CORRECTION article
Front. Artif. Intell.
Sec. Language and Computation
Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1650320
Correction: Stylistic variation across English translations of Chinese science fiction: Ken Liu versus ChatGPT
Provisionally accepted
- Frontiers Media SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
A Correction on: Zhou P and Cheng J (2025) Stylistic variation across English translations of Chinese science fiction: Ken Liu versus ChatGPT. Front. Artif. Intell. 8:1576750. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1576750 In the acknowledgements statement, the text was incorrectly edited to reflect an additional author without consent. This section has now been removed after a request from the first author.There was a mistake in Table 1 as published. The last row was shifted two places to left adding '101,567' and '99,324' to columns 2 and 3, although these cells should have been blank. The corrected Table 1 appears below. The original version of this article has been updated.
Keywords: science fiction translation, large language model translations, corpus-based translation, Stylistic variation, Multi-dimensional analysis
Received: 19 Jun 2025; Accepted: 19 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Production Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Frontiers Production Office, Frontiers Media SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.