Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1494352

Challenges and limitations in developing of a new maxillary standardized rat alveolar bone defect model to study bone regenerative approaches in oral and maxillofacial surgery

Provisionally accepted
Naïma  Ahmed OmarNaïma Ahmed Omar1Jéssica  RoqueJéssica Roque1Céline  BergeautCéline Bergeaut2Laurent  BidaultLaurent Bidault2Amedee  JoelleAmedee Joelle1Didier  LETOURNEURDidier LETOURNEUR3Jean-Christophe  FricainJean-Christophe Fricain1Mathilde  FenelonMathilde Fenelon1*
  • 1INSERM U1026 Bioingénierie Tissulaire, Bordeaux, France
  • 2SILTISS, Saint-Viance, France
  • 3INSERM U1148 Laboratoire de Recherche Vasculaire Translationnelle, Villetaneuse, Île-de-France, France

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Innovative biomaterials are increasingly being investigated for guided bone regeneration (GBR) in oral and maxillofacial surgery. This study aimed to propose a standardized and reproducible maxillary bone defect model in rats that could be relevant to evaluate new materials for GBR. We first compared three defect sizes (2.8, 3.3, and 4.5 mm in diameter) in rat maxillary, and assessed until 12 weeks post-surgery, bone regeneration using longitudinal micro-computed tomography and histological analysis. The defect was subsequently filled by an osteoconductive bone substitute (GLYCOBONE), then covered either by a new natural polysaccharide membrane supplemented with hydroxyapatite, or by a commercial collagen membrane (BIO-GIDE). Results showed little spontaneous tissue regeneration for empty defects (bone volume fractions (BVF) below 40 % after 12 weeks). The smallest size defect (2.8 mm) was the most reproducible and was thus selected for testing GBR membranes. Defects filled with GLYCOBONE and covered with membranes displayed for both materials accelerated and substantial bone regeneration (with BVF that reached 80 % after 12 weeks).Histological sections showed immature bone formation for the empty defects, whereas the defects filled with the GBR membranes highlighted a lamellar structured bone. The polysaccharide membrane was as effective as the commercial collagen membrane to guide bone tissue regeneration. This study provides a step-by-step protocol of a new standardized rat maxillary bone defect model. In line with ethical and financial considerations, this rodent model should be considered as a preliminary level before performing larger animal experiments.

Keywords: preclinical model, Micro-computed tomography, Guided bone regeneration, membrane, Bone graft substitute

Received: 10 Sep 2024; Accepted: 18 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ahmed Omar, Roque, Bergeaut, Bidault, Joelle, LETOURNEUR, Fricain and Fenelon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mathilde Fenelon, INSERM U1026 Bioingénierie Tissulaire, Bordeaux, France

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.