Promoting Recovery Capital among College Students in Recovery on a Campus Developing a Collegiate Recovery Program

Michael Broman^1,2*Jhuma Acharya¹Elizabeth A Bowen³Emily Pasman⁴Erin Marks^5,6Jeffrey Kuentzel⁷Stella M Resko^5,8

• ¹College of Social Work, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
• ²Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Drug Misuse Prevention and Recovery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
• ³School of Social Work, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, United States
• ⁴Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking, and Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
• ⁵School of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States
• ⁶Health & Wellness, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States
• ⁷Counseling and Psychological Services, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States
• ⁸Merrill Palmer Skillman Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, United States

Intro: Recovery capital is important to substance use recovery among general populations and among college students in recovery. Demographic factors and various psychosocial variables have been associated with recovery capital in studies including adults in the general population.However, recovery capital has received limited research attention in the context of collegiate recovery, and there has been little empirical evaluation of factors that might be linked with recovery capital among college students. As more collegiate recovery programs are developed to support students in recovery, these programs should implement features to augment students' recovery capital.We conducted a needs assessment on a campus with a newly developing collegiate recovery program. Students in recovery (n = 86) were asked to complete the 28-item Multidimensional Inventory of Recovery Capital (MIRC). They were also asked about Formatted: Not Highlight sociodemographic and recovery-related factors including length of time in recovery, recovery pathway, perceived discrimination, mental health challenges, quality of relationships, and financial well-being. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to assess relationships between these variables and recovery capital.Students reported a moderate level of recovery capital overall (M=82.55, SD=13.64).Students who reported fewer mental health challenges in the past 30 days (β=-.25, t=-2.79, p=.006), better quality of relationships in the past week (β=.27, t=3.41, p=.001), and greater financial well-being (β=.38, t=4.69, p<.001) had greater recovery capital. Sociodemographic variables, recovery length, recovery pathway, and perceived discrimination were not associated with recovery capital.Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify associations between recovery capital as measured by the MIRC and various sociodemographic and recovery-related factors among a sample of college students in recovery. As such, this study extends previous work with updated knowledge of how students can be supported in their efforts to increase recovery capital.Future research can build on this study by utilizing the MIRC on various types of campuses and by assessing recovery capital among college students longitudinally.