Abstract
Increasing environmental temperatures pose significant challenges to food security and animal welfare. In dairy production systems, heat stress detrimentally affects cow health, reproductive function, and immune resilience. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the impacts of heat stress in dairy cattle, emphasizing cellular targets, physiological and molecular consequences, and implications for health and productivity. Heat stress is associated with increased disease incidence in dairy cows. Elevated temperatures can increase pathogen abundance or alter host immune function, thereby compromising overall health. Both peripheral immune responses and local tissue responses are disrupted under heat stress. These effects could be mediated by various molecular mechanisms which contribute to dysregulated immune signaling. Moreover, heat stress can impair key immune pathways leading to either insufficient or excessive inflammatory responses, both of which predispose cows to disease. Effective mitigation of heat stress requires a multifaceted approach. While no single strategy fully offsets the detrimental effects of heat stress, a combination of environmental modifications (fans, shade, sprinklers), nutritional interventions (vitamins, minerals, targeted feed additives), and genetic selection for thermotolerance offer promising avenues to support cow health, immune resilience and maintain productivity in a warming climate.
1 Introduction
Optimal health is fundamental to ensure both animal welfare and productivity across all livestock species (). In intensive production systems, livestock depend on a resilient and well-coordinated immune system to withstand the diverse health challenges including a wide range of pathogens, nutritional challenges, social stress and elevated ambient temperatures (Sheldon et al., 2009; Hammon et al., 2006; Ster et al., 2012; ; Huzzey et al., 2007; ). This resilience depends on the competency of both innate and adaptive immunity (Vlasova and Saif, 2021). A dysregulated immune system is associated with a high susceptibility to infectious diseases (Mallard et al., 1998; Kehrli and Harp, 2001). Heat stress has emerged as a particularly critical and escalating threat, impairing both productivity and fertility (; Hansen, 2009). Heat stress occurs when an animal fails to maintain thermal balance between heat gain and heat loss (Lendez et al., 2021; ), leading to behavioral and physiological changes that influences health, welfare and productivity ().
Dairy cows genetically selected for high milk production are particularly susceptible to heat stress due to elevated ambient temperatures, which reduce feed intake while increasing metabolic heat production and overall heat load (; Loor et al., 2023; ). This added heat load occurs due to greater energy demands for body growth and milk synthesis, making high-producing cows more prone to the negative impacts of heat stress (; Gauly et al., 2013). For instance, studies conducted in Germany and China reported that lactating Holstein cows exposed to heat stress produced up to 53% less milk, with a marked reduction in milk quality compared to cooled cows, as ~22% decrease was observed in the milk protein (Hou et al., 2021; Gernand et al., 2019). Global climate change is exacerbating heat stress. Average surface temperatures have risen by 0.2 °C per decade since 1970, faster than in any other 50-year period, with projections of a further 1.4 °C to 4.4 °C increase by 2100 (IPCC, 2023). Consequently, the frequency of heat stress days affecting the livestock industry has markedly increased over recent decades (Solymosi et al., 2010). Heat stress costs the United States livestock industry an estimated $1.69–2.36 billion annually, with the dairy sector contributing the largest share, approximately $897 million, because of reduced milk yield, impaired reproduction, and increased mortality (St-Pierre et al., 2003). These estimates exclude losses from diminished product quality such as low-quality milk (low milk protein yield and percentage, higher somatic cells count) and carcasses, meaning the true economic impact is likely even greater. Moreover, heat stress disrupts livestock production efficiency across all stages of development, affecting milk yield and composition, growth performance, reproductive efficiency, and carcass traits (; Ross et al., 2017, Habimana et al., 2023) and thus represents a significant economic burden for livestock producers globally (). Moreover, carry-over effects of dry period heat stress on mammary gland development further compound this burden as cows that experience heat stress during the dry period produce less milk in the subsequent lactation even when cooled after calving, translating to an additional $810 million in annual losses (, , ; Tao et al., 2011; Fabris et al., 2020; Ferreira et al., 2016). Studies in USA have demonstrated that in utero exposure to maternal heat stress during gestation impairs postnatal milk production performance of offspring (Laporta et al., 2020).
Beyond its impact on productivity, heat stress compromises immune competence by impairing immune cell function and reducing immunoglobulin production (; Kamwanja et al., 1994; , ). The specific effects of heat stress on immune cell populations and their functions will be discussed in detail in a later section of this review. However, the mechanisms underlying heat stress-induced immune dysfunction remain poorly understood, reflecting the complex interplay among metabolic, neuroendocrine, and immune pathways (; ). The susceptibility of animals to heat stress and subsequent impacts on production vary between species, breed and physiological state such as pregnancy, transition period and lactation (). Maintaining immune homeostasis under heat stress is critical to prevent excessive inflammation, autoimmune disorders and potential disease susceptibility (Nathan, 2002; Grivennikov et al., 2010).
With global temperatures continuing to rise, it is increasingly pertinent to understand how heat stress disrupts immune resilience and health in livestock. Dairy cattle are particularly vulnerable to heat stress because of their high metabolic demands. Therefore, the aim of this review is to summarize the impacts of heat stress on dairy cattle, and discuss the cellular targets, physiological and molecular consequences of heat stress, and implications for dairy cow health and productivity.
A conceptual summary of the multi-level consequences of heat stress is presented in Figure 1, illustrating how elevated environmental temperatures initiate a cascade of disruptions from whole-animal health and pathogen dynamics to immune function and cellular responses. This review explores each of these levels in detail to provide a comprehensive understanding of how heat stress compromises reproductive health.
Figure 1
2 Impacts of heat stress on physiology, disease and immunity
Heat stress negatively affects both the productivity and health of dairy cows. In hot and humid environments, cows experience elevated body temperatures and reduced feed intake, which in turn disrupts physiological functions such as milk production (West, 2003; ). One common measure of heat stress is the temperature-humidity index (THI), a single metric that combines air temperature and humidity to estimate the level of heat stress experienced by animals (West, 2003; ; ).
2.1 Heat stress and milk production traits
Milk production has been shown to decline approximately 1% for each unit increase in THI above 72 (West, 2003; ). The broader impact of heat stress on dairy production has also been assessed using state-level data, with estimates indicating a 1% reduction in annual milk yield due to heat stress, and even greater losses when accounting for milk quality (Gisbert-Queral et al., 2021; Hutchins et al., 2025; St-Pierre et al., 2003). Notably, farm size plays a role in moderating these effects as larger dairy farms (> 500 cows) experienced relatively modest losses (~1% of single-day milk production), while smaller farms faced more than double the impact, with losses ranging from 2.5% to 3.9%, suggesting that management practices significantly influence vulnerability to heat stress (Hutchins et al., 2025). While large-scale observational studies based on climate data have provided valuable insights into the association between heat stress and milk yield losses, they often capture the combined effects of multiple environmental and management factors. Although these studies are critical for estimating real-world impact, they may not fully isolate the direct physiological responses to heat stress.
To complement findings from observational studies, controlled environmental chamber experiments provide valuable mechanistic insight by isolating the direct effects of heat stress. For instance, Spiers et al. (2004) demonstrated that cows experienced a 23% drop in milk yield just four days after abrupt exposure to elevated THI in a controlled setting. Heat stress during the dry period has been shown to impair mammary development in late gestation, ultimately reducing the milk production capacity of the cow in the subsequent lactation (Tao et al., 2011; Fabris et al., 2020). In another controlled study, the use of electric blankets to induce heat stress during the dry period led to an approximate 0.2 °C increase in rectal temperature and a 6 kg/day decline in subsequent milk yield compared to unheated controls (). Such controlled studies are critical for isolating the direct effects of heat stress from other confounding environmental and management factors. Moreover, the extent to which heat stress reduces milk production is also influenced by breed or genotype, environmental and geographical conditions, and non-genetic factors, including parity and stage of lactation (Menéndez-Buxadera et al., 2020; Leliveld et al., 2023). Further research is needed to disentangle these interacting effects across production systems. The negative impact of heat stress extends beyond the dams, affecting multiple generations. For example, gestational heat stress reduces milk yield by 2.2 kg/day in daughters and 1.3 kg/day in granddaughters compared with offspring of cooled dams, highlighting the lasting, multigenerational consequences on dairy production (Laporta et al., 2020).
2.2 Heat stress and reproduction
One of the major physiological effects of heat stress in cows is reduced fertility, as it significantly impairs their ability to establish and maintain pregnancy (Jordan, 2003). Female fertility traits such as pregnancy per artificial insemination (AI) decrease with an increasing THI (Gernand et al., 2019). In Germany, only 16% of inseminations resulted in pregnancies at a THI of 80, underscoring the profound fertility losses associated with heat stress conditions (Gernand et al., 2019). Another study reported that long-term heat stress (THI ≥ 73) reduced pregnancy success with frozen-thawed semen by 63%, while short-term heat stress reduced success with fresh semen by 80% (Schüller et al., 2016). Several mechanisms could explain reduced fertility under heat stress. Elevated temperatures impair follicular development (; Wilson et al., 1998; Roth et al., 2000), disrupt steroid hormone synthesis, and suppresses estrus behavior (Kadokawa et al., 2012; Provolo and Riva, 2009). For example, estrus expression is nearly halved under seasonal heat stress, averaging only 4.5 mounts compared to 8.6 in winter, partly due to reduced 17β-estradiol production by the dominant follicle (Wilson et al., 1998; Nebel et al., 1997). Gestational heat stress in cows reduces uterine and umbilical blood flow by 51% and 30% respectively, resulting in a 22% decrease in fetal weight (Wolfenson et al., 1988; Dreiling et al., 1991). Furthermore, heat stress can compromise gestation success during the peri-implantation period and fetal losses. For example, a study from Spain reported pregnancy losses of 12.3% in cows conceiving during the warm period, compared with 2.1% during the cool period (García-Ispierto et al., 2006). Abortions also represent a loss of reproductive efficiency. Hossein-Zadeh et al. (2008) reported higher odds of abortion during spring and summer compared with other seasons. Similarly, under subtropical Egyptian conditions, fetal loss increased significantly from 17.1% at low (< 70) THI to 24.9% at high (80–85) THI (El-Tarabany and El-Tarabany, 2015). While the detrimental effects of heat stress on cow reproductive physiology are well established, gaps remain in linking molecular alterations (e.g., epigenetics alterations, oocyte mitochondrial dysfunction, embryonic mortality) with observed reductions in fertility (Laporta et al., 2024; Halli et al., 2025).
Gestation length is defined as the number of days from confirmed conception to calving (Vieira-Neto et al., 2017; Pajohande et al., 2023). Several factors influence gestation length including fetal sex, age of the dam, and season (Silva et al., 1992). Notably, cows calving during the warm season have been reported to have a gestation length approximately 1.5-2.8 days shorter than those calving in the cool season (Dubois and Williams, 1980; Vieira-Neto et al., 2017). Shorter gestation lengths are associated with high summer temperatures (Mcguirk et al., 1998; Norman et al., 2009; Tomasek et al., 2017). Heat stress during late gestation triggers inflammatory responses and disrupts nutrient transport functions in the placenta of dairy cows (). Reduced nutrient transfer, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress-induced inflammation in the metabolically active placenta during late gestation can lead to premature birth (; Sultana et al., 2023; ). The shorter gestation lengths under heat stress may increase the risk of postpartum complications such as still birth and retained fetal membranes which are also important risk factors for uterine diseases such metritis (Dubois and Williams, 1980; Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh and Ardalan, 2011; Norman et al., 2009; Vieira-Neto et al., 2017). Dairy cows with short gestation length have 2.5-fold greater incidence of still birth and 5-fold greater incidence of retained fetal membranes, resulting in a 2-fold increase in the incidence of uterine diseases (Vieira-Neto et al., 2017). Retained fetal membranes in dairy cattle may result from impaired immune-mediated clearance of fetal tissues at parturition (Kimura et al., 2002; ). The combination of a weakened immune response and retained necrotic tissues likely contributes to the increased incidence of metritis.
2.3 Heat stress, immunity and health
The immune system is a central system that protects mammals against environmental stressors and maintains cellular and physiological resilience (Sonna et al., 2002). However, under heat stress conditions, this finely tuned system becomes disrupted, leading to impaired immunocompetence. As a first line of defense, the innate immune system plays a crucial role in mounting an immediate, non-specific response to pathogens and environmental immune challenges (Medzhitov, 2007). The innate immune system then primes and supports the activation of the adaptive immune system to produce pathogen-specific antibodies and cellular responses (Janeway, 1999). Dysregulation of both innate and adaptive immune functions weakens an animals ability to mount effective defenses against pathogens, creating conditions that favor infection establishment and progression that ultimately threaten productivity and welfare (Sonna et al., 2002; Vlasova and Saif, 2021).
Heat stress influences the incidence and persistence of infectious diseases. Seasonal variation in clinical mastitis is well documented with an increased incidence of 10-40% in hotter summer months when cows experience heat stress compared to cool season months (Erskine et al., 1988; Hogan et al., 1989a, 1989). Mastitis is a primary cause of elevated somatic cell count (SCC) in milk (Pakrashi et al., 2023). The detrimental effects of heat stress on somatic cell count and the incidence of clinical mastitis have been consistently reported across dairy herds in multiple regions such as USA, Netherlands and Thailand (Rhone et al., 2008; ; Olde Riekerink et al., 2007). Heat stress increases SCC, with studies from Canada reporting higher SCC during summer months (; Sargeant et al., 1998). During the summer, mastitis is highly associated with increased infections caused by Streptococcus and Coliform bacteria, which are the predominant pathogens isolated during this season (June to August) in confined dairy herds in the United States (Erskine et al., 1988; Hogan et al., 1989a; Makovec and Ruegg, 2003). Higher THI is also associated with increased incidence of retained placenta and puerperal disorders (Morse et al., 1988; Olde Riekerink et al., 2007; Gernand et al., 2019; Joosten et al., 1991; Labernia et al., 1998; Jingar et al., 2014). Cows calving between May and September in the Northern Hemisphere experience nearly double the incidence of retained placenta and metritis (24%) compared to those calving in the cooler months (12%) (Dubois and Williams, 1980). Notably, heat stress contributes to both a higher incidence and persistence of disease (Molinari et al., 2022). found a significant increase in both incidence and persistence of metritis in dairy cows during warmer months, despite no significant change in bacterial load in the vagina. Additionally, cows calving in the summer were seven times more likely to exhibit persistent endometritis beyond 60 days postpartum compared with those calving in autumn (Gautam et al., 2010; Pascottini et al., 2017).
The persistence of uterine diseases during heat stress may be attributed to reduced vascular perfusion of the uterus, which impairs leukocyte trafficking to the endometrium and compromises immune-mediated clearance of pathogens (Roman-Ponce et al., 1978). Seasonal variation also influences macrophage distribution within the endometrium, with macrophages primarily concentrated in the subepithelial stroma during winter, while exhibiting a more diffuse and sparse localization across the endometrial tissue in summer (Sakai et al., 2020). However, it remains unclear whether the altered localization of macrophages under heat stress directly contributes to the prolonged course of endometritis observed in summer, highlighting the need for further in vivo investigations. Collectively, heat stress may not only impair host susceptibility to infection and disease but also the recovery from diseases in dairy cows.
Beyond infectious diseases, heat stress has been implicated in metabolic and inflammatory disorders. For instance, the incidence of ketosis increases by 11% during summer compared with cooler seasons (Pavlicek et al., 1989), likely reflecting the combined effects of oxidative stress and negative energy balance due to high milk production, low feed intake, reduction in rumination and nutrient absorption and increased maintenance requirements under heat stress (; Rhoads et al., 2009). Similarly, lameness and digital phlegmon (foot rot) occur more frequently in warm and humid conditions (Sanders et al., 2009; ; Gernand et al., 2019). This is likely due to an increased abundance of foot rot causing pathogens, including Fusobacterium necrophorum, in warmer, more humid conditions (Van Metre, 2017). Prolonged exposure to moderate heat stress also promotes systemic inflammation, evidenced by increased circulating tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 in dairy cows (Min et al., 2016). Transcriptomic analysis of whole blood from Holstein bull calves exposed to heat stress for 12 hours in an environmentally controlled chamber revealed a 1.5- to 3-fold increase in the expression of immune-related genes. These included genes involved in Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling, interferon (IFN) signaling, and interleukins such as IL-8 and IL-15 (Srikanth et al., 2017). The findings suggest systemic activation of the innate immune response under heat stress.
Heat stress has been associated with reduced immune responses following vaccination. Dry cows exposed to heat stress during the prepartum period showed reduced immunoglobulin responses to ovalbumin vaccination, although these deficits recovered post-calving when cooling was provided (). Similarly, elevated stress hormones such as cortisol and corticosterone under heat stress interfere with antigen presentation and antibody production in swine and poultry, undermining vaccination efficacy and complicating disease control efforts (Prates, 2025). Using a murine model, Hu et al. (2007) demonstrated that chronic heat stress using 38 ± 1 °C for 2 h per day for 35 days impaired cell-mediated immune response in mice following vaccination by reducing IgG2a production, T-cell proliferation, IFNγ expression, and cytotoxic T cell activity as compared to control mice maintained at 24 ± 18 °C. This study suggests that heat stress can result in a weaker immune response to vaccines and reduce vaccine efficacy. Beyond immediate effects on vaccine responses, genetic variation in immune responsiveness offers a promising avenue for resilience under heat stress. Holstein dairy cattle classified as high antibody and high cell-mediated immune responders show reduced disease incidence and improved vaccine responsiveness (Mallard et al., 1998; Wagter et al., 2000; Thompson-Crispi et al., 2012). Collectively these data highlight a critical gap in current vaccination programs under heat stress conditions and points to a promising research avenue for developing strategies to mitigate immune dysregulation caused by heat stress.
Evidence indicates lasting carryover effects of heat stress beyond the immediate period of heat stress. Mice exposed to chronic heat stress at 38 ± 1 °C for 21 days prior to H5N1 influenza infection exhibited a decreased mRNA expression of Il6 and Ifnb1 followed by increased lung viral loads and 37% increased mortality compared to mice kept in thermoneutral conditions, indicating that prior heat stress suppresses innate immune responses that increase the virulence of disease pathogens in mice (Hu et al., 2007; Jin et al., 2011). Although rodent models highlight links between prior heat stress and impaired immunity, equivalent mechanistic studies in livestock are limited (Gernand et al., 2019). showed a linear increase in digital phlegmon and puerperal disorders with increasing THI values in the week preceding disease onset, suggesting a carry-over effect of heat stress on disease. Such findings imply that prior heat stress primes animals for higher disease susceptibility, prolonged recovery, and reduced resilience in subsequent physiological stages. Major gaps remain in mechanistic understanding of how heat stress alters long-term disease susceptibility. Few studies directly associate heat stress-induced immune cell dysfunction with disease onset in livestock (; Tao et al., 2011). Longitudinal research is needed to clarify how prior heat stress exposure alters immune response, tissue resilience, and disease persistence across lactations. Taken together, heat stress not only triggers immediate immune challenges but also may have lasting effects on immune function. Understanding these long-term impacts is an important area for future research.
While heat stress during the summer is widely recognized as a major factor impairing immunity and overall health, it remains important to recognize that other seasonal factors such as photoperiod, feed intake, pathogen load, and management changes also contribute to immune function (Pavlicek et al., 1989; ; Guinn et al., 2019; ; ). For instance, photoperiod itself plays a role, as extended daylight during summer has been shown to impair cellular immunity in cows (), highlighting how neuroendocrine-immune interactions may further exacerbate disease susceptibility during the summer season.
Not all studies demonstrate a clear association between ambient temperature and disease incidence. Some studies report weak or no associations of summer high temperatures with retained fetal membranes (Gröhn and Rajala-Schultz, 2000; Han and Kim, 2005; Pinedo et al., 2020), while others report a positive association with low seasonal temperatures during winter and higher rate of retained fetal membranes, metritis and clinal mastitis (; Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh and Ardalan, 2011). These discrepancies likely reflect differences in management systems, housing (pasture vs. confinement), change of feeding regimes, duration of heat stress, adaptation to the environment and statistical approaches (Wetherill, 1965; Muller and Owens, 1974; Dubois and Williams, 1980; ; Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh and Ardalan, 2011; Gisbert-Queral et al., 2021). For example, pasture access during summer has been associated with lower rates of retained placenta and metritis (), highlighting management as an important modifier of heat stress effects.
The preponderance of evidence suggests that heat stress, either experimentally or seasonally, alters dairy cattle physiology, diminishes productive performance, reduces fertility, alters innate and adaptive immune responses and increases the incidence of disease. Thus, the mechanism by which heat stress impacts dairy cattle health requires increased investigation to develop mitigation strategies.
3 Cellular targets of environmental stress
With the well-characterized impacts of heat stress on productive traits, much of the efforts have shifted toward understanding its cellular targets, particularly those related to immune function and host defense (Rhoads et al., 2009; Wheelock et al., 2010). In this section, we review the literature on how heat stress targets the cells (immune & non-immune) involved in host defense, and the microbiome, each of which plays a critical role in disease susceptibility, immune resilience and overall health (; Molinari et al., 2022).
3.1 Classical hematopoietic immune cells
Environmental heat stress exerts profound effects on hematological and immunological profiles in livestock, though findings often vary across experimental models (Sejian et al., 2018). Hematological shifts are among the earliest indicators of systemic response to heat stress (Kim et al., 2020; Gujar et al., 2022). For example, heat-stressed Holsteins (THI ≥ 79) exhibited a 10% reduction in hemoglobin and 11% reduction in red blood cell (RBC) counts compared to cows with no heat stress (THI ≤ 68) (Zeng et al., 2023). This effect is likely due to hemodilution, as water intake can increase by 50% as the THI reaches 80 (Sejian et al., 2018). Decrease in RBC counts may also result from erythrocyte destruction, reflected in decreased hematocrit (%), mean corpuscular hemoglobin and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration values (Lee et al., 1976; Ju et al., 2014).
Leukocytes are central components of the immune system that function to protect the animal against a wide range of invading pathogens (). These immune cells show both stimulatory and suppressive responses to heat stress (Lacetera et al., 2005). In dairy cows, confinement in an environmental chamber (40–48 °C, 70–80% humidity for 24 hours) or natural environmental heat exposure during the summer months (THI 71.2–80.3, June–August) increase leukocyte counts by approximately 20%, particularly neutrophils and eosinophils (Wegner et al., 1976; Sejian et al., 2018). This observation may be linked to corticosteroid-driven mobilization of mature neutrophils from bone marrow. In a similar study, dairy cows exposed to seasonal heat stress (temperature: 20.4-33.6 °C; relative humidity: 45.1-97.5%) showed a 201% increase in circulating neutrophils, a 26.7% increase in eosinophils and a 5.3% increase in lymphocytes compared to cows in the intermediate season (temperature: 10.7-21.8 °C, relative humidity: 45.1-97.5%) (Lee et al., 1976). Together, these findings indicate that heat stress potentially induces a leukocytic response in dairy cows, reflecting systemic immune dysregulation.
Other experimental systems have reported decreases in leukocyte concentrations during the summer compared to winter in both cows and buffaloes (O'Connor et al., 2000; Ju et al., 2014), reflecting inconsistencies that may stem from breed, age, or methodological differences (Elvinger et al., 1991; Kamwanja et al., 1994; Lacetera et al., 2002, 2006). For example, when polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) from dairy cows were exposed to heat stress in vitro (41 °C) for 2 h, their phagocytic activity and oxidative burst capacity decreased by 37% and 21% compared to PMN under normothermic condition (39 °C) (Lecchi et al., 2016). Several in vitro studies have demonstrated that short and severe heat shock (42 °C) reduces the viability and responsiveness of bovine PMN and lymphocytes to mitogen stimulation (Elvinger et al., 1991; Kamwanja et al., 1994). Similarly, murine macrophages exposed to heat shock (45 °C) for 12 min exhibited a ~60-fold reduction in Tnf mRNA expression following endotoxin stimulation while maintaining phagocytic capacity, highlighting a stress-adapted modulation of innate immune activity (Snyder et al., 1992). However (), reported no differences in neutrophil phagocytic activity or oxidative burst capacity when comparing dairy cows exposed to heat stress during the dry period (THI 77.6; no fans or water sprinklers) and cooled cows (THI: 77.1; with fans and water sprinklers). Interestingly, by 20 days postpartum, when all cows were maintained under the same cooling conditions, neutrophils from previously heat-stressed cows exhibited a 13% reduction in oxidative burst capacity and a 14% decline in phagocytic activity compared with cooled counterparts (). These findings highlight that the effects of heat stress on immune responses can persist beyond the period of direct exposure, suggesting long-term carryover impacts on postpartum immune competence that warrants further investigation.
Lymphocytes play a central role in immune function, including the production of immunoglobulins and the regulation of immune responses (; Pearce et al., 2013a). Lymphocyte proliferation and viability are diminished following heat shock in vitro (Lacetera et al., 2005; Elvinger et al., 1991; Kamwanja et al., 1994), often associated with a Th1 to Th2 cytokine shift (Lacetera et al., 2005, 2006). In vivo results, however, remain inconclusive, with some studies reporting minimal effects of heat stress on lymphocyte proliferation in Holsteins (Elvinger et al., 1991). These discrepancies highlight the need for integrative studies linking endocrine, metabolic, and immune pathways. These findings suggest that adaptive immunity in cows is also vulnerable to heat stress.
Heat stress alters cytokine production and receptor signaling, as evidenced by dairy cows exposed to elevated seasonal THI (80.3 ± 1.0; June-July) showing increased serum concentrations of TNFα and IL-10 compared with cows under low to moderate THI conditions (56.4 ± 2.5 to 73.9 ± 1.7, May-June) (Zhang et al., 2014). Similar findings were reported in dairy cows exposed to prolonged heat stress (THI = 80 for 23 days) which increased the plasma concentrations of inflammation-related proteins, including IL-6 and TNFα, indicating that long-term heat stress may promote an inflammatory response in dairy cows (Min et al., 2016).
While studies on immune cell function demonstrate that heat stress impairs processes such as phagocytosis, oxidative burst, and cytokine secretion, molecular analyses can also provide insights into the mechanisms underlying these functional shifts. For example, transcriptomic analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from cows subjected to heat stress for four days using controlled environmental chambers (21.3 to 32.8 °C and 35 to 88% relative humidity; THI 69–83) revealed that bradykinin receptor B1 (BDKRB1) was the most highly upregulated gene (5-fold), compared with the cows under thermoneutral conditions (10.2–15.9 C, and 61–94% relative humidity; THI 55) (Garner et al., 2020). Even short-term heat stress (42 °C, 90% humidity for 4 h) in controlled environmental chambers has been shown to upregulate innate immune and inflammation-related genes, such as IL17A, which remained elevated for up to 48 h. This sustained increase indicates an accelerated inflammatory response consistent with a role for IL-17A in promoting cytokine release, immune cell recruitment, and vascular permeability (Raslan et al., 2010; Mehla et al., 2014). Heat stress also increases the expression of apoptosis related genes such as BCL2- associated athanogene 2 (BAG2) and oxidative stress related genes such as STIP1 were upregulated while glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) was downregulated, indicating that heat challenge increases cellular vulnerability to free radical damage during oxidative stress (Garner et al., 2020).
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from heat-stressed cows exhibit enhanced responsiveness to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) via TLR 2/4 upregulation (Ju et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2005; ), yet paradoxically, heat shock can inhibit nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) activation by stabilizing the nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor alpha (IκBα)–NF-κB complex, suppressing downstream cytokine production (Sun et al., 2005; Zhou et al., 2005; ). This may suggest that the inhibitory effects of heat shock response on LPS-induced NF-κB activation and cytokine production may be independent of TLR4.
Neutrophil dysfunction during the dry period persists into lactation (), while peripheral blood mononuclear cells from heat-stressed cows display heightened inflammatory responses to LPS for > 21 days postpartum, even under thermoneutral conditions (Marins et al., 2021; Molinari et al., 2023). These findings suggest that immune dysregulation under heat stress extends beyond immediate exposure, likely through epigenetic reprogramming, metabolic ‘memory’, or unresolved mechanisms.
Although bovine PMN cells play a critical role in defense against diseases, the lasting carry-over effects of elevated temperatures on their innate immune function remain underexplored. Despite extensive in vitro evidence for suppressed leukocyte and lymphocyte function under heat stress, in vivo findings are inconsistent and often confounded by nutrition, parity, and management systems. Future work should focus on (a) longitudinal field studies integrating hematological, cellular, and molecular alterations, (b) mechanistic exploration of PMN dysfunction, particularly its persistence across different physiological states including lactation and pregnancy, and (c) identification of epigenetic or metabolic ‘memory’ pathways that facilitate carry-over effects of prepartum heat stress on postpartum immunity.
3.2 Non-immune cells
In addition to classical immune cells, epithelial and stromal cells actively coordinate inflammation and support immune defense alongside their normal physiological functions (Medzhitov, 2008; Iwasaki and Medzhitov, 2015). In particular, the mucosal epithelial cells that line the gastrointestinal, reproductive and respiratory tracts form a barrier to the underlying stroma and serve as the frontline responders to microorganisms, shaping downstream immune cell activation (Yang and Yan, 2021; Zhou et al., 2025). Under heat stress, intestinal epithelial barrier integrity is compromised, which leads to translocation of luminal microorganisms and their products to the underlying tissues (Hall et al., 2001; Pearce et al., 2013b) and initiation of local and systemic inflammation (Koch et al., 2019; Song et al., 2019; Yi et al., 2020).
During the dry period, mammary gland regeneration for the next lactation relies on epithelial cell apoptosis and proliferation (). Heat stress impairs this remodeling by suppressing autophagic activity and cell proliferation (Tao et al., 2011; Wohlgemuth et al., 2016), resulting in fewer mammary epithelial cells and reduced milk production in subsequent lactations (; ; Fabris et al., 2020). At the molecular level, these functional impairments are reflected in altered gene expression patterns of mammary epithelial cells exposed to heat stress. Gene expression microarrays of cultured bovine mammary epithelial cells showed that heat shock (42 °C for up to 4 h) downregulated the expression of genes related to immune response (CCL2, IGF2 and S100A1), metabolism and biosynthesis (PFKP, IDH3B, CSN and HSD17B7), and morphogenesis (MYL6, CFL2 and COL14A1) (; Kapila et al., 2016).
It is important to distinguish between the effects of short-term in vitro heat shock and the prolonged environmental heat stress experienced by whole animals on innate immune responses. For example, dairy cows exposed to seasonal heat stress (THI: 78.6 ± 4.5) for 28 days and then challenged with an intramammary LPS infusion (10 µg in 5 ml saline) on day 30 exhibited higher milk concentrations of IL-10 and TNFα, with a tendency for increased milk haptoglobin, indicating that heat stress amplified mammary inflammatory responses to LPS (). Whether other tissues, such as the endometrium, display a similar heightened response to LPS after prolonged heat stress remains an important question for future investigation. Furthermore, the impact of prepartum heat stress does not dissipate with removal of the stressor, but persists as evidenced in lactating mammary glands where heat-stressed cows showed more than 200 differentially abundant proteins and phosphoproteins, affecting immune, metabolic, and stress-response pathways (Skibiel et al., 2018). These long-lasting molecular imprints suggest a need to investigate mechanisms of cellular ‘memory’ in the mammary gland (Naik and Fuchs, 2022; Silva et al., 2024) as it relates to lactation but also immune function.
The endometrium (mucosal lining of the uterus) integrates endocrine, reproductive, and immunological functions (Wira and Fahey, 2004; Mansouri-Attia et al., 2009). Heat stress disrupts bovine endometrial signaling, including prostaglandin synthesis in response to TNFα or IFN-tau (Katagiri et al., 2013; Sakai et al., 2018, 2021). In addition to its reproductive functions, the endometrium serves as a key immunological barrier, providing innate defense against ascending uterine pathogens using TLRs, antimicrobial peptides, and acute-phase proteins (Wira and Fahey, 2004). Both endometrial epithelial and stromal cells detect pathogen-associated molecular patterns via TLRs, triggering an inflammatory response marked by the secretion of inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β, IL-6, and CXCL8 (IL-8) that mobilize and activate immune cells (; ; Turner et al., 2014). In vitro cultured bovine endometrial epithelial and stromal cells show opposite innate immune responses to LPS when exposed to short-term heat shock (40.5 °C for 32 h) (Sakai et al., 2020; ). For example (Sakai et al., 2020), demonstrated that bovine endometrial epithelial cells produce less IL-6 protein in response LPS (1 µg/mL) under heat shock condition (40.5 °C) compared with epithelial cells under thermoneutral conditions (38.5 °C), whereas stromal cells produced more IL-6 and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1. These changes occurred without altering pathogen-recognition receptor expressions such as TLRs. However, a mixed population of in vitro cultured bovine endometrial cells, containing both epithelial and stromal cells, showed a reduced innate immune response to LPS (1 µg/mL) under short-term heat shock (40.4 °C for 24 h) compared with thermoneutral conditions (37 °C). This was evidenced by decreased S100A8 expression and reduced secretion of IL-8 and PGF2α (). In support of these findings, studies have also identified heat shock protein (HSP) 70 as a negative regulator of the inflammasome pathway controlling IL-1β production in rodent macrophages (Martine and Rébé, 2019). A major role of epithelial cells in innate immunity is the production of chemokines such as IL8. If heat stress perturbs epithelial cell synthesis of chemokines, this could have a significant impact on innate immune responses and leukocyte inflammation (Zachariae, 1993; ; Turner et al., 2014; Karstrup et al., 2017; Martínez-Burgo et al., 2019).
By contrast (Molinari and Bromfield, 2023), reported exaggerated inflammatory responses in bovine endometrial epithelial cells under acute heat exposure in vitro, suggesting that exacerbated inflammatory responses may predispose animals to uterine diseases. Similarly, liver transcriptome analysis of dairy cows exposed to environmental heat stress (THI: 74–82 for 14 days) revealed down regulation of protein-coding genes in mitochondria (COX1, COX2, CYTB, ND1 and ND2) and key regulators of phosphorylation and milk fat synthesis (ASCL1, KCNIP4), while genes involved in immune response (HAMP, SAA3 and IL1B) were upregulated compared with cows in thermoneutral conditions (THI: 68) (Li et al., 2023). These molecular adjustments may enhance basic survival mechanisms but fail to fully counteract metabolic turbulence during heat stress that contributes to immune dysregulation and reduced milk production (Li et al., 2023). Nonetheless, future research should determine whether the decline in cellular energy metabolism under heat stress results from a direct effect of heat stress on mitochondrial function or is a secondary consequence of an activated inflammatory response (Ganeshan et al., 2019).
Maternal heat stress alters placental development, reducing cotyledon number, placental mass, and vascularity in cattle and sheep, potentially compromising nutrient exchange and fetal growth (; Early et al., 1991; Van Wettere et al., 2021; ). Some studies, however, suggest compensatory hypertrophy of cotyledons to preserve fetal growth (Silva et al., 2021; ). At the molecular level, heat exposure disrupts placental gene expression linked to angiogenesis, hypoxia, and oxygen metabolism, potentially impairing oxygen delivery to the fetus (). These findings highlight the placenta as a sensitive and underexplored target of maternal heat exposure, with significant implications for offspring health.
Collectively, these findings indicate distinct cellular responses in immune and non-immune cells under heat stress that require further investigation, and underscores the need to account for cell type, timing, and culture conditions. Despite insights from in vitro heat shock cell culture experiments, where alterations in cell function are primarily driven by the high temperature, the in vivo gene expression dynamics of different bovine tissues such as the endometrium remain poorly understood, with most studies limited by invasive sampling methods such as biopsies or post-mortem analysis (Pfaffl et al., 2003). Recent advances in non-invasive approaches such as endometrial cytology could improve real-time monitoring of stress-induced transcriptional changes (Rocha et al., 2022). Furthermore, changes in gene expression represent only one component of the cellular response to high ambient temperatures; a comprehensive understanding requires an integrative approach that considers not only transcriptional regulation but also the functional interactions among molecular, metabolic and physiological pathways.
3.3 Microbiome
The host microbiota is increasingly recognized as a critical regulator of health and disease (; O'Hara et al., 2020, Peixoto et al., 2021), to the extent that it has been described as a ‘forgotten organ’ due to its profound physiological influence on the host (O'Hara and Shanahan, 2006). Environmental stressors including social stress (), weaning (), and thermal stress (Song et al., 2014) reshape microbial communities with consequences for host health (Kim et al., 2022).
Disease development depends on the interaction between a susceptible host and the pathogen, and environmental factors that affect both the host defense and pathogen activity which may enhance pathogenic bacterial prevalence or virulence and impair host immune function, thereby increasing the risk of disease (Molinari et al., 2022). Elevated temperatures can increase pathogen proliferation and facilitate microbial dysbiosis, thereby increasing the risk of infectious disease (). For example, higher environmental temperatures correlate with increased bloodstream infections in humans, particularly by Gram-negative pathogens such as Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter spp (Eber et al., 2011). This highlights the influence of ambient temperature on pathogen dynamics, a pattern also relevant to livestock health. In dairy cattle, bacterial load on teat skin and bedding increases during the summer and is associated with an increased incidence of mastitis (Hogan et al., 1989a; Rowbotham and Ruegg, 2016). Seasonal peaks of Streptococcus uberis and E. coli–associated mastitis have also been reported during the summer months, particularly in August, compared to the winter season (Olde Riekerink et al., 2007). Furthermore, the increased incidence of mastitis under hot and humid conditions has been attributed to the proliferation of pathogen vectors (). Environmental heat stress (THI > 60 in Germany) has also been shown to increase the shedding of pathogens such as yeasts and Streptococcus uberis from intramammary-infected quarters. This effect may result from impaired immune function and elevated milk temperature, both of which favor pathogen proliferation (Hamel et al., 2021).
In ruminants, heat stress disrupts rumen fermentation by altering bacterial composition. While (Zhao et al., 2019) found that heat stress did not markedly change the overall bacterial community of the rumen, heat stress selectively increased lactate-producing bacteria and reduced acetate-producing bacteria, potentially contributing to acidosis and impaired milk fat synthesis. Other studies in dairy cows (Zhao et al., 2019; ), pigs (Xia et al., 2022), and goats () confirm heat stress-associated microbial shifts in the gut, yet the extent to which these are direct effects of temperature versus indirect effects of reduced feed intake and altered behavior remain unresolved.
Emerging evidence suggests heat stress may also foster microbial persistence and adaptation (Zhang et al., 2025). Novel findings indicate that bacteria can transiently tolerate lytic phages without acquiring resistance mutations, a survival mechanism enhanced by heat stress (Park et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2025). Similar persistence has been described under antibiotic stress (Levin-Reisman et al., 2017, 2019), raising the possibility that heat stress inadvertently promotes microbial survival and resistance emergence. Such dynamics may contribute to the increased persistence of uterine diseases like metritis during hot seasons. However, in vivo studies are needed to investigate the direct and long-term effects of heat stress on uterine microbial diversity and resistance, as well as to determine whether heat stress to dairy cows induces microbial mutations or epigenetic adaptations that lead to systemic immune dysfunction and facilitate pathogen persistence.
4 Stress-induced signaling pathways in immune modulation
4.1 Heat shock proteins and stress signaling
Heat shock proteins (HSP) represent the primary molecular chaperones induced by cellular stress, and their expression is markedly upregulated during heat stress across multiple livestock species, including genes such as HSPA4, HSPA6, HSPA1A/HSPA1L (HSP70), HSP90AB1 (HSP90), HSPH1 (HSP105), and HSP90 activators AHSA1 (Schmidt and Abdulla, 1988; Lei et al., 2009; Hu et al., 2016; Kapila et al., 2016; Garner et al., 2020). Functionally, HSPs preserve protein homeostasis by preventing aggregation, refolding damaged proteins, and inhibiting apoptosis, thereby sustaining cell survival under stress (Garrido et al., 2001; Stetler et al., 2010; Srivastava, 2002; Mayer and Bukau, 2005).
Beyond cytoprotection HSP70 also exerts critical immunomodulatory roles, enhancing innate immunity by activating antigen-presenting cells, promoting antibody production, stimulating T-cell responses, and providing both cell protection and immune support during heat stress (Wallin et al., 2002; Zügel and Kaufmann, 1999). In the bovine endometrium, heat shock response also intersects with the innate immune response. For instance (Molinari and Bromfield, 2023), demonstrated that while heat shock (40 °C for 24 h) of endometrial epithelial cells increases the gene expression of HSPA1A and amplified inflammatory responses to LPS (1 or 10 µg/mL), knock down of HSPA1A or heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) exacerbated the immune response to LPS. This suggests that the heat shock response (increased HSP) functions as an intrinsic brake on excessive inflammation, highlighting that immune responses may be modulated by heat shock (Molinari and Bromfield, 2023). Heat shock protein 70 acts as a danger signal that activates antigen-presenting cells and promotes proinflammatory cytokine production (Somensi et al., 2017; Song et al., 2019). For example, human monocytes exposed to purified exogenous HSP70 (7 nM at 37 °C for 2–4 h) increased IL-1β, IL-6 and TNFα through CD14 engagement and NF-κB–mediated signaling (). Similarly, exposure of human lung cancer cells to extracellular HSP70 induced proinflammatory gene transcription after 30 min (Somensi et al., 2017). These findings suggest that although HSP70 is primarily an intracellular chaperone, it can also elicit immune responses when released outside the cell (Mambula and Calderwood, 2006; Vega et al., 2008). Contradictory evidence also suggests that HSP70 can suppress NF-κB-mediated inflammation by interfering with TRAF6 ubiquitination (Hauser et al., 1996; ; ). These findings underscore the complexity of HSP-mediated regulation, which may vary by cell type, context, and exposure duration.
Taken together, elevated HSP expression under acute heat shock supports cytoprotection and immune modulation, yet questions remain about the long-term consequences of heat stress on HSP activity. Chronic or repeated heat stress may lead to sustained HSP overexpression, potentially diverting cellular resources, promoting persistent inflammation, or disrupting immune balance (; Singh et al., 2025). This raises an important question: Could prolonged HSP induction, while protective in the short term, compromise cellular performance or predispose livestock to immune dysregulation under chronic environmental stress?
4.2 Inflammatory pathways: NF-κB and MAPKs
Inflammation is a fundamental component of innate immune responses, crucial for maintaining immune homeostasis and initiating adaptive immunity. Inflammatory mediators activate antigen-presenting cells, which in turn amplify cytokines production (). These cytokines stimulate T and B lymphocytes, thereby promoting the development of adaptive immune responses (Iwasaki and Medzhitov, 2010). The functional and transcriptional alterations to cells under heat stress are, at least in part, mediated by changes in the activity and nuclear translocation of key transcription factors. For example, Y-box factor translocates to the nucleus under heat stress where it upregulates the expression of multidrug resistance genes such as MDR1 and MRP1, thereby enhancing protection against drug-induced cytotoxicity, including that caused by the anti-cancer drug Adriamycin in human colorectal carcinoma cells (Stein et al., 2001).
The NF-κB family comprises inducible transcription factors that regulate a wide range of genes governing immune and inflammatory responses (Oeckinghaus and Ghosh, 2009). While inflammation is normally beneficial and self-limiting, dysregulated NF-κB activity can cause prolonged tissue damage and drive acute or chronic inflammatory diseases (Liu et al., 2017). The role of heat stress and heat shock proteins in the inflammatory response is very controversial. Nuclear translocation of NF-κB, normally induced by LPS or cytokines, is suppressed by heat shock (41–43 °C for 1 h) in murine lung epithelial cells through stabilization of the IκBα/NF-κB complex when followed by stimulation with a combination of IL-1β or TNFα and IFNγ (5 ng/mL for 24 hours) (Wong et al., 1997). A similar inhibition of NF-κB nuclear localization was observed under heat shock conditions in human respiratory epithelial cells (43 °C for 2–4 h), followed by IL-1β or TNFα stimulation (1 U/mL for 18 hours), in rat pancreatic islet cells (42 °C for 60 min) stimulated with IL-1β, and in human pancreatic islet cells (42 °C for 90 min) stimulated by IL-1β and IFNγ (Scarim et al., 1998; Yoo et al., 2000). These findings underscore that heat stress modulates NF-κB dynamics and targeted gene expression, thereby regulating inflammatory responses (Harper et al., 2018; ).
As discussed earlier, the number of circulating leukocytes often increase during heat stress (Mitlöhner et al., 2002; ) contributing to elevated systemic cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα (; ; Min et al., 2016). Heat shock proteins, particularly extracellular HSP70, act as danger-associated molecular patterns that activate TLR2/4 signaling, leading to downstream ERK1/2 and NF-κB activation and transcription of proinflammatory genes (; ; Orhan et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2016; Somensi et al., 2017; Martine and Rébé, 2019). These findings are further supported by Tang et al. (2021) who demonstrated that heat stress (41 °C for 12 h) intensified intestinal inflammation by activating the TLR4–NF-κB signaling after E. coli infection (Tang et al., 2021). In parallel, MAPK signaling, including p38 and JNK, is stimulated by oxidative stress under heat stress, further driving cytokine synthesis and release (Dodd et al., 2010; ). A transcriptomic analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of heifers exposed to seasonal heat stress (THI: 82; August) revealed an increase in expression of the genes involved in MAPK signaling pathway such as HRAS, MAP3K9, and MAP2K7 (Dutta et al., 2024).
As outlined previously, several studies also report that heat stress can suppress inflammatory transcription by blocking nuclear translocation of NF-κB (; Yoo et al., 2000; Ferat-Osorio et al., 2014). This occurs through inhibition of IκB kinase (IKK) activation, stabilization of IκBα, and prevention of its phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and degradation, thereby sequestering NF-κB to the cytoplasm (Wong et al., 1997; Scarim et al., 1998; ; Yoo et al., 2000; Shanley et al., 2000). Some systems (in vitro cell culture or live mice) show heat shock-induced upregulation of IκBα mRNA (NFKBIA), further stabilizing the NF-κB/IκBα complex (Wong et al., 1997; Pritts et al., 2000). These inhibitory mechanisms underscore the importance of NF-κB inhibition under heat stress, as cells exposed to heat stress following proinflammatory stimulation often undergo apoptosis, highlighting a critical role of NF-κB suppression in maintaining cell survival during stress (; ).
Together, these findings emphasize a paradoxical role of heat stress in inflammatory signaling; while acute heat shock dampens the immune response, prolonged or severe heat stress induces inflammatory responses. This suggests that the net outcome likely depends on cell type, stress duration, and the presence of concurrent immune stimuli. Importantly, most current evidence is derived from in vitro studies or short-term heat stress models, with limited in vivo data from livestock. Defining the temporal and tissue-specific dynamics of NF-κB and TLR signaling under heat stress in dairy cows is important. Such knowledge may elucidate sensitive windows such as the dry period or early postpartum, where targeted modulation of inflammatory pathways could mitigate the detrimental effects of heat stress while preserving essential immune defense (Lim et al., 2007).
4.3 Heat stress-induced impairment of mitochondrial function
Mitochondria play a central role in health and disease (). Mitochondria are the main energy hubs of the cell, producing about 90% of required ATP through oxidative phosphorylation (). Heat stress can impair bioenergetic status of tissues and alter mitochondrial biogenesis and functions such as oxidative phosphorylation (Singh, 2004; Marquez Acevedo et al., 2025). In vitro heat shock (42 °C for 3h) of fetal sheep myoblasts resulted in decreased mitochondrial biogenesis, reduced ATP production and decreased cell proliferation and increased apoptosis (Singh, 2004; Li et al., 2023; Lu et al., 2023). These findings are supported by other in vitro studies where bovine mammary epithelial cells were exposed to either moderate (40 °C for 1 h) or adverse heat shock (42 °C for 2 h) resulting in mitochondrial dysfunction and inhibition of cellular proliferation (Du et al., 2008; ). Heat stress (41.0 °C for 12 h) during in vitro maturation of bovine oocytes reduces mitochondrial membrane potential and increases ROS, indicating mitochondrial dysfunction (Payton et al., 2018). Moreover, these impairments persist in early embryogenesis (Payton et al., 2018). Such alterations in maternally derived mitochondria likely explain some of the negative impacts of heat stress on oocyte competence, embryonic development, and pregnancy outcomes (Schrock et al., 2007; Edwards et al., 2009).
Mitochondrial dysfunction also acts as a driver of inflammation as damaged mitochondria release excessive ROS and other byproducts that function as danger signals, activating innate immune pathways but simultaneously inducing low-grade, chronic inflammation (Zampino et al., 2020; ). In cattle, heat stress downregulates protein-coding genes in liver mitochondria that regulate electron transfer, NADH dehydrogenase, and respiratory chain complexes, thereby impairing hepatic energy production (Li et al., 2023). Immune activation itself imposes significant metabolic demands. For example, stimulation of TLR4 with LPS reduces oxygen consumption as part of an energy-conserving response, suggesting that activation of the immune system imposes an energetic trade-off, often leading to hypometabolism (Ganeshan et al., 2019). When mitochondrial capacity is compromised, these trade-offs become more pronounced, leaving insufficient energy to sustain robust immune responses ().
Additionally, heat stress suppresses the expression of transporters such as SLC38A10 (amino acid transport) and SLC2A1/GLUT1 (glucose transport), while repressing PPARγ-mediated metabolic pathways in dairy cows, further limiting cellular fuel availability, weakening mitochondrial integrity, and imposing energetic constraints on immunity (Wheelock et al., 2010; Gao et al., 2019). This raises critical questions: To what extent do mitochondrial defects directly impair immune cell function, and can targeted metabolic interventions restore immunocompetence under thermal stress? Furthermore, current evidence on heat stress and mitochondrial function is mostly from in vitro studies on muscle or mammary epithelial cells, with little known about heat stress impact on endometrial epithelial cells. Addressing these gaps will be essential to improve thermotolerance and postpartum health in dairy cows.
4.4 Oxidative stress pathways
Heat stress provokes oxidative stress by enhancing ROS production across multiple tissues, disrupting redox homeostasis and impairing cellular metabolism (; ; Flanagan et al., 1998). Concurrently, oxidative stress promotes cytokine synthesis and release (Dodd et al., 2010; ). In response, animals activate antioxidant defense systems, including enzymatic antioxidants (superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, catalase), non-enzymatic compounds (melatonin, L-cysteine, albumin), and low-molecular-weight antioxidants (ascorbic acid, glutathione, α-tocopherol, β-carotene) to mitigate ROS toxicity. These antioxidant responses are often upregulated in response to heat stress to mitigate the damaging effects of ROS. Oxidative stress, caused by excessive production of free radicals and ROS or a decline in antioxidant defenses, results in cellular damage and promotes tissue inflammation (Khor et al., 2011; Weismann et al., 2011). Evidence in dairy cattle shows elevated oxidative stress markers, such as catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione reductase, and malondialdehyde, particularly during hot months, confirming systemic redox imbalance under heat stress (). Oxidative stress has been directly implicated in immune dysfunction by impairing leukocyte activity, weakening responses to inflammatory stimuli, and predisposing animals to infectious and metabolic diseases (). Elevated ROS generation under heat stress conditions inhibited DNA synthesis and suppressed IL2 gene expression in murine T cells (Pahlavani and Harris, 1998).
Crosstalk between oxidative stress and immune regulation occurs through activation of NF-κB, which amplifies proinflammatory cytokine production, and through NRF2 which orchestrates antioxidant gene transcription (Gehrig et al., 2012; Morris et al., 2022). Acute heat stress stimulates mitochondrial superoxide production in skeletal muscle of poultry, leading to oxidative damage of mitochondrial lipid and protein synthesis (Mujahid et al., 2005). Heat shock proteins such as HSP72 further modulate this balance by limiting the propagation of inflammatory mediators, suggesting a protective but insufficient adaptation during chronic heat stress. While numerous studies have quantified oxidative stress biomarkers in livestock, the precise mechanisms linking ROS signaling with immune dysfunction remain poorly defined in vivo.
4.5 Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and glucocorticoid signaling under heat stress
During heat stress, the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis is activated to maintain homeostasis in response to stress stimuli (Sejian et al., 2018). Activation of the HPA axis represents a central mechanism by which environmental stress alters immune function in dairy cows (Grandin, 1997). Under heat or other stressors, hypothalamic secretion of corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulates the anterior pituitary to release adrenocorticotropic hormone, which in turn drives glucocorticoid (primarily cortisol) production from the adrenal cortex (Hicks et al., 1998). Cortisol, known as the stress hormone, modulates immune function by regulating genes that encode cytokines, chemokines, inflammatory mediators, and their receptors (; ). Increased cortisol due to heat stress binds with DNA, inhibiting the expression of genes involved in immune cell activation and cytokine production (Elenkov and Chrousos, 1999; Webster et al., 2002; Sgorlon et al., 2012; ). Cortisol also engages in crosstalk with STAT pathways, altering cytokine signaling, and inducing MAPK phosphatase-1, which inhibits p38 MAPK activity, thereby broadly downregulating inflammatory gene expression (Wu et al., 2005). Glucocorticoids act via the glucocorticoid receptor to reshape immune gene expression and their receptors (; ). The glucocorticoid receptor directly interferes with proinflammatory transcription factors, such as NF-κB and AP-1, suppressing transcription of cytokines, chemokines, and their receptors (Liberman et al., 2007; ). Acutely, glucocorticoids inhibit vasodilation and vascular permeability following inflammation and reduce leukocyte extravasation into inflamed sites (Mcewen et al., 1997; Perretti and Ahluwalia, 2000).
Heat stress increases cortisol secretion, but levels plateau and eventually decline with prolonged exposure, suggesting adaptation of the HPA axis (Mishra, 2021). Cortisol secretion is accompanied by the release of catecholamines and other hormones, as heat stress also activates the sympathetic–adrenal–medullary axis (Mishra, 2021). Catecholamines further stimulate cortisol secretion and act directly on immune cell functions (). Heat stress has been associated with elevated cortisol concentrations in both blood and milk of cattle (). In contrast, as noted earlier, heat stress has been shown to induce proinflammatory responses in dairy cows (). Because cortisol concentrations fluctuate widely depending on the duration of heat stress exposure, they may be insufficient to elicit a sustained anti-inflammatory effect. In such cases, inflammation may emerge despite elevated cortisol (Min et al., 2016; Most and Yates, 2021). Supporting this concept (), demonstrated that glucocorticoids can also trigger inflammation in humans, depending on exposure duration and the basal immune state. In cows, high cortisol levels have been associated with greater occurrence of retained fetal membranes, which is further associated with metritis (Kaczmarowski et al., 2006). The effects of heat stress on cortisol levels (Mishra, 2021) may help explain the increased incidence of metritis with heat stress (Mishra, 2021; Molinari et al., 2022).
4.6 Heat stress-induced epigenetic modifications
Conrad Hal Waddington first coined the term “epigenetic” to describe the dynamic interaction between an organism’s genetic makeup and its environment in shaping observable traits (Waddington, 1956). His classic experiments with Drosophila demonstrated that environmental stress could induce epigenetic changes; for instance, larvae exposed to heat stress developed adults with abnormal wings. These abnormalities represented phenocopies of phenotypic changes driven by environmental influences rather than genetic mutations (Waddington, 1957). Epigenetic mechanisms including microRNAs (miRNA), long non-coding RNAs, histone modifications, and DNA methylation play a central role in regulating gene expression and shaping cellular function (Gibney and Nolan, 2010; ). Among these, DNA methylation is the most extensively studied, typically occurring at cytosine residues within CpG dinucleotides in gene promoter regions, where methylation can interfere with transcription factor binding and consequently suppress gene transcription (Greenberg and Bourc’his, 2019), and influencing phenotypic variation and adaptive responses to environmental stressors such as heat stress (Law and Holland, 2019). Evidence from chickens, sheep, goats, and cattle demonstrates that elevated temperatures induce differential DNA methylation across genes involved in metabolism, immune function, inflammatory signaling, and cellular stress responses (Vinoth et al., 2018; ; ; Livernois et al., 2021; Sajjanar et al., 2024).
Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of blood from bulls exposed to seasonal heat stress (THI: 75–85; 56 days) revealed differentially methylated genes associated with cellular and metabolic processes, stress responses, and, importantly, immune and inflammatory pathways (). In cattle, cytosine methylation differences between indicine and taurine subspecies of cattle have been linked to variation in thermal resilience (). Evidence from multiple species, including birds, fish, and insects, suggests that variable methylation in adaptive genomic regions may contribute to evolutionary processes (Gore et al., 2018; ). Recent work in taurine and indicine cattle further supports the role of DNA methylation in linking genotypes to phenotypes, underscoring its potential as a marker for climate adaptability ().
Emerging evidence indicates that environmental stressors can induce transgenerational effects in cattle (Skibiel et al., 2018; Larsen and Laporta, 2024). It has been reported that granddaughters (F2) of heat-stressed granddams have impaired epithelial microstructure and stunted cellular turnover: the balance between cell growth and cell loss (Larsen and Laporta, 2024). In Italian Simmental cows, the season of the great-granddam’s pregnancy (F0) was linked to the performance of great-granddaughters (F3), with winter and spring gestations associated with favorable estimated breeding values for milk and protein yields, while summer and autumn gestations had detrimental effects (Macciotta et al., 2023). These trends were consistent with THI values (< 69, 69-73, 73-75, > 75) recorded during different stages of F0 pregnancy, highlighting the role of maternal heat stress in shaping production traits across generations. Although these results were based on estimated breeding values, validation using raw phenotypic records will be essential to strengthen the evidence for heat stress–mediated epigenetic inheritance in dairy cattle (Macciotta et al., 2023). Importantly, shared differentially methylated promoter regions in both dams and calves strengthen the possibility that certain epigenetic marks induced by heat stress may persist and influence immune responsiveness later in life (Kipp et al., 2021; Halli et al., 2025).
Cellular stress also reshapes post-transcriptional regulation through altered miRNA expression, which fine-tunes the specificity, timing, and magnitude of gene expression (; ; Harfe, 2005; Mckenna et al., 2010). For instance, heat exposure induces differential expression of miRNAs in bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells, suggesting a role in coordinating adaptive cellular responses (Sengar et al., 2018). Collectively, these findings establish epigenetic modifications as pivotal mediators of cellular responses to heat stress, enabling both dynamic adaptation and heritable changes in gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence (Wang and Ibeagha-Awemu, 2020). Future research should integrate epigenomic, transcriptomic, and phenotypic datasets to uncover regulatory nodes that may serve as biomarkers or intervention targets to enhance thermotolerance in livestock.
5 Mitigation strategies for heat stress in dairy cows
5.1 Managemental strategies
The dairy cattle industry has invested in efforts to mitigate heat stress through adjustments in daily management practices, cooling infrastructure, and strategic modifications to breeding schedules. Studies conducted in the United States have shown that providing heat-abatement measures, such as fans and water sprinklers, significantly improves milk production. Cows with access to these cooling systems produced about 34 kg of milk per day, whereas cows without heat abatement produced only 27.7 kg per day (Tao et al., 2012). Moreover, simulation models suggest that optimal heat abatement strategies could reduce livestock industry-wide losses from heat stress by approximately $700 million (St-Pierre et al., 2003). Nevertheless, despite technological advances, no single intervention can fully safeguard the cattle industry against heat stress. Evidence from extreme heat stress conditions indicate that even well-managed large-scale herds sustain significant losses, highlighting the inherent limitations of current technologies and management practices (Hutchins et al., 2025). Dairy producers invest in infrastructure such as shade structures, fans, and sprinkler systems to provide cooling during periods of elevated heat stress. The decline in milk production and reproductive efficiency due to heat stress can be mitigated by implementing cooling strategies (). Investments in cooling infrastructure, including sprinklers and fans, can lessen yield losses under mild to moderate heat stress and may partly explain the lower losses observed in larger operations compared with smaller operations (Hutchins et al., 2025). However, the effectiveness of these cooling systems diminishes under high relative humidity, when evaporative cooling capacity is greatly reduced (). Shading systems provide an economical strategy to reduce heat load in livestock by limiting direct solar radiation, thereby helping to maintain body temperature and alleviate the adverse effects of heat stress (Fournel et al., 2017). Furthermore, heat abatement during the dry period enhances immune function in dairy cows. Studies show that cooled cows exhibit greater IgG secretion and stronger neutrophil oxidative burst compared with heat-stressed cows, highlighting improvements in both humoral and innate immunity (, ).
Another cost-effective approach to reducing the impact of heat stress involves adjusting management decisions such as the timing of calving. Peripartum cows are especially susceptible to heat stress, as environmental challenges during this period can intensify production losses (; Tao et al., 2011; Ferreira et al., 2016; Fabris et al., 2020). Adjusting calving schedules to avoid the spring and summer months may help mitigate these effects in warmer regions. However, shifting calving into cooler seasons introduces additional challenges, including higher risks of calf mortality and increased production losses in colder climates (Litherland et al., 2014; Hulbert and Moisá, 2016).
5.2 Feed supplements and immune modulators
Nutritional interventions and immune-modulating strategies can serve as valuable complements to environmental management, particularly during periods of prolonged heat stress. However, strong evidence for substantive interventional strategies that limit or reduce the negative impacts of heat stress on cow production are limited at best. Historically dietary interventions to overcome the impacts of heat stress have included diet formulation to account for reduced feed intake, enhanced nutrient requirements during heat stress, dietary heat increment and avoiding nutrient excess in diets. During heat stress, altering diet composition has been shown to stimulate feed intake, partially compensating for reduced consumption (Renaudeau et al., 2012). Modulation of post absorptive metabolism and metabolic heat production could serve as effective strategies to reduce heat stress effects, while enhanced water consumption may have even greater positive effects at alleviating heat stress effects on production than dietary manipulation. Dietary manipulations to overcome the production effects of heat stress have been extensively reviewed in the literature (West, 2003, 1999; Golder and Lean, 2024; ; Plaizier et al., 2022).
In terms of health and immunity, supplementation with antioxidants and electrolytes to the animals under heat stress can potentially strengthen immunity and alleviate oxidative stress associated with heat stress. In buffaloes, vitamin C and electrolytes have been shown to reduce oxidative damage during heat stress, while provision of dietary ascorbic acid improves immunity, growth, semen quality, fertility, and oxidative balance in poultry under heat stress (Panda et al., 2008; Kumar et al., 2010). Vitamin A supplementation has been shown to enhance immune function in dairy cattle by increasing pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNFα, along with immunoglobulins IgM, IgG, and IgA and their transport proteins (Tjoelker et al., 1990; Jin et al., 2014). Similarly, supplementation with vitamin E and selenium has demonstrated beneficial effects in postpartum buffalo affected by dystocia by mitigating oxidative stress and enhancing neutrophil function by improving chemotaxis (Sathya et al., 2007).
Rumen-protected methionine improves liver function, oxidative balance, and inflammation during the transition period (Osorio et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2017; ), though data under heat stress are limited. Supplementing methionine and arginine during heat stress has been shown to enhance mammary cell function and metabolism in dairy cows (Salama et al., 2019). Appropriate insulin action is essential for survival and adaptation under heat stress. Studies have shown that enhancing insulin sensitivity through supplementation with insulin-sensitizing additives such as chromium, thiazolidinediones, or lipoic acid can improve animal performance during heat stress (Ranganathan et al., 2006; ; Rhoads et al., 2013). As mentioned earlier, the gastrointestinal tract is highly susceptible to heat stress due to reduced blood flow and hypoxia (Johnson et al., 2016b, 2016). Nutritional interventions can help preserve intestinal integrity and function. L-glutamine, a primary fuel for enterocytes and lymphocytes, supports barrier function, suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokines, and improves productivity, including milk yield in dairy cows and growth in pigs (Reeds and Burrin, 2000; Jiang et al., 2009; ; Johnson and Lay, 2017). Under heat stress, adding chromium to the diet helped strengthen the primary immune response by boosting IgM and IgG production in poultry and improved ruminal fermentation and metabolism in Holstein dairy cows (Vivier et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2014; Wo et al., 2023). Zinc contributes to gut health by enhancing tight junction proteins and providing antioxidant protection via metallothionein induction (Zhang and Guo, 2009; Wang et al., 2013, 2014), while betaine acts as an osmotic regulator and methyl donor, improving thermoregulation, immunity, and production outcomes under heat stress (Singh et al., 2022; Hassan et al., 2011).
Dietary supplementation with yeasts, plant extracts, and probiotics can support heat-stressed animals by improving rumen metabolism, regulating body temperature, and strengthening intestinal barriers. Combined prebiotics and probiotics further enhance immunity by promoting phagocytosis, cytokine production (TNFα, IFNγ), and vaccine-induced antibody responses (Salehimanesh et al., 2016). While these nutrients offer promising protective effects against heat stress, they should be viewed as complementary, rather than replacements for environmental management strategies.
5.3 Genetic selection for heat tolerance in dairy cows
Genetic adaptation offers long-term solutions to mitigate heat stress in livestock. Genetic selection for thermotolerance has been pursued using both quantitative and genomic approaches, revealing a low to moderate heritable component that is often negatively correlated with production traits in dairy animals (Ravagnolo and Misztal, 2002; ; ; ; Nguyen et al., 2016). A recent genome-wide association study introduced a principal component–based measure of heat tolerance, derived from milk yield, fat and protein percentages, and somatic cell score across THI classes (Macciotta et al., 2017). This approach captured both the baseline level of performance and the slope of decline under heat stress, revealing that these components are genetically uncorrelated and heritable. Significant loci near genes such as HSF1 and MCAT highlight the involvement of classical heat-shock response and metabolic pathways, offering new insights into the complex biology of thermotolerance and providing novel targets for genetic selection (Macciotta et al., 2017). Furthermore, the Australian Heat Tolerance Breeding Value enables the selection of cows that maintain lower body temperatures under heat stress (Nguyen et al., 2016, 2017). However, its effectiveness in distinguishing heat-stress responses in lactating Holstein cows remains under investigation (Jensen et al., 2022).
Although several thermotolerance-related genes have been identified, the inheritance of heat stress tolerance is further complicated by epigenetic regulation, underscoring the need for integrative genetic and epigenetic strategies to improve resilience in dairy cattle (; Macciotta et al., 2017; Ghaffari, 2022). Cattle inheriting the PRLR slick mutation exhibit enhanced thermotolerance, characterized by improved regulation of body temperature during heat stress (; Landaeta-Hernández et al., 2021; ). This mutation shortens and thins the hair coat, facilitating more efficient heat dissipation and reducing susceptibility to heat stress (Olson et al., 2003; ). As a result, slick-haired cattle maintain lower rectal temperatures, higher sweating rates, and improved reproductive and productive performance under hot environmental conditions (, ; Eisemann et al., 2020).
At the molecular level, heat shock proteins are key regulators of cellular defense. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes such as HSP90AB1, HSP70A1A, HSF1, and HSBP1 have been associated with thermotolerance in various cattle breeds (Liu et al., 2011; ; Wang et al., 2013; ). Non-heat shock protein genes, including ATP1A1 and ATP1B2, have also been implicated in thermotolerance (Liu et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011; ). These markers can be applied in genomic selection programs, along with the use of thermotolerant sires accelerating the development of heat-adapted offspring without compromising productivity.
6 Conclusion and future directions
Heat stress, driven by rising ambient temperatures under global warming and climate change, is a major challenge to dairy production, particularly in warmer regions. Heat stress reduces milk yield and quality including protein content and somatic cell count, compromises reproductive performance, weakens immunity, and collectively contributes to billions of dollars in annual economic losses to global animal agriculture. At the farm level, mitigation of heat stress relies on environmental modifications (e.g., shade, shelter, cooling systems) and nutritional interventions, which have helped buffer some effects of climate variability. Indeed, the sensitivity of milk yield to thermal extremes has declined over time, suggesting that genetic selection and advances in management practices, such as improved cooling, housing, and diet formulation, are already having a positive impact (Gisbert-Queral et al., 2021). However, the cost of climate adaptation efforts alone has been estimated to reduce productive growth in dairy systems by 0.31% per year (Njuki et al., 2020). As summarized in Figure 1, the collective evidence demonstrates that heat stress acts across multiple biological levels, affecting whole-animal physiology, microbial ecology, immune responsiveness, and cellular function, resulting in compromised health and immune resilience in dairy cattle. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms by which heat stress increases disease susceptibility and disrupts immune function remain incompletely understood.
Genetic strategies offer promising avenues for long-term resilience. Modeling cow performance against continuous THI values has proven useful for identifying animals that combine high yield with reduced thermal sensitivity. Furthermore, polymorphisms in immune-related genes may serve as predictive markers for thermotolerance and could be integrated into breeding programs to enhance resilience. However, inheritance of heat tolerance is complex, shaped not only by genetic variation but also by epigenetic regulation.
Future research should therefore focus on unraveling the cellular and molecular pathways through which heat stress alters immune function, including detailed analysis of signaling cascades involved in immunity and disease resistance. Refinements in breeding strategies will be crucial for developing heat stress-resilient cattle capable of sustaining productivity and immune competence under higher THI conditions. Integration of genomics, epigenomics, and proteomics with conventional and advanced breeding approaches holds particular promise. These tools can improve the precision and predictability of selection programs while offering deeper insight into gene function and regulation. Such integrative strategies will be essential to accelerate genetic improvement and ensure sustainable livestock production in the face of global climate challenges.
Statements
Author contributions
AT: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JB: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2024-67015-42414.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbdelnourS. A.Abd El-HackM. E.KhafagaA. F.ArifM.TahaA. E.NoreldinA. E. (2019). Stress biomarkers and proteomics alteration to thermal stress in ruminants: A review. J. Therm. Biol.79, 120–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.12.013
2
AgarwalA.Aponte-MelladoA.PremkumarB. J.ShamanA.GuptaS. (2012). The effects of oxidative stress on female reproduction: A review. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol.10, 49. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-49
3
AkiraS.UematsuS.TakeuchiO. (2006). Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell.124, 783–801. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.015
4
AkköseM.VuralM. R. (2025). Effect of season during late gestation on metabolic alterations, inflammatory response, and oxidative stress status in dairy cows and offspring. Theriogenology.249, 117601. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117601
5
AleriJ. W.HineB. C.PymanM. F.MansellP. D.WalesW. J.MallardB.et al. (2016). Periparturient immunosuppression and strategies to improve dairy cow health during the periparturient period. Res. Vet. Sci.108, 8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.07.007
6
AllisC. D.JenuweinT. (2016). The molecular hallmarks of epigenetic control. Nat. Rev. Genet.17, 487–500. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.59
7
AltizerS.DobsonA.HosseiniP.HudsonP.PascualM.RohaniP. (2006). Seasonality and the dynamics of infectious diseases. Ecol. Lett.9, 467–484. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00879.x
8
AlvaradoS.RajakumarR.AbouheifE.SzyfM. (2015). Epigenetic variation in the egfr gene generates quantitative variation in a complex trait in ants. Nat. Commun.6, 6513. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7513
9
ArmstrongD. V. (1994). Heat stress interaction with shade and cooling. J. Dairy Sci.77, 2044–2050. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77149-6
10
AseaA.KraeftS. K.Kurt-JonesE. A.StevensonM. A.ChenL. B.FinbergR. W.et al. (2000). Hsp70 stimulates cytokine production through a cd14-dependant pathway, demonstrating its dual role as a chaperone and cytokine. Nat. Med.6, 435–442. doi: 10.1038/74697
11
AuchtungT. L.Salak-JohnsonJ. L.MorinD. E.MallardC. C.DahlG. E. (2004). Effects of photoperiod during the dry period on cellular immune function of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.87, 3683–3689. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73507-9
12
BadingaL.ThatcherW. W.DiazT.DrostM.WolfensonD. (1993). Effect of environmental heat stress on follicular development and steroidogenesis in lactating holstein cows. Theriogenology.39, 797–810. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(93)90419-6
13
BagathM.KrishnanG.DevarajC.RashamolV. P.PragnaP.LeesA. M.et al. (2019). The impact of heat stress on the immune system in dairy cattle: A review. Res. Vet. Sci.126, 94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.08.011
14
BaiH.UkitaH.KawaharaM.MitaniT.FurukawaE.YanagawaY.et al. (2020). Effect of summer heat stress on gene expression in bovine uterine endometrial tissues. Anim. Sci. J.91, e13474. doi: 10.1111/asj.13474
15
BaileyM. T.DowdS. E.GalleyJ. D.HufnagleA. R.AllenR. G.LyteM. (2011). Exposure to a social stressor alters the structure of the intestinal microbiota: Implications for stressor-induced immunomodulation. Brain Behav. Immun.25, 397–407. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.023
16
BalakrishnanK.AdamsL. E. (1995). The role of the lymphocyte in an immune response. Immunol. Invest.24, 233–244. doi: 10.3109/08820139509062775
17
BarnesT. L.BurrackR. M.SchmidtT. B.PetersenJ. L.YatesD. T. (2021). Sustained heat stress elevated corneal and body surface temperatures and altered circulating leukocytes and metabolic indicators in wether lambs supplemented with ractopamine or zilpaterol. J. Anim. Sci.99, skab236. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab236
18
BartelD. P. (2004). Micrornas: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell.116, 281–297. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5
19
BaskervilleS.BartelD. P. (2005). Microarray profiling of micrornas reveals frequent coexpression with neighboring mirnas and host genes. RNA.11, 241–247. doi: 10.1261/rna.7240905
20
BasuS.BinderR. J.SutoR.AndersonK. M.SrivastavaP. K. (2000). Necrotic but not apoptotic cell death releases heat shock proteins, which deliver a partial maturation signal to dendritic cells and activate the nf-kappa b pathway. Int. Immunol.12, 1539–1546. doi: 10.1093/intimm/12.11.1539
21
BatistelF.ArroyoJ. M.GarcesC. I. M.TrevisiE.ParysC.BallouM. A.et al. (2018). Ethyl-cellulose rumen-protected methionine alleviates inflammation and oxidative stress and improves neutrophil function during the periparturient period and early lactation in holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.101, 480–490. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13185
22
BaumgardL. H.RhoadsR. P.Jr. (2013). Effects of heat stress on postabsorptive metabolism and energetics. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci.1, 311–337. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103644
23
BeckerC. A.CollierR. J.StoneA. E. (2020). Invited review: Physiological and behavioral effects of heat stress in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.103, 6751–6770. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17929
24
BellA. W.McbrideB. W.SlepetisR.EarlyR. J.CurrieW. B. (1989). Chronic heat stress and prenatal development in sheep: I. Conceptus growth and maternal plasma hormones and metabolites. J. Anim. Sci.67, 3289–3299. doi: 10.2527/jas1989.67123289x
25
BennounaS.BlissS. K.CurielT. J.DenkersE. Y. (2003). Cross-talk in the innate immune system: Neutrophils instruct recruitment and activation of dendritic cells during microbial infection. J. Immunol.171, 6052–6058. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.11.6052
26
BenzaquenM. E.RiscoC. A.ArchbaldL. F.MelendezP.ThatcherM. J.ThatcherW. W. (2007). Rectal temperature, calving-related factors, and the incidence of puerperal metritis in postpartum dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.90, 2804–2814. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-482
27
BernabucciU.BiffaniS.BuggiottiL.VitaliA.LaceteraN.NardoneA. (2014). The effects of heat stress in italian holstein dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.97, 471–486. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6611
28
BernabucciU.RonchiB.LaceteraN.NardoneA. (2002). Markers of oxidative status in plasma and erythrocytes of transition dairy cows during hot season. J. Dairy Sci.85, 2173–2179. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74296-3
29
BerryD. P.O’brienB.O’callaghanE. J.SullivanK. O.MeaneyW. J. (2006). Temporal trends in bulk tank somatic cell count and total bacterial count in irish dairy herds during the past decade. J. Dairy Sci.89, 4083–4093. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72453-5
30
BertipagliaE. C. A.Da SilvaR. G.CardosoV.FriesL. A. (2008). Hair coat characteristics and sweating rate of braford cows in Brazil. Livestock Science.112, 99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.01.159
31
BeutlerB. (2004). Inferences, questions and possibilities in toll-like receptor signalling. Nature.430, 257–263. doi: 10.1038/nature02761
32
BirdL. (2019). Getting enough energy for immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol.19, 269. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0159-y
33
BochniarzM.Hahaj-SiembidaA.Krajewska-WedzinaM.OsinskaM.TraczA.TroscianczykA.et al. (2024). Cytokine inflammatory response in dairy cows with mastitis caused by streptococcus agalactiae. J. Vet. Res.68, 115–121. doi: 10.2478/jvetres-2024-0002
34
BohmanovaJ.MisztalI.ColeJ. B. (2007). Temperature-humidity indices as indicators of milk production losses due to heat stress. J. Dairy Sci.90, 1947–1956. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-513
35
BorishL. C.SteinkeJ. W. (2003). 2. Cytokines and chemokines. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.111, S460–S475. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.108
36
BrodzkiP.KostroK.BrodzkiA.LisieckaU.KurekL.MarczukJ. (2014). Phenotyping of leukocytes and granulocyte and monocyte phagocytic activity in the peripheral blood and uterus of cows with endometritis. Theriogenology.82, 403–410. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.04.014
37
BronzoV.LopreiatoV.RivaF.AmadoriM.CuroneG.AddisM. F.et al. (2020). The role of innate immune response and microbiome in resilience of dairy cattle to disease: The mastitis model. Anim. (Basel).10, 1397. doi: 10.3390/ani10081397
38
BruunJ.ErsbollA. K.AlbanL. (2002). Risk factors for metritis in danish dairy cows. Prev. veterinary Med.54, 179–190. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5877(02)00026-0
39
BuchmanT. G.AbelloP. A.SmithE. H.BulkleyG. B. (1993). Induction of heat shock response leads to apoptosis in endothelial cells previously exposed to endotoxin. Am. J. Physiol.265, H165–H170. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1993.265.1.H165
40
BurhansW. S.BurhansC. A. R.BaumgardL. H. (2022). Lethal heat stress: The putative pathophysiology of a deadly disorder in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.105, 3716–3735. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21080
41
BusilloJ. M.CidlowskiJ. A. (2013). The five rs of glucocorticoid action during inflammation: Ready, reinforce, repress, resolve, and restore. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.24, 109–119. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2012.11.005
42
CalderwoodS. K.GongJ.MurshidA. (2016). Extracellular hsps: The complicated roles of extracellular hsps in immunity. Front. Immunol.7. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00159
43
CapraE.LazzariB.MilanesiM.NogueiraG. P.GarciaJ. F.UtsunomiyaY. T.et al. (2023). Comparison between indicine and taurine cattle DNA methylation reveals epigenetic variation associated to differences in morphological adaptive traits. Epigenetics.18, 2163363. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2022.2163363
44
CapucoA. V.AkersR. M.SmithJ. J. (1997). Mammary growth in holstein cows during the dry period: Quantification of nucleic acids and histology. J. Dairy Sci.80, 477–487. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75960-5
45
CarmickleA. T.LarsonC. C.HernandezF. S.PereiraJ. M. V.FerreiraF. C.HaimonM. L. J.et al. (2022). Physiological responses of holstein calves and heifers carrying the slick1 allele to heat stress in california and florida dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci.105, 9216–9225. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22177
46
CaropreseM.AlbenzioM.MarinoR.SantilloA.SeviA. (2013). Dietary glutamine enhances immune responses of dairy cows under high ambient temperature. J. Dairy Sci.96, 3002–3011. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6306
47
CarrollJ. A.ForsbergN. E. (2007). Influence of stress and nutrition on cattle immunity. Veterinary Clinics North America. Food Anim. practice.23, 105–149. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2007.01.003
48
CasanovaA.WeversA.Navarro-LedesmaS.PruimboomL. (2023). Mitochondria: It is all about energy. Front. Physiol.14. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1114231
49
CasarottoL. T.CattaneoL.GlossonK. M.HumphreyB. D.ChapmanJ. D.DahlG. E. (2025a). Effect of a nutritional immunomodulator in dry cows heat stressed with an electric blanket model. J. Dairy Sci.108, 2083–2089. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-25878
50
CasarottoL. T.JonesH. N.Chavatte-PalmerP.DahlG. E. (2025b). Review: Placental physiology and fetal programming in ruminants under heat stress. Biol. Reprod., ioaf047. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaf047
51
CasarottoL. T.JonesH. N.Chavatte-PalmerP.LanceJ. M.OlmoH.DahlG. E. (2025c). Late gestation heat stress induces inflammation and impacts nutrient transfer signature in the placenta of dairy cows. Theriogenology.245, 117506. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.117506
52
ChandraS.TripathiA. K.MishraS.AmzarulM.VaishA. K. (2012). Physiological changes in hematological parameters during pregnancy. Indian J. Hematol. Blood Transfus.28, 144–146. doi: 10.1007/s12288-012-0175-6
53
CharoensookR.GatphayakK.SharifiA. R.ChaisongkramC.BrenigB.KnorrC. (2012). Polymorphisms in the bovine hsp90ab1 gene are associated with heat tolerance in thai indigenous cattle. Trop. Anim. Health Prod.44, 921–928. doi: 10.1007/s11250-011-9989-8
54
ChauhanS. S.CeliP.LeuryB. J.ClarkeI. J.DunsheaF. R. (2014). Dietary antioxidants at supranutritional doses improve oxidative status and reduce the negative effects of heat stress in sheep. J. Anim. Sci.92, 3364–3374. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7714
55
ChauhanS. S.RashamolV. P.BagathM.SejianV.DunsheaF. R. (2021). Impacts of heat stress on immune responses and oxidative stress in farm animals and nutritional strategies for amelioration. Int. J. Biometeorol.65, 1231–1244. doi: 10.1007/s00484-021-02083-3
56
ChebelR. C.SilvaP. R. B.EndresM. I.BallouM. A.LuchterhandK. L. (2016). Social stressors and their effects on immunity and health of periparturient dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.99, 3217–3228. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10369
57
ChenX.DuanX.ChongQ.LiC.XiaoH.ChenS. (2023). Genome-wide DNA methylation differences between bos indicus and bos taurus. Anim. (Basel).13, 203. doi: 10.3390/ani13020203
58
ChenK. L.WangH. L.JiangL. Z.QianY.YangC. X.ChangW. W.et al. (2020). Heat stress induces apoptosis through disruption of dynamic mitochondrial networks in dairy cow mammary epithelial cells. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim.56, 322–331. doi: 10.1007/s11626-020-00446-5
59
ChenS.WangJ.PengD.LiG.ChenJ.GuX. (2018). Exposure to heat-stress environment affects the physiology, circulation levels of cytokines, and microbiome in dairy cows. Sci. Rep.8, 14606. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32886-1
60
ChenH.WuY.ZhangY.JinL.LuoL.XueB.et al. (2006). Hsp70 inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced nf-kappab activation by interacting with traf6 and inhibiting its ubiquitination. FEBS Lett.580, 3145–3152. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.04.066
61
ChotimanukulS.SuwimonteerabutrJ.TechakumphuM.Swangchan-UthaiT. (2022). In vitro effects of short-term and long-term heat exposures on the immune response and prostaglandin biosynthesis in bovine endometrial cells. Anim. (Basel).12, 2359. doi: 10.3390/ani12182359
62
ClementeJ. C.UrsellL. K.ParfreyL. W.KnightR. (2012). The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: An integrative view. Cell.148, 1258–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.035
63
CollierR. J.DahlG. E.VanbaaleM. J. (2006). Major advances associated with environmental effects on dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.89, 1244–1253. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72193-2
64
CollierR. J.RenquistB. J.XiaoY. (2017). A 100-year review: Stress physiology including heat stress. J. Dairy Sci.100, 10367–10380. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13676
65
Contreras-JodarA.NayanN. H.HamzaouiS.CajaG.SalamaA. (2019). Heat stress modifies the lactational performances and the urinary metabolomic profile related to gastrointestinal microbiota of dairy goats. PloS One14, e0202457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202457
66
CookeR. F. (2019). Effects on animal health and immune function. Veterinary Clinics North America. Food Anim. practice.35, 331–341. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.02.004
67
Cruz-TopeteD.CidlowskiJ. A. (2015). One hormone, two actions: Anti- and pro-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids. Neuroimmunomodulation.22, 20–32. doi: 10.1159/000362724
68
CurryH. A.ClemensR. A.ShahS.BradburyC. M.BoteroA.GoswamiP.et al. (1999). Heat shock inhibits radiation-induced activation of nf-kappab via inhibition of i-kappab kinase. J. Biol. Chem.274, 23061–23067. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.33.23061
69
DahlG. E.TaoS.LaportaJ. (2020). Heat stress impacts immune status in cows across the life cycle. Front. Vet. Sci.7. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00116
70
DasR.SailoL.VermaN.BhartiP.SaikiaJ.Imtiwatiet al. (2016). Impact of heat stress on health and performance of dairy animals: A review. Vet. World.9, 260–268. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.260-268
71
DaviesC. J.HillJ. R.EdwardsJ. L.SchrickF. N.FisherP. J.EldridgeJ. A.et al. (2004). Major histocompatibility antigen expression on the bovine placenta: Its relationship to abnormal pregnancies and retained placenta. Anim. Reprod. Sci.82–83, 267–280. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.05.016
72
DavisM. Y.ZhangH.BrannanL. E.CarmanR. J.BooneJ. H. (2016). Rapid change of fecal microbiome and disappearance of clostridium difficile in a colonized infant after transition from breast milk to cow milk. Microbiome.4, 53. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0198-6
73
DebR.SajjanarB.SinghU.KumarS.SinghR.SengarG.et al. (2014). Effect of heat stress on the expression profile of hsp90 among sahiwal (bos indicus) and frieswal (bos indicus × bos taurus) breed of cattle: A comparative study. Gene.536, 435–440. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.11.086
74
Del CorvoM.LazzariB.CapraE.ZavarezL.MilanesiM.UtsunomiyaY. T.et al. (2021). Methylome patterns of cattle adaptation to heat stress. Front. Genet.12. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.633132
75
DemeesterS. L.BuchmanT. G.CobbJ. P. (2001). The heat shock paradox: Does nf-kappab determine cell fate? FASEB J.15, 270–274. doi: 10.1096/fj.00-0170hyp
76
DenoyelleL.De VillemereuilP.BoyerF.KhelifiM.GaffetC.AlbertoF.et al. (2021). Genetic variations and differential DNA methylation to face contrasted climates in small ruminants: An analysis on traditionally-managed sheep and goats. Front. Genet.12. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.745284
77
Diaz-VegasA.Sanchez-AguileraP.KrycerJ. R.MoralesP. E.Monsalves-AlvarezM.CifuentesM.et al. (2020). Is mitochondrial dysfunction a common root of noncommunicable chronic diseases? Endocr. Rev.41, bnaa005. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnaa005
78
DieselB.Kulhanek-HeinzeS.HöltjeM.BrandtB.HöltjeH. D.VollmarA. M.et al. (2007). Alpha-lipoic acid as a directly binding activator of the insulin receptor: Protection from hepatocyte apoptosis. Biochemistry.46, 2146–2155. doi: 10.1021/bi602547m
79
DikmenS.AlavaE.PontesE.FearJ. M.DikmenB. Y.OlsonT. A.et al. (2008). Differences in thermoregulatory ability between slick-haired and wild-type lactating holstein cows in response to acute heat stress. J. Dairy Sci.91, 3395–3402. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1072
80
DikmenS.ColeJ. B.NullD. J.HansenP. J. (2012). Heritability of rectal temperature and genetic correlations with production and reproduction traits in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.95, 3401–3405. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4306
81
DikmenS.KhanF. A.HusonH. J.SonstegardT. S.MossJ. I.DahlG. E.et al. (2014). The slick hair locus derived from senepol cattle confers thermotolerance to intensively managed lactating holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci.97, 5508–5520. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8087
82
DikmenS.WangX. Z.OrtegaM. S.ColeJ. B.NullD. J.HansenP. J. (2015). Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with thermoregulation in lactating dairy cows exposed to heat stress. J. Anim. Breed. Genet.132, 409–419. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12176
83
DingX. Z.Fernandez-PradaC. M.BhattacharjeeA. K.HooverD. L. (2001). Over-expression of hsp-70 inhibits bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced production of cytokines in human monocyte-derived macrophages. Cytokine.16, 210–219. doi: 10.1006/cyto.2001.0959
84
Do AmaralB. C.ConnorE. E.TaoS.HayenJ.BubolzJ.DahlG. E. (2009). Heat-stress abatement during the dry period: Does cooling improve transition into lactation? J. Dairy Sci.92, 5988–5999. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2343
85
Do AmaralB. C.ConnorE. E.TaoS.HayenJ.BubolzJ.DahlG. E. (2010). Heat stress abatement during the dry period influences prolactin signaling in lymphocytes. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol.38, 38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2009.07.005
86
Do AmaralB. C.ConnorE. E.TaoS.HayenM. J.BubolzJ. W.DahlG. E. (2011). Heat stress abatement during the dry period influences metabolic gene expression and improves immune status in the transition period of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.94, 86–96. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-3004
87
DoddS. L.GagnonB. J.SenfS. M.HainB. A.JudgeA. R. (2010). Ros-mediated activation of nf-kappab and foxo during muscle disuse. Muscle Nerve.41, 110–113. doi: 10.1002/mus.21526
88
DreilingC. E.CarmanF. S.BrownD. E. (1991). Maternal endocrine and fetal metabolic responses to heat stress. J. Dairy Sci.74, 312–327. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78175-7
89
DuJ.DiH.-S.GuoL.LiZ.-H.WangG.-L. (2008). Hyperthermia causes bovine mammary epithelial cell death by a mitochondrial-induced pathway. J. Therm. Biol.33, 37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2007.06.002
90
DuboisP. R.WilliamsD. J. (1980). Increased incidence of retained placenta associated with heat stress in dairy cows. Theriogenology.13, 115–121. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(80)90120-x
91
DuttaG.AlexR.SinghA.GowaneG. R.VohraV.DeS.et al. (2024). Functional transcriptome analysis revealed upregulation of mapk-smad signalling pathways in chronic heat stress in crossbred cattle. Int. J. Biometeorol.68, 1371–1385. doi: 10.1007/s00484-024-02672-y
92
EarlyR. J.McbrideB. W.VatnickI.BellA. W. (1991). Chronic heat stress and prenatal development in sheep: Ii. Placental cellularity and metabolism. J. Anim. Sci.69, 3610–3616. doi: 10.2527/1991.6993610x
93
EberM. R.ShardellM.SchweizerM. L.LaxminarayanR.PerencevichE. N. (2011). Seasonal and temperature-associated increases in gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections among hospitalized patients. PloS One6, e25298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025298
94
EdwardsJ. L.BogartA. N.RispoliL. A.SaxtonA. M.SchrickF. N. (2009). Developmental competence of bovine embryos from heat-stressed ova. J. Dairy Sci.92, 563–570. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1495
95
EisemannJ. H.AshwellM. S.DevineT. L.PooleD. H.PooreM. H.LinderK. E. (2020). Physiological response, function of sweat glands, and hair follicle cycling in cattle in response to fescue toxicosis and hair genotype. J. Anim. Sci.98, skaa013. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa013
96
ElenkovI. J.ChrousosG. P. (1999). Stress hormones, th1/th2 patterns, pro/anti-inflammatory cytokines and susceptibility to disease. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.10, 359–368. doi: 10.1016/s1043-2760(99)00188-5
97
El-TarabanyM. S.El-TarabanyA. A. (2015). Impact of maternal heat stress at insemination on the subsequent reproductive performance of holstein, brown swiss, and their crosses. Theriogenology.84, 1523–1529. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.07.040
98
ElvingerF.HansenP. J.NatzkeR. P. (1991). Modulation of function of bovine polymorphonuclear leukocytes and lymphocytes by high temperature in vitro and in vivo. Am. J. Vet. Res.52, 1692–1698. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.1991.52.10.1692
99
ErskineR. J.EberhartR. J.HutchinsonL. J.SpencerS. B.CampbellM. A. (1988). Incidence and types of clinical mastitis in dairy herds with high and low somatic cell counts. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.192, 761–765. doi: 10.2460/javma.1988.192.06.761
100
FabrisT. F.LaportaJ.SkibielA. L.Dado-SennB.WohlgemuthS. E.DahlG. E. (2020). Effect of heat stress during the early and late dry period on mammary gland development of holstein dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.103, 8576–8586. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17911
101
Ferat-OsorioE.Sánchez-AnayaA.Gutiérrez-MendozaM.Boscó-GárateI.Wong-BaezaI.Pastelin-PalaciosR.et al. (2014). Heat shock protein 70 down-regulates the production of toll-like receptor-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines by a heat shock factor-1/constitutive heat shock element-binding factor-dependent mechanism. J. Inflammation (Lond).11, 19. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-11-19
102
FerreiraF. C.GennariR. S.DahlG. E.De VriesA. (2016). Economic feasibility of cooling dry cows across the United States. J. Dairy Sci.99, 9931–9941. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11566
103
FlanaganS. W.MoseleyP. L.BuettnerG. R. (1998). Increased flux of free radicals in cells subjected to hyperthermia: Detection by electron paramagnetic resonance spin trapping. FEBS Lett.431, 285–286. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00779-0
104
FournelS.OuelletV.CharbonneauÉ. (2017). Practices for alleviating heat stress of dairy cows in humid continental climates: A literature review. Anim. (Basel).7, 37. doi: 10.3390/ani7050037
105
GaneshanK.NikkanenJ.ManK.LeongY. A.SogawaY.MaschekJ. A.et al. (2019). Energetic trade-offs and hypometabolic states promote disease tolerance. Cell.177, 399–413.e312. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.050
106
GaoS. T.MaL.ZhouZ.ZhouZ. K.BaumgardL. H.JiangD.et al. (2019). Heat stress negatively affects the transcriptome related to overall metabolism and milk protein synthesis in mammary tissue of midlactating dairy cows. Physiol. Genomics51, 400–409. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00039.2019
107
García-IspiertoI.López-GatiusF.SantolariaP.YánizJ. L.NogaredaC.López-BéjarM.et al. (2006). Relationship between heat stress during the peri-implantation period and early fetal loss in dairy cattle. Theriogenology.65, 799–807. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.06.011
108
GarnerJ. B.ChamberlainA. J.Vander JagtC.NguyenT. T. T.MasonB. A.MarettL. C.et al. (2020). Gene expression of the heat stress response in bovine peripheral white blood cells and milk somatic cells in vivo. Sci. Rep.10, 19181. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75438-2
109
GarridoC.GurbuxaniS.RavagnanL.KroemerG. (2001). Heat shock proteins: Endogenous modulators of apoptotic cell death. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.286, 433–442. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5427
110
GaulyM.BollweinH.BrevesG.BrügemannK.DänickeS.DaşG.et al. (2013). Future consequences and challenges for dairy cow production systems arising from climate change in central europe - a review. Animal: an Int. J. Anim. bioscience.7, 843–859. doi: 10.1017/s1751731112002352
111
GautamG.NakaoT.KoikeK.LongS. T.YusufM.RanasingheR. M.et al. (2010). Spontaneous recovery or persistence of postpartum endometritis and risk factors for its persistence in holstein cows. Theriogenology.73, 168–179. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.08.010
112
GehrigS. M.van der PoelC.SayerT. A.SchertzerJ. D.HenstridgeD. C.ChurchJ. E.et al. (2012). Hsp72 preserves muscle function and slows progression of severe muscular dystrophy. Nature.484, 394–398. doi: 10.1038/nature10980
113
GernandE.KonigS.KippC. (2019). Influence of on-farm measurements for heat stress indicators on dairy cow productivity, female fertility, and health. J. Dairy Sci.102, 6660–6671. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16011
114
GhaffariM. H. (2022). Developmental programming: Prenatal and postnatal consequences of hyperthermia in dairy cows and calves. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol.80, 106723. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2022.106723
115
Ghavi Hossein-ZadehN.ArdalanM. (2011). Cow-specific risk factors for retained placenta, metritis and clinical mastitis in holstein cows. Vet. Res. Commun.35, 345–354. doi: 10.1007/s11259-011-9479-5
116
GibneyE. R.NolanC. M. (2010). Epigenetics and gene expression. Heredity (Edinb).105, 4–13. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2010.54
117
Gisbert-QueralM.HenningsenA.MarkussenB.NilesM. T.KebreabE.RigdenA. J.et al. (2021). Climate impacts and adaptation in us dairy systems 1981-2018. Nat. Food.2, 894–901. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00372-z
118
GolderH. M.LeanI. J. (2024). Ruminal acidosis and its definition-a critical review. J. Dairy Sci.107, 10066–10098. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-24817
119
GoreA. V.TominsK. A.IbenJ.MaL.CastranovaD.DavisA. E.et al. (2018). An epigenetic mechanism for cavefish eye degeneration. Nat. Ecol. Evol.2, 1155–1160. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0569-4
120
GrandinT. (1997). Assessment of stress during handling and transport. J. Anim. Sci.75, 249–257. doi: 10.2527/1997.751249x
121
GreenbergM. V. C.Bourc’hisD. (2019). The diverse roles of DNA methylation in mammalian development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.20, 590–607. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0159-6
122
GrivennikovS. I.GretenF. R.KarinM. (2010). Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell.140, 883–899. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025
123
GröhnY. T.Rajala-SchultzP. J. (2000). Epidemiology of reproductive performance in dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci.60–61, 605–614. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4320(00)00085-3
124
GuinnJ. M.NolanD. T.KrawczelP. D.Petersson-WolfeC. S.PighettiG. M.StoneA. E.et al. (2019). Comparing dairy farm milk yield and components, somatic cell score, and reproductive performance among United States regions using summer to winter ratios. J. Dairy Sci.102, 11777–11785. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16170
125
GujarG.ChoudharyV. K.VivekP.SodhiM.ChoudharyM.TiwariM.et al. (2022). Characterization of thermo-physiological, hematological, and molecular changes in response to seasonal variations in two tropically adapted native cattle breeds of bos indicus lineage in hot arid ambience of thar desert. Int. J. Biometeorol.66, 1515–1529. doi: 10.1007/s00484-022-02293-3
126
HabimanaV.NgulumaA. S.NzikuZ. C.Ekine-DzivenuC. C.MorotaG.MrodeR.et al. (2023). Heat stress effects on milk yield traits and metabolites and mitigation strategies for dairy cattle breeds reared in tropical and sub-tropical countries. Front. Vet. Sci.10, 1121499. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1121499
127
HallD. M.BuettnerG. R.OberleyL. W.XuL.MatthesR. D.GisolfiC. V. (2001). Mechanisms of circulatory and intestinal barrier dysfunction during whole body hyperthermia. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.280, H509–H521. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.2.H509
128
HalliK.YinT.KochC.KrebsS.KoenigS. (2025). Heat stress induces specific methylation, transcriptomic and metabolic pattern in dairy cows and their female progeny. Sci. Rep-Uk.15, 17021. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01082-3
129
HamelJ.ZhangY.WenteN.KrömkerV. (2021). Heat stress and cow factors affect bacteria shedding pattern from naturally infected mammary gland quarters in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.104, 786–794. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19091
130
HammonD. S.EvjenI. M.DhimanT. R.GoffJ. P.WaltersJ. L. (2006). Neutrophil function and energy status in holstein cows with uterine health disorders. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.113, 21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.03.022
131
HanI. K.KimI. H. (2005). Risk factors for retained placenta and the effect of retained placenta on the occurrence of postpartum diseases and subsequent reproductive performance in dairy cows. J. Vet. Sci.6, 53–59. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2005.6.1.53
132
HansenP. J. (2009). Effects of heat stress on mammalian reproduction. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci.364, 3341–3350. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0131
133
HarfeB. D. (2005). Micrornas in vertebrate development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.15, 410–415. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2005.06.012
134
HarperC. V.WoodcockD. J.LamC.Garcia-AlbornozM.AdamsonA.AshallL.et al. (2018). Temperature regulates nf-κb dynamics and function through timing of a20 transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States America.115, E5243–e5249. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803609115
135
HassanR. A.EbeidT. A.El-LateifA. I. A.IsmailN. B. (2011). Effect of dietary betaine supplementation on growth, carcass and immunity of New Zealand white rabbits under high ambient temperature. Livestock Science.135, 103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.132
136
HauserG. J.DayaoE. K.WasserloosK.PittB. R.WongH. R. (1996). Hsp induction inhibits inos mrna expression and attenuates hypotension in endotoxin-challenged rats. Am. J. Physiol.271, H2529–H2535. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1996.271.6.H2529
137
HicksT. A.McgloneJ. J.WhisnantC. S.KatteshH. G.NormanR. L. (1998). Behavioral, endocrine, immune, and performance measures for pigs exposed to acute stress. J. Anim. Sci.76, 474–483. doi: 10.2527/1998.762474x
138
HoganJ. S.SmithK. L.HobletK. H.SchoenbergerP. S.TodhunterD. A.HuestonW. D.et al. (1989a). Field survey of clinical mastitis in low somatic cell count herds. J. Dairy Sci.72, 1547–1556. doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(89)79266-3
139
HoganJ. S.SmithK. L.HobletK. H.TodhunterD. A.SchoenbergerP. S.HuestonW. D.et al. (1989b). Bacterial counts in bedding materials used on nine commercial dairies. J. Dairy Sci.72, 250–258. doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(89)79103-7
140
Hossein-ZadehN. G.Nejati-JavaremiA.Miraei-AshtianiS. R.KohramH. (2008). An observational analysis of twin births, calf stillbirth, calf sex ratio, and abortion in Iranian holsteins. J. Dairy Sci.91, 4198–4205. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1079
141
HouY.ZhangL.DongR. Y.LiangM. Y.LuY.SunX. Q.et al. (2021). Comparing responses of dairy cows to short-term and long-term heat stress in climate-controlled chambers. J. Dairy Sci.104, 2346–2356. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18946
142
HuY.JinH.DuX.XiaoC.LuoD.WangB.et al. (2007). Effects of chronic heat stress on immune responses of the foot-and-mouth disease DNA vaccination. DNA Cell Biol.26, 619–626. doi: 10.1089/dna.2007.0581
143
HuH.ZhangY.ZhengN.ChengJ.WangJ. (2016). The effect of heat stress on gene expression and synthesis of heat-shock and milk proteins in bovine mammary epithelial cells. Anim. Sci. J.87, 84–91. doi: 10.1111/asj.12375
144
HulbertL. E.MoisáS. J. (2016). Stress, immunity, and the management of calves. J. Dairy Sci.99, 3199–3216. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10198
145
HutchinsJ.SkidmoreM.NolanD. (2025). Vulnerability of us dairy farms to extreme heat. Food Policy.131, 102821. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102821
146
HuzzeyJ. M.VeiraD. M.WearyD. M.Von KeyserlingkM. A. (2007). Prepartum behavior and dry matter intake identify dairy cows at risk for metritis. J. Dairy Sci.90, 3220–3233. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-807
147
IPCC (2023). “ Summary for Policymakers.” in Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups i, ii and iii to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. eds. Core Writing TeamLeeH.RomeroJ.. (Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC), 1–34. doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001
148
IwasakiA.MedzhitovR. (2010). Regulation of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Science.327, 291–295. doi: 10.1126/science.1183021
149
IwasakiA.MedzhitovR. (2015). Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Nat. Immunol.16, 343–353. doi: 10.1038/ni.3123
150
JanewayC. A.Jr. (1999). The role of self-recognition in receptor repertoire development. Members of the janeway laboratory. Immunol. Res.19, 107–118. doi: 10.1007/bf02786480
151
JensenL. M.JannamanE. A.PryceJ. E.De VriesA.HansenP. J. (2022). Effectiveness of the Australian breeding value for heat tolerance at discriminating responses of lactating holstein cows to heat stress. J. Dairy Sci.105, 7820–7828. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21741
152
JiangZ. Y.SunL. H.LinY. C.MaX. Y.ZhengC. T.ZhouG. L.et al. (2009). Effects of dietary glycyl-glutamine on growth performance, small intestinal integrity, and immune responses of weaning piglets challenged with lipopolysaccharide. J. Anim. Sci.87, 4050–4056. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1120
153
JinY.HuY.HanD.WangM. (2011). Chronic heat stress weakened the innate immunity and increased the virulence of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus h5n1 in mice. J. Biomed. Biotechnol.2011, 367846. doi: 10.1155/2011/367846
154
JinL.YanS. M.ShiB. L.BaoH. Y.GongJ.GuoX. Y.et al. (2014). Effects of vitamin a on the milk performance, antioxidant functions and immune functions of dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.192, 15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.03.003
155
JingarS. C.MehlaR. K.ChhokarM. S. (2014). Climatic effects on occurrence of clinical mastitis in different breeds of cows and buffaloes. Arch. Zootec.63, 473–482. doi: 10.4321/s0004-05922014000300008
156
JohnsonJ. S.LayD. C. (2017). Evaluating the behavior, growth performance, immune parameters, and intestinal morphology of weaned piglets after simulated transport and heat stress when antibiotics are eliminated from the diet or replaced with l-glutamine. J. Anim. Sci.95, 91–102. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.1070
157
JohnsonJ. S.MartinK. L.PohlerK. G.StewartK. R. (2016a). Effects of rapid temperature fluctuations prior to breeding on reproductive efficiency in replacement gilts. J. Therm. Biol.61, 29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.08.003
158
JohnsonJ. S.SapkotaA.LayD. C.Jr. (2016b). Rapid cooling after acute hyperthermia alters intestinal morphology and increases the systemic inflammatory response in pigs. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985).120, 1249–1259. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00685.2015
159
JoostenI.Van EldiP.ElvingL.van der MeyG. J. W. (1991). Factors affecting occurrence of retained placenta in cattle. Effect of sire on incidence. Anim. Reprod. Sci.25, 11–22. doi: 10.1016/0378-4320(91)90003-I
160
JordanE. R. (2003). Effects of heat stress on reproduction. J. Dairy Sci.86, E104–E114. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74043-0
161
JuX. H.XuH. J.YongY. H.AnL. L.JiaoP. R.LiaoM. (2014). Heat stress upregulation of toll-like receptors 2/4 and acute inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (pbmc) of bama miniature pigs: An in vivo and in vitro study. Animal: an Int. J. Anim. bioscience.8, 1462–1468. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114001268
162
KaczmarowskiM.MalinowskiE.MarkiewiczH. (2006). Some hormonal and biochemical blood indices in cows with retained placenta and puerperal metritis. B Vet. I Pulawy.50, 89–92.
163
KadokawaH.SakataniM.HansenP. J. (2012). Perspectives on improvement of reproduction in cattle during heat stress in a future Japan. Anim. Sci. J.83, 439–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2012.01011.x
164
KamwanjaL. A.ChaseC. C.Jr.GutierrezJ. A.GuerrieroV.Jr.OlsonT. A.HammondA. C.et al. (1994). Responses of bovine lymphocytes to heat shock as modified by breed and antioxidant status. J. Anim. Sci.72, 438–444. doi: 10.2527/1994.722438x
165
KapilaN.SharmaA.KishoreA.SodhiM.TripathiP. K.MohantyA. K.et al. (2016). Impact of heat stress on cellular and transcriptional adaptation of mammary epithelial cells in riverine buffalo (bubalus bubalis). PloS One11, e0157237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157237
166
KarstrupC. C.AgerholmJ. S.JensenT. K.SwaroL. R. V.KlitgaardK.RasmussenE. L.et al. (2017). Presence and localization of bacteria in the bovine endometrium postpartum using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Theriogenology.92, 167–175. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.01.026
167
KatagiriS.MoriyoshiM.TakahashiY. (2013). Low incidence of an altered endometrial epidermal growth factor (egf) profile in repeat breeder holstein heifers and differential effect of parity on the egf profile between fertile holstein (dairy) and Japanese black (beef) cattle. J. Reprod. Dev.59, 575–579. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2013-067
168
KehrliM. E.Jr.HarpJ. A. (2001). Immunity in the mammary gland. Veterinary Clinics North America. Food Anim. practice.17, 495–-516. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30003-7
169
KhorB.GardetA.XavierR. J. (2011). Genetics and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature.474, 307–317. doi: 10.1038/nature10209
170
KimW. S.Ghassemi NejadJ.RohS. G.LeeH. G. (2020). Heat-shock proteins gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells as an indicator of heat stress in beef calves. Anim. (Basel).10, 895. doi: 10.3390/ani10050895
171
KimS. H.RamosS. C.ValenciaR. A.ChoY. I.LeeS. S. (2022). Heat stress: Effects on rumen microbes and host physiology, and strategies to alleviate the negative impacts on lactating dairy cows. Front. Microbiol.13, 804562. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.804562
172
KimuraK.GoffJ. P.KehrliM. E.Jr.ReinhardtT. A. (2002). Decreased neutrophil function as a cause of retained placenta in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.85, 544–550. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74107-6
173
KippC.BrügemannK.YinT.HalliK.KönigS. (2021). Genotype by heat stress interactions for production and functional traits in dairy cows from an across-generation perspective. J. Dairy Sci.104, 10029–10039. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20241
174
KochF.ThomU.AlbrechtE.WeikardR.NolteW.KuhlaB.et al. (2019). Heat stress directly impairs gut integrity and recruits distinct immune cell populations into the bovine intestine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States America.116, 10333–10338. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820130116
175
KumarB. V. S.SinghG.MeurS. K. (2010). Effects of addition of electrolyte and ascorbic acid in feed during heat stress in buffaloes. Asian Austral J. Anim.23, 880–888. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2010.90053
176
LaberniaJ.Lopez-GatiusF.SantolariaP.LaurentY.HoutainJ. Y. (1998). Influence of calving season on the interactions among reproductive disorders of dairy cows. Anim. Science.67, 387–393. doi: 10.1017/S1357729800032781
177
LaceteraN.BernabucciU.RonchiB.ScaliaD.NardoneA. (2002). Moderate summer heat stress does not modify immunological parameters of holstein dairy cows. Int. J. Biometeorol.46, 33–37. doi: 10.1007/s00484-001-0115-x
178
LaceteraN.BernabucciU.ScaliaD.BasiricòL.MoreraP.NardoneA. (2006). Heat stress elicits different responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from brown swiss and holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci.89, 4606–4612. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72510-3
179
LaceteraN.BernabucciU.ScaliaD.RonchiB.KuzminskyG.NardoneA. (2005). Lymphocyte functions in dairy cows in hot environment. Int. J. Biometeorol.50, 105–110. doi: 10.1007/s00484-005-0273-3
180
Landaeta-HernándezA. J.Zambrano-NavaS.VerdeO.Pinto-SantiniL.Montero-UrdanetaM.Hernández-FonsecaJ. P.et al. (2021). Heat stress response in slick vs normal-haired criollo limonero heifers in a tropical environment. Trop. Anim. Health Prod.53, 445. doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-02856-3
181
LaportaJ.FerreiraF. C.OuelletV.Dado-SennB.AlmeidaA. K.De VriesA.et al. (2020). Late-gestation heat stress impairs daughter and granddaughter lifetime performance. J. Dairy Sci.103, 7555–7568. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18154
182
LaportaJ.KhatibH.ZachutM. (2024). Review: Phenotypic and molecular evidence of inter- and transgenerational effects of heat stress in livestock mammals and humans. Animal: an Int. J. Anim. bioscience.18, 101121. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101121
183
LarsenG. A.LaportaJ. (2024). Carryover effects of maternal late-gestation heat stress on granddaughters’ growth and mammary gland development. J. Dairy Sci.107, 6383–6392. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-24678
184
LawP. P.HollandM. L. (2019). DNA methylation at the crossroads of gene and environment interactions. Essays Biochem.63, 717–726. doi: 10.1042/ebc20190031
185
LecchiC.RotaN.VitaliA.CecilianiF.LaceteraN. (2016). In vitro assessment of the effects of temperature on phagocytosis, reactive oxygen species production and apoptosis in bovine polymorphonuclear cells. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.182, 89–94. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2016.10.007
186
LeeJ. A.RousselJ. D.BeattyJ. F. (1976). Effect of temperature-season on bovine adrenal cortical function, blood cell profile, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci.59, 104–108. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(76)84163-X
187
LeiL.YuJ.BaoE. (2009). Expression of heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) and transcription of its corresponding mrna in broilers exposed to high temperature. Br. Poult Sci.50, 504–511. doi: 10.1080/00071660903110851
188
LeliveldL. M. C.LovarelliD.FinziA.RivaE.ProvoloG. (2023). Effects of cow reproductive status, parity and lactation stage on behaviour and heavy breathing indications of a commercial accelerometer during hot weather conditions. Int. J. Biometeorology.67, 1263–1272. doi: 10.1007/s00484-023-02496-2
189
LendezP. A.Martinez CuestaL.Nieto FariasM. V.VaterA. A.GhezziM. D.Mota-RojasD.et al. (2021). Alterations in tnf-α and its receptors expression in cows undergoing heat stress. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.235, 110232. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2021.110232
190
Levin-ReismanI.BraunerA.RoninI.BalabanN. Q. (2019). Epistasis between antibiotic tolerance, persistence, and resistance mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States America.116, 14734–14739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906169116
191
Levin-ReismanI.RoninI.GefenO.BranissI.ShoreshN.BalabanN. Q. (2017). Antibiotic tolerance facilitates the evolution of resistance. Science.355, 826–830. doi: 10.1126/science.aaj2191
192
LiG.YuX.Portela FontouraA. B.JavaidA.de la Maza-EscolàV. S.SalandyN. S.et al. (2023). Transcriptomic regulations of heat stress response in the liver of lactating dairy cows. BMC Genomics24, 410. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09484-1
193
LibermanA. C.DrukerJ.PeroneM. J.ArztE. (2007). Glucocorticoids in the regulation of transcription factors that control cytokine synthesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.18, 45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2007.01.005
194
LimC. L.WilsonG.BrownL.CoombesJ. S.MackinnonL. T. (2007). Pre-existing inflammatory state compromises heat tolerance in rats exposed to heat stress. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.292, R186–R194. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00921.2005
195
LitherlandN. B.Da SilvaD. N.LabergeR. J.SchefersJ.KertzA. (2014). Supplemental fat for dairy calves during mild cold stress. J. Dairy Sci.97, 2980–2989. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6942
196
LiuL.FuC.YanM.XieH.LiS.YuQ.et al. (2016). Resveratrol modulates intestinal morphology and hsp70/90, nf-κb and egf expression in the jejunal mucosa of black-boned chickens on exposure to circular heat stress. Food Funct.7, 1329–1338. doi: 10.1039/c5fo01338k
197
LiuY.LiD.LiH.ZhouX.WangG. (2011). A novel snp of the atp1a1 gene is associated with heat tolerance traits in dairy cows. Mol. Biol. Rep.38, 83–88. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0080-8
198
LiuT.ZhangL.JooD.SunS. C. (2017). Nf-κb signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct Target Ther.2, 17023. doi: 10.1038/sigtrans.2017.23
199
LivernoisA. M.MallardB. A.CartwrightS. L.CánovasA. (2021). Heat stress and immune response phenotype affect DNA methylation in blood mononuclear cells from holstein dairy cows. Sci. Rep.11, 11371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89951-5
200
LoorJ. J.LopreiatoV.PalomboV.D’andreaM. (2023). Physiological impact of amino acids during heat stress in ruminants. Anim. Front.13, 69–80. doi: 10.1093/af/vfad052
201
LuJ.LiH.YuD.ZhaoP.LiuY. (2023). Heat stress inhibits the proliferation and differentiation of myoblasts and is associated with damage to mitochondria. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.11. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1171506
202
MacciottaN. P. P.BiffaniS.BernabucciU.LaceteraN.VitaliA.Ajmone-MarsanP.et al. (2017). Derivation and genome-wide association study of a principal component-based measure of heat tolerance in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.100, 4683–4697. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12249
203
MacciottaN. P. P.DimauroC.DeganoL.VicarioD.CesaraniA. (2023). A transgenerational study on the effect of great-granddam birth month on granddaughter ebv for production traits in italian simmental cattle. J. Dairy Sci.106, 2588–2597. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22455
204
MakovecJ. A.RueggP. L. (2003). Results of milk samples submitted for microbiological examination in wisconsin from 1994 to 2001. J. Dairy Sci.86, 3466–3472. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73951-4
205
MallardB. A.DekkersJ. C.IrelandM. J.LeslieK. E.SharifS.VankampenC. L.et al. (1998). Alteration in immune responsiveness during the peripartum period and its ramification on dairy cow and calf health. J. Dairy Sci.81, 585–595. doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75612-7
206
MambulaS. S.CalderwoodS. K. (2006). Heat induced release of hsp70 from prostate carcinoma cells involves both active secretion and passive release from necrotic cells. Int. J. Hyperthermia.22, 575–585. doi: 10.1080/02656730600976042
207
Mansouri-AttiaN.SandraO.AubertJ.DegrelleS.EvertsR. E.Giraud-DelvilleC.et al. (2009). Endometrium as an early sensor of in vitro embryo manipulation technologies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States America.106, 5687–5692. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812722106
208
MarinsT. N.GaoJ.YangQ.BindaR. M.PessoaC. M. B.Orellana RivasR. M.et al. (2021). Impact of heat stress and a feed supplement on hormonal and inflammatory responses of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.104, 8276–8289. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20162
209
Marquez AcevedoA. S.HoodW. R.García-RocheM.SkibielA. L. (2025). Mild heat stress effects on hepatic and mammary mitochondria of lactating dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci108, 12689–12704. doi: 10.3168/jds.2025-26980
210
MartineP.RébéC. (2019). Heat shock proteins and inflammasomes. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20, 4508. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184508
211
Martínez-BurgoB.CobbS. L.PohlE.KashaninD.PaulT.KirbyJ. A.et al. (2019). A c-terminal cxcl8 peptide based on chemokine-glycosaminoglycan interactions reduces neutrophil adhesion and migration during inflammation. Immunology.157, 173–184. doi: 10.1111/imm.13063
212
MayerM. P.BukauB. (2005). Hsp70 chaperones: Cellular functions and molecular mechanism. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.62, 670–684. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4464-6
213
McewenB. S.BironC. A.BrunsonK. W.BullochK.ChambersW. H.DhabharF. S.et al. (1997). The role of adrenocorticoids as modulators of immune function in health and disease: Neural, endocrine and immune interactions. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.23, 79–133. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(96)00012-4
214
McguirkB. J.GoingI.GilmourA. R. (1998). The genetic evaluation of beef sires used for crossing with dairy cows in the uk 1. Sire breed and non-genetic effects on calving survey traits. Anim. Science.66, 35–45. doi: 10.1017/S135772980000881X
215
MckennaL. B.SchugJ.VourekasA.MckennaJ. B.BramswigN. C.FriedmanJ. R.et al. (2010). Micrornas control intestinal epithelial differentiation, architecture, and barrier function. Gastroenterology.139, 1654–1664, e1651. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.07.040
216
MedzhitovR. (2007). Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response. Nature.449, 819–826. doi: 10.1038/nature06246
217
MedzhitovR. (2008). Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature.454, 428–435. doi: 10.1038/nature07201
218
MehlaK.MagotraA.ChoudharyJ.SinghA. K.MohantyA. K.UpadhyayR. C.et al. (2014). Genome-wide analysis of the heat stress response in zebu (sahiwal) cattle. Gene.533, 500–507. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.09.051
219
Menéndez-BuxaderaA.PereiraR. J.El FaroL.SantanaM. L. (2020). Genotype by environment interaction due to heat stress during gestation and postpartum for milk production of holstein cattle. Animal: an Int. J. Anim. bioscience.14, 2014–2022. doi: 10.1017/S1751731120001068
220
MinL.ZhengN.ZhaoS.ChengJ.YangY.ZhangY.et al. (2016). Long-term heat stress induces the inflammatory response in dairy cows revealed by plasma proteome analysis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.471, 296–302. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.01.185
221
MishraS. R. (2021). Behavioural, physiological, neuro-endocrine and molecular responses of cattle against heat stress: An updated review. Trop. Anim. Health Prod.53, 400. doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-02790-4
222
MitlöhnerF. M.GalyeanM. L.McgloneJ. J. (2002). Shade effects on performance, carcass traits, physiology, and behavior of heat-stressed feedlot heifers. J. Anim. Sci.80, 2043–2050. doi: 10.2527/2002.8082043x
223
MolinariP. C. C.BromfieldJ. J. (2023). Inflammatory responses of bovine endometrial epithelial cells are increased under in vitro heat stress conditions. J. Therm. Biol.114, 103564. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2023.103564
224
MolinariP. C. C.DahlG. E.SheldonI. M.BromfieldJ. J. (2022). Effect of calving season on metritis incidence and bacterial content of the vagina in dairy cows. Theriogenology.191, 67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.08.001
225
MolinariP. C. C.DavidsonB. D.LaportaJ.DahlG. E.SheldonI. M.BromfieldJ. J. (2023). Prepartum heat stress in dairy cows increases postpartum inflammatory responses in blood of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.106, 1464–1474. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22405
226
MorrisG.GevezovaM.SarafianV.MaesM. (2022). Redox regulation of the immune response. Cell Mol. Immunol.19, 1079–1101. doi: 10.1038/s41423-022-00902-0
227
MorseD.DelorenzoM. A.WilcoxC. J.CollierR. J.NatzkeR. P.BrayD. R. (1988). Climatic effects on occurrence of clinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci.71, 848–853. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79626-5
228
MostM. S.YatesD. T. (2021). Inflammatory mediation of heat stress-induced growth deficits in livestock and its potential role as a target for nutritional interventions: A review. Anim. (Basel).11, 3539. doi: 10.3390/ani11123539
229
MujahidA.YoshikiY.AkibaY.ToyomizuM. (2005). Superoxide radical production in chicken skeletal muscle induced by acute heat stress. Poult Sci.84, 307–314. doi: 10.1093/ps/84.2.307
230
MullerL. D.OwensM. J. (1974). Factors associated with the incidence of retained placentas. J. Dairy Sci.57, 725–728. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(74)84956-8
231
NaikS.FuchsE. (2022). Inflammatory memory and tissue adaptation in sickness and in health. Nature.607, 249–255. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04919-3
232
NathanC. (2002). Points of control in inflammation. Nature.420, 846–852. doi: 10.1038/nature01320
233
NebelR. L.JobstS. M.DransfieldM. B. G.PandolfiS. M.BaileyT. L. (1997). Use of radiofrequency data communication system, heatwatch®, to describe behavioral estrus in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.80, 179.
234
NguyenT. T. T.BowmanP. J.Haile-MariamM.NieuwhofG. J.HayesB. J.PryceJ. E. (2017). Short communication: Implementation of a breeding value for heat tolerance in Australian dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.100, 7362–7367. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12898
235
NguyenT. T. T.BowmanP. J.Haile-MariamM.PryceJ. E.HayesB. J. (2016). Genomic selection for tolerance to heat stress in Australian dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.99, 2849–2862. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9685
236
NjukiE.Bravo-UretaB. E.CabreraV. E. (2020). Climatic effects and total factor productivity: Econometric evidence for wisconsin dairy farms. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ.47, 1276–1301. doi: 10.1093/erae/jbz046
237
NormanH. D.WrightJ. R.KuhnM. T.HubbardS. M.ColeJ. B.VanradenP. M. (2009). Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.92, 2259–2269. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0982
238
O’connorT. M.O’halloranD. J.ShanahanF. (2000). The stress response and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: From molecule to melancholia. QJM.93, 323–333. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/93.6.323
239
O’haraE.NevesA. L. A.SongY.GuanL. L. (2020). The role of the gut microbiome in cattle production and health: Driver or passenger? Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci.8, 199–220. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083952
240
O’haraA. M.ShanahanF. (2006). The gut flora as a forgotten organ. EMBO Rep.7, 688–693. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400731
241
OeckinghausA.GhoshS. (2009). The nf-kappab family of transcription factors and its regulation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.1, a000034. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000034
242
Olde RiekerinkR. G.BarkemaH. W.StryhnH. (2007). The effect of season on somatic cell count and the incidence of clinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci.90, 1704–1715. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-567
243
OlsonT. A.LucenaC.ChaseC. C.Jr.HammondA. C. (2003). Evidence of a major gene influencing hair length and heat tolerance in bos taurus cattle. J. Anim. Sci.81, 80–90. doi: 10.2527/2003.81180x
244
OrhanC.AkdemirF.SahinN.TuzcuM.KomorowskiJ. R.HayirliA.et al. (2012). Chromium histidinate protects against heat stress by modulating the expression of hepatic nuclear transcription factors in quail. Br. Poult Sci.53, 828–835. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2012.747084
245
OsorioJ. S.JiP.DrackleyJ. K.LuchiniD.LoorJ. J. (2013). Supplemental smartamine m or metasmart during the transition period benefits postpartal cow performance and blood neutrophil function. J. Dairy Sci.96, 6248–6263. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5790
246
PahlavaniM. A.HarrisM. D. (1998). Effect of in vitro generation of oxygen free radicals on t cell function in young and old rats. Free Radical Biol. Med.25, 903–913. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(98)00124-5
247
PajohandeK.Amirabadi FarahaniT.FarsuniN. E. (2023). Increased incidence of reproductive disorders associated with short gestation length in holstein dairy cows. Theriogenology.205, 9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.04.014
248
PakrashiA.RyanC.GuéretC.BerryD. P.CorcoranM.KeaneM. T.et al. (2023). Early detection of subclinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows using cow-level features. J. Dairy Sci.106, 4978–4990. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22803
249
PandaA. K.RamaraoS. V.RajuM. V. L. N.ChatterjeeR. N. (2008). Effect of dietary supplementation with vitamins e and c on production performance, immune responses and antioxidant status of white leghorn layers under tropical summer conditions. Brit Poultry Sci.49, 592–599. doi: 10.1080/00071660802337233
250
ParkT.MaL.GaoS.BuD.YuZ. (2022). Heat stress impacts the multi-domain ruminal microbiota and some of the functional features independent of its effect on feed intake in lactating dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.13, 71. doi: 10.1186/s40104-022-00717-z
251
PascottiniO. B.HostensM.SysP.VercauterenP.OpsomerG. (2017). Risk factors associated with cytological endometritis diagnosed at artificial insemination in dairy cows. Theriogenology.92, 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.01.004
252
Pavlicek A.M. Z.MisicM. (1989). Effects of high summer temperatures on milking, health and fertility of dairy cows. Veterinarski glasnik.43, 397–400.
253
PaytonR. R.RispoliL. A.NagleK. A.GondroC.SaxtonA. M.VoyB. H.et al. (2018). Mitochondrial-related consequences of heat stress exposure during bovine oocyte maturation persist in early embryo development. J. Reprod. Dev.64, 243–251. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2017-160
254
PearceS. C.ManiV.BoddickerR. L.JohnsonJ. S.WeberT. E.RossJ. W.et al. (2013b). Heat stress reduces intestinal barrier integrity and favors intestinal glucose transport in growing pigs. PloS One8, e70215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070215
255
PearceE. L.PoffenbergerM. C.ChangC. H.JonesR. G. (2013a). Fueling immunity: Insights into metabolism and lymphocyte function. Science.342, 1242454. doi: 10.1126/science.1242454
256
PeixotoR. S.HarkinsD. M.NelsonK. E. (2021). Advances in microbiome research for animal health. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci.9, 289–311. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-091020-075907
257
PerrettiM.AhluwaliaA. (2000). The microcirculation and inflammation: Site of action for glucocorticoids. Microcirculation.7, 147–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2000.tb00117.x
258
PfafflM. W.WittmannS. L.MeyerH. H.BruckmaierR. M. (2003). Gene expression of immunologically important factors in blood cells, milk cells, and mammary tissue of cows. J. Dairy Sci.86, 538–545. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73632-7
259
PinedoP.SantosJ. E. P.ChebelR. C.GalvaoK. N.SchuenemannG. M.BicalhoR. C.et al. (2020). Early-lactation diseases and fertility in 2 seasons of calving across us dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci.103, 10560–10576. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17951
260
PlaizierJ. C.MulliganF. J.NevilleE. W.GuanL. L.SteeleM. A.PennerG. B. (2022). Effect of subacute ruminal acidosis on gut health of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.105, 7141–7160. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-21960
261
PratesJ. (2025). Heat stress effects on animal health and performance in monogastric livestock: Physiological responses, molecular mechanisms, and management interventions. Vet. Sci.12, 429. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12050429
262
PrittsT. A.WangQ.SunX.MoonM. R.FischerD. R.FischerJ. E.et al. (2000). Induction of the stress response in vivo decreases nuclear factor-kappa b activity in jejunal mucosa of endotoxemic mice. Arch. Surg.135, 860–866. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.7.860
263
ProvoloG.RivaE. (2009). One year study of lying and standing behaviour of dairy cows in a frestall barn in Italy. J. Agric. Engineering.40, 27–33. doi: 10.4081/jae.2009.2.27
264
RanganathanG.UnalR.PokrovskayaI.Yao-BorengasserA.PhanavanhB.Lecka-CzernikB.et al. (2006). The lipogenic enzymes dgat1, fas, and lpl in adipose tissue: Effects of obesity, insulin resistance, and tzd treatment. J. Lipid Res.47, 2444–2450. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M600248-JLR200
265
RaslanF.SchwarzT.MeuthS. G.AustinatM.BaderM.RennéT.et al. (2010). Inhibition of bradykinin receptor b1 protects mice from focal brain injury by reducing blood-brain barrier leakage and inflammation. J. Cereb Blood Flow Metab.30, 1477–1486. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.28
266
RavagnoloO.MisztalI. (2002). Effect of heat stress on nonreturn rate in holsteins: Fixed-model analyses. J. Dairy Sci.85, 3101–3106. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74397-X
267
ReedsP. J.BurrinD. G. (2000). The gut and amino acid homeostasis. Nutrition.16, 666–668. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(00)00354-3
268
RenaudeauD.CollinA.YahavS.De BasilioV.GourdineJ. L.CollierR. J. (2012). Adaptation to hot climate and strategies to alleviate heat stress in livestock production. Animal: an Int. J. Anim. bioscience.6, 707–728. doi: 10.1017/s1751731111002448
269
RhoadsR. P.BaumgardL. H.SuageeJ. K.SandersS. R. (2013). Nutritional interventions to alleviate the negative consequences of heat stress. Adv. Nutr.4, 267–276. doi: 10.3945/an.112.003376
270
RhoadsM. L.RhoadsR. P.VanbaaleM. J.CollierR. J.SandersS. R.WeberW. J.et al. (2009). Effects of heat stress and plane of nutrition on lactating holstein cows: I. Production, metabolism, and aspects of circulating somatotropin. J. Dairy Sci.92, 1986–1997. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1641
271
RhoneJ. A.KoonawootrittrironS.ElzoM. A. (2008). Record keeping, genetic selection, educational experience and farm management effects on average milk yield per cow, milk fat percentage, bacterial score and bulk tank somatic cell count of dairy farms in the central region of Thailand. Trop. Anim. Health Prod.40, 627–636. doi: 10.1007/s11250-008-9141-6
272
RochaC. C.SilvaF. A. C.MartinsT.MarreroM. G.BromfieldJ. J.DriverJ.et al. (2022). Culture of endometrial epithelial cells collected by a cytological brush in vivo. JDS Commun.3, 217–221. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2021-0189
273
Roman-PonceH.ThatcherW. W.CatonD.BarronD. H.WilcoxC. J. (1978). Thermal stress effects on uterine blood flow in dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci.46, 175–180. doi: 10.2527/jas1978.461175x
274
RossJ. W.HaleB. J.SeibertJ. T.RomoserM. R.AdurM. K.KeatingA. F.et al. (2017). Physiological mechanisms through which heat stress compromises reproduction in pigs. Mol. Reprod. Dev.84, 934–945. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22859
275
RothZ.MeidanR.Braw-TalR.WolfensonD. (2000). Immediate and delayed effects of heat stress on follicular development and its association with plasma fsh and inhibin concentration in cows. J. Reprod. Fertil.120, 83–90. doi: 10.1530/reprod/120.1.83
276
RowbothamR. F.RueggP. L. (2016). Bacterial counts on teat skin and in new sand, recycled sand, and recycled manure solids used as bedding in freestalls. J. Dairy Sci.99, 6594–6608. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10674
277
SajjanarB.AalamM. T.KhanO.DharaS. K.GhoshJ.GandhamR. K.et al. (2024). Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles regulate distinct heat stress response in zebu (bos indicus) and crossbred (bos indicus × bos taurus) cattle. Cell Stress Chaperones.29, 603–614. doi: 10.1016/j.cstres.2024.06.005
278
SakaiS.HagiharaN.KuseM.KimuraK.OkudaK. (2018). Heat stress affects prostaglandin synthesis in bovine endometrial cells. J. Reprod. Dev.64, 311–317. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2018-051
279
SakaiS.HatabuT.YamamotoY.KimuraK. (2020). Alteration of chemokine production in bovine endometrial epithelial and stromal cells under heat stress conditions. Physiol. Rep.8, e14640. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14640
280
SakaiS.YagiM.FujimeN.KuseM.SakumotoR.YamamotoY.et al. (2021). Heat stress influences the attenuation of prostaglandin synthesis by interferon tau in bovine endometrial cells. Theriogenology.165, 52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.02.005
281
SalamaA.DuqueM.WangL.ShahzadK.OliveraM. (2019). Enhanced supply of methionine or arginine alters mechanistic target of rapamycin signaling proteins, messenger rna, and microrna abundance in heat-stressed bovine mammary epithelial cells in vitro. J. Dairy Sci.102, 2469–2480. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15219
282
SalehimaneshA.MohammadiM.MehrM. R. A. (2016). Effect of dietary probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic supplementation on performance, immune responses, intestinal morphology and bacterial populations in broilers. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr.100, 694–700. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12431
283
SandersA. H.ShearerJ. K.De VriesA. (2009). Seasonal incidence of lameness and risk factors associated with thin soles, white line disease, ulcers, and sole punctures in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.92, 3165–3174. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1799
284
SargeantJ. M.SchukkenY. H.LeslieK. E. (1998). Ontario bulk milk somatic cell count reduction program: Progress and outlook. J. Dairy Sci.81, 1545–1554. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75720-0
285
SathyaA.PrabhakarS.SanghaS. P.GhumanS. P. (2007). Vitamin e and selenium supplementation reduces plasma cortisol and oxidative stress in dystocia-affected buffaloes. Vet. Res. Commun.31, 809–818. doi: 10.1007/s11259-007-0116-2
286
ScarimA. L.HeitmeierM. R.CorbettJ. A. (1998). Heat shock inhibits cytokine-induced nitric oxide synthase expression by rat and human islets. Endocrinology.139, 5050–5057. doi: 10.1210/endo.139.12.6366
287
SchmidtJ. A.AbdullaE. (1988). Down-regulation of il-1 beta biosynthesis by inducers of the heat-shock response. J. Immunol.141, 2027–2034. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.141.6.2027
288
SchrockG. E.SaxtonA. M.SchrickF. N.EdwardsJ. L. (2007). Early in vitro fertilization improves development of bovine ova heat stressed during in vitro maturation. J. Dairy Sci.90, 4297–4303. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0002
289
SchüllerL. K.BurfeindO.HeuwieserW. (2016). Effect of short- and long-term heat stress on the conception risk of dairy cows under natural service and artificial insemination breeding programs. J. Dairy Sci.99, 2996–3002. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10080
290
SejianV.BhattaR.GaughanJ. B.DunsheaF. R.LaceteraN. (2018). Review: Adaptation of animals to heat stress. Animal: an Int. J. Anim. bioscience.12, s431–s444. doi: 10.1017/s1751731118001945
291
SengarG. S.DebR.SinghU.RajaT. V.KantR.SajjanarB.et al. (2018). Differential expression of micrornas associated with thermal stress in frieswal (bos taurus x bos indicus) crossbred dairy cattle. Cell Stress Chaperones.23, 155–170. doi: 10.1007/s12192-017-0833-6
292
SgorlonS.ColittiM.AsquiniE.FerrariniA.PallaviciniA.StefanonB. (2012). Administration of botanicals with the diet regulates gene expression in peripheral blood cells of sarda sheep during acth challenge. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol.43, 213–226. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2012.03.001
293
ShanleyT. P.RyanM. A.Eaves-PylesT.WongH. R. (2000). Heat shock inhibits phosphorylation of i-kappabalpha. Shock.14, 447–450. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200014040-00005
294
SheldonI. M.CroninJ.GoetzeL.DonofrioG.SchuberthH. J. (2009). Defining postpartum uterine disease and the mechanisms of infection and immunity in the female reproductive tract in cattle. Biol. Reprod.81, 1025–1032. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.109.077370
295
SilvaJ. C. C.CaldeiraM. O.MoraesJ. G. N.Sellmer RamosI.GullT.EricssonA. C.et al. (2024). Metritis and the uterine disease microbiome are associated with long-term changes in the endometrium of dairy cows†. Biol. Reprod.111, 332–350. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioae067
296
SilvaP. S.HooperH. B.ManicaE.MerigheG. K. F.OliveiraS. A.TraldiA. S.et al. (2021). Heat stress affects the expression of key genes in the placenta, placental characteristics, and efficiency of saanen goats and the survival and growth of their kids. J. Dairy Sci.104, 4970–4979. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18301
297
SilvaH. M.WilcoxC. J.ThatcherW. W.BeckerR. B.MorseD. (1992). Factors affecting days open, gestation length, and calving interval in florida dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.75, 288–293. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77764-9
298
SinghK. K. (2004). Mitochondria damage checkpoint in apoptosis and genome stability. FEMS Yeast Res.5, 127–132. doi: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.04.008
299
SinghS. V.DeshpandeA. D.SomagondY. M. (2022). Betaine: A potent feed additive for amelioration of adverse effect of heat stress in livestock and poultry. Indian J. Anim. Sci.92, 277–282. doi: 10.56093/ijans.v92i3.122253
300
SinghM. K.HanS.JuS.RanbhiseJ. S.HaJ.YeoS. G.et al. (2025). Hsp70: A multifunctional chaperone in maintaining proteostasis and its implications in human disease. Cells.14, 509. doi: 10.3390/cells14070509
301
SkibielA. L.PenagaricanoF.AmorinR.AhmedB. M.DahlG. E.LaportaJ. (2018). In utero heat stress alters the offspring epigenome. Sci. Rep.8, 14609. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32975-1
302
SnyderY. M.GuthrieL.EvansG. F.ZuckermanS. H. (1992). Transcriptional inhibition of endotoxin-induced monokine synthesis following heat shock in murine peritoneal macrophages. J. Leukoc. Biol.51, 181–187. doi: 10.1002/jlb.51.2.181
303
SolymosiN.TormaC.KernA.Maróti-AgótsA.BarczaZ.KönyvesL.et al. (2010). Changing climate in Hungary and trends in the annual number of heat stress days. Int. J. Biometeorol.54, 423–431. doi: 10.1007/s00484-009-0293-5
304
SomensiN.BrumP. O.De Miranda RamosV.GasparottoJ.Zanotto-FilhoA.RostirollaD. C.et al. (2017). Extracellular hsp70 activates erk1/2, nf-kb and pro-inflammatory gene transcription through binding with rage in a549 human lung cancer cells. Cell Physiol. Biochem.42, 2507–2522. doi: 10.1159/000480213
305
SongJ. H.KimK. J.ChoiS. Y.KohE. J.ParkJ.LeeB. Y. (2019). Korean ginseng extract ameliorates abnormal immune response through the regulation of inflammatory constituents in sprague dawley rat subjected to environmental heat stress. J. Ginseng Res.43, 252–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2018.02.003
306
SongJ.XiaoK.KeY. L.JiaoL. F.HuC. H.DiaoQ. Y.et al. (2014). Effect of a probiotic mixture on intestinal microflora, morphology, and barrier integrity of broilers subjected to heat stress. Poult Sci.93, 581–588. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03455
307
SonnaL. A.FujitaJ.GaffinS. L.LillyC. M. (2002). Invited review: Effects of heat and cold stress on mammalian gene expression. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985).92, 1725–1742. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01143.2001
308
SpiersD. E.SpainJ. N.J.D.S.R.P.R. (2004). Use of physiological parameters to predict milk yield and feed intake in heat-stressed dairy cows. J. Therm. Biol.29, 759–764. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2004.08.051
309
SrikanthK.KwonA.LeeE.ChungH. (2017). Characterization of genes and pathways that respond to heat stress in holstein calves through transcriptome analysis. Cell Stress Chaperones.22, 29–42. doi: 10.1007/s12192-016-0739-8
310
SrivastavaP. (2002). Roles of heat-shock proteins in innate and adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol.2, 185–194. doi: 10.1038/nri749
311
SteinU.JürchottK.WaltherW.BergmannS.SchlagP. M.RoyerH. D. (2001). Hyperthermia-induced nuclear translocation of transcription factor yb-1 leads to enhanced expression of multidrug resistance-related abc transporters. J. Biol. Chem.276, 28562–28569. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100311200
312
SterC.LoiselleM. C.LacasseP. (2012). Effect of postcalving serum nonesterified fatty acids concentration on the functionality of bovine immune cells. J. Dairy Sci.95, 708–717. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4695
313
StetlerR. A.GanY.ZhangW.LiouA. K.GaoY.CaoG.et al. (2010). Heat shock proteins: Cellular and molecular mechanisms in the central nervous system. Prog. Neurobiol.92, 184–211. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.05.002
314
St-PierreN. R.CobanovB.SchnitkeyG. (2003). Economic losses from heat stress by us livestock industries. J. Dairy Sci.86, E52–E77. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)74040-5
315
SultanaZ.QiaoY.MaitiK.SmithR. (2023). Involvement of oxidative stress in placental dysfunction, the pathophysiology of fetal death and pregnancy disorders. Reproduction.166, R25–r38. doi: 10.1530/rep-22-0278
316
SunD.ChenD.DuB.PanJ. (2005). Heat shock response inhibits nf-kappab activation and cytokine production in murine kupffer cells. J. Surg. Res.129, 114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.05.028
317
TangL. P.LiW. H.LiuY. L.LunJ. C.HeY. M. (2021). Heat stress aggravates intestinal inflammation through tlr4-nf-kappab signaling pathway in ma chickens infected with escherichia coli o157:H7. Poult Sci.100, 101030. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101030
318
TaoS.BubolzJ. W.Do AmaralB. C.ThompsonI. M.HayenM. J.JohnsonS. E.et al. (2011). Effect of heat stress during the dry period on mammary gland development. J. Dairy Sci.94, 5976–5986. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4329
319
TaoS.ThompsonI. M.MonteiroA. P. A.HayenM. J.YoungL. J.DahlG. E. (2012). Effect of cooling heat-stressed dairy cows during the dry period on insulin response. J. Dairy Sci.95, 5035–5046. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5405
320
Thompson-CrispiK. A.HineB.QuintonM.MigliorF.MallardB. A. (2012). Short communication: Association of disease incidence and adaptive immune response in holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.95, 3888–3893. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-5201
321
TjoelkerL. W.ChewB. P.TanakaT. S.DanielL. R. (1990). Effect of dietary vitamin-a and beta-carotene on polymorphonuclear leukocyte and lymphocyte function in dairy-cows during the early dry period. J. Dairy Sci.73, 1017–1022. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78760-7
322
TomasekR.RezacP.HavlicekZ. (2017). Environmental and animal factors associated with gestation length in holstein cows and heifers in two herds in the Czech Republic. Theriogenology.87, 100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.08.009
323
TurnerM. L.CroninJ. G.HealeyG. D.SheldonI. M. (2014). Epithelial and stromal cells of bovine endometrium have roles in innate immunity and initiate inflammatory responses to bacterial lipopeptides in vitro via toll-like receptors tlr2, tlr1, and tlr6. Endocrinology.155, 1453–1465. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1822
324
Van MetreD. C. (2017). Pathogenesis and treatment of bovine foot rot. Vet. Clin. N Am-Food A.33, 183–18+. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2017.02.003
325
Van WettereW.KindK. L.GatfordK. L.SwinbourneA. M.LeuS. T.HaymanP. T.et al. (2021). Review of the impact of heat stress on reproductive performance of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.12, 26. doi: 10.1186/s40104-020-00537-z
326
VegaV. L.Rodríguez-SilvaM.FreyT.GehrmannM.DiazJ. C.SteinemC.et al. (2008). Hsp70 translocates into the plasma membrane after stress and is released into the extracellular environment in a membrane-associated form that activates macrophages. J. Immunol.180, 4299–4307. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.6.4299
327
Vieira-NetoA.GalvãoK. N.ThatcherW. W.SantosJ. E. P. (2017). Association among gestation length and health, production, and reproduction in holstein cows and implications for their offspring. J. Dairy Sci.100, 3166–3181. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11867
328
VinothA.ThirunalasundariT.ShanmugamM.UthrakumarA.SujiS.RajkumarU. (2018). Evaluation of DNA methylation and mrna expression of heat shock proteins in thermal manipulated chicken. Cell Stress Chaperones.23, 235–252. doi: 10.1007/s12192-017-0837-2
329
VivierE.TomaselloE.BaratinM.WalzerT.UgoliniS. (2008). Functions of natural killer cells. Nat. Immunol.9, 503–510. doi: 10.1038/ni1582
330
VlasovaA. N.SaifL. J. (2021). Bovine immunology: Implications for dairy cattle. Front. Immunol.12. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.643206
331
WaddingtonC. H. (1956). Embryology, epignetics, and biogenetics - reply. Nature.177, 1241–1241. doi: 10.1038/1771241a0
332
WaddingtonC. H. (1957). The genetic basis of the ‘assimilated bithorax’ stock. 1957. J. Genet.85, 101–105. doi: 10.1007/bf02729015
333
WagterL. C.MallardB. A.WilkieB. N.LeslieK. E.BoettcherP. J.DekkersJ. C. (2000). A quantitative approach to classifying holstein cows based on antibody responsiveness and its relationship to peripartum mastitis occurrence. J. Dairy Sci.83, 488–498. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74908-3
334
WallinR. P.LundqvistA.MoréS. H.Von BoninA.KiesslingR.LjunggrenH. G. (2002). Heat-shock proteins as activators of the innate immune system. Trends Immunol.23, 130–135. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(01)02168-8
335
WangM.Ibeagha-AwemuE. M. (2020). Impacts of epigenetic processes on the health and productivity of livestock. Front. Genet.11. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.613636
336
WangX.ValenzanoM. C.MercadoJ. M.ZurbachE. P.FloundersC. J.MullinJ. M. (2014). Zinc enhancement of llc-pk(1) renal epithelial barrier function. Clin. Nutr.33, 280–286. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.05.001
337
WangX.ValenzanoM. C.MercadoJ. M.ZurbachE. P.MullinJ. M. (2013). Zinc supplementation modifies tight junctions and alters barrier function of caco-2 human intestinal epithelial layers. Dig. Dis. Sci.58, 77–87. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2328-8
338
WangZ.WangG.HuangJ.LiQ.WangC.ZhongJ. (2011). Novel snps in the atp1b2 gene and their associations with milk yield, milk composition and heat-resistance traits in chinese holstein cows. Mol. Biol. Rep.38, 1749–1755. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0289-6
339
WebsterJ. I.TonelliL.SternbergE. M. (2002). Neuroendocrine regulation of immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol.20, 125–163. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.082401.104914
340
WegnerT. N.SchuhJ. D.NelsonF. E.StottG. H. (1976). Effect of stress on blood leucocyte and milk somatic cell counts in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.59, 949–956. doi: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(76)84303-2
341
WeismannD.HartvigsenK.LauerN.BennettK. L.SchollH. P.Charbel IssaP.et al. (2011). Complement factor h binds malondialdehyde epitopes and protects from oxidative stress. Nature.478, 76–81. doi: 10.1038/nature10449
342
WestJ. W. (1999). Nutritional strategies for managing the heat-stressed dairy cow. J. Anim. Sci.77, 21–35. doi: 10.2527/1997.77suppl_221x
343
WestJ. W. (2003). Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci.86, 2131–2144. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73803-X
344
WetherillG. D. (1965). Retained placenta in the bovine. A brief review. Can. Vet. J.6, 290–294.
345
WheelockJ. B.RhoadsR. P.VanbaaleM. J.SandersS. R.BaumgardL. H. (2010). Effects of heat stress on energetic metabolism in lactating holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci.93, 644–655. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2295
346
WilsonS. J.MarionR. S.SpainJ. N.SpiersD. E.KeislerD. H.LucyM. C. (1998). Effects of controlled heat stress on ovarian function of dairy cattle. 1. Lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci.81, 2124–2131. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75788-1
347
WiraC. R.FaheyJ. V. (2004). The innate immune system: Gatekeeper to the female reproductive tract. Immunology.111, 13–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.01796.x
348
WoY.MaF.ShanQ.GaoD.JinY.SunP. (2023). Plasma metabolic profiling reveals that chromium yeast alleviates the negative effects of heat stress in mid-lactation dairy cows. Anim. Nutr.13, 401–410. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.01.012
349
WohlgemuthS. E.Ramirez-LeeY.TaoS.MonteiroA. P. A.AhmedB. M.DahlG. E. (2016). Short communication: Effect of heat stress on markers of autophagy in the mammary gland during the dry period. J. Dairy Sci.99, 4875–4880. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10649
350
WolfensonD.FlamenbaumI.BermanA. (1988). Dry period heat stress relief effects on prepartum progesterone, calf birth weight, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci.71, 809–818. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79621-6
351
WongH. R.RyanM.WispéJ. R. (1997). The heat shock response inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression by blocking i kappa-b degradation and nf-kappa b nuclear translocation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.231, 257–263. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6076
352
WuW.PewT.ZouM.PangD.ConzenS. D. (2005). Glucocorticoid receptor-induced mapk phosphatase-1 (mpk-1) expression inhibits paclitaxel-associated mapk activation and contributes to breast cancer cell survival. J. Biol. Chem.280, 4117–4124. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411200200
353
XiaB.WuW.FangW.WenX.XieJ.ZhangH. (2022). Heat stress-induced mucosal barrier dysfunction is potentially associated with gut microbiota dysbiosis in pigs. Anim. Nutr.8, 289–299. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.05.012
354
YangJ.YanH. (2021). Mucosal epithelial cells: The initial sentinels and responders controlling and regulating immune responses to viral infections. Cell Mol. Immunol.18, 1628–1630. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00650-7
355
YiH.XiongY.WuQ.WangM.LiuS.JiangZ.et al. (2020). Effects of dietary supplementation with l-arginine on the intestinal barrier function in finishing pigs with heat stress. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl).104, 1134–1143. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13277
356
YooC. G.LeeS.LeeC. T.KimY. W.HanS. K.ShimY. S. (2000). Anti-inflammatory effect of heat shock protein induction is related to stabilization of i kappa b alpha through preventing i kappa b kinase activation in respiratory epithelial cells. J. Immunol.164, 5416–5423. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.10.5416
357
ZachariaeC. O. (1993). Chemotactic cytokines and inflammation. Biological properties of the lymphocyte and monocyte chemotactic factors elcf, mcaf and il-8. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl. (Stockh).181, 1–37.
358
ZampinoM.BrennanN. A.KuoP. L.SpencerR. G.FishbeinK. W.SimonsickE. M.et al. (2020). Poor mitochondrial health and systemic inflammation? Test of a classic hypothesis in the baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Geroscience.42, 1175–1182. doi: 10.1007/s11357-020-00208-x
359
ZengJ.CaiJ.WangD.LiuH.SunH.LiuJ. (2023). Heat stress affects dairy cow health status through blood oxygen availability. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.14 (1), 112. doi: 10.1186/s40104-023-00915-3
360
ZhangF.ChenH. Z.ZhengB.HuangL.XiangY.ZhangJ. R.et al. (2025). Heat stress induces phage tolerance in enterobacteriaceae. Elife.14, RP105703. doi: 10.7554/eLife.105703
361
ZhangB.GuoY. (2009). Supplemental zinc reduced intestinal permeability by enhancing occludin and zonula occludens protein-1 (zo-1) expression in weaning piglets. Br. J. Nutr.102, 687–693. doi: 10.1017/s0007114509289033
362
ZhangF. J.WengX. G.WangJ. F.ZhouD.ZhangW.ZhaiC. C.et al. (2014). Effects of temperature-humidity index and chromium supplementation on antioxidant capacity, heat shock protein 72, and cytokine responses of lactating cows. J. Anim. Sci.92, 3026–3034. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6932
363
ZhaoS.MinL.ZhengN.WangJ. (2019). Effect of heat stress on bacterial composition and metabolism in the rumen of lactating dairy cows. Anim. (Basel).9, 925. doi: 10.3390/ani9110925
364
ZhouJ.AnH.XuH.LiuS.CaoX. (2005). Heat shock up-regulates expression of toll-like receptor-2 and toll-like receptor-4 in human monocytes via p38 kinase signal pathway. Immunology.114, 522–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.02112.x
365
ZhouZ.TrevisiE.LuchiniD. N.LoorJ. J. (2017). Differences in liver functionality indexes in peripartal dairy cows fed rumen-protected methionine or choline are associated with performance, oxidative stress status, and plasma amino acid profiles. J. Dairy Sci.100, 6720–6732. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12299
366
ZhouX.WuY.ZhuZ.LuC.ZhangC.ZengL.et al. (2025). Mucosal immune response in biology, disease prevention and treatment. Signal Transduct Target Ther.10, 7. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-02043-4
367
ZügelU.KaufmannS. H. (1999). Role of heat shock proteins in protection from and pathogenesis of infectious diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.12, 19–39. doi: 10.1128/cmr.12.1.19
Summary
Keywords
cellular response, dairy cattle health, environmental stressors, heat stress, immune resilience
Citation
Tariq A and Bromfield JJ (2026) Heat stress: an environmental challenge to immune resilience and health in dairy cows. Front. Anim. Sci. 7:1755098. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2026.1755098
Received
26 November 2025
Revised
29 January 2026
Accepted
30 January 2026
Published
17 February 2026
Volume
7 - 2026
Edited by
Christine Janet Nicol, Royal Veterinary College (RVC), United Kingdom
Reviewed by
Vincent Habimana, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania
Chris Reynolds, University of Reading, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Tariq and Bromfield.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: John J. Bromfield, jbromfield@ufl.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.