REVIEW article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biofabrication
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1506122
This article is part of the Research TopicInsights in Biofabrication 2023: Novel Developments, Current Challenges, and Future PerspectivesView all 5 articles
Recapitulating the bone extracellular matrix through 3D bioprinting using various crosslinking chemistries
Provisionally accepted- Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Bioprinting allows to spatially organize cellular niches influencing mechanobiology into tissue engineered constructs thereby aiming to achieve a similar functional complexity as the various tissues present within bone. Natural polymer hydrogel matrices are favorably selected as part of many bioinks thanks to their level of mimicry with the bone osteoid matrix. More specifically, a variety of biophysical and biochemical cues targeting osteogenesis can be presented towards cells encapsulated in bioprinted constructs. This review focusses on delineating bioprinting targeting osteogenesis based on the printing approach (deposition- versus light-based bioprinting) and crosslinking chemistry utilized (chain- versus step-growth crosslinking). Moreover, the cell-biomaterial interactions at play within these constructs are addressed in line with currently established mechanobiology concepts. The delicate interplay between the presented cues from the encapsulating matrix, the used printing process and the maturity, source and concentration of the used cell type finally dictates the osteoregenerative outcome of a bioprinted construct. Given the advantages towards cell encapsulation associated with step-growth systems, there is a huge need to evaluate these systems in comparison to the heavily reported chain-growth systems (predominantly gelatin methacryloyl or GelMA) towards the bioprinting of constructs serving osteogenesis. Moreover, multiple bioprinting strategies should be combined to tackle key challenges in the field and enable functional and scalable hierarchical constructs serving osteogenesis with incorporation of vascularization and innervation.
Keywords: Biophysical cues, Biofabrication, Bone extracellular matrix, mechanobiology, natural polymer, Chain-growth crosslinking, Step-growth crosslinking
Received: 04 Oct 2024; Accepted: 16 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Van Vlierberghe, Parmentier and Vermeersch. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Sandra Van Vlierberghe, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.