ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Anim. Sci.
Sec. Animal Welfare and Policy
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1597218
This article is part of the Research TopicBehavioral Assessment as an Indicator of Health and Welfare of Animals used for Food-Production or Research PurposesView all 5 articles
Multi-omics exploration of the factors influencing feather coverage in laying hens
Provisionally accepted- 1Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China
- 2Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Hefei, Anhui Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The symbol "&" indicates that Xiaohui Shen is a co-first author, whose contributions to this research are equivalent to those of other first authors. The symbol "*" marked next to Huaxiang Yan and Junfeng Yao designates them as co-corresponding authors, who are responsible for communicating with journal editors and readers and answering academic questions related to the paper.Objective: This study aimed to elucidate the molecular and microbial mechanisms underlying feather coverage in laying hens, with implications for understanding epithelial homeostasis and potential translational applications in tissue regeneration. By integrating multi-omics approaches, we sought to identify key genetic and microbial determinants of feather morphology and their synergistic effects on host physiology.A retrospective analysis was conducted on 400 laying hens classified into high (H) and low (L) feather coverage groups using a standardized 4-point scoring system. Transcriptomic profiling of cecal tissue was performed via RNA sequencing, while gut microbiota composition was analyzed using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Differential gene expression and pathway enrichment were assessed using DESeq2 and clusterProfiler.Microbial community structure was evaluated through LEfSe analysis, and interplay between host transcripts and microbiota was examined via coinertia analysis.Results: Key findings revealed distinct microbial signatures in the L group, characterized by elevated Bacteroidetes (P < 0.01) and reduced Firmicutes (P < 0.01) abundance compared with the H group. Transcriptomic analysis identified dysregulation of pathways involved in epithelial remodeling (Wnt/β-catenin, TGF-β) and structural integrity (BMP and keratin family genes). Integration of multi-omics data demonstrated significant correlations between microbial composition and host gene expression (P < 0.05), highlighting the synergistic regulation of feather morphogenesis via microbial-metabolite crosstalk.Conclusions: This study elucidates the intricate interplay between host genetics and gut microbiota in regulating feather coverage, providing insights into epithelial biology and potential therapeutic targets for tissue homeostasis disorders. The findings underscore the importance of microbiome modulation in optimizing physiological traits relevant to avian health and agricultural productivity.
Keywords: laying hens, Feather coverage, multi-omics, Gut Microbiota, Transcriptomics
Received: 20 Mar 2025; Accepted: 29 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Shen, Wang, Yan, Liu, Zhan, He, Yang, Yan and Yao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Huaxiang Yan, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China
Junfeng Yao, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.