ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Artif. Intell.
Sec. AI in Finance
This article is part of the Research TopicImplementing Anti-Financial Crime Risk Control Measures Using Artificial Intelligence: Challenges for Advanced Economies and Emerging MarketsView all 6 articles
Tackling Fraud Detection with an Enhanced Kepler Optimization and Ghost Opposition-Based Learning
Provisionally accepted- 1Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia
- 2Department of Computer Science, College of Information Technology, Amman Arab University, Amman 11953, Jordan
- 3Department of Information Systems, Sohag University, Sohag 82511, Egypt
- 4Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
- 5Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The growing prevalence of fraud and malware, fueled by increased online activity and digital transactions, has exposed the shortcomings of conventional detection systems, particularly in handling novel or obfuscated threats, class imbalance, and high-dimensional data with many irrelevant features. This underscores the need for robust and adaptive detection methodologies. This study proposes an advanced Fraud Detection (FD) methodology, BKOA-GOBL, that enhances the Binary Kepler Optimization Algorithm (BKOA) by integrating Ghost Opposition-Based Learning (GOBL) to improve Feature Selection (FS). The BKOA dynamically models gravitational attraction, planetary motion mechanics, and cyclic control to maintain a balance between exploration and exploitation. At the same time, the GOBL enhances broader search diversification and prevents early convergence, allowing the local optimum to be avoided. The Random Under-Sampling (RUS) technique is utilized to mitigate the class imbalance in fraud benchmarks. Experimental validation is conducted on five real-world benchmarks, including the Australian, European, CIC-MalMem-2022, Synthetic Financial Transaction Log, and Real vs Fake Job Postings datasets, using k-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN) and XGBoost (Xgb-tree) classifiers. The BKOA-GOBL achieves outstanding performance, reaching classification accuracies up to 99.96% in some benchmarks and corresponding feature reduction rates up to 81.82%. Precision, recall, ROC AUC, and F1-scores were consistently high across most benchmarks, demonstrating reliable and balanced detection. However, some challenging benchmarks—such as the Real vs Fake Job Postings dataset using k-NN classifier—returned lower scores (Precision = 76.14%, Recall = 66.55%, F1-score = 71.00%, and ROC AUC = 74.15%), reflecting the difficulty of the problem. Comparative analyses against 12 recent Metaheuristic Algorithms (MHAs) and Machine Learning (ML) classifiers confirmed BKOA-GOBL’s dominance in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. Its statistical superiority is confirmed by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, underscoring its robustness, adaptability, and effectiveness in high-dimensional fraud and malware detection tasks and real-world fraud and malware detection scenarios.
Keywords: Feature Selection, Fraud detection, Ghost Opposition-Based Learning (GOBL), KeplerOptimization Algorithm, machine learning, Metaheuristic algorithms
Received: 24 Sep 2025; Accepted: 04 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Egami, Abd El-Mageed, Gafar and Abohany. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mona G. Gafar
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
