STUDY PROTOCOL article
Front. Allergy
Sec. Food Allergy
A phase 2 randomized controlled trial using biologics to improve multi OIT outcomes (COMBINE): Design, rationale, and methods
Provisionally accepted- 1Stanford University, Stanford, United States
- 2University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
- 3University of California San Diego, La Jolla, United States
- 4National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, United States
- 5Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Food allergy remains a serious public health concern associated with significantly lowered quality of life and the risk of potentially life-threatening allergic reactions. While oral immunotherapy (OIT) has consistently demonstrated efficacy in the desensitization of multi-food allergic patients, many patients undergoing such treatment are burdened by dose-related side effects that can hinder their compliance and the overall efficacy of OIT. Recent efforts to improve upon OIT have begun to evaluate the concomitant use of biologics such as omalizumab and dupilumab with OIT for their ability to selectively inhibit pathways involved in the underlying pathology of food allergy. Methods: Herein, we detail the clinical trial design, rationale, and methods for a Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center study evaluating the safety and efficacy of omalizumab and/or dupilumab therapy in combination with participant-specific multi-food (mOIT) in patients aged 4 to 55 years, with multi-food allergy that includes peanut. In this two-arm superiority trial, participants will be randomized (5:5:1) to (1) omalizumab/placebo-dupilumab with mOIT (n=50), (2) omalizumab/dupilumab with mOIT (n=50), or (3) a mechanistic-only arm of placebo-omalizumab/dupilumab with mOIT (n=10). Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) will be used to assess desensitization to ≥1043 mg cumulative protein at Week 32, after which all treatment is to be discontinued. A follow-up assessment of sustained unresponsiveness via DBPCFCs will be conducted at Week 44. Conclusion: This trial tests the hypothesis that adding dupilumab to omalizumab-facilitated mOIT will increase the likelihood of inducing sustained unresponsiveness and decrease mOIT-related adverse events.
Keywords: Biologic, Combine, Dupilumab, food allergy, multi-allergen, Omalizumab, oral immunotherapy
Received: 20 Oct 2025; Accepted: 30 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sindher, Long, Martinez, Choi, Albarran, Schuetz, Parry, Tang, Garcia Lloret, Zedeck, Grissinger, Kiernan, Leonard, Raeber, Feight, Anderson, Sharma, Bogetic, Chin, Woch, Poyser, Laurienzo Panza, Togias, Wheatley, Boyd, Galli, Nadeau and Chinthrajah. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Sayantani B Sindher
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
