SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Artif. Intell.

Sec. Medicine and Public Health

Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1517670

The application of random forest-based models in prognostication of gastrointestinal tract malignancies: a systematic review

Provisionally accepted
Armin  Zarin KhatArmin Zarin Khat1*Zhina  MohamadiZhina Mohamadi1Ali  ShafizadeAli Shafizade2Yasaman  AliyanYasaman Aliyan2Fatemeh  ShayestehFatemeh Shayesteh3Parsa  GoudarziParsa Goudarzi4Alireza  KhodabandehAlireza Khodabandeh5Amirali  VaghariAmirali Vaghari4Helma  AshrafiHelma Ashrafi6Yalda  KhodabandeYalda Khodabande7Kimia  PouyanKimia Pouyan8
  • 1Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
  • 2Islamic Azad University, West Tehran, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • 3Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • 4Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • 5Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Qazvin, Iran
  • 6Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahrood, Semnan, Iran
  • 7School of Mechanics, University of Guilan, Rasht, Gilan, Iran
  • 8Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Khuzestan, Iran

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Malignancies of the GI tract account for one-third of cancer-related deaths globally and more than 25% of all cancer diagnoses. The rising prevalence of GI tract malignancies and the shortcomings of existing treatment approaches highlight the need for better predictive prediction models. RF's machine-learning method can predict cancers by using numerous decision trees to locate, classify, and forecast data. This systematic study aims to assess how well RF models predict the prognosis of GI tract malignancies.Method: Following PRISMA criteria, we performed a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science until May 28, 2024. Studies used RF models to forecast the prognosis of GI tract malignancies, including esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers. The QUIPS approach was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.Result: Out of 1846 records, 86 studies met inclusion requirements; eight were disqualified.Numerous studies showed that when combining clinical, genetic, and pathological data, RF models were very accurate and dependable in predicting the prognosis of GI tract malignancies, responses, recurrence, survival rates, and metastatic risks, distinguishing between operable and inoperable tumors, and patient outcomes. RF models outperformed conventional prognostic techniques in terms of accuracy; several research studies reported prediction accuracies of over 80% in survival rate estimates.RF models, in terms of accuracy, performed better than the conventional approaches and provided better capabilities for clinical decision-making. Such models can increase the life quality and survival of patients by personalizing their treatment regimens for cancers of the GI tract. These models can, in a significant manner, raise patients' survival and quality of life through hastening clinical decision-making and providing personalized treatment options.

Keywords: random forest, prognostication, GI tract cancers, malignancy, Prognose

Received: 26 Oct 2024; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zarin Khat, Mohamadi, Shafizade, Aliyan, Shayesteh, Goudarzi, Khodabandeh, Vaghari, Ashrafi, Khodabande and Pouyan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Armin Zarin Khat, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.