DATA REPORT article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 17 January 2017

Sec. Bioenergy and Biofuels

Volume 4 - 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2016.00100

The Chlorella vulgaris S-Nitrosoproteome under Nitrogen-Replete and -Deplete Conditions

  • CA

    Calvin A. Henard *

  • MT

    Michael T. Guarnieri

  • EP

    Eric P. Knoshaug

  • National Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA

Article metrics

View details

15

Citations

4,8k

Views

1,2k

Downloads

Oleaginous microalgae synthesize and accumulate large quantities of lipids that are promising feedstocks for the production of biofuels (Hu et al., 2008; Williams and Laurens, 2010; Day et al., 2012; Quinn and Davis, 2015). The algal species Chlorella vulgaris accumulates triacylglycerides that dominate its cellular composition (>60% lipid based on dry cell weight) when cultured in medium lacking a nitrogen source (Guarnieri et al., 2011; Ikaran et al., 2015), which is a “lipid trigger” in an array of microalgae. As such, C. vulgaris represents a model algal species for examination of lipid accumulation mechanisms and a potential deployment organism in industrial algal biofuels applications. C. vulgaris has been extensively characterized biochemically and physiologically (Converti et al., 2009; Liang et al., 2009), and de novo-generated transcriptomic and proteomic datasets have indicated that post-transcriptional and -translational mechanisms likely govern lipid accumulation in response to nitrogen starvation (Guarnieri et al., 2011, 2013). However, the specific mechanisms underlying lipid biosynthesis in response to nitrogen stress remain elusive.

Nitric oxide (NO) has received much attention as a signaling molecule due to its ability to react specifically with a limited number of biomolecules, primarily mediating physiological changes by modifying proteins in diverse domains of life, including plants, animals, and prokaryotes. This diatomic radical targets [Fe–S] clusters of dehydratases in several central metabolic pathways and can react with redox active sulfhydryls in cysteines to produce S-nitrosothiols. Protein S-nitrosylation by NO has been shown to play important roles in an array of cellular responses in organisms ranging from prokaryotes to metazoans. Previous studies have identified several proteins as targets of NO in higher plants, confirming S-nitrosylation as a key post-translational mechanism governing cell signaling in these organisms (Zaffagnini et al., 2016). Additional studies in the green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii have identified hundreds of S-nitrosylated proteins after treatment with S-nitrosoglutathione (Samuel et al., 2014), supporting S-nitrosylation as a widespread post-translational mechanism employed by autotrophic organisms.

Based on the nitrate reductase-dependent NO production observed in higher plants and microalgae (Sakihama et al., 2002; Mur et al., 2013), we evaluated whether NO is produced by C. vulgaris when cultured in medium with nitrate as the sole nitrogen source. Using the NO-reactive fluorophore 4,5-diaminofluorescein, we detected NO produced by C vulgaris during logarithmic growth in modified Bold’s Basal Medium (BBM) supplemented with 3 mM sodium nitrate (Figure 1). The NO detected in algae exposed to nitrite in acidified BMM (pH 4.5), a condition that non-enzymatically generates high concentrations of NO congeners (Henard et al., 2014), was 10-fold higher than the concentration endogenously produced by this organism under nitrogen-replete growth (Figure 1A). NO was detected throughout the cell cytoplasm of cells grown in the presence of acidified nitrite, with more intense staining observed in the chloroplast (Figure 1B).

Figure 1

To assess whether the nitrate-derived NO is biologically active, we determined the S-nitrosoproteome of C. vulgaris in the presence or absence of nitrate. The biotin switch method identified 40 proteins that are endogenously S-nitrosylated in C. vulgaris during active growth (Table 1, nitrogen replete). S-nitrosylated proteins were identified from a variety of metabolic pathways including photosynthesis and light capture, the Calvin–Benson cycle and carbon capture, protein synthesis, the TCA cycle, stress response, fatty acid biosynthesis, and cell structure. Several of the S-nitrosylated proteins identified here have confirmed orthologous targets of NO in diverse organisms, including plants and algae (Zaffagnini et al., 2016). Interestingly, 80% of the S-nitrosothiols detected during active growth were undetected under nitrogen starvation (Table 1, nitrogen deplete) with only 9 of the 40 proteins identified as being S-nitrosylated during nitrogen-replete conditions still identified during nitrogen starvation conditions. Collectively, the decrease in S-nitrosylated proteins identified under nitrogen starvation suggests S-nitrosylation occurs primarily during growth in a nitrogen-replete environment, presumably due to nitrate reductase-mediated NO production. Several proteins identified here have been previously identified as S-nitrosylated in plants, mammals, and prokaryotes in the presence of exogenous NO donors; however, our data represent targets S-nitrosylated by endogenously produced NO via nitrate metabolism.

Table 1

Replete
Deplete
Scaffold.geneBLASTP matche ValueMolecular weight (kDa)# unique peptides% coverage# unique peptides% coverage# cysteine residues
Photosynthesis
291.25Photosystem I subunit VII3.80E−5293389
432.15Chlorophyll a/b-binding protein1.00E−152274422
772.94Chloroplast light-harvesting complex II protein precursor0.00E+0052728482
1102.1Photosystem I p700 chlorophyll a apoprotein a10.00E+008333224
1102.11Photosystem I p700 apoprotein a20.00E+0070353
1102.7Photosystem II 47 kDa protein0.00E+0056583
1280.117Photosystem I subunit chloroplast precursor8.20E−90202113
1313.7Photosystem I light-harvesting protein5.20E−133284183
1313.76Photosystem I light-harvesting protein1.80E−130232111
1504.25Chlorophyll a/b binding2.30E−15831261
1611.13Photosystem I subunit XI precursor5.20E−98462711
1615.55Porphobilinogen deaminase0.00E+00385
1759.19Photosystem I light-harvesting protein1.10E−12679225
2265.19Photosystem II oxygen-evolving complex2.10E−81262100
2779.8Light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein1.20E−155274193151
Calvin–Benson cycle/carbon capture and concentration
101.72Phosphoglycerate kinase0.00E+0049383
669.32Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase0.00E+00438244
971.4Low-CO2 inducible protein0.00E+005562231210
1137.114Transketolase0.00E+0077359
1250.71Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase type I0.00E+003829295
1605.9Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase type I8.60E−125225332122
1655.2Ribulose bisphosphate small subunit precursor7.60E−84155442204
1691.8Fructose bisphosphate aldolase0.00E+00416184
Protein synthesis
352.92Glutamine synthetase0.00E+00422810
355.1Elongation factor tu0.00E+00453102
407.59Choline dehydrogenase0.00E+0064247
564.10760S ribosomal protein4.30E−107172173
759.8Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 20.00E+0049163971710
835.5Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase0.00E+001172217
1136.46Elongation factor 20.00E+00682416
1412.67Homocysteine S-methyltransferase0.00E+001092420
2123.11Glutamate-1-semialdehyde-aminomutase0.00E+00473107
TCA cycle/energy generation
291.19ATP synthase CF1-beta subunit0.00E+00495183
291.6ATP synthase CF1 alpha subunit0.00E+00554111
1889.22Dihydrolipoyl (dihydrolipamide) dehydrogenase0.00E+0053256
Stress response/signaling cascades
545.25l-Ascorbate peroxidase1.20E−15343289
1123.1Calcium calmodulin-dependent protein kinase3.50E−100252131
1196.84Hop-interacting protein thi0451.80E−110258453182
Fatty acid biosynthesis
2978.6Biotin carboxylase2.40E−164312102
Cell maintenance and growth
439.32Beta-tubulin0.00E+00473813

Chlorella vulgaris S-nitrosylated proteins under nitrate-replete and -deplete conditions.

S-nitrosylation of proteins identified here could have direct roles in lipid accumulation in C. vulgaris. The differential S-nitrosylation of biotin carboxylase observed during nitrogen-deplete and -replete conditions may play a direct role in C. vulgaris lipid accumulation. Biotin carboxylase is a subunit of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) complex and production of malonyl-CoA by this enzyme complex is considered the first committing step in lipid triacylglycerol (TAG) biosynthesis. We previously noted that this enzyme is upregulated during nitrogen starvation (Guarnieri et al., 2013), but, interestingly, we only detected S-nitrosylated biotin carboxylase during growth in the presence of nitrate. We should note that since biotin is a cofactor utilized by this enzyme, it is possible that even in the absence of being S-nitrosylated, it can potentially bind to the streptavidin matrix and be enriched with S-nitrosothiols during the biotin switch assay. However, although biotin carboxylase is upregulated during nitrogen starvation, we did not detect this enzyme under nitrogen-deplete conditions, indicating that its enrichment in nitrogen-replete samples was not simply biotinylated enzyme. Given the low level of neutral lipids produced during nitrogen-replete growth, biotin carboxylase represents a potential protein-engineering target to improve TAG accumulation during active growth.

Dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase (DHLD) functions as a subunit in the α-ketoacid dehydrogenase complexes. As a subunit in the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex, DHLD is involved in converting pyruvate to acetyl-CoA and has been implemented in increasing lipid production by providing additional lipid precursors (acetyl-CoA) in Chlorella protothecoides grown heterotrophically on sugarcane bagasse hydrolyzate (Mu et al., 2015). DHLD has also been shown to be S-nitrosylated in plants responding to pathogens, cold, and abiotic stress (Maldonado-Alconada et al., 2011; Ortega-Galisteo et al., 2012; Puyaubert et al., 2014). As with biotin carboxylase, DHLD is only S-nitrosylated during nitrogen-replete growth and represents another potential target for protein engineering to eliminate the negative effects of S-nitrosylation on this enzyme.

Six enzymes involved in the Calvin cycle were identified as S-nitrosylated including ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase, phosphoglycerate kinase, three isozymes of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GAPDH), and fructose bisphoshate aldolase (FBA). GAPDH has been previously reported to be S-nitrosylated in plants responding to cold, ozone, high light, salt, or pathogen-induced stress (Maldonado-Alconada et al., 2011; Astier and Lindermayr, 2012; Puyaubert et al., 2014; Vanzo et al., 2014). GAPDH regulation in response to nitrogen stress in C. vulgaris appears to be quite complex as its three isozymes are differentially regulated, one is downregulated, while the other two are upregulated during nitrogen stress (Guarnieri et al., 2013). Interestingly, S-nitrosylation of GAPDH has been shown to inhibit this enzyme and cause a shift in its activity where it localizes to the nucleus and acts as an S-nitrosylase and S-nitrosylates other target proteins (Astier and Lindermayr, 2012; Zaffagnini et al., 2013). Thus, S-nitrosylated GAPDH could mediate global transcriptional and metabolic regulatory alterations in C. vulgaris. We also identified FBA as S-nitrosylated under nitrogen-replete growth. In Arabidopsis, FBA is important for modulating stress responses and is inhibited by S-nitrosylation (van der Linde et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2012). Together with the inhibition of GAPDH, FBA inhibition could result in increased carbon flux through the oxidative branch of the pentose phosphate pathway under nitrogen-replete growth.

These data support endogenously produced NO during nitrate metabolism as a potential signaling molecule and indicate that protein S-nitrosylation could be a common post-translational modification utilized by C. vulgaris to regulate responses to nitrogen availability. Interestingly, a significant percentage (30%) of the S-nitrosylated proteins are differentially regulated under nitrogen-replete and nitrogen-deplete conditions (Guarnieri et al., 2013), suggesting that NO might be a key post-translational regulator of lipid biosynthesis in C. vulgaris. Collectively, the data presented here provide insight into the physiological role of S-nitrosylation as it relates to lipid accumulation, which can inform C. vulgaris engineering strategies to enable algae-based biofuels.

Materials and Methods

Culture Conditions and Biotin Switch

Chlorella vulgaris UTEX395 was grown in BBM supplemented with 3 mM NaNO3 to an OD750nm of 2 as previously described (Guarnieri et al., 2011). Equal concentrations of logarithmically growing cells were harvested, washed in nitrate-free BBM, suspended in BBM with or without 3 mM NaNO3 to OD750nm = 2.0, and grown in 500 mL shake flasks. After 24 h of incubation, whole cell lysates were prepared and enriched for S-nitrosylated proteins using the biotin switch pull-down assay as previously described (Jaffrey and Snyder, 2001; Forrester et al., 2009).

Fluorometric Detection of NO

Chlorella vulgaris grown in BBM with 3 mM NaNO3 to an OD750nm of 2 were pelleted, washed 2× in nitrate-free BMM, and resuspended at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL in BBM pH 4.5 supplemented with 1 mM NaNO2 or NaNO3 for 1 h. After treatment, equal concentrations of NaNO2-treated, NaNO3-treated, and untreated cells were stained with 4,5-diaminofluorescein (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) to detect nitric oxide production fluorometrically.

Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Peptides were purified and concentrated using an online enrichment column (Thermo Scientific 5 µm, 100 µm ID × 2 cm C18 column). Subsequent chromatographic separation was performed on a reverse phase nanospray column (Thermo Scientific EASYnano-LC, 3 µm, 75 µm ID × 100 mm C18 column) using a 30 min linear gradient from 10–30% buffer B (100% ACN, 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 400 nL/min. Peptides were eluted directly into the mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Velos) and spectra were collected over a m/z range of 400–2000 Da using a dynamic exclusion limit of two MS/MS spectra of a given peptide mass for 30 s (exclusion duration of 90 s). The instrument was operated in Orbitrap-LTQ mode where precursor measurements were acquired in the orbitrap (60,000 resolution) and MS/MS spectra (top 20) were acquired in the LTQ ion trap with a normalized collision energy of 35 kV. Compound lists of the resulting spectra were generated using Xcalibur 2.2 software (Thermo Scientific) with an S/N threshold of 1.5 and 1 scan/group.

Protein Identification

Tandem mass spectra were extracted, charge state deconvoluted and deisotoped by ProteoWizard (MS-Convert) version 3.0. All MS/MS samples were analyzed using Mascot (Matrix Science, London, UK; version 2.3.02). Mascot was set up to search the Cv395_Maker_7100_peps database (unknown version, 7,100 entries) assuming the digestion enzyme trypsin. Mascot was searched with a fragment ion mass tolerance of 0.80 Da and a parent ion tolerance of 20 ppm. Oxidation of methionine and carbamidomethyl of cysteine were specified in Mascot as variable modifications. Scaffold (version Scaffold_4.3.2, Proteome Software Inc., Portland, OR, USA) was used to validate MS/MS-based peptide and protein identifications. Peptide identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 85.0% probability by the Peptide Prophet algorithm (Keller et al., 2002) with Scaffold delta-mass correction. Protein identifications were accepted if they could be established at greater than 80.0% probability and contained at least one identified peptide. Protein probabilities were assigned by the Protein Prophet algorithm (Nesvizhskii et al., 2003). Proteins that contained similar peptides and could not be differentiated based on MS/MS analysis alone were grouped to satisfy the principles of parsimony. All identified peptides had a >95% probability of correct identification based on a BLASTP search of the predicted peptides against the predicted proteins present in the draft C. vulgaris genome (Accession#: LDKB01000000). S-nitrosylated targets identified here under nitrogen-deplete and -replete conditions are presented in Table 1 and deposited as an excel file at Figshare at the following link: https://figshare.com/s/39ea5540257b0efa9d5d.

Quality Control

Instrument functionality and stability was monitored using the MassQC software (Proteome Software). This software uses a set of quantitative metrics developed by the National Institute of Science and Technology in collaboration with the National Cancer Institute’s Clinical Proteomic Technologies for Cancer (CPTC) that monitor technical variability in mass spectrometry-based proteomics instrumentation. Quality control samples containing a mixture of six trypsin digested bovine proteins were injected at least once every 24 h throughout the analysis, and the data from this run were analyzed using the MassQC software. Values for all metrics were within normal limits throughout the duration of the experiment indicating instrument stability and data robustness.

Statements

Author contributions

CH and EK designed experimental strategies. CH performed experiments and CH, MG, and EK analyzed data. CH, MG, and EK wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). This work was also supported in part by the Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under Agreement No. 28812.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Colorado State University Proteomics and Metabolomics Facility for assistance with the mass spectrometry analysis and subsequent protein identification.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    AstierJ.LindermayrC. (2012). Nitric oxide-dependent posttranslational modification in plants: an update. Int. J. Mol. Sci.13, 1519315208.10.3390/ijms131115193

  • 2

    ConvertiA.CasazzaA. A.OrtizE. Y.PeregoP.Del BorghiM. (2009). Effect of temperature and nitrogen concentration on the growth and lipid content of Nannochloropsis oculata and Chlorella vulgaris for biodiesel production. Chem. Eng. Process.48, 11461151.10.1016/j.cep.2009.03.006

  • 3

    DayJ. G.SlocombeS. P.StanleyM. S. (2012). Overcoming biological constraints to enable the exploitation of microalgae for biofuels. Bioresour. Technol.109, 245251.10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.033

  • 4

    ForresterM. T.FosterM. W.BenharM.StamlerJ. S. (2009). Detection of protein S-nitrosylation with the biotin-switch technique. Free Radic. Biol. Med.46, 119126.10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.09.034

  • 5

    GuarnieriM. T.NagA.SmolinskiS. L.DarzinsA.SeibertM.PienkosP. T. (2011). Examination of triacylglycerol biosynthetic pathways via de novo transcriptomic and proteomic analyses in an unsequenced microalga. PLoS ONE6:e25851.10.1371/journal.pone.0025851

  • 6

    GuarnieriM. T.NagA.YangS.PienkosP. T. (2013). Proteomic analysis of Chlorella vulgaris: potential targets for enhanced lipid accumulation. J. Proteomics93, 245253.10.1016/j.jprot.2013.05.025

  • 7

    HenardC. A.TapscottT.CrawfordM. A.HusainM.DouliasP.-T.PorwollikS.et al (2014). The 4-cysteine zinc-finger motif of the RNA polymerase regulator DksA serves as a thiol switch for sensing oxidative and nitrosative stress. Mol. Microbiol.91, 790804.10.1111/mmi.12498

  • 8

    HuQ.SommerfeldM.JarvisE.GhirardiM.PosewitzM.SeibertM.et al (2008). Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: perspectives and advances. Plant J.54, 621639.10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03492.x

  • 9

    IkaranZ.Suárez-AlvarezS.UrretaI.CastañónS. (2015). The effect of nitrogen limitation on the physiology and metabolism of Chlorella vulgaris var L3. Algal Res.10, 134144.10.1016/j.algal.2015.04.023

  • 10

    JaffreyS. R.SnyderS. H. (2001). The biotin switch method for the detection of S-nitrosylated proteins. Sci. STKE2001, pl1.10.1126/stke.2001.86.pl1

  • 11

    KellerA.NesvizhskiiA. I.KolkerE.AebersoldR. (2002). Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem.74, 53835392.10.1021/ac025747h

  • 12

    LiangY.SarkanyN.CuiY. (2009). Biomass and lipid productivities of Chlorella vulgaris under autotrophic, heterotrophic and mixotrophic growth conditions. Biotechnol. Lett.31, 10431049.10.1007/s10529-009-9975-7

  • 13

    LuW.TangX.HuoY.XuR.QiS.HuangJ.et al (2012). Identification and characterization of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase genes in Arabidopsis reveal a gene family with diverse responses to abiotic stresses. Gene503, 6574.10.1016/j.gene.2012.04.042

  • 14

    Maldonado-AlconadaA. M.Echevarría-ZomeñoS.LindermayrC.Redondo-LópezI.DurnerJ.Jorrín-NovoJ. V. (2011). Proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis protein S-nitrosylation in response to inoculation with Pseudomonas syringae. Acta Physiol. Plant.33, 14931514.10.1007/s11738-010-0688-2

  • 15

    MuJ.LiS.ChenD.XuH.HanF.FengB.et al (2015). Enhanced biomass and oil production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate (SBH) by heterotrophic oleaginous microalga Chlorella protothecoides. Bioresour. Technol.185, 99105.10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.082

  • 16

    MurL. A. J.MandonJ.PersijnS.CristescuS. M.MoshkovI. E.NovikovaG. V.et al (2013). Nitric oxide in plants: an assessment of the current state of knowledge. AoB Plants5, pls052.10.1093/aobpla/pls052

  • 17

    NesvizhskiiA. I.KellerA.KolkerE.AebersoldR. (2003). A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.75, 46464658.10.1021/ac0341261

  • 18

    Ortega-GalisteoA. P.Rodríguez-SerranoM.PazmiñoD. M.GuptaD. K.SandalioL. M.Romero-PuertasM. C. (2012). S-Nitrosylated proteins in pea (Pisum sativum L.) leaf peroxisomes: changes under abiotic stress. J. Exp. Bot.63, 20892103.10.1093/jxb/err414

  • 19

    PuyaubertJ.FaresA.RézéN.PeltierJ.-B.BaudouinE. (2014). Identification of endogenously S-nitrosylated proteins in Arabidopsis plantlets: effect of cold stress on cysteine nitrosylation level. Plant Sci.21, 150156.10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.10.014

  • 20

    QuinnJ. C.DavisR. (2015). The potentials and challenges of algae based biofuels: a review of the techno-economic, life cycle, and resource assessment modeling. Bioresour. Technol.184, 444452.10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.075

  • 21

    SakihamaY.NakamuraS.YamasakiH. (2002). Nitric oxide production mediated by nitrate reductase in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: an alternative NO production pathway in photosynthetic organisms. Plant Cell Physiol.43, 290297.10.1093/pcp/pcf034

  • 22

    SamuelM.MirkoZ.Xing-HuangG.Lemaire StéphaneD.Marchand ChristopheH. (2014). Insight into protein S-nitrosylation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Antioxid. Redox Signal.21, 12711284.10.1089/ars.2013.5632

  • 23

    van der LindeK.GutscheN.LeffersH.-M.LindermayrC.MüllerB.HoltgrefeS.et al (2011). Regulation of plant cytosolic aldolase functions by redox-modifications. Plant Physiol. Biochem.49, 946957.10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.06.009

  • 24

    VanzoE.GhirardoA.Merl-PhamJ.LindermayrC.HellerW.HauckS. M.et al (2014). S-nitroso-proteome in poplar leaves in response to acute ozone stress. PLoS ONE9:e106886.10.1371/journal.pone.0106886

  • 25

    WilliamsP. J. B.LaurensL. M. L. (2010). Microalgae as biodiesel & biomass feedstocks: review & analysis of the biochemistry, energetics & economics. Energy Environ. Sci.3, 554590.10.1039/b924978h

  • 26

    ZaffagniniM.De MiaM.MorisseS.Di GiacintoN.MarchandC. H.MaesA.et al (2016). Protein S-nitrosylation in photosynthetic organisms: a comprehensive overview with future perspectives. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1864, 952966.10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.02.006

  • 27

    ZaffagniniM.MorisseS.BedhommeM.MarchandC. H.FestaM.RouhierN.et al (2013). Mechanisms of nitrosylation and denitrosylation of cytoplasmic glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase from Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem.288, 2277722789.10.1074/jbc.M113.475467

Summary

Keywords

Chlorella, biofuels, microalgae, S-nitrosylation, nitric oxide

Citation

Henard CA, Guarnieri MT and Knoshaug EP (2017) The Chlorella vulgaris S-Nitrosoproteome under Nitrogen-Replete and -Deplete Conditions. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 4:100. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00100

Received

04 November 2016

Accepted

27 December 2016

Published

17 January 2017

Volume

4 - 2016

Edited by

S. Venkata Mohan, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, India

Reviewed by

Yu-Shen Cheng, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan; G. Venkata Subhash, Reliance Industries, India

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Calvin A. Henard,

Specialty section: This article was submitted to Bioenergy and Biofuels, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics