ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Artif. Intell.
Sec. Medicine and Public Health
Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1452471
Evaluating the Impact of Common Clinical Confounders on Performance of Deep-Learning based Sepsis Risk Assessment
Provisionally accepted- 1Siemens Healthineers (United States), Princeton, United States
- 2Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Early identification of sepsis in the emergency department using machine learning remains a challenging problem, primarily due to the lack of a gold standard for sepsis diagnosis, the heterogeneity in clinical presentations, and the impact of confounding conditions. In this work, we present a deep learning-based predictive model designed to enable early detection of patients at risk of developing sepsis, using data from the first 24 hours of admission. The model is based on routine blood test results commonly performed on patients, including CBC (Complete Blood Count), CMP (Comprehensive Metabolic Panel), and lipid panels, as well as vital signs, age, and sex.To address the challenge of label uncertainty as a part of the training process, we explore two different definitions, namely, Sepsis-3 and Adult Sepsis Event. We analyze the advantages and limitations of each in the context of patient clinical parameters and comorbidities. We specifically examine how the quality of the ground truth label influences the performance of the deep learning system and evaluate the effect of a consensus-based approach that incorporates both definitions. Our results show that the consensus-based model identifies at-risk patients in the first 24 hours with 83.7% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and an AUC of 0.9.We also evaluated the model's performance across sub-cohorts, including patients with confounding comorbidities (such as chronic kidney and liver disease, and coagulation disorders) and those with confirmed infections. Our analysis revealed variable performance across different cohorts. This work highlights the limitations of retrospective sepsis definitions, and underscores the need for tailored approaches in automated sepsis detection, particularly when dealing with patients with confounding comorbidities.
Keywords: deep learning, VAE, Autoencoder, Sepsis-3, ASE, Sepsis, Sepsis confounders, ed
Received: 20 Jun 2024; Accepted: 13 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chaganti, Singh, Gent, Kamaleswaran and Kamen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Shikha Chaganti, Siemens Healthineers (United States), Princeton, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.