ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aquac.

Sec. Society, Value Chains, Governance and Development

Effects of various alternative stunning techniques on welfare indicators and meat quality of Nile tilapia

  • 1. Somsak farm, Chachoengsao, Thailand

  • 2. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand

  • 3. University of Stirling Institute of Aquaculture, Stirling, United Kingdom

Article metrics

View details

115

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Humane slaughter practices are critical for improving fish welfare and ensuring product quality in aquaculture. This study evaluated the effects of six stunning methods: priest, bolt pistol, ikijime, live freezing, anesthetic overdose, and asphyxiation, on behavioral and physiological welfare indicators and fillet quality in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). A total of 54 fish (9 per group) were randomly assigned to each treatment. Welfare was assessed through behavioral response (BR) and morphological damage (MD). Postmortem biochemical parameters (muscle pH, lactate, ATP), rigor mortis index, and fillet quality (texture, color, proximate composition, water drip loss) were measured after slaughter. Anesthetic overdose and bolt pistol stunning produced the most favorable outcomes. Both methods resulted in rapid loss of consciousness (BR=0) with minimal MD scores and lower lactate levels (3.0 ± 0.5 mmol/L) than other techniques. In contrast, asphyxiation demonstrated the worst welfare (BR=1), with elevated stress biomarkers, and inferior fillet quality, texture, and storage time. While live freezing and priest stunning revealed good welfare indicators, there were no benefits in terms of stress indicators and fillet quality indices. Finally, ikijime technique showed variable effectiveness depending on operator proficiency. Overall, these results support the adoption of anesthetic overdose or bolt pistol stunning as humane and effective methods that enhance fish welfare. Piloting of such practices with stakeholders is recommended to meet ethical standards and improve product value in commercial tilapia production.

Summary

Keywords

Aquaculture, Fillet quality, Stunning techniques, Tilapia, Welfare indicators

Received

02 January 2026

Accepted

09 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Hirunratanakorn, Yamkasem, Youngnoi, Setthawong, SURACHETPONG and Lertwanakarn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: WIN SURACHETPONG; Tuchakorn Lertwanakarn

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics