Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Agron.

Sec. Agroecological Cropping Systems

This article is part of the Research TopicAgroecology in Action: Case Studies, Challenges and Best PracticesView all 16 articles

Better safe than sorry? European Farmers' perceptions on agroecological practices: A Theory of Planned Behaviour case study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy
  • 2Agroecology and Environment research unit, ISARA, Lyon, France
  • 3Department of Agroecology, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark
  • 4Julius Kuehn Institute, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Strategies and Technology Assessment, Kleinmachnow, Germany
  • 5Beratungsteam Ökologischer Landbau, Landesbetrieb Landwirtschaft Hessen, Witzenhausen, Germany
  • 6Agroecology & Integrated Pest Management Division, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, United Kingdom
  • 7Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Adoption rates of agroecological farming practices remain low amongst European farmers and vary from country to country, despite European or national policies aimed at achieving 'sustainable agriculture'. Our study, based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and conducted in eight European countries in 2023 with 268 farmers surveyed, examines behavioural drivers of adoption of agroecological practices in terms of attitudes, perceived behavioural control, social norms, perceived risk, and the role of formal and informal information sources. The main findings reveal three key points: 1) Farmers were more likely to adopt agroecological practices if they had a positive attitude towards them and felt confident in their ability to implement them whilst social pressure had only a limited impact on adoption. 2) Perceived risks associated with agroecological practices significantly reduced farmers' willingness to adopt. 3) Formal sources of information had a significant positive effect on the perceived risks, whereas informal information sources did not. However, the latter had a significant positive effect on social pressures, suggesting that they influence farmers' perceptions of what is socially expected by their communities. These findings imply that to accelerate the adoption of agroecological practices, policy and advisory services should focus on mitigating farmers' risk perceptions through formal, evidence-based information, thereby fostering positive attitudes and a stronger sense of control.

Keywords: Agroecological practices, Farmer behaviour, Practice adoption, Risk Perception, sustainable agriculture, TPB

Received: 26 Sep 2025; Accepted: 21 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Paparella, Perrin, Williams, Wenzel, Borrello, Kehlenbeck, Winkler, Cembalo, Cook, Ninkovic, Ferrer, Del Giudice and Wezel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Bettina Wenzel

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.