METHODS article
Front. Agron.
Sec. Climate-Smart Agronomy
This article is part of the Research TopicMeasurements and Modelling of Methane Emissions from Agricultural Cropping SystemsView all 4 articles
Measurement Approaches for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rice II: Advanced Technology for Accelerating Throughput
Provisionally accepted- 1International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines
- 2Karlsruher Institut fur Technologie, Karlsruhe, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The systematic acquisition of field data is a major bottleneck for identifying scalable solutions that effectively reduce emissions while maintaining productivity in agricultural systems such as rice. This 2nd volume of a multilayered presentation of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission measurements in rice fields links up with a review of scientific findings achieved with well-established measurement approaches. Special emphasis is given to advanced systems with laser-based trace gas analyzers (TGA) integrated into an upgraded closed chamber system. A synchronized field experiment was conducted under Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD) and Continuous Flooding (CF), comparing a) manual sampling with gas chromatography representing a time-tested reference method, b) a TGA in a stand-alone (portable) configuration, and c) a TGA assembled with a semi-automated multi-valve system. Following a preparatory test resulting in an optimum sampling interval of 4 min, the reliability of the TGA measurements was assessed by calculating R² from linear regression of gas concentration versus sampling time. Based on a paired t-test, the three approaches did not present any significant difference except for rare outliers with p ≤ 0.01 reaching a maximum difference of 12.62 mg m⁻² d⁻¹. In total, these disparities were small compared to overall emission levels and occurred randomly across treatments, indicating that there was no systematic bias between approaches. In the second part of this volume, we broadened the perspective to a comparative assessment of methods supplemented by projecting future developments in GHG measurements in rice. Both portable and multi-valve TGA systems provide greater efficiency and real-time data acquisition while their mutual comparison is a function of research objectives and project settings. Regarding technical features of future measurement systems in rice, we highlighted the multi-valve TGA system as a feasible core component of a high-throughput screening platform intended to identify low-emission rice varieties for immediate dissemination across scales and integration into breeding programs. Finally, we assessed the possible synergies of these high-frequency TGA data sets with other emerging technologies, namely Remote Sensing and Machine Learning, under a diversified regulatory framework for GHG accounting that will likely dissolve the distinction of Tier 2 and 3 approaches for rice production.
Keywords: Methane emission, Closed chamber technique, Manual sampling, Gaschromatography, laser-based trace gas analyzers, Semi-automated measurements, High-throughput measurements
Received: 27 Aug 2025; Accepted: 03 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Vo, Wassmann, Romasanta, Centeno, Mendoza, Willibald, Kiese and Radanielson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Thi Bach Thuong Vo
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
