nowadays, when compared to the PRPs, it can be stated that in oral and maxillofacial surgery, the PRFs (P-PRF and L-PRF sub-families; not including red blood cells within) have and continue to receive the highest consideration and hype. This is, as we have recently studied (27–29), is mainly due to (i) pre-op simplicity and rapidness of biomaterial attainment and preparation; (ii) intra-op user-friendliness in terms of handling and overall malleability; and (iii) post-op prognosis in terms of clinical results, pain, edema and cost-effectiveness (5, 7, 23–27).
Figure 1. Clinical and histological presentation of L-PRF. (A) Platelet concentrates' clinical preparation, types/classes, and clinical illustration/presentation of several platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) preparations (membranes). (B) PRF composition/architecture illustration. Schematic representation of PRF bio-components and SEM (scanning electron microscope) micrographs of the PRF membranes displaying its polymerized interconnected fibrin network and large living cell population content.
PRF and L-PRF are second-generation “autologous” platelet concentrates of collected whole venous blood from the patient immediately pre-op (10, 12). Briefly, can be described as a fibrin gel-like material, that is polymerized slowly and strongly abundant in growth factors, platelets, leukocytes (almost half of the initial blood harvest), and lymphocytes is collected, following the simple and rapid (~10 min) centrifugation (please note that preparation protocols vary) of blood (10 mL), in vacutainer tubes, without anti-coagulant, bovine thrombin, additives or any other gelifying agent (i.e., under naturally physiological concentrations of autologous thrombin) (8, 27–30). The resulting and/or gathered “clot” (now, bioactive material) is stable, resilient, strong, adhesive, and malleable (Figure 1A), where it can be easily cut and/or adapted into different anatomical defects and applications: blended/mixed with bone grafting material, applied as filling material in a direct way, or even compacted into a stronger fibrin membrane. Alongside this established clinical ease of use and handling, the biochemical composition of the PRF by-products provides it with attractive biochemical properties, hemostatic, angiogenic, osteogenic, anti-inflammatory, anti-microbial, pain-inhibitory, and wound-healing characteristics (5, 27–29, 31), rendering PRFs, at least desirable and revolutionary.
Can be used as an adjuvant therapeutic technique following intraoral surgical procedures to enhance tissue regeneration and wound healing (8, 28, 32), L-PRF, as mentioned earlier, belongs to the second generation of autologous platelet concentrates; where it comprises proteins, cytokines, leukocytes, growth factors, and a stem cell-content (11, 29, 33). L-PRF has a more convenient fibrin network (Figure 1B) that is suitable for cell migration with ability and capacity to store (and release or deliver) cytokines and growth factors—when compared to PRP (30). In addition, the presence of leukocytes has been suggested by some to be highly favorable due to its strong influence on the healing process as a result of the chemotactic recruitment of cells and control of the inflammatory environment (28, 33–39). Accumulating evidence, to date of this review, shows that L-PRF membranes can actively produce and release abundant concentrations of growth factors and cytokines for up to 28 days post-preparation (29). This phenomenon is achieved via activating the platelets, which in turn secrete significant quantities of essential growth factors and proteins including Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Transforming Growth Factor-β1 (TGF-β1), Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs), Transforming Growth Factor-β2 (TGF-β2),-which is a major factor in bone healing-, Insulin–like Growth Factor (IGF), and Platelet-Derived Growth factor (PDGF) (11, 19, 31, 33, 40–54).
It is noteworthy here in, to the interested clinical reader, that to obtain a practical or usable L-PRF clot (fibrin), the blood sample should be promptly centrifuged (30, 33, 55). This is because initially, a high concentration of fibrinogen is in the mid-upper part of the tube and, subsequently, there is a transformation of thrombin, which turns into fibrin by centrifugation. In the lower part of the tube there are erythrocytes, and in the middle a resilient, strong and malleable clot of fibrin and at the top there is cellular plasma (27, 56). The resulting clot can be easily cut and/or adapted into the maxillary sinus (Figure 2). It is so vital herein to re-emphasize that the key of the technique is a fast/rapid preparation.
Figure 2. Clinical case presentation of (A) prepared L-PRF use/ application in (B) a maxillary sinus floor lift and augmentation procedure prior (C) to immediate dental implant placement (D).
Recently, the clinical effects of L-PRF use and application in maxillary sinus lift procedures have been receiving much attention and to date, no consensus has been reached. While some studies report positive effects, other studies have shown limitations to the clinical efficacy and/or potential of L-PRF for bone formation or that it should be combined with other materials (1) to achieve the desired effect. Hence, such variability of “evidence” alongside the detected confusion, ignited this clinical review in an attempt to carefully evaluate the reported beneficial (or not) effect of L-PRF use during maxillary sinus lift procedures and compare to the most common graft materials used for this particular surgery.
Focused PICO Structured Questions
The following PICO was established to formulate the questions:
The population (P): comprised of patients in need of maxillary sinus floor augmentation for implant placement; the intervention (I) was the exclusive use of L-PRF; the comparison (C) was no addition of L-PRF or in combination with other materials, and outcomes (O) were bone regeneration. The question was: is the addition of leukocyte platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF)—as a sole grafting material—as efficient as other biomaterials or the combination of both in clinical (human) cases of maxillary sinus floor augmentation procedure?
The inclusion criteria were clinical studies of patients who underwent maxillary sinus lift surgery and in which the comparison was between the use of L-PRF alone or in combination with other biomaterials in comparison with standard technics. Different protocols in preparation of L-PRF were included.
The exclusion criteria comprised the use of other platelet concentrates and biological enhancers such as: platelet rich fibrin (PRF), platelet rich plasma (PRP), bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) fibrin glue, plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), enamel matrix derivative (EMD) and recombinant human PDGF (rh-PDGF), in vitro and animal in vivo studies.
An electronic search was conducted using three main databases PubMed-MEDLINE database, Google Scholar and Cochrane library/Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials) for the period between January 2009 – February 2020. Only studies in English language were included. The last search was performed on the 3rd of February of 2020. The main key words were: “L-PRF” and “maxillary sinus augmentation,” as follows: (a) (“leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin”(All Fields) AND “sinus” (All Fields)); (b) [ “sinus floor augmentation” (Mesh) OR “sinus lift” (All Fields)] AND [ “L-PRF” (Mesh)].
Titles and abstracts obtained by the electronic search were screened by four authors. Upon screening, full-text versions of all the eligible articles were obtained and carefully investigated. All authors had to agree on the inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria and the finally selected articles. Any case of disagreement(s) was resolved by an open discussion between the authors and supervised by the corresponding author. No registered incidents of (no) consensus or disagreements between the authors.
Data Collection Process
Tabulated data extraction included the first author, year of publication, and study design; characteristics of populations; L-PRF preparation procedure, comparison/control; treatment outcomes, complications, and patient-reported outcomes. Five authors triple-checked the tabulated data/item collection process.
Quality Assessment and Risk of Bias
The quality assessment of all included articles was conducted by four authors in addition to the corresponding author, based on Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias (59); as is presented in Table 1, classified as: adequate (+), inadequate (-), unclear (*) or not applicable (NA); according to the following criteria: (a) randomization (b) allocation concealment (c) blinding of participants personnel and outcome assessors (d) completeness of follow-up (e) selective reporting (statistical reporting) and (f) other bias. Hence, a low risk of bias could be indicated if all the above criteria were met. A moderate risk of bias is indicated if one or more key domains were unclear and, on the other hand, a high risk of bias is indicated if one or more key domains were not met. The conducted Risk of Bias was not evaluated for obtained articles classified as case reports and case series.
The article selection process is illustrated in Figure 3. The electronic search in PubMed-MEDLINE, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library) respectively provided 469 potentially eligible articles published between the years of 2009 and of 2020, with 27 item duplicates discarded following reading all of the abstracts. Then, 396 articles were excluded on the basis of title and scope, and 46 full-texts were further assessed for eligibility with 39 full-texts then excluded (with reasons) and finally only seven articles met the inclusion criteria and were considered for in-depth comparative analysis. The characteristics of all included studies are presented in Tables 2–4.
Table 2. Studies on L-PRF and maxillary sinus augmentation with L-PRF as the SOLE grafting material.
Table 3. Studies on L-PRF and maxillary sinus augmentation with L-PRF in combination with OTHER graft materials.
Table 4. Studies on L-PRF and maxillary sinus augmentation with L-PRF as an adjuvant in the management of sinus membrane perforation.
Quality Assessment and Risk of Bias Analysis of Included Studies
The quality assessment of all the included studies in this review is presented in Table 1. Most of the studies were identified with a moderate risk of bias and only one study was recognized with a high risk of bias.
Results of Individual Studies
Of the seven studies, four used L-PRF in combination with DBBM (63–66), one used L-PRF as a sole grafting material (61) and one utilized L-PRF as a repair material/method for a sinus membrane perforation (62).
The study of Zhang et al. (63) compared the effect of six sinus floors grafted with DBBM and L-PRF with five sinuses grafted with xenograft alone. They described that the newly formed bone in the L-PRF group was 1.4 times higher than that in the control group, without statistical significance. Histologically, a very similar composition and distribution of histologic structures were detected between the groups, with no significant signs of any inflammatory reaction. Evidently, the DBBM particles were distributed homogenously within the augmented area and new bone formation (characterized as woven bone in contrast to the mature skeletal tissue of the alveolar crest, consisting of lamellar bone), was shown to bridge the gaps between the DBBM particles in samples. Furthermore, no significant difference in the percentage of the contour length of the bone substitute material in contact with new bone, was observed, with a bone-to-bone substitute contact of 21.45 ± 14.57% in the DBBM+L-PRF group and 18.57 ± 5.39% in the control group. On the other hand, the study of Pichotano et al. (65), was of split-mouth design in one patient where they compared the combination of xenograft with collagen membrane and L-PRF (experimental side) with DBBM and collagen membrane alone. The magnitude of newly-formed bone was measured using histomorphometric analysis showing a higher proportion in the experimental side (2,118,102 vs. 975,535 mm3). Their study described less fibrous tissue within the sinus in the side without L-PRF than the contra-lateral side, at the expense of more newly formed bone. Nizam et al. (64) also used a split-mouth design and compared DBBM + L-PRF (case) and DBBM alone (control). The percentages of newly-formed bone were 21.38 ± 8.78% and 21.25 ± 5.59% for each group, respectively, with no significant differences. They found NSSD in the newly-formed bone ratio, bone graft remnants, fibrous tissue within the sinus and percentage of the bone graft in contact with the newly-formed bone.
Pichotano et al. (66) applied a combination of L-PRF with DBBM for their test group, and DBBM alone for the control group, with the percentages of newly formed bone 44.58 ± 13.9% for the test group and 30.02 ± 8.42% for the control group, showing an increase in new bone formation that favored the L-PRF group, however without statistical significant differences. The team obtained biopsies at 4 months (during implant placement) from the group with bone graft and L-PRF and at 8 months from the control group (xenograft only). Histomorphometric analysis showed increased new bone formation in the experimental group in comparison to the control group (44.58 ± 13.9% and 30.02 ± 8.42%, respectively). No significant differences in the amount of fibrous tissue within the sinus were detected. Additionally, more residual bone graft in the control group reported, yet with no statistical significance.
Simonpieri et al. (61) used L-PRF as a sole grafting material and found that the L-PRF seemed to promote bone regeneration according to the results of vertical bone gain: between 8.5 and 12 mm.
Effect of L-PRF on Soft Tissue Healing
Gurler and Delilbasi (60) reported higher wound healing in the case group (L-PRF + allogenous bone graft) in comparison to the control group (allogenous bone graft alone). The HI scores (healing index) of the case group (4.2 ± 0.9) were higher than the control group (3.6 ± 0.7) on the 7th (4.7 ± 0.4) and 14th post-operative days (4.4 ± 0.5). Therefore, no significant differences were observed (P = 0.127 and P = 0.189, respectively). The authors also reported “gradual” improvements in post-operative pain, swelling, sleeping, eating, phonetics, activities of daily living, and number of missed working days in the L-PRF group, however no significant differences between the two groups were observed (P > 0.05).
This review was designed, aimed and attempted to closely assess the potential benefit (or lack thereof) of L-PRF concentrate and by-product use during maxillary sinus floor/membrane lift, graft and surgical augmentation procedures, not solely as a matrix but also as a bioactive autologous material (62, 67). The included studies were selected on basis of L-PRF/Choukroun's platelet-rich fibrin and not any other type of platelet concentrates such as P-PRF (Pure Platelet-Rich Fibrin), P-PRP (Pure Platelet-Rich Plasma), PRF (Platelet-Rich Fibrin) or PRP (Platelet-Rich Plasma). It should be noted that some reviews mixed up the different types of platelets and considered them the same (59). It also has been reported that the use of PRF in combination with other grafting biomaterials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation seems to provide no additional beneficial effects (68). The heterogeneity of platelet concentrates has been explained in many studies (5, 69–73). L-PRF is widely used in many fields such as orthodontics (74), endodontics (75), periodontics (76), skull surgeries (77), aesthetic plastic surgeries (46), and for treatment for Androgenetic Alopecia (78). There are various techniques and protocols to obtain L-PRF based on the rate and time of centrifugation and settings, which do influence the chair-side, histomorphometrical, and clinical outcomes (27, 79). Changes in the time of centrifugation, speed, or even the utilization of different centrifuges can affect the final product in significant ways (27, 80). Therefore, as many researchers agree (81), a clear standardized protocol is much considered necessary.
L-PRF is not just a fibrin membrane but a matrix that contains all the beneficial substances and cues found in the blood (12). Some studies opted to combine L-PRF with DBBM to enhance osteoconductive properties of the graft and provide a material for a slow rate of absorption (70, 71). This combination may accelerate bone formation and promote wound healing. The mechanism that underlies both events could be the ability of L-PRF to increase blood flow in the sinus cavity via the release of growth factors and moreover its ability to increase osteoblast proliferation in vitro stimulating osteo-protegerin secretion in human osteoblasts. Nonetheless, the exact mechanism pathways underlying the role and/or clinical function/effect of L-PRF are not fully understood (72, 73).
It was suggested that L-PRF could be beneficial for bone healing and post-operative discomfort when used in combination with traditional graft materials (29), yet the inclusion of leukocytes have been reported to induce/increase pain and inflammation/edema (82) and accelerate the deterioration of the fibrin (83, 84). Different articles in the research reveal a beneficial effect of L-PRF in maxillary sinus lift procedures, especially when combined with DBBM. Nonetheless in most of the studies, the difference was non-statistically significant. It is noteworthy, that in most, except for Pichotano in 2018 (65) the biopsies were taken at the same time for both groups. Pichotano describes, that maybe the use of L-PRF could accelerate bone formation and therefore enable the insertion of the dental fixture/implant earlier than when using any other protocol. However, this cannot be evidently conclusive and therefore, further longitudinal, randomized, controlled clinical trials are warranted in/to support this assumption.
It is perhaps suitable to re-emphasize to the interested clinical reader that new or modern L-PRF preparations (and protocols), unlike the predecessors, tend to function more as biologically-active biomaterials, scaffolds and/or matrices (platforms) for autologous cells and growth factor release and delivery. Therefore, it is to be considered a “living tissue” preparation for natural guided tissue regeneration rather than just a “growth factor-rich” surgical adjuvant. Yet, its only fair to clarify that this remains an unexplored territory in dental bio-engineering research, to the best of knowledge, and further investigation is encouraged to confirm the reported “clinical observations,” whilst other scientific studies are awaited to accurately characterize and/or elucidate the underlying mechanism(s) of action, from the physical, chemical-biological (histo-morpho-metrical and immune-histo-chemical) and mechanical-rheological aspects of L-PRF, for a more practical understanding, suitable for its use and application (28, 85); a topic currently undergoing vigorous R&D at our BioMAT'X Chile laboratory.
Conclusion and Closing Remarks
Hundreds of endogenous proteins affect the tissue repair process(s), including angiogenesis, chemotaxis and cell proliferation, with no one exogenic agent effectively governing all these processes. Platelet Concentrates, in general and PRFs, in specific, as a biomedical and biologic tool, aim to quantitively and qualitatively stimulate tissue regeneration via the application/utilization of such autologous proteins and in situ enrichment with growth factors. Thus, far, the balanced and gradual release of such bio-active growth factors and cytokines plays a critical role in clinical efficacy and tissue repair time (speed). In summary, our attempted review demonstrates neither an advantage nor a disadvantage, clearly, in the application of PRF preparations and their by-products in combination with bone grafting materials. The use of bone grafts remains much more predictable than the use of L-PRF alone, in particular. The combination of both “biomaterials,” however, could move forward or accelerate healing and the time of dental implant insertion. Hence, in sinus lift and treatment of Schneider membrane, the formation of mature bone remains inconclusive. Therefore, more studies are eagerly awaited utilizing standardized protocols in order to prove the beneficial or detrimental effects of PRFs, in general and L-PRFs, in specific; especially in their tissue regenerative potential pertaining to the promotion of angiogenesis, enhancing of cell proliferation, stimulation of cell migration and autocrine/paracrine secretion of growth factors, as well as to reach a consensus or a conclusive and distinct determination of the effect of leukocytes (and their inclusion) on inflammation/edema and pain.
MD: database search, tabulation, and manuscript write-up. CC: database search, tabulation, check, and art-work. ME: database search, tabulation, and manuscript write-up. DA: database search, tabulation, check, quality assessment, and RoB. AA: database search, tabulation, and selected study analysis. ZN: contributed to review idea, database check, discussions, and art-work. ZH: review idea, database check, discussions, manuscript writing, editing, closing remarks, and overall supervision of work. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
This work was supported, in part, by generous funding and operating grants provided to the BioMAT'X R&D&I Group, part of CIIB (Centro de Investigación e Innovación Biomédica at UAndes), through the Faculty of Dentistry and Fondo de Ayuda a la Investigacion FAI—No. INV-IN-2015-101 (2015–2020), Department for Research, Development and Innovation, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago de Chile.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors also wish to acknowledge supplementary funding provided under awarded national grants from CONICYT-FONDEF Chile #ID16I10366 (the maxSALIVA project; 2016–2020) and CORFO-CT-Tecnológicos para la Innovación #18COTE-89695 (the bioFLOSS project; 2018–2021).
1. Liu R, Yan M, Chen S, Huang W, Wu D, Chen J. Effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin as an adjunctive material to bone graft in maxillary sinus augmentation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. Biomed Res Int. (2019) 2019:7267062. doi: 10.1155/2019/7267062
2. Tricot M, Deleu PA, Detrembleur C, Leemri- jse T. Clinical assessment of 115 cases of hindfoot fusión with two different types of graft: allograft+DBM+bone marrow aspi- rate versus autograft+DBM. Orthop Trau Matol Surg Res. (2017) 103:697–702. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.014
3. Silva LD, de Lima VN, Faverani LP, de Mendonça MR, Okamoto R, Pellizzer EP. Maxillary sinus lift surgery-with or without graft material? A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. (2016) 45:1570–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.09.023
4. Bahammam MA. Effectiveness of bovine-derived xenograft versus bioactive glass with periodontally accelerated os- teogenic orthodontics in adults: a rando- mized, controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. (2016) 16:126. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0321-x
5. Del Corso M, Vervelle A, Simonpieri A, Jimbo R, Inchingolo F, Sammartino G, et al. Current knowledge and perspectives for the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in oral and maxillofacial surgery part 1: periodontal and dentoalveolar surgery. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. (2012) 13:1207–30. doi: 10.2174/138920112800624391
6. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A, Dohan SL, Dohan AJ, Mouhyi J, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part III: leucocyte activation: a new feature for platelet concentrates? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. (2006) 101:e51–5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.010
7. Heddle NM, Klama L, Singer J, Richards C, Fedak P, Walker I, et al. The role of the plasma from platelet concentrates in transfusion reactions. N Engl J Med. (1994) 331:625–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199409083311001
8. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, de Peppo GM, Doglioli P, Sammartino G. Slow release of growth factors and thrombospondin-1 in Choukroun's platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a gold standard to achieve for all surgical platelet concentrates technologies. Growth Factors. (2009) 27:63–9. doi: 10.1080/08977190802636713
11. Del Corso M, Etienne D. Choukroun's platelet-rich fibrin membranes in periodontal surgery: understanding the biomaterial or believing in the magic of growth factors? J Periodontol. (2009) 80:1694–9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090253
12. Choukroun J, Diss A, Simonpieri A, Girard MO, Schoeffler C, Dohan SL, et al. A second-generation platelet concentrate. Part V: histologic evaluations of PRF effects on bone allograft maturation in sinus lift. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. (2006) 101:299–303. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.012
13. Simonpieri A, Del Corso M, Sammartino G, Ehrenfest DM. The relevance of Choukroun's platelet-rich fibrin and metronidazole during complex maxillary rehabilitations using bone allograft. Part I: a new grafting protocol. Implant Dent. (2009) 18:102–11. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318198cf00
14. Simonpieri A, Del MC, Sammartino G, Dohan DE. The relevance of Choukroun's platelet-rich fibrin and metronidazole during complex maxillary rehabilitations using bone allograft. Part II: implant surgery, prosthodontics, and survival. Implant Dent. (2009) 18:220–9. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31819b5e3f
15. Chang YC, Zhao JH. Effects of platelet-rich fibrin on human periodontal ligament fibroblasts and application for periodontal infrabony defects. Aust Dent J. (2011) 56:365–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01362.x
16. Sammartino G, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Carile F, Tia M, Bucci P. Prevention of hemorrhagic complications after dental extractions into open heart surgery patients under anticoagulant therapy: the use of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin. J Oral Implantol. (2011) 37:681–90. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00001
17. Baeyens W, Glineur R, Evrard L. The use of platelet concentrates: platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in bone reconstruction prior to dental implant surgery. Rev Med Brux. (2010) 31:521–7.
19. Kiran NK, Mukunda KS, Tilak Raj TN. Platelet concentrates: a promising innovation in dentistry. J Dent Sci Res. (2011) 2:50–61. Available online at: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/31297865/platelet-concentrates-a-promising-innovation-in-ssdctumkurorg
21. Sonnleitner D, Huemer P, Sullivan DY. A simplified technique for producing platelet-rich plasma and platelet concentrate for intraoral bone grafting techniques: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. (2000) 15:879–82.
22. Weibrich G, Hansen T, Kleis W, Buch R, Hitzler WE. Effect of platelet concentration in platelet-rich plasma on peri-implant bone regeneration. Bone. (2004) 34:665–71. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.12.010
23. Babbush CA, Kevy SV, Jacobson MS. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of autologous platelet concentrate in oral reconstruction. Implant Dent. (2003) 12:24–34. doi: 10.1097/01.ID.0000052020.81109.C7
24. Schär MO, Diaz-Romero J, Kohl S, Zumstein MA, Nesic D. Platelet-rich concentrates differentially release growth factors and induce cell migration in vitro. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (2015) 473:1635–43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4192-2
26. Simonpieri A, Del Corso M, Vervelle A, Jimbo R, Inchingolo F, Sammartino G, et al. Current knowledge and perspectives for the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in oral and maxillofacial surgery part 2: bone graft, implant and reconstructive surgery. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. (2012) 13:1231–56. doi: 10.2174/138920112800624472
27. Ruga E, Gallesio C, Boffano P. Platelet-rich fibrin and piezoelectric surgery: a safe technique for the prevention of periodontal complications in third molar surgery. J Craniofac Surg. (2011) 22:1951–5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822ea76b
28. Pinto NR, Ubilla M, Zamora Y, Del Rio V, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Quirynen M. Leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) as a regenerative medicine strategy for the treatment of refractory leg ulcers: a prospective cohort study. Platelets. (2018) 29:468–75. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2017.1327654
33. Muñoz F, Jiménez C, Espinoza D, Vervelle A, Beugnet J, Haidar Z. Use of leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO): clinical effects on edema and pain. J Clin Exp Dent. (2016) 8:e119–24. doi: 10.4317/jced.52760
34. Alizalde F, Kazemi M, Irani S, Sohrabi M. Biologic characteristics of platelet rich plasma and platelet rich fibrin: a review. Int J Contemporary Dental Med Rev. (2016) 1–4. doi: 10.15713/ins.ijcdmr.104
35. Moojen DJ, Everts PA, Schure RM, Overdevest EP, van Zundert A, Knape T, et al. Antimicrobial activity of platelet-leukocyte gel against Staphylococcus aureus. J Orthop Res. (2008) 26:404–10. doi: 10.1002/jor.20519
36. Everts PA, Hoffmann J, Weibrich G, Mahoney CB, Schonberger JP, van Zundert A, et al. Differences in platelet growth factor release and leucocyte kinetics during autologous platelet gel formation. Transfus Med. (2006) 16:363–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2006.00708.x
37. Bielecki TM, Gazdzik TS, Arendt J, Szczepanski T, Krol W, Wielkoszynski T, et al. Antibacterial effect of autologous platelet gel enriched with growth factors and other active substances: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. (2007) 89:417–20. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18491
38. Bielecki T, Gazdzik TS, Szczepanski T. Benefit of percutaneous injection of autologous platelet-leukocyte-rich gel in patients with delayed union and nonunion. Eur Surg Res. (2008) 40:289–96. doi: 10.1159/000114967
39. Everts PA, Devilee RJ, Brown Mahoney C, van Erp A, Oosterbos CJ, Stellenboom M, et al. Exogenous application of platelet-leukocyte gel during open subacromial decompression contributes to improved patient outcome. A prospective randomized double-blind study. Eur Surg Res. (2008) 40:203–10. doi: 10.1159/000110862
40. Everts PA, Overdevest EP, Jakimowicz JJ, Oosterbos CJ, Schonberger JP, Knape T, et al. The use of autologous platelet-leukocyte gels to enhance the healing process in surgery,a review. Surg Endosc. (2007) 21:2063–8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9293-x
43. Anitua E, Orive G, Pla R, Roman P, Serrano V, Andia I. The effects of PRGF on bone regeneration and on titanium implant osseointegration in goats: a histologic and histomorphometric study. J Biomed Mater Res A. (2009) 91:158–65. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32217
45. Ehrenfest DM. How to optimize the preparation of leukocyte-and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF, Choukroun's technique) clots and membranes: introducing the PRF Box. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. (2010) 110:275–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.05.048
46. Zumstein MA, Berger S, Schober M, Boileau P, Nyffeler RW, Horn M, et al. Leukocyte-and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) for long-term delivery of growth factor in rotator cuff repair: review, preliminary results and future directions. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. (2012) 13:1196–206. doi: 10.2174/138920112800624337
47. Cieslik-Bielecka A, Choukroun J, Odin G, M Dohan Ehrenfest D. L-PRP/L-PRF in esthetic plastic surgery, regenerative medicine of the skin and chronic wounds. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. (2012) 13:1266–77. doi: 10.2174/138920112800624463
48. Marenzi G, Riccitiello F, Tia M, di Lauro A, Sammartino G. Influence of leukocyte-and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in the healing of simple postextraction sockets: a split-mouth study. BioMed Res Int. (2015) 2015:369273. doi: 10.1155/2015/369273
49. Cieslik-Bielecka A, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Lubkowska A, Bielecki T. Microbicidal properties of leukocyte-and platelet-rich plasma/fibrin (L-PRP/L-PRF): new perspectives. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. (2012) 26(2Suppl.1):43S–52S.
51. Kazemi D, Fakhrjou A. Leukocyte and platelet rich plasma (L-PRP) versus leukocyte and platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) for articular cartilage repair of the knee: a comparative evaluation in an animal model. Iran Red Crescent Med J. (2015) 17:e19594. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.19594
52. Kim JW, Kim SJ, Kim MR. Leucocyte-rich and platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a prospective feasibility study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. (2014) 52:854–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.07.256
53. Kobayashi E, Flückiger L, Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Sawada K, Sculean A, Schaller B, et al. Comparative release of growth factors from PRP, PRF, and advanced-PRF. Clin Oral Investig. (2016) 20:2353–60. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1719-1
56. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Del Corso M, Diss A, Mouhyi J, Charrier JB. Three-dimensional architecture and cell composition of a Choukroun's platelet-rich fibrin clot and membrane. J Periodontol. (2010) 81:546–55. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090531
57. Cano-Durán JA, Peña-Cardelles J-F, Ortega-Concepción D, Paredes-Rodríguez VM, García-Riart M, López-Quiles J. The role of Leucocyte-rich and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in the treatment of the medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ). J Clin Exp Dent. (2017) 9:e1051–59. doi: 10.4317/jced.54154
58. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. (2009) 62:1006–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
59. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. (2009) 6:e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
60. Da dos Santos Pinto G, Pigossi SC, Pessoa T, Nícoli LG, Araújo RF, Marcantonio C, et al. Successful use of leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin in the healing of sinus membrane perforation: a case report. Implant Dent. (2018) 27:375–80. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000731
61. Pichotano Ec, de Molon Rs, de Souza Rv, Austin RS, Marcantonio R, Zandim-Barcelos DL. Evaluation of L-PRF combined with deproteinized bovine bone mineral for early implant placement after maxillary sinus augmentation: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. (2019) 21:253–62. doi: 10.1111/cid.12713
62. Simonpieri A, Choukroun J, Del Corso M, Sammartino G, Ehrenfest DM. Simultaneous sinus-lift and implantation using microthreaded implants and leukocyte-and platelet-rich fibrin as sole grafting material: a six-year experience. Implant Dent. (2011) 20:2–12. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181faa8af
63. Nizam N, Eren G, Akcali A, Donos N. Maxillary sinus augmentation with leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a split-mouth histological and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implant Res. (2018) 29:67–75. doi: 10.1111/clr.13044
64. Pichotano EC, de Molon RS, Freitas de Paula LG, de Souza RV, Marcantonio E Jr, Zandim-Barcelos DL. Early placement of dental implants in maxillary sinus grafted with leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin and deproteinized bovine bone mineral. J Oral Implantol. (2018) 44:199–206. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00220
65. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1. 0. The Cochrane Collaboration. (2011). Available online at: https://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/.
66. Zhang Y, Tangl S, Huber CD, Lin Y, Qiu L, Rausch-Fan X. Effects of Choukroun's platelet-rich fibrin on bone regeneration in combination with deproteinized bovine bone mineral in maxillary sinus augmentation: a histological and histomorphometric study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. (2012) 40:321–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.04.020
69. Ortega-Mejia H, Estrugo-Devesa A, Saka-Herrán C, Ayuso-Montero R, López-López J, Velasco-Ortega E. Platelet-rich plasma in maxillary sinus augmentation: systematic review. Materials. (2020) 13:E622. doi: 10.3390/ma13030622
70. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Bielecki T, Corso MD, Inchingolo F, Sammartino G. Shedding light in the controversial terminology for platelet-rich products: platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), platelet-leukocyte gel (PLG), preparation rich in growth factors (PRGF), classification and commercialism. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. (2010) 95:1280–2. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32894
71. Ehrenfest DM, Andia I, Zumstein MA, Zhang CQ, Pinto NR, Bielecki T. Classification of platelet concentrates (Platelet-rich plasma-PRP, platelet-rich fibrin-pRF) for topical and infiltrative use in orthopedic and sports medicine: current consensus, clinical implications and perspectives. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. (2014) 4:3–9.
73. Ehrenfest DM, Rasmusson L, Albrektsson T. Classification of platelet concentrates: from pure platelet-rich plasma (P-PRP) to leucocyte-and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). Trends Biotechnol. (2009) 27:158–67. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.11.009
74. Ehrenfest DD, Sammartino G, Shibli JA, Wang HL, Zou DR, Bernard JP. Guidelines for the publication of articles related to platelet concentrates (Platelet-Rich Plasma-PRP, or Platelet-Rich Fibrin-PRF): the international classification of the POSEIDO. Poseido J. (2013) 1:17–28. Available online at: http://www.poseido.info/publication/volume-1-2013/poseido-20131117-27-dohan.pdf
75. Tehranchi A, Behnia H, Pourdanesh F, Behnia P, Pinto N, Younessian F. The effect of autologous leukocyte platelet rich fibrin on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur J Dent. (2018) 12:350–7. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_424_17
76. Pinto N, Harnish A, Cabrera C, Andrade C, Druttman T, Brizuela C. An Innovative regenerative endodontic procedure using leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin associated with apical surgery: a case report. J Endo. (2017) 43:1828–34. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.07.002
77. Del Fabbro M, Bortolin M, Taschieri S, Weinstein R. Is platelet concentrate advantageous for the surgical treatment of periodontal diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. (2011) 82:1100–11. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100605
78. Soldatova L, Campbell RG, Elkhatib AH, Schmidt TW, Pinto NR, Pinto JM, et al. Role of leukocyte–platelet-rich fibrin in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery defect reconstruction. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. (2017) 78:59–62. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584894
79. Schiavone G, Paradisi A, Ricci F, Abeni D. Injectable platelet-, leukocyte-, and fibrin-rich plasma (iL-PRF) in the management of androgenetic alopecia. Dermatol Surg. (2018) 44:1183–90. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001584
80. Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Pinto NR, Pereda A, Jiménez P, Corso MD, Kang BS, et al. The impact of the centrifuge characteristics and centrifugation protocols on the cells, growth factors, and fibrin architecture of a leukocyte-and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) clot and membrane. Platelets. (2018) 29:171–84. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2017.1293812
81. Miron RJ, Chai J, Zheng S, Feng M, Sculean A, Zhang Y. A novel method for evaluating and quantifying cell types in platelet rich fibrin and an introduction to horizontal centrifugation. J Biomed Mater Res A. (2019) 107:2257–71. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36734
82. Castro AB, Meschi N, Temmerman A, Pinto N, Lambrechts P, Teughels W, et al. Regenerative potential of leucocyte-and platelet-rich fibrin. Part A: intra-bony defects, furcation defects and periodontal plastic surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. (2017) 44:67–82. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12643
83. Filardo G, Kon E, Pereira Ruiz MT, Vaccaro F, Guitaldi R, Di Martino A, et al. Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular injections for cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis: single- versus double-spinning approach. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. (2012) 20:2082–91. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1837-x
84. Anitua E, Zalduendo M, Troya M, Padilla S, Orive G. Leukocyte inclusion within a platelet rich plasma-derived fibrin scaffold stimulates a more pro-inflammatory environment and alters fibrin properties. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0121713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121713
85. Zumarán C, Parra M, Olate S, Fernández E, Muñoz F, Haidar ZS. The 3 R's for platelet-rich fibrin: a “super” tri-dimensional biomaterial for contemporary naturally-guided oro-maxillo-facial soft and hard tissue repair, reconstruction and regeneration. Materials. (2018) 11:1293. doi: 10.3390/ma11081293
Keywords: maxillary sinus lift, augmentation, schneiderian membrane, platelet concentrates, bone grafting
Citation: Damsaz M, Castagnoli CZ, Eshghpour M, Alamdari DH, Alamdari AH, Noujeim ZEF and Haidar ZS (2020) Evidence-Based Clinical Efficacy of Leukocyte and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Maxillary Sinus Floor Lift, Graft and Surgical Augmentation Procedures. Front. Surg. 7:537138. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.537138
Received: 10 July 2020; Accepted: 18 September 2020;
Published: 24 November 2020.
Edited by:Naif Alotaibi, Alfaisal University, Saudi Arabia
Reviewed by:A. B. Zulkiflee, University Malaya Medical Center, Malaysia
Katharina Stölzel, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
Copyright © 2020 Damsaz, Castagnoli, Eshghpour, Alamdari, Alamdari, Noujeim and Haidar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ziyad Samir Haidar, email@example.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work