ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Behav. Neurosci.
Sec. Behavioral Endocrinology
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1649660
This article is part of the Research TopicAnimal Models of Anxiety and Depression: Exploring the Underlying Mechanisms of Sex Differences - Volume IIView all 8 articles
Sub-chronic stress exerts partially distinct behavioral and epigenetic effects in male and female mice
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Villanova University, Villanova, North Carolina, United States
- 2Departments of Biology and Psychological and Brain Sciences, Villanova University, Villanova, North Carolina, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Stress-related disorders, such as major depression, anxiety disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder, lead to considerable disease burden and are notoriously difficult to treat. These disorders are characterized by striking sex differences, but the neurobiological underpinnings of the disparities in mental health between men and women remain largely undefined. With an improved understanding of the biological factors that promote or protect against psychopathology, it may become possible to design interventions that enhance resilience. Preclinical research using rodent models can provide fundamental insight into potential sex differences in the neurobiological consequences of stress, which could have important implications for our understanding of stress-related disorders. Towards this end, the current work compared stress-induced alterations in DNA methylation and behavior in male and female c57BL/6 mice. The results indicate that exposure to five days of mild stress induces behavioral dysfunction in the light-dark emergence, open field, and effort-related reward choice tests. Statistical analyses using two-way ANOVAs revealed that although some of the effects of stress in the light-dark emergence test were specific to females, both sexes were susceptible to several behavioral consequences of this stress paradigm. Stress was also shown to decrease global DNA methylation in the nucleus accumbens one week following the end of stress exposure in both sexes, but no significant effects were observed two hours following stress. In the hippocampus, no global DNA methylation differences were observed at either time point. Targeted evaluations using methylation-specific PCR revealed sex differences in stress-induced changes in DNA methylation at sites in the prodynorphin and inhibitory kappa B kinase beta genes in the nucleus accumbens. In contrast, no significant sex-by-stress interactions were observed for methylation changes in the hippocampus, although stress significantly increased DNA methylation of prodynorphin and inhibitory kappa B kinase beta two hours after the final stress exposure and reduced methylation of the NEMO and D2 dopamine receptor genes one week following stress. Overall, these findings provide further evidence of sex differences in stress susceptibility and suggest that sex differences in epigenetic adaptations to stress could contribute to the partially distinct behavioral outcomes of stress in males and females.
Keywords: light-dark emergence, open field, effort-related reward choice tests, Prodynorphin, inhibitory kappa B kinase beta genes, NEMO, D2 dopamine receptor genes, light-dark emergence (LDE)
Received: 18 Jun 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Domanico, Stevens, Wainston, Khoo, Mccall, Swack and Sachs. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Benjamin D. Sachs, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Villanova University, Villanova, 27710, North Carolina, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.