Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Anim. Sci.

Sec. Animal Physiology and Management

Farmer perceptions on goat kids pre-weaning mortality in KwaZulu-Natal and Eastern Cape Provinces of South Africa

Provisionally accepted
Moeketsi  SegakoengMoeketsi Segakoeng1,2Bohani  MtileniBohani Mtileni2Takalani  MpofuTakalani Mpofu2Ayanda  MchunuAyanda Mchunu1Ongeziwe  BixaOngeziwe Bixa1Simphiwe  NiniSimphiwe Nini1Tlou  MateleleTlou Matelele3Khanyisile  HadebeKhanyisile Hadebe1*
  • 1Agricultural Research Council of South Africa (ARC-SA), Pretoria, South Africa
  • 2Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa
  • 3Department of Agriculture, South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Community-based breeding programs (CBBPs) are promoted as an ideal model for farmer-focused research and as an improvement strategy of indigenous goats in various developing countries. The Agricultural Research Council - Biotechnology Platform (ARC-BTP), in collaboration with the Kaonafatso ya Dikgomo (KyD) recording scheme, initiated two CBBP sites to improve animal recording and goat production in these regions. The aim of this effort was to identify community-level interventions on kid mortality, which is one of the key limitations for market competitiveness in numbers and quality of the animals produced in these communities. Individual interviews were conducted on 195 goat farmers from Anders Mission, Giff, Mxhaxho, Mantlaneni and Ncera villages in the Eastern Cape province (n = 150), and Ophande, Ezinkunini, Machibini and Majozini villages in the KwaZulu-Natal province (n = 45), covering neighboring villages in Buffalo City and uMkhanyakude Districts, respectively. The study used semi-structured questionnaires to determine the farmers' perceptions on the causes of mortality, drawing from focus group discussions and questionnaire surveys. Majority of the participants were males (68%) aged between 30 to 82 years. Of these goat farmers, 42.1% had primary formal school, but all could read and write. Majority (56.4%) relied on old age pension as source of income, followed by livestock sales (24.1%). The average number of years in farming was 15.48 ±14.58, and other animal species kept included chickens, cattle, sheep, pigs and dogs. The animals were extensively managed on communal land. The average goat herd sizes were 17.71 ±11.52 in Buffalo City and 13.06 ±11.52 in uMkhanyakude, with 22% made up of kids across the regions, respectively. Diarrhea, heartwater and starvation were the strongest (p<0.001) farmer-identified predictors of pre-weaning kid mortality with incidence rate ratios of 1.93, 1.58 and 2.52, respectively. These causes may stem from the low-input extensive production systems u. Intervention programs such as CBBPs, which integrate farmer training, resource sharing, and access to expert technical guidance, can address both primary and secondary causes of pre-weaning goat kid mortality, thereby improving productivity under the current and future production systems while conserving important South African goat genetic resources.

Keywords: Community-based breeding program, Indigenous goats, Management, perceptions, Pre-weaning mortality

Received: 11 Nov 2025; Accepted: 19 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Segakoeng, Mtileni, Mpofu, Mchunu, Bixa, Nini, Matelele and Hadebe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Khanyisile Hadebe

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.