Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Artif. Intell.

Sec. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence

This article is part of the Research TopicConvergence of Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive SystemsView all 3 articles

Beyond Mimicry: A Framework for Evaluating Genuine Intelligence in Artificial Systems

Provisionally accepted
  • University of Illinois, Chicago, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Current AI benchmarks often equate mimicry with genuine intelligence, emphasizing task performance over the underlying cognitive processes that enable human-like understanding. The Machine Perturbational Complexity & Agency Battery (mPCAB) introduces a new, substrate-independent framework that applies neurophysiological methods used initially to assess consciousness in artificial systems. Unlike existing evaluations, it features four key components—perturbational complexity, global workspace assessment, norm internalization, and agency—that link mechanisms with functions. This enables systematic comparisons across digital, neuromorphic, and biological substrates, addressing three research gaps: long-term reasoning with coherent behavior, norm internalization amid distribution shifts, and transformational creativity involving meta-cognitive rule modification. By analyzing theories of consciousness (GNW, IIT, PP, HOT), we identify targets for AI implementation. Our cognitive architecture analysis maps human functions—such as working memory and executive control—to their computational counterparts, providing guiding principles for design. The creativity taxonomy progresses from combinational to transformational, with measurable criteria like changes in conceptual space and the depth of meta-level reasoning. Ethical considerations are integrated into frameworks for monitoring organoid intelligence, reducing bias in creativity, and addressing rights issues. Pilot studies demonstrate mPCAB's feasibility across different substrates and show that its metrics are comparable. This framework moves evaluation away from superficial benchmarks toward mechanism-based assessment, supporting the development of mind-like machines and responsible AI advancements.

Keywords: Machine consciousness, artificial intelligence, creativity, neuromorphic computing, organoid intelligence, perturbational complexity, agency, evaluation frameworks

Received: 15 Aug 2025; Accepted: 09 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Niazi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Sarfaraz K. Niazi

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.