ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Adolesc. Med.

Sec. Addiction in Adolescents

Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fradm.2025.1567567

This article is part of the Research TopicUnderstanding Recovery Capital for Addiction Recovery in Adolescence and Young AdulthoodView all articles

Recovery capital, the recovery ecosystem, and substance use among recovery high school students

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development, School of Arts and Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States
  • 2Recovery Research Institute (RRI), Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • 4Department of Human and Organizational Development, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Adolescent development and substance use disorder recovery unfold within diverse contexts, where recovery capital is key to planning. This study examined the relationship between social and personal recovery capital, community recovery capital, and cannabis and alcohol use among adolescents. In this cross-sectional study, 416 students from 20 U.S. recovery high schools reported their past 90-day alcohol and cannabis use and completed the Assessment of Recovery Capital (adapted for youth readability). Student data were merged with data from the Recovery Ecosystem Index, which measures county-level recovery ecosystem, using each high school’s county as a proxy for residence. Zero-inflated Poisson regression models estimated the odds of abstinence and substance use days, with recovery capital and recovery ecosystem index as predictors, while accounting for age, race, gender, and duration of enrollment (≥90 days). There were 378 (91%) and 360 (87%) students who provided alcohol and cannabis use data and were subsequently included in each model, respectively. Students, 47% female and 60% White person/persons/people, reported alcohol (M=2.0; SD=8.1) and cannabis (M=6.0; SD=18.0) use days, with most reporting zero days of use (284 and 266). The results indicated that the recovery capital score was positively associated with alcohol abstinence (adjusted odds ratio[aOR]=1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]= 1.01-1.06; P=0.02) and cannabis abstinence (aOR=1.03; 95% 1.01-1.06; P=0.01). As recovery capital increased, adolescents reported fewer alcohol use days (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=0.93, 95% CI=0.93-0.94; P<0.001) and fewer cannabis use days (IRR=0.95; 95% CI=0.95-0.96, P<0.001). The recovery ecosystem index was not associated with alcohol or cannabis abstinence, but days of alcohol use (IRR=1.12; 95% C=1.04-1.22, P=0.01) and cannabis use (IRR=1.10; 95% CI=1.05-1.15; P<0.001) increased as the index increased. Findings suggest that greater recovery capital is linked to greater alcohol and cannabis abstinence among recovery high school students. Unexpected was that a higher recovery ecosystem index score was associated with more substance use days. Youth-focused recovery supports could benefit from examining how changes in individual recovery capital influence service usage and how service usage, in turn, impacts recovery capital. There is also the need for a youth-tailored recovery ecosystem measure which focuses on factors unique to their developmental phase.

Keywords: recovery capital, cannabis, alcohol, adolescence, recovery high school Recovery high school, Addiction, Adolescent, substance use, recovery ecosystem, Recovery capital, alcohol, Cannabis

Received: 27 Jan 2025; Accepted: 30 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jurinsky, George, Riccio, Finch, Kelly and Hennessy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jordan Jurinsky, Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development, School of Arts and Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, 02155, Massachusetts, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.