Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Behav. Neurosci.

Sec. Motivation and Reward

Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1643979

A rodent model of enhanced anticipation of positive events: Sex-specific enhancements in cognitive bias and emotional resilience

Provisionally accepted
Sarah  C HartvigsenSarah C Hartvigsen1*Megan  HooperMegan Hooper1Olivia  HardingOlivia Harding1Evelyn  BarringerEvelyn Barringer1Isabel  DilandroIsabel Dilandro1Aditya  NarayananAditya Narayanan1Brendan  CrockettBrendan Crockett1Yulia  ShatalovYulia Shatalov1Bella  TomeBella Tome1Paean  LubyPaean Luby1Braden  WixtedBraden Wixted1Molly  KentMolly Kent2Kelly  LambertKelly Lambert1*
  • 1University of Richmond Department of Psychology, Richmond, United States
  • 2Virginia Military Institute Biology Department, Lexington, VA, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

While it is known that chronic unpredictable stress and negative events adversely affect neurobiological outcomes, much less is known regarding the neurobiological impact of positive emotions such as chronic anticipation of appetitive events. From a translational perspective, an enhanced understanding of the impact of extended exposure to positive emotions may provide novel insights into effective non-pharmacological, behavior-based approaches to enhance mental resilience. Here, we investigate a novel rodent model of chronic Unpredictable Positive Event Response (UPER) training in male and female Long Evans rats to examine behavioral, neural, and endocrine effects of enhanced anticipation of positive events. Rats were exposed to either three weeks of daily, randomly administered, cued positive events (UPER training) or exposure to the same positive events administered at the same time (i.e. in a predictable manner) each day to control for anticipation (Enriched Control Training; ENR). Following UPER and ENR training, rats were assessed for cognitive bias, exploratory behaviors, and persistence in a Cognitive Bias Assessment paradigm, Novelty-Suppressed Feeding Task, and an Unattainable Puzzle Reward Task, respectively. In the Cognitive Bias Assessment, a trend for UPER-trained males to respond with an optimistic bias was observed. A main effect of training was observed in the Unattainable Puzzle Reward Task, with UPER-trained rats exhibiting reduced latency to interact with the novel object. A sex-dependent latency to consume a food reward in a Novelty-Suppressed Feeding Task was also seen. Focusing on fecal corticosterone metabolite (FCM) levels following anticipation-enhanced versus anticipation-minimized training, UPER-trained rats exhibited a trend for lower levels than ENR-trained rats. No c-fos activation differences were observed between the groups. Overall, these preliminary findings suggest that anticipation for positive events may have sex-specific effects on emotional responses to uncertain events. Accordingly, further research may determine relevance of this model in preclinical models of psychiatric diseases.

Keywords: anticipation, cognitive bias, sex differences, positive events, emotional regulation

Received: 09 Jun 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hartvigsen, Hooper, Harding, Barringer, Dilandro, Narayanan, Crockett, Shatalov, Tome, Luby, Wixted, Kent and Lambert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Sarah C Hartvigsen, sarah.c.hart@richmond.edu
Kelly Lambert, klambert@richmond.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.