Skip to main content


Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 19 July 2021
Sec. Cell and Gene Therapy
This article is part of the Research Topic Advanced Cell Culture Technologies to Boost Cell-Based Therapies View all 12 articles

Editorial: Advanced Cell Culture Technologies to Boost Cell-Based Therapies

  • 1Institute of Cell and Tissue Culture Technologies, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
  • 2Institute of Biomaterials, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Erlangen Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • 3Diabetes Research Institute & Cell Transplantation Center, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
  • 4Tissue Engineering Research Group (TERG) & AMBER Centre Department of Anatomy & Regenerative Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland

Approved cells and cellular products for cell-based therapy (CBT) applications carry a huge promise for the treatment of a broad variety of diseases and several (stem) cell therapies. However, the therapeutic potential of cells is not fully exploited at present. On the one hand, outdated culture conditions are still used during in vitro cultivation. On the other hand, technological hurdles block the way to efficient and safe cell-based therapy products. This Research Topic gathered articles about recent advances in cell culture technologies to increase the therapeutic properties of cells or the manufacturing processes for CBT.

Oxygen has an outstanding role as a cell culture parameter as it is involved in numerous cellular processes and the generation of energy. Tse et al. highlighted in their review article the importance of physiological oxygenation in 3D cultures while keeping anoxic regions at a minimum. With finite element modeling the authors demonstrated the degree of anoxic tissue in standard and gas-permeable plates. Further methods such as transwell plates, microfluidic or bioreactor systems to improve oxygenation in 3D cultures are presented. To monitor oxygen gradients occurring inside spheroids, Schmitz et al. reported the development of a modified hypoxia reporter MSC cell line with a genetic sensor for hypoxic conditions. Using this reporter cell line, the authors demonstrated that the method for producing MSC spheroids and cell number per spheroid play a crucial role in the onset of hypoxia in MSC spheroids. The cell line represents a reliable tool for monitoring hypoxic conditions inside spheroids which may be used to increase comparability between different spheroid production systems.

Besides oxygen, also the culture format itself heavily impacts cellular functionalities. Harnessing 3D spheroid culture for MSCs is known to increase therapeutically relevant effects. Kouroupis and Correa summarize in their review article current methods for the generation of MSC spheroids and how spheroid culture increases functionality of MSCs in various therapeutic applications. Thus, recent findings on the anti-inflammatory and therapeutic properties of MSC spheroids in wound healing, osteochondral defects, myocardial infarction, neovascularization/ischemia and liver and kidney diseases are summarized. Findings from this review demonstrate the need to intensify research on and translation of MSC spheroids into clinical applications. Rüger et al. presented an innovative 3D in vitro vascular niche model to observe de novo vessel formation by vasculogenesis. The model consists of blood-derived progenitor cells, mature immune cells and MSCs, but not mature ECs, providing an environment which led to maturation of ECs through cellular, extracellular and paracrine cross-talk. This model opens up a new possibility for the in vitro engineering of autologous blood vessels. Babajani et al. summarized in their review article recent findings in using MSCs as drug delivery system for chemotherapeutic drugs while focusing on possible adverse effects of chemotherapeutics on MSCs and the efficacy of drug loading and releasing.

For applications in cell-based therapies, MSCs and other cell types need to be amplified or expanded to high numbers while keeping their functionality and critical stem cell properties. Thus, advanced methods for the safe expansion of these cells are required. In this context, Nath et al. reviewed the state of the art on technologies for manufacturing of CBTs and point out the current limitations and bottlenecks. They conclude that automated bioreactors are a key technology for providing CBTs in the future. Furthermore, efforts should be made to perform all steps of the production process (genetic modification, expansion, differentiation) in one integrated bioreactor to provide cost-effective solutions. The use of platelet lysate (PL) as serum alternative has become central in manufacturing of CBTs. Kirsch et al. demonstrated that human PL as media supplement is superior to fetal bovine serum (FBS) and human serum for the expansion and differentiation of MSCs, both in 2D and 3D. The cells exhibited enhanced proliferation and differentiation in 2D culture, compared to FBS or human serum. Furthermore, human PL increased cell spreading and proliferation in gelatin-methacryloyl hydrogels. This study underlines the suitability of PL for the culture of MSCs and proof its advantages also for 3D applications. While PL is already available for culture of human cells, there is a lack of standardized processes for the production of equine PL. Hagen et al. presented the production of equine PL for the use as serum alternative in equine MSC culture. If used at the same concentration, equine PL supports MSC expansion as well as adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation comparable to FBS. As cellular therapies experience a notable shift towards the use of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), there is an urgent need for chemically-defined and xeno-free culture media specialized for the production of EVs. Interestingly, the study of Figueroa-Valdés et al. presented a suitable xeno-free, blood-free and chemically-defined media for the production of MSC-sEVs. An increased MSC-sEV secretion and characteristic expression pattern of sEV markers was observed while retaining the parental cell’s stem cell phenotype. Consequently, this medium could enable the large-scale manufacturing of MSC-sEVs under regulatory compliant conditions. To achieve reasonable cell numbers for cell-therapies, advanced processes for the dynamic expansion of MSCs are still required. Van Beylen et al. present an approach to screen for suitable microcarriers for the expansion of MSCs with the later aim for bone formation in an in vivo mouse model. They found a microcarrier that supported MSC expansion while keeping potency and functionality regarding in vivo bone formation. The microcarrier-based expansion process could be used for the large-scale production of MSCs with subsequent in vivo bone formation.

In summary, this article collection provides a comprehensive review of the state of the art in advanced cell culture technologies to boost cell-based therapies which we believe will be of significant interest to the journal readership.

Author Contributions

DE wrote the editorial which was proof-read, revised and approved by all other authors.


FO’B is supported by funding from a European Research Council Advanced Grant, ReCaP (agreement no. 788,753).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


The editors would like to thank all the authors that contributed to the Research Topic.

Keywords: 3D cell culture, physiological conditions, cell-based therapy, therapeutic potential, stem cells

Citation: Egger D, Boccaccini AR, Correa D, Kasper C and O’Brien FJ (2021) Editorial: Advanced Cell Culture Technologies to Boost Cell-Based Therapies. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:727298. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.727298

Received: 18 June 2021; Accepted: 06 July 2021;
Published: 19 July 2021.

Edited and reviewed by:

Andrea Banfi, University of Basel, Switzerland

Copyright © 2021 Egger, Boccaccini, Correa, Kasper and O’Brien. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Dominik Egger,

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.