Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Agron.

Sec. Agroecological Cropping Systems

This article is part of the Research TopicAgronomy and Sustainable Development Goal 15: Life on LandView all 5 articles

Crop diversification with high-value perennial seed crops drives profitability in crop rotations in northwestern Canada

Provisionally accepted
Keshav  BhattaraiKeshav Bhattarai1,2Nityananda  KhanalNityananda Khanal1*Malinda  S. ThilakarathnaMalinda S. Thilakarathna2Newton  Z. LupwayiNewton Z. Lupwayi3Noabur  RahmanNoabur Rahman1Jennifer  OtaniJennifer Otani1Bharat  ShresthaBharat Shrestha1Reynald  L LemkeReynald L Lemke4Roland  KroebelRoland Kroebel3
  • 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Beaverlodge Research Farm, Beaverlodge, Canada
  • 2University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  • 3Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Canada
  • 4Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, Saskatoon, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Cropping system diversification is considered a rational management practice for improving resource-use efficiency, enhancing productivity, and optimizing farm returns in the face of climate change. However, few studies have concurrently explored the productivity, profitability, and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of cropping systems diversified with perennial forage seed crops. This study, conducted on dark gray Luvisolic soil in the Peace River region of western Canada from 2013 to 2024, sought to address this gap. A field experiment, arranged in a split-plot design, comprised eight cropping sequences as main plots and three nitrogen (N) levels (0, 45, and 90 kg N ha-1) as sub-plots. The cropping sequences included two perennial legumes (red clover and alsike clover), three perennial grasses (creeping red fescue, meadow bromegrass, and timothy), and four annual field crops (wheat, canola, pea, and barley). Productivity was evaluated based on seed yield and expressed as canola equivalent yield (CEY), while gross revenue and gross margin were used as profitability metrics. Based on CEY and aboveground biomass yield, NUE was also assessed for uniform comparison among cropping sequences. Intermittent inclusion of red clover (a perennial legume) and meadow bromegrass (a perennial vernalizing grass) in the cropping sequence increased CEY, gross revenue, gross margin, and agronomic NUE by 95-108%, 118-174, 191-255%, and 21–77%, respectively, compared with alternating annual wheat-canola sequences across three N fertility levels. The higher seed price of red clover and greater seed yield and price of meadow bromegrass during their production phases provided opportunities to capitalize on local market demands. The N fertilization at 45 kg N ha-1 improved the yield and profitability across all cropping sequences, whereas the 90 kg N ha-1 rate did not result in significant economic benefits in comparison. Our results provide evidence that forage seed crop-based cropping systems have the potential to reduce reliance on external N inputs and enhance the economic efficiency of production systems.

Keywords: annual, canola equivalent yield, Cropping Sequence, Gross margin, nitrogen use efficiency, perennial

Received: 26 Oct 2025; Accepted: 11 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bhattarai, Khanal, Thilakarathna, Lupwayi, Rahman, Otani, Shrestha, Lemke and Kroebel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Nityananda Khanal

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.