ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Adolesc. Med.
Sec. Addiction in Adolescents
This article is part of the Research TopicUnderstanding Recovery Capital for Addiction Recovery in Adolescence and Young AdulthoodView all 6 articles
Understanding Recovery Capital: Voices of Adolescents and Caregivers from the Georgia Recovery Clubhouse Program
Provisionally accepted
- Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Adolescents recovering from substance use face developmentally specific challenges requiring tailored supports. Recovery capital (RC), defined as internal and external resources sustaining recovery, offers a framework to address these needs. Guided by the Recovery Capital for Adolescents Model (RCAM), this study explored how adolescents and caregivers experienced RC and investigated perceptions of the Recovery Clubhouse as a context for building and sustaining these resources. Methods: Matched semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven adolescent–caregiver pairs. Adolescents aged 16–18 participated, using guides tailored to age and role. Caregivers could complete interviews in English or Spanish. Interviews were thematically analyzed using RCAM as the guiding framework. Results: Adolescents and caregivers identified multiple internal and external resources as essential to recovery, often framed in relation to Recovery Clubhouse involvement. Within community recovery capital (CRC), both groups emphasized the value of enjoyable, substance-free activities and creative expression offered through the Clubhouse. In human recovery capital (HRC), adolescents described how intrinsic motivation developed over time, replacing initial external pressures such as court mandates or parental requirements, and noted that Clubhouse participation supported this process. Financial recovery capital (FRC) was also influential: caregivers valued Clubhouse-provided resources for easing financial strain, while adolescents saw employment as a motivator and pathway to independence and long-term goals. Social recovery capital (SRC) revealed the most divergence: adolescents emphasized relationships with Clubhouse staff and friendships outside the program, including peers who used substances. Caregivers viewed these external friendships as risks and instead highlighted the protective role of the Clubhouse’s peer network. Interconnections across RC domains were evident, with gains in one area reinforcing others (e.g., CRC participation supporting HRC via coping skills). Additional themes included the importance of family involvement and language-accessible services. Discussion: The RCAM framework provided a comprehensive lens for understanding recovery resources perceived as valuable by adolescents and caregivers. Findings suggest recovery supports should be developmentally tailored, incorporating engaging activities, opportunities for economic empowerment, staff relationships, and culturally responsive family programming. Recovery Clubhouses were perceived not only as access points for these resources, but also as environments where RC was built and sustained.
Keywords: Adolescent, Recovery capital, Recovery Capital for Adolescents Model, Recovery, Qualitative
Received: 24 Mar 2025; Accepted: 28 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Avila Rodriguez, Smith, Taylor and Mclaren. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Wendy Avila Rodriguez, wavila1@gsu.edu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.