ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Anim. Sci.

Sec. Animal Welfare and Policy

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1570586

This article is part of the Research TopicEmotion, Affective State and Animal ExperienceView all articles

Social hierarchy impacts response to reward downshift in sows

Provisionally accepted
  • University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Pigs are social, hierarchical animals. Frequent mixing and regrouping of unfamiliar animals are common production practices that result in disruption and re-establishment of hierarchies. Little research has focused on the emotional component of this experience. Reward downshift paradigms have been investigated as a promising method for evaluating the aHective state of animals. Therefore, we sought to evaluate responses to reward downshift as a method for evaluating the aHective states of high vs. low-ranking sows.Pigs of either high (n = 8) or low (n = 9) social hierarchy (based on feed order) were enrolled. Pigs were initially trained to approach and consume a sweet sports drink (Gatorade, 5.8% sugar). The reward was then downshifted to a 1:10 diluted solution (0.58% sugar), and the approach latency, volume consumed, and peak force applied to the reward container were measured for each subject over a 3 min test for four consecutive days.Pigs of high social standing reacted to the downshift by decreasing their consumption both initially and over subsequent test days as well as slowing their approach to the reward over time. Low ranking sows also reduced their immediate consumption but did not show changes over the subsequent test days following the downshift.The reward appears to be valuable to low-rank animals regardless of its quality, potentially indicating lower reward expectations, value in the non-competitive access to a resource, or the stress-buHering action of the reward, possibly reflective of a relative negative aHective state. Our findings suggest that reward valuation can be promising tool for the assessment of an animal's aHective states, but further research will be needed to fully understand its utility.

Keywords: Animal Welfare, Animal emotions, AJective states, successive negative contrast, SNc, Swine, Frustration, social rank

Received: 03 Feb 2025; Accepted: 17 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ede, Ibach and Parsons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Thomas Ede, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.