Abstract
Polydopamine (PDA), the final oxidation product of dopamine or other catecholamines, attracted much attention as versatile coatings that can be used to cover the surface of almost all materials with a conformal layer of adjustable thickness ranging from a few to about 100 nm. These PDA layers can be subsequently modified with molecules carrying nucleophilic groups or with metallic nanoparticles from solutions containing metallic cations. However, during the deposition of PDA film on the surfaces, the reaction products that are simultaneously obtained from the oxidation of catecholamines in solution precipitate. Hence, some recent effort has been devoted to produce PDA in the form of nanoparticles. The aim of this short review is to give a comprehensive description of the synthesis methods yielding of PDA nanoparticles in the absence or in the presence of templating agents (polymers, polyelectrolytes, surfactants, proteins, and even some small organic molecules). We will also describe the use of thin PDA layers to coat already synthesized nanoparticles or nanotubes. Finally, several first applications of the obtained PDA nanoparticles will be described.
Oxidation of catecholamines and its consequences on surfaces and in solution
During the whole of the Twentieth century, guided by technological requirements, surface science was characterized by the development of surface modification methods, such as the protection against corrosion and the development of anti-adhesive coatings. It appeared that each kind of material required some specific functionalization chemistry. For instance, the noble metals can be functionalized by covalent bonds using alkanes modified with thiols (Ullmann, ). The oxides can be modified with silanes or phosphonates (Sagiv, ). The surface of polymer materials can be modified if the polymers carry reactive lateral side chains, but the chemical modification of the surface of polymeric materials can remain a challenge. The layer-by-layer deposition of polyelectrolyte multilayer films offers an interesting functionalization method of charged surfaces (Decher, ; Borges and Mano, ; Richardson et al., ) but it is not applicable on a number of materials. Moreover, the obtained coatings, even if their thickness can be finely tuned (by altering the number of deposition steps or the physicochemical parameters of the solution), are often not stable enough for long-term applications (though chemical crosslinking may reinforce these coatings). This is to say that the development of versatile coating methods that are able to functionalize on a vast repertoire of material surfaces, appearing possible with the development of catecholamine-based coatings, was a major advance in surface science (Lee et al., ; Kang et al., ; Hong et al., ). These coating methods rely on the oxidation of catecholamines, such as dopamine, norepinephrine, and L-DOPA (Jaber and Lambert, ), and their subsequent polymerization or self-assembly to a eumelanin-like material called “polydopamine” (PDA). The whole surface functionalization strategy relies on biomimetism: the proteins on the extremity of the mussel byssus are extremely rich in L-DOPA (up to 30 mol%) and L-Lysine residues (Lee et al., ). These specific amino acid residues, containing a catechol and an amine as functional groups in L-DOPA and L-Lysine, respectively, allow for a strong adhesion of the mussel to all kinds of substrates in a wet and slightly basic environment of sea water. The rationale behind the use of catecholamines to deposit the adhesive coatings on all kinds of materials was the simultaneous presence of a catechol and an amine functional group (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1
Most catecholamine-based coatings are produced from dopamine in the presence of Tris buffer at pH = 8.5, by using O2 dissolved in water as the oxidant. However, it was soon found that several other oxidants can be used as well, such as ammonium peroxodisulfate and sodium periodate (Wei et al., ), or UV irradiation to generate free radical species (Du et al., ). The used oxidant has a major impact on the kinetics of film deposition and on the film composition and structure. For instance, using sodium periodate as the oxidant leads to fast film growth with the possibility for the film to reach a thickness close to 100 nm, in about 2 h, in the presence of 2 mg mL−1 dopamine and 10 mM NaIO4 (Ponzio et al., ). On the other hand, in the presence of Tris buffer and O2 as the oxidant, the film thickness saturates at 40–45 nm after about 16 h of oxidation (Lee et al., ; Ponzio et al., ). The hydrophilic character of the PDA-NaIO4 films is markedly improved with respect to the PDA-O2 films (Figure 1).
Figure 1
There are therefore many kinds of PDA films depending on the synthesis conditions (d'Ischia et al.,
The PDA films can also be deposited at the water/air interface and transferred therefrom to solid substrates by the Langmuir–Schaeffer method (Ponzio et al.,
Even if there is a major uncertainty about the molecular structure of PDA and the related materials being either a polymer or a supramolecular aggregate, some strong arguments show the presence of non-covalently bound small oligomers of dopamine (Hong et al.,
Scheme 2

Chemical pathways leading to eumelanin (left column) and pheomelanin (right column) in living organisms. The first enzymatically catalyzed step is omitted in the synthesis of synthetic melanins. Reproduced from Ito (
When PDA is produced using the oxidants added in the solutions, the PDA films are deposited on the walls of the reaction beakers and on the substrates of interest, but some insoluble black precipitate, forming the main reaction product, is deposited at the bottom of the reaction vessel. This is a major drawback which can be avoided when dopamine is electropolymerized on the surface of a conductive material (Li et al.,
Polydopamine nanoparticles without templating agents
Interestingly, the eumelanin grains synthesized from L-Dopa show a pH-dependent size and a pH-dependent fractal dimension. The size of these nanoparticles decreases with an increase in the pH, with the possibility to reach the range of tens of nanometers at pH 10 (Bridelli,
Figure 2

Hydrodynamic radius (left hand vertical scale,
) and fractal dimension (right hand vertical scale,
) of eumelanin grains obtained at the end of the reaction kinetics from L-DOPA solutions, as function of the pH. Reproduced from Bridelli (
In analogy with the Stöber process to synthesize silica nanoparticles from silicon alkoxydes via hydrolysis and condensation in ethanol-water mixtures and in the presence of ammonia as a catalyst, the PDA nanoparticles in the diameter range of 100 nm and 200 nm could be obtained (Ju et al.,
The synthesis of PDA nanoparticles was further improved with the use of water-ethanol mixtures by adding ammonia as a catalyst in the dopamine containing solvent (Liu et al.,
Very small PDA nanoparticles, with diameters of only a few nanometers, can be synthesized by anodic microplasma electrochemistry (Wang et al.,
Similar PDA nanoparticles with excitation wavelength-dependent emission spectra have been described (Zhang et al.,
The Fe3+ cations can be directly incorporated in the PDA nanoparticles (Li et al.,
Of course, the already formed nanoparticles can be coated with thin PDA films. This concept has been applied to produce hollow PDA capsules (Postma et al.,
Tip-sonication of a dopamine-hydrochloride solution containing AgNO3 or CuSO4 at the location of the solution/n-decane interface produces metal-composite PDA nanoparticles. Carrying out sonication (150 W.cm−2 at 20 kHz) for 6 min produces Cu-PDA nanoparticles and Ag-PDA nanoparticles having a diameter of (259 ± 31) nm and (295 ± 38) nm, respectively. On using a mixture of CuSO4 and AgNO3 during the synthesis, the obtained particles had an average diameter of (270 + 28) nm after the same sonication step (Yeroslavsky et al.,
Finally, the hydroxyl radical induced degradation of the already formed polydopamine produces extremely small (with diameter in nanometers) fluorescent PDA-based dots (Lin et al.,
Polydopamine nanoparticles and nanotubes with templating agents
When considering the size distribution of eumelanin grains in the skin, it immediately appears that they are constituted from aggregates of uniform nanoparticles of 100–200 nm, which in turn are constituted from smaller aggregates (Clancy and Simon,
Figure 3

Hydrodynamic diameter (A) and zeta potential (B) of PDA particles obtained after 24 h of dopamine oxidation (2 mg.mL−1 in the presence of 50 mM Tris buffer at pH = 8.5) as a function of the PAH concentration in the reaction medium. The error bars correspond to one standard deviation on the mean (n = 10 measurements). The black dashed line in (B) corresponds to the zero value of the zeta potential and is aimed to guide the eye. The vertical red dashed line corresponds to the PAH concentration (0.7 mg.mL−1) above which the PDA particles remain stable, without phase separation, even after prolonged storage. The inset in (A) corresponds to a picture of the PDA containing solutions taken 7 days after the completion of the oxygenation of the dopamine solutions in the presence or in the absence of PAH as indicated with blue arrows. (C)13C CP-MAS Spectra of the PAH-only sample (red curve), PAH-PDA (blue curve), and pristine PDA (green curve). The PAH concentration was 2 mg.mL−1 in the synthesis batch as well as in the reference PAH solution. Data have been taken from Mateescu et al. (
Proteins such as human serum albumin (HSA) speed up the production rate of PDA in solution, as evaluated by means of UV-vis spectroscopy (Figure 4A), and reduce the hydrodynamic diameter of the PDA nanoparticles after 24 h of oxidation in the presence of 50 mM Tris buffer at pH = 8.5 (dissolved O2 being the oxidant) (Figure 4B). Similar to polycations (Mateescu et al.,
Figure 4

(A) Absorbance at λ = 350 nm vs. time for dopamine solutions placed in oxidizing conditions (in the presence of O2 from the air and at pH = 8.5, 50 mM Tris buffer) in the absence of HSA (
) and in the presence of HAS at various concentrations: 0.2 mg.mL−1 (
), 1 mg.mL−1 (
), and 2 mg.mL−1 (
). The horizontal dashed line corresponds to the saturation absorption at the end of the oxidation kinetics of dopamine. (B) Hydrodynamic diameter of PDA particles synthesized for 24 h from a 2 mg.mL−1 dopamine solution (50 mM Tris buffer at pH = 8.5) in the presence of HSA at different concentrations (
). Hydrodynamic diameter of PDA particles prepared in the same conditions as previously described and stored in a closed bottle (without refreshed air) for 3 months before characterization by dynamic light scattering (
). Reproduced from Chassepot and Ball (
Some proteins, such as bovine pancreatic alkaline phosphatase, allow for a similar protein concentration-dependent control in the size of PDA nanoparticles whereas other proteins (such as hen egg white lysozyme and bovine α-lactalbumin) do not control the size of the PDA aggregates (leading to precipitation after a few hours of oxidation) and do not impede the deposition of PDA films on solid/liquid interfaces. The reason why some proteins control the formation of well-defined colloidal PDA nanoparticles, while some others do not influence the oxidative self-assembly process, remains to be investigated from a fundamental point of view.
Smaller molecules, such as folic acid (Yu et al.,
It has also been found that the surfactants, such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HTAB), enable the acceleration of the oxidation process of dopamine and a progressive reduction of the size of the obtained PDA aggregates. When the surfactant concentration is increased, these PDA particles finally reach a hydrodynamic diameter that is slightly larger than the hydrodynamic diameter of the surfactant micelles obtained above the critical micellar concentration of the surfactant (Figure 5A) (Ponzio et al.,
Figure 5

(A) Evolution of the hydrodynamic diameter of PDA aggregates as a function of the surfactant concentration in the case of SDS (
), HTAB (
), and Triton X-100 (
). The dopamine concentration was 2 mg.mL−1 in the presence of 50 mM Tris buffer at pH = 8.5 in all experiments. The long-dashed lines in the upper part of the figure correspond to the size of the PDA prepared in the absence of surfactant, whereas the short-dashed lines in the lower part of the figure corresponds to the size of the surfactant micelles [measured in the case of SDS (
) and HTAB (
)]. (B) Relative deposition of PDA films as calculated by dividing the thickness of the PDA films, obtained on silicon in the presence of a surfactant, by the film thickness obtained in the absence of a surfactant. The film thickness was obtained by means of single wavelength ellipsometry fixing the complex refractive index of PDA to 1.73 ± 0.02i at λ = 632.8 nm. The deposition of PDA on silicon was investigated in the presence of different concentrations of SDS (___
___), HTAB (
), sodium octylsulfate (
), and Triton X-100 (
). The error bars are calculated from the standard errors on the film thickness produced both in the absence and presence of surfactants. The long-dashed line has the same significance as in (A). Reproduced from Ponzio et al. (
It was also found that some uncharged surfactants (such as Triton X100) and negatively charged surfactants with shorter alkyl chains (such as octyl sulfate) do not control the formation of PDA (Figure 5).
The triblock F127 copolymer with 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (TMB) incorporated in the hydrophobic propylene oxide core of the micelles produced mesoporous PDA particles about 90–100 nm in diameter with a porous size distribution depending on the TMB/F127 ratio after the removal of the F127-TMB core (Chen et al.,
Overall, the main synthesis strategies of PDA nanomaterial synthesis, either with or without templates, are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
| Main idea of the PDA nanomaterial synthesis | With or without templates and average size of the obtained nanomaterials | References |
|---|---|---|
| Water/ethanol mixtures Ammonia as a catalyst | Without template 100–200 nm | Ju et al., |
| Microplasma electrochemistry at the water/air interface | Without template About 3 nm | Wang et al., |
| Dopamine, glutaraldehyde (for 12 h), reduction with NaBH4 (for 2 h), finally ammonium hydroxide and mercaptoethanol (for 30 min) | Without template Only a few dopamine units | Xiong et al., |
| Incorporation of metallic actions in the PDA nanoparticles | Without template About 100–200 nm | Li et al., |
| PDA deposition on sacrificial nanorods or microparticles | Wall thickness of PDA between 13 and 75 nm | Postma et al., |
| Hydroxyl radical induced degradation of larger polydopamine | Without template A few nanometers in diameter | Lin et al., |
| Tip sonication at the aqueous solution/n-decane interface | Without template Between 250 and 300 nm with incorporated metals | Yeroslavsky et al., |
| Dopamine oxidation in the presence of synthetic polymers, polyelectrolytes | With templates Tens to hundreds of nanometers | Arzillo et al., |
| Dopamine oxidation in the presence of specific proteins | With templates Diameter depending on the initial protein/dopamine ratio | Chassepot and Ball, |
| Dopamine oxidation in the presence of DNA origamis | With templates A few nanometers in diameter | Tokura et al., |
| Using π stacking interactions with folic acid, optimal reaction temperature at 60°C | With templates Obtention of PDA nanofibers | Yu et al., |
| Dopamine oxidation in the presence of surfactants or block copolymer micelles | With templates Possibility to use the size of the template to control the diameter of the PDA-based material | Ponzio et al., |
Summary of the major synthesis protocols of PDA nanomaterials.
Applications of polydopamine nanoparticles
The applications of PDA nanoparticles are by far less developed in comparison to those of PDA-based films owing to the recent development of the synthesis methods of these nanoparticles as described in sections Polydopamine Nanoparticles Without Templating Agents and Polydopamine Nanoparticles and Nanotubes with Templating Agents.
PDA nanoparticles in thin films
PDA nanoparticles with a diameter of (146 ± 15) nm were synthesized in a water-ethanol mixture in the presence of ammonia and self-assembled via the vertical evaporation technique to obtain films displaying structural colors (Xiao et al.,
PDA-based particles can be deposited in alternation with polycations, such as poly (diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride) (PDADMAC), using the layer by layer deposition method (Decher,
Figure 6

(A) Thickness of (PDADMAC-PDA)n multilayer films deposited on silicon slides as measured by single wavelength ellipsometry (circles) and linear regressions to the data (lines). The error bars represent one standard deviation over 5 measurements taken on the same sample. (
), Films deposited immediately after the end of the 24 h dopamine oxidation (2 mg.mL−1 at pH = 8.5), (
), film deposited after 3.5 days of aging of the PDA suspension. Inset: Slope of the thickness vs. the number of layer pairs as a function of the aging time of the PDA suspension before deposition of the (PDADMAC-PDA)n film. (B) UV-visible spectra of the (PDADMAC-PDA)n films for n = 2 (black solid line), n = 4 (black long-dashed line), n = 6 (red solid line), and n = 8 (blue solid line). For these experiments, the PDA containing suspension was aged for 24 h before the film deposition. The inset displays the absorbance at λ = 589 nm as a function of the number of deposited layer pairs. The straight line and the dashed lines correspond to a linear regression to the data and to the limits of the 95% confidence interval, respectively. (C) AFM topographies of a (PDADMAC-PDA)10 film prepared using a PDA containing solution aged for 3 days before film deposition. Reproduced from Bernsmann et al. (
PDA nanomaterials as a sensing platform
An emerging trend is the use of PDA nanoparticles as sensors. PDA by itself, owing to its absorption spectrum covering the whole UV-visible and near infrared range, is an extremely efficient fluorescence quencher, for dyes including aminomethylcoumarin acetate 6-carboxyfluoresceine, 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine, and Cy5. When such dyes are bound either at the 5′ or 3′ end of a single stranded DNA, the DNA loses its fluorescence upon binding to the PDA nanoparticles (either 336 nm or 54 nm in diameter), but the fluorescence is recovered in a dose-dependent manner when the DNA bound nanospheres are placed in contact with the complementary DNA strands (Qiang et al.,
The PDA nanoparticles (3.1 nm in diameter) synthesized from the solution/air interface by microplasma induced electropolymerization can be used as specific sensors for U6+ cations with a detection limit of 2.1 mg.mL−1 (Wang et al.,
Formaldehyde in the gas phase interacts strongly with the PDA through hydrogen bonds with imines present in the PDA film as shown by molecular simulations using the Gaussian software. This concept has been applied to the hollow PDA nanotubes deposited on the surface of a quartz crystal to measure formaldehyde concentrations with a detection limit down to 100 ppb and very low interference with other atmospheric gases, such as H2S, CO2, and benzene (Yan et al.,
PDA nanoparticles for theranostic applications
The PDA nanoparticles with an average diameter of 25 to 43 nm were synthesized in reverse emulsions, crosslinked with Fe3+ cations, and subsequently modified with poly(ethylene glycol) and used as pH-dependent magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents displaying a high photothermal efficiency owing to the ability of PDA to transform photons in phonons (Liu et al.,
The Gd3+ doped PDA nanoparticles display relaxivities of 75 mM−1.s−1 and 10.3 mM−1.s−1 at 1.4 T and 7 T, respectively, offering an excellent contrast for magnetic resonance imaging (Wang et al.,
The PDA nanoparticles chelated with Mn2+ cations (through surface catechol groups of PDA), and subsequently modified with thiolated PEG, simultaneously offer the possibility to enhance the contrast in magnetic resonance imaging and to ablate cancer cells (HeLa cells) through the photothermal effect afforded by PDA (Miao et al.,
PDA nanomaterials for drug release applications
Another major application of the PDA nanoparticles concerns stimulated drug release. PDA nanoparticles around 200 nm in diameter were coated with a porous 5-boronobenzene-1,3-dicarboxylic acid–Zn2+ coordination polymer. The obtained core shell nanoparticles were subsequently coated with a catechol capped PEG. These hybrid nanoparticles could be loaded with doxorubicin as a model anticancer drug. The presence of PEG and phenylboronic acid moieties allowed them to target sialic acid overexpressed MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. The acidic environment of such cells allowed for a release of the PEG capping agent and an increased release of doxorubicin. This release was further increased upon irradiation with near infrared (NIR) light (808 nm, about 1 W.cm−2) producing a photothermal effect on PDA. The combined photothermal effect and the increased release of doxorubicin was evaluated in vivo by measuring the weight of tumors after excision at day 16 following the administration of drug loaded composite nanoparticles and several NIR irradiation steps (Liu et al.,
PDA nanoparticles modified with PEG-TTP (TTP is triphenyl phosphonium) could also be loaded with doxorubicin to specifically target the mitochondria in the cells (Li W.-Q. et al.,
Metal organic framework-based particles are ideal porous nanomaterials to load different drugs but their in vivo degradation can induce cell apoptosis, organ abnormalities, and even the death of the animals used. The encapsulation of doxorubicin loaded zeolithic imidazole frameworks with a thin PDA layer considerably decreased the decomposition of the metal organic framework without impeding the drug release (Wu et al.,
Composite hollow CaCO3-PDA nanoparticles were synthesized by oxidizing a Ca2+ salt-dopamine mixture with O2 and bubbling NH4HCO3 in the mixture. These nanoparticles were subsequently modified with PEG and loaded with a photosensitizer, chlorin e6. The fluorescence of this dye was quenched in the presence of PDA that reduced skin photosensitivity but in the acidic environment of cancerous cells, CaCO3 was dissolved and the photodynamic effect of the photosensitizer was recovered at the required location (Dong et al.,
The PDA mesoporous nanospheres also offer excellent opportunities for drug release applications as well as for removing dyes such as rhodamine B (Chen et al.,
The PDA nanoparticles display excellent anti-inflammatory properties owing to their eumelanin-like nature affording them the ability to scavenge the reactive oxygen species produced during inflammation. This property was demonstrated in murine models of acute peritonitis and acute lung injury after a single dose of PDA nanoparticles injection (Zhao et al.,
PDA nanomaterials for tissue engineering
β-Tricalcium phosphate porous scaffolds display excellent affinity for PDA nanoparticles which in turn immobilize various signal biomolecules to promote cellular activity and tissue regeneration (Wang et al.,
Conclusions and perspectives
PDA can not only find applications as a versatile coating to cover almost all known materials with a conformal layer of a eumelanin-like compound but also as a stable suspension of nanoparticles. These nanoparticles can be produced in the absence of a template, by oxidizing catecholamines in water or in water/ethanol mixtures, and also in the presence of templating molecules. These templating molecules can be surfactants having a considerably long aliphatic chain, as well as polymers, polyelectrolytes, and proteins. The reduction of the hydrodynamic diameter of the PDA nanoparticles is dependent on the concentration of the templating agent. It is of interest to note that the reduction in size of the PDA nanoparticles is accompanied by a progressive decrease, up to total suppression, of the thickness of the PDA coating on the surface of the reaction beaker. This final result suggests a progressive decrease in the amount of free catecholamine able to react with/on surfaces, and correlatively the existence of strong interactions between the catecholamine and the templating molecules. The nature and the strength of the interactions between PDA and templating molecules remain to be investigated in the future to be able to define possible new templating agents for the production of stable inks based on PDA nanoparticles. The structure of the PDA nanoparticles produced in the presence of proteins also remains to be investigated. These particles are biocompatible up to high concentrations and could be either the scrambled egg type with a uniform distribution of the protein in the particle's volume or the core-shell type. Current research is underway in the INSERM 1121 team to elucidate these questions.
However, the PDA based nanoparticles have already found a role in a large set of applications, particularly in the field of biomaterials where they can be used as a bioink and where the ability of PDA to convert light to heat may be fully exploited for cancer treatment by hyperthermy. Many applications in the field of sensing are also emerging owing to the fluorescence quenching ability of PDA. Finally, the PDA loaded scaffolds appear as a material of choice for new applications in the field of tissue engineering.
Statements
Author contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AminD. R.SugnauxC.Aaron LauK. H.MessersmithP. B. (2017). Size control and fluorescence labelling of polydopamine melanin-mimetic nanoparticles for intracellular imaging. Biomimetics2, 17–36. 10.3390/biomimetics2030017
2
ArzilloM.MangiapiaG.PezzellaA.HeenanR. K.RadulescuA.PaduanoL.et al. (2012). Eumelanin buildup on the nanoscale: aggregate growth/assembly and visible absorption development in biomimetic 5,6-dihydroxyindole polymerization. Biomacromolecules13, 2379–2390. 10.1021/bm3006159
3
BallV. (2010). Impedance spectroscopy and zeta potential titration of melanin films produced by oxidation of dopamine. Colloids Surfaces A. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 363, 92–97. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.04.020
4
BernsmannF.ErsenO.VoegelJ.-C.JanE.KotovN. A.BallV. (2010). Melanin-containing films: growth from dopamine solutions versus layer-by-layer deposition. ChemPhysChem11, 3299–3305. 10.1002/cphc.201000384
5
BernsmannF.VoegelJ.-C.BallV. (2011). Different synthesis methods allow to tune the permeability and permselectivity of dopamine-melanin films to electrochemical probes. Electrochimica Acta56, 3914–3919. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.028
6
BorgesJ.ManoJ. F. (2014). Molecular interactions driving the layer-by-layer assembly of multilayers. Chem. Rev.114, 8883–8942. 10.1021/cr400531v
7
BridelliM. G. (1998). Self-assembly of melanin studied by laser light scattering. Biophys. Chem. 73, 227–239. 10.1016/S0301-4622(98)00148-3
8
ChassepotA.BallV. (2014). Human serum albumin and other proteins as templating agents for the synthesis of nanosized dopamine-eumelanin. J. Colloid Interf. Sci.414, 97–102. 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.10.002
9
ChenF.XingY.WangZ.ZhengX.ZhangJ.CaiK. (2016). Nanoscale polydopamine (PDA) meets π-π interactions: an interface-directed coassembly approach for mesoporous nanoparticles. Langmuir32, 12119–12128. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03294
10
ClancyC. M.SimonJ. D. (1998). Ultrastructural organization of eumelanin from Sepia officinalis measured by atomic force microscopy. Biochemistry40, 13353–13360. 10.1021/bi010786t
11
DecherG. (1997). Fuzzy nanoassemblies: toward layered polymeric multicomposites. Science277, 1232–1237. 10.1126/science.277.5330.1232
12
d'IschiaM.NapolitanoA.BallV.ChenC.-T.BuehlerM. J. (2014). Polydopamine and melanins: from structure-property relationships to a unified tailoring strategy. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 3541–3550. 10.1021/ar500273y
13
d'IschiaM.NapolitanoA.PezzellaA.MeredithP.SarnaT. (2009). Chemical and structural diversity in eumelanins: unexplored bio-optoelectronic materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 3914–3921. 10.1002/anie.200803786
14
DongZ.FengL.HaoY.ChenM.GaoM.ChaoY.et al. (2018). Synthesis of hollow biomineralized CaCO3-polydopamine nanoparticles for multimodal imaging-guided cancer photodynamic therapy with reduced skin photosensitivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 2165–2178. 10.1021/jacs.7b11036
15
DuX.LiL.LiJ.YangC.FrenkelN.WelleA.et al. (2014). UV-triggered dopamine polymeization: control of polymerization, surface coating, and photoppaterning. Adv. Mater. 26, 8029–8033. 10.1002/adma.201403709
16
FanD.ZhuX.ZhaiQ.WangE.DongS. (2016). Polydopamine nanotubes as an effective fluorescent quencher for highly sensitive and selective detection of biomolecules assisted with Exonuclease III amplification. Anal. Chem. 88, 9158–9165. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b02282
17
FanH.YuX.LiuY.ShiZ.LiuH.NieZ.et al. (2015). Folic acid-polydopamine nanofibers show enhanced ordered-stacking via π-π interactions. Soft Matter11, 4621–4629. 10.1039/C5SM00732A
18
GuoS.HongL.AkhremitchevB. B.SimonJ. D. (2008). Surface elastic properties of human retinal pigment epithelium melanosomes. Photochem. Photobiol. 84, 671–678. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00331.x
19
HanL.ZhangY.LuX.WangK.WangZ.ZhangH. (2016). Polydopamine nanoparticles modulating stimuli responsive PNIPAM hydrogels with cell/tissue adhesiveness. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf.8, 29088–29100. 10.1021/acsami.6b11043
20
HongS.KimJ.NaY. S.ParkJ.KimS.SinghaK.et al. (2013). Poly(norepinephrine): ultrasmooth material-independent surface chemistry and nanodepot for nitric oxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 9187–9191. 10.1002/anie.201301646
21
HongS.NaY.-S.ChoiS.SongI.-T.KimW. Y.LeeH. (2012). Non-covalent self-assembly and covalent polymerization co-contribute to polydopamine formation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 4711–4717. 10.1002/adfm.201201156
22
HongS.SchaberC. F.DeningK.AppelE.GorbS. N.LeeH. (2014). Air/water interfacial formation of freestanding, stimuli responsive, self-healing catecholamine Janus faced microfilms. Adv. Mater. 26, 7581–7587. 10.1002/adma.201403259
23
HuangY.LiY.HuZ.YueX.ProettoM. T.JonesY.et al. (2017). Mimicking melanosomes: polydopamine nanoparticles as artificial microparasols. ACS Central. Sci.3, 564–569. 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00230
24
ItoS. (1989). Optimization of conditions for preparing synthetic pheomelanin. Pigment Cell Res. 2, 53–56. 10.1111/j.1600-0749.1989.tb00158.x
25
JaberM.LambertJ.-F. (2010). A new nanocomposite: L-DOPA/Laponite. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.1, 85–88. 10.1021/jz900020m
26
JuK. Y.LeeY.LeeS.ParkS. B.LeeJ. K. (2011). Bioinspired polymerization of dopamine to generate melanin-like nanoparticles having an excellent free-radical-scavenging property. Biomacromolecules12, 625–632. 10.1021/bm101281b
27
KangS. M.RhoJ.ChoiI. S.MessersmithP. B.LeeH. (2009). Norepinephrine: material-independent, multifunctional surface modification reagent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 13224–13225. 10.1021/ja905183k
28
LeeB. P.MessersmithP. B.IsraelachviliJ. N.WaiteJ. H. (2011). Mussel-inspired adhesives and coatings. Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 41, 99–132. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100429
29
LeeH.DellatoreS. M.MillerW. M.MessersmithP. B. (2007). Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science318, 426–430. 10.1126/science.1147241
30
LiH.JinZ.ChoS.JeonM. J.NguyenV. D.ParkJ.-O.et al. (2017). Folate-receptor-targeted NIR-sensitive polydopamine nanoparticles for chemophotothermal cancer therapy. Nanotechnology28:425101. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa8477
31
LiW.-Q.WangZ.HaoS.HeH.WanY.ZhuC.et al. (2017). Mitochondria targeting polydopamine nanoparticles to deliver doxorubicin for overcoming drug resistance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 9, 16793–16802. 10.1021/acsami.7b01540
32
LiY.LiuM.XiangC.XieQ.YaoS. (2006). Electrochemical quartz microbalance study on growth and property of the polymer deposit at gold electrodes during oxidation of dopamine in aqueous solutions. Thin Solid Films497, 270–278. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.10.048
33
LiY.XieY.WangZ.ZangN.CarniatoF.HuangY.et al. (2016). Structure and function of iron-loaded synthetic melanin. ACS Nano10, 10186–10194. 10.1021/acsnano.6b05502
34
LinJ.-H.YuC.-J.YangY.-C.TsengW.-L. (2015). Formation of fluorescent polydopamine dots from hydroxyl radical induced degradation of polydopamine nanoparticles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 15124–15130. 10.1039/C5CP00932D
35
LiuF.HeX.ZhangJ.ChenH.ZhangH.WangZ. (2015). Controllable synthesis of polydopamine nanoparticles in microemulsions with pH activable properties for cancer detection and treatment. J. Mater. Chem. B. 3, 6731–6739. 10.1039/C5TB01159K
36
LiuH.AiK.LiuJ.DengM.HeY.LuL. (2013). Dopamin-melanin colloidal nanospheres: an efficient near-infrared photothermal therapeutic agent for in vivo cancer therapy. Adv. Mater.25, 1353–1359. 10.1002/adma.201204683
37
LiuS.PanJ.LiuJ.MaY.QiuF.MeiL.et al. (2018). Dynamically PEGylated and borate-coordination-polymer coated polydopamine nanoparticles for synergetic tumor-targeted, chemo-photothermal combination therapy. Small14:1703968. 10.1002/smll.201703968
38
LiuY.ZhaoY.ZhuZ.XingZ.MaH.WeiQ. (2017). Ultrasensitive immunosensor for prostate specific antigen using biomimetic polydopamine nanopsheres as an electroluminescence superquencher and antibody carriers. Anal. Chim. Acta963, 17–23. 10.1016/j.aca.2017.01.068
39
MateescuM.Metz-BoutigueM.-H.BertaniP. H.BallV. (2016). Polyelectrolytes to produce nanosized functional polydopamine. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 469, 184–190. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.02.023
40
MeredithP.SarnaT. (2006). The physical and chemical properties of eumelanin. Pig. Cell Res.19, 572–594. 10.1111/j.1600-0749.2006.00345.x
41
MiaoZ.-H.WangH.YangH.LiZ.-L.ZhenL.XuC.-Y. (2015). Intrinsically Mn2+-chelated polydopamine nanoparticles for simultaneous magnetic resonance imaging and photothermal ablation of cancer cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 7, 16946–16952. 10.1021/acsami.5b06265
42
PezzellaA.BarraM.MustoA.NavarraA.AlfèM.ManiniP.et al. (2014). Stem-cell compatible eumelanin biointerface fabricated by chemically controlled solid state polymerization. Mater. Horiz. 2, 212–220. 10.1039/C4MH00097H
43
PonzioF.BallV. (2014). Persistence of dopamine and small oxidation products thereof in oxygenated dopamine solutions and in polydopamine films. Colloids Surfaces A. Phys. Eng. Aspects443, 540–543. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.12.027
44
PonzioF.BarthesJ.BourJ.MichelM.BertaniP. H.HemmerleJ.et al. (2016). Oxidant control of polydopamine surface chemistry in acids: a mechanism-based entry to superhydrophilic-superoleophobic coatings. Chem. Mater. 28, 4697–4705. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01587
45
PonzioF.BertaniP.BallV. (2014a). Role of surfactants in the control of dopamine-eumelanin particle size and in the inhibition of film deposition at solid-liquid interfaces. J. Colloid Interf. Sci.431, 176–179. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.06.025
46
PonzioF.Le HouerouV.ZafeiratosS.GauthierC.GarnierT.JierryL.et al. (2017). Robust alginate-catechol @polydopamine free standing membranes obtained from the water/air interface. Langmuir33, 2420–2426. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04435
47
PonzioF.PayamyarP.SchneiderA.WinterhalterM.BourJ.AddiegoF.et al. (2014b). Polydopamine films from the forgotten air/water interface. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 3436–3440. 10.1021/jz501842r
48
PostmaA.YanY.WangY. J.ZelikinA. N.TjiptoE.CarusoF. (2009). Self-polymerization of dopamine as a versatile and robust technique to prepare polymer capsules. Chem. Mater. 21, 3042–3044. 10.1021/cm901293e
49
QiangW.LiW.LiX.ChanX.XuD. (2014). Bioinspired polydopamine nanospheres: a superquencher for fluorescence sensing of biomolecules. Chem. Sci. 5, 3018–3024. 10.1039/C4SC00085D
50
RichardsonJ. J.CuiJ.BorjmalmM.BraungerJ. A.EjimaH.CarusoF. (2016). Innovation in LBL assembly. Chem. Rev. 116, 14828–14867. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00627
51
SagivA. (1980). Organized monolayers by adsorption. 1. Formation and structure of oleophobic mixed monolayers on solid surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 92–98. 10.1021/ja00521a016
52
SchlaichC.LiM.ChengC.DonskyiI. S.YuL.SongG.et al. (2018). Mussel-inspired polymer-based spray coating for surface modification: fast fabrication of antibacterial and superhydrophobic surface coatings. Adv. Mater. Interf.5:1701254. 10.1002/admi.201701254
53
TokuraY.HarveyS.ChenC.WuY.NgD. Y. W.WeilT. (2018). Fabrication of defined polydopamine nanostructures by DNA origami-templated polymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 1587–1591. 10.1002/anie.201711560
54
UllmannA. (1996). Formation and structure of self-assembled monolayers. Chem. Rev. 96, 1533–1554. 10.1021/cr9502357
55
VatralJ.BocaR.LinertW. (2015). Oxidation properties of dopamine at and near physiological conditions. Monatshefte Chem. 146, 1799–1805. 10.1007/s00706-015-1560-2
56
WaghS.RamaiahR.SubramanianR.GovindarayanR. (2000). Melanosomal proteins promote melanin polymerization. Pig. Cell. Res.13, 442–448. 10.1034/j.1600-0749.2000.130606.x
57
WangZ.CarniatoF.XieY.HuangY.LiY.HeS.et al. (2017). High relaxivity gadolinium-polydopamine nanoparticles.Small13:1701830. 10.1002/smll.201701830
58
WangZ.WangK.ZhangY.JiangY.LuX.FangL.et al. (2016). Protein-affinitive polydopamine nanoparticles as an efficient surface modification strategy for versatile porous scaffolds enhancing tissue regeneration. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 33, 89–100. 10.1002/ppsc.201500187
59
WangZ.XuC.LuY.WeiG.YeG.SunT.et al. (2018). Microplasma electrochemistry controlled rapid preparation of fluorescent polydopamine nanoparticles and their application in uranium detection. Chem. Eng. J. 344, 480–486. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.096
60
WeiQ.ZhangF.LiJ.LiB.ZhaoC. (2010). Oxidant-induced dopamine polymerization for multifunctional coatings. Polym. Chem. 1, 1430–1433. 10.1039/c0py00215a
61
WuQ.NiuM.ChenX.TanL.FuC.RenX.et al. (2018). Biomaterials162, 132–143. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.02.022
62
XiaoM.LiY.AllenM. C.DeheynD. D.YueX.ZhaoJ.et al. (2015). Bio-inspired structural colours produced via self-assembly of synthetic melanin nanoparticles. ACS Nano9, 5454–5460. 10.1021/acsnano.5b01298
63
XingY.ZhangJ.ChenF.LiuJ.CaiK. (2017). Mesoporous polydopamine nanoparticles with co-delivery function for overcoming multidrug resistance via synergistic chemo-photothermal therapty. Nanoscale9, 8781–8790. 10.1039/C7NR01857F
64
XiongB.ChenY.ShuY.ShenB.ChanH. N.ChenY.et al. (2014). Highly emissive and biocompatible dopamine-derived oligomers as fluorescent probes for chemical detection and targeted bioimaging. Chem. Comm.50, 13578–13580. 10.1039/C4CC06139J
65
XuS.NieY.JiangL.WangJ.XuG.WangW.et al. (2018). Polydopamine nanosphere/gold nanocluster (Au NC)-based nanoplatform for dual color simultaneous detection of multiple tumor-related microRNAs with DNase-I-assisted target recycling amplification. Anal. Chem. 90, 4039–4045. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05253
66
XueJ.ZhengW.WangL.JinZ. (2016). Scalable fabrication of polydopamine nanotubes based on curcumin crystals, ACS Biomater. Sci. 2, 489–493. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00102
67
YanD.XuP.XiangQ.MouH.XuJ.WenW.et al. (2016). Polydopamine nanotubes: bio-inspired synthesis, formaldehyde sensing properties and thermodynamic investigation. J. Mater. Chem. A4, 3487–3493. 10.1039/C6TA00396F
68
YangY. C.XuW.DuY.WuJ.ZuZ.-K. (2014). Composite free-standing films of polydopamine/polyethylenimine grown at the air/water interface. RSC Adv. 4, 45415–45418. 10.1039/C4RA04549A
69
YeroslavskyG.LaviR.AlisaevA.RahimipourS. (2016). Sonochemically-produced metal-containing polydopamine nanoparticles and their antibacterial and antibiofilm activity. Langmuir32, 5201–5212. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00576
70
YildirimA.BayindirM. (2014). Turn-on fluorescent dopamine sensing based on in situ formation of visible light emitting polydopamine nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 86, 5508–5512. 10.1021/ac500771q
71
YouI.HyejinY.LeeK.DoM.SeoY. C.LeeH. A.et al. (2017). Polydopamine coating in organic solvent for material independent immobilization of water insoluble molecules and avoidance of substrate hydrolysis. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 46, 379–385. 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.11.007
72
YuX.FanH.WangL.JinZ. (2014). Formation of polydopamine nanofibers with the aid of folic acid. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 12600–12604. 10.1002/anie.201404947
73
ZhangX.WangS.XuL.FengL.JiY.TaoL.et al. (2012). Biocompatible polydopamine fluorescent organic nanoparticles: facile preparation and cell imaging. Nanoscale4, 5581–5584. 10.1039/c2nr31281f
74
ZhaoH.ZengZ.LiuL.ChenJ.ZhouH.HuangL.et al. (2018). Polydopamine nanoparticles for the treatment of acute inflammation-induced injury. Nanoscale10, 6981–6991. 10.1039/C8NR00838H
Summary
Keywords
polydopamine, polydopamine nanoparticles, nanotubes, proteins, polyelectrolytes, surfactants
Citation
Ball V (2018) Polydopamine Nanomaterials: Recent Advances in Synthesis Methods and Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 6:109. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00109
Received
19 May 2018
Accepted
13 July 2018
Published
17 August 2018
Volume
6 - 2018
Edited by
May Griffith, Université de Montréal, Canada
Reviewed by
Debasish Mondal, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Ahmed El-Fiqi, Dankook University, South Korea
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2018 Ball.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Vincent Ball vball@unistra.fr
This article was submitted to Biomaterials, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.