Research on systematics, ecology and social behavior of bees within the subgenus Megapis is still in its early stages. The six recent studies in the Research Topic “Biology of Giant Honeybees” have contributed to all three areas.
The report in this Research Topic by Kitnya et al. using traditional morphological taxonomy, identified diagnostic morphological differences between Apis dorsata of mainland Asia and Apis binghami from the Philippines/Sulawesi. Bhatta et al. applied mitochondrial DNA sequencing in their genetic analysis, further dividing the Apis dorsata complex into four geographic lineages: Mainland Asia, Sulawesi, Philippines, and South India. Both studies recognized Apis laboriosa as a valid species. These contributions have advanced our understanding of species diversity and phylogeny of the subgenus.
Otis et al. revised the distribution of Apis laboriosa and significantly expanded its range to include northeastern Vietnam, central Myanmar, northwestern Thailand, western Nepal and northeastern Pakistan (). Its distribution now spans >3300 km from west to east, south of the Himalayan massif and higher-elevation regions of China. They found that the species inhabits both subtropical broadleaf and coniferous forests, with new evidence of migratory strategies, such as following river valleys northward out of India and Nepal into China. In Vietnam, colonies often nest on tree branches, a behavior not previously documented.
Rehel et al. reviewed studies of Apis dorsata in the Western Ghats of South India. They provide valuable insights into nesting sites and colony abundance. However, differing methodologies and lack of coordinated nationwide studies hinder more comprehensive understanding and conservation efforts for these bees.
Raffiudin et al. is the first study to compare the foraging behavior of Apis dorsata across two habitats: an oil palm plantation and a mixed forest–agriculture area. The findings indicate that the bees preferentially forage in sites with abundant flowering plants, suggesting a migratory behavior to exploit mass flowering events. Consistent with expectations, they foraged on a broader diversity of plants in the forest–agriculture area.
Kastberger et al. expanded on their previous work () on the collective decision-making processes during mass flight activity (MFA) in Apis dorsata colonies. Their infrared heat analyses, combined with motion profiles and spectra, measured how a nest—normally quiescent most of the day—enters a state of restructuring during MFA. This restructuring temporarily impairs the colony’s ability to defend itself, as shown by its response to dummy wasp attacks. The study revealed a negative correlation between heat production and movement, suggesting a temporary social paralysis, which could be interpreted as social thanatosis—a phenomenon not previously documented in the animal kingdom.
Discussion and future research directions
Species status of taxa in the Apis dorsata complex
Genetic differences greater than 5% between the four lineages identified by Bhatta et al. suggest these may all merit species designation. Additional morphological studies are needed to resolve the taxonomy of Apis breviligula and Apis dorsata-South India. Future analyses using ultra-conserved elements (UCEs) or whole genomes are expected to further clarify the phylogeny of the giant honeybees.
Geographic distribution and introgression
Further sampling and analyses of both nuclear and mtDNA are necessary to clarify the extent of introgression between mainland Indian and South Indian lineages of A. dorsata.
Conservation concerns
Conservation studies on Apis dorsata in Sumatra (Raffiudin et al.) and South India (Rehel et al.) suggest that each genetically distinct lineage faces unique threats that require targeted conservation efforts. In addition, researchers often encounter restrictions in protected areas and collecting specimens. Nationwide initiatives are essential to promote collaborative research and conservation efforts for giant honeybees, similar to those dedicated to large “charismatic” vertebrates.
Pollination role
Despite their ecological importance, no papers in this Research Topic addressed the role of giant honeybees in pollination. Future research should explore their contributions to both natural and agro-ecosystems ().
Migratory behavior
Giant honeybee migrations are still poorly understood, although evidence of their return to previous nest sites has been demonstrated (; ). Key questions include what triggers migration, how far swarms travel, and how weather and floral resources influence their movements. Future studies should track colony births and deaths, and explore their navigation and stopover patterns. The precise role of scout bees and dancing bees in directing colony movement both from the nest and from bivouacs needs further research.
Shimmering behavior and defense
Although the role of shimmering in defending nests from wasps has been described in several studies (, ), the mechanisms which involve three-dimensional wave processes in the bee curtain and generally in the nest are still unclear (, ). Future research should focus on examining how the dynamic movements involved in shimmering influence predator behavior.
Nest restructuring during MFA
The restructuring of the nest and bivouacs () during MFA is not fully understood (; ), as discussed by Kastberger et al. It remains unclear which bees are involved and how the process is regulated. Demographic studies of worker bees and colony populations could provide valuable insights. Focusing observations on the “mouth zone,” which appears to play a key role in controlling nest activity, may provide deeper insights into colony behavior.
Asynchrony of MFA in colony aggregations
Mass flights within larger nest aggregations occur asynchronously, with little overlap between colonies (). This lack of colony synchronization remains unexplored but may be crucial for understanding colony dynamics during MFA. An enduring question is why MFAs occur at all.
Outsmarting avian predators?
The giant honeybee’s defense mechanisms, including shimmering and mass counter-attacks (), are effective against wasps and mammals but less so against avian predators like bee-eaters and honey buzzards (; ). This raises an intriguing question: How have giant honeybees (Apis dorsata) survived for over 5 million years despite these birds circumventing their defenses? One key factor may lie in the bees’ migratory behavior, which may create a dynamic that challenges traditional predator–prey models—such as the Lotka-Volterra “fox–rabbit” model ().
Conclusion
In conclusion, while substantial progress has been made in understanding the biology, ecology, and behavior of giant honeybees, there is still much to learn. Collaborative research on genetics, migration, ecological roles, and defense strategies, as well as nest organization, is essential for furthering knowledge and ensuring conservation efforts.
Statements
Author contributions
GO: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WR: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
KastbergerG. (1999). The magic trees of Assam (Wien: National Geographic, ZDF, ORF & epo-film). Available at: https://www.studiocanal.com/title/the-magic-trees-of-assam-1999/ (Accessed March 4, 2025).
2
KastbergerG.EbnerM.HötzlT. (2024). Giant honeybees (Apis dorsata) trade off defensiveness against periodic mass flight activity. PloS One19 (4), e0298467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298467
3
KastbergerG.HoetzlT.MaurerM.KrannerI.WeissS.WeihmannF. (2014). Speeding up social waves. Propagation mechanisms of shimmering in giant honeybees. PloS One9.1, e86315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086315
4
KastbergerG.MaurerM.WeihmannF.RuetherM.HoetzlT.KrannerI.et al. (2011). Stereoscopic motion analysis in densely packed clusters: 3D analysis of the shimmering behaviour in giant honey bees. Front. Zoology8, 1–18. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-8-3
5
KastbergerG.SchmelzerE.KrannerI. (2008). Social waves in giant honeybees repel hornets. PloS One3 (9), e3141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003141
6
KastbergerG.SharmaD. K. (2000). The predator-prey interaction between blue-bearded bee eaters (Nyctyornis athertoni Jardine and Selby 1830) and giant honeybees (Apis dorsata Fabricius 1798). Apidologie31.6, 727–736. doi: 10.1051/apido:2000157
7
KastbergerG.WeihmannF.HoetzlT. (2013). Social waves in giant honeybees (Apis dorsata) elicit nest vibrations. Naturwissenschaften100, 595–609. doi: 10.1007/s00114-013-1056-z
8
KastbergerG.WinderO.HoetzlT.RaspotnigG. (1996). Behavioural features of a periodic form of massed flight activity in the giant honeybee Apis dorsata. Apidologie27.5, 381–395. doi: 10.1051/apido:19960506
9
KitnyaN.OtisG. W.ChakravortyJ.SmithD. R.BrockmannA. (2022). Apis laboriosa confirmed by morphometric and genetic analyses of giant honey bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) from sites of sympatry in Arunachal Pradesh, North East India. Apidologie53, 47. doi: 10.1007/s13592-022-00956-z
10
NeumannP.KoenigerN.KoenigerG.TingekS.KrygerP.MoritzR. F. A. (2000). Home-site fidelity in migratory honeybees. Nature406 (6795), 474–475. doi: 10.1038/35020193
11
PaarJ.OldroydB. P.KastbergerG. (2000). Giant honeybees return to their nest sites. Nature406 (6795), 475–475. doi: 10.1038/35020196
12
RobinsonW. S. (2021). Surfing the sweet wave: migrating giant honey bees (Hymenoptera / Apidae / Apis dorsata) display spatial and temporal fidelity to annual stopover site in Thailand. J. Insect Sci.21 (6), 1. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieab037
13
ShakilM. (2015). The modeling of predator-prey interactions. Available at: http://www.iaees.org/publications/journals/nb/articles/2015-5(2)/modeling-predator-prey-interactions.pdf (Accessed March 4, 2025).
14
WarritN.AscherJ.BasuP.BelavadiV.BrockmannA.BuchoriD.et al. (2023). Opportunities and challenges in Asian bee research and conservation. Biol. Conserv.285, 110173. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110173
Summary
Keywords
giant honeybees, ecology, social behavior, systematics (Megapis), future research areas (giant honeybees), distribution of Apis laboriosa
Citation
Otis GW, Robinson WS, Brockmann A and Kastberger G (2025) Editorial: Biology of giant honeybees. Front. Bee Sci. 3:1572680. doi: 10.3389/frbee.2025.1572680
Received
07 February 2025
Accepted
18 February 2025
Published
13 March 2025
Volume
3 - 2025
Edited and reviewed by
Susan E. Fahrbach, Wake Forest University, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Otis, Robinson, Brockmann and Kastberger.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gerald Kastberger, gerald.kastberger@uni-graz.at
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.