ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biomechanics

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1536738

This article is part of the Research TopicApplication of Biomechanics in Diagnosis & Therapy of Skeletal System DiseasesView all 12 articles

Gait analysis with smart insoles can identify patients at risk of tibial shaft fracture nonunion as early as six weeks after surgery: longitudinal and cross-sectional study

Provisionally accepted
  • Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Nonunion, a common and detrimental complication of tibial shaft fractures, is usually diagnosed via X-ray-based imaging. Unfortunately, it often takes months of observation until the indication for revision surgery or other interventions is given, which is why additional methods are desirable to enhance the ability to predict and prevent nonunion earlier.Objective: As gait patterns and subjective outcomes obtained by questionnaires improved during regular fracture healing, the aim of this study was to determine whether gait analyses with instrumented insoles and patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) questionnaires could be used to detect patients at risk of developing nonunion during the healing phase after tibial shaft fracture. Methods: Data were collected from a longitudinal and a cross-sectional tibial fracture cohort via gait analysis with instrumented insoles (OpenGO, Moticon GmbH, Munich, Germany) and in addition via PROMIS questionnaires. The gait parameters included pressure, temporal, angular velocity and acceleration-related parameters. The PROMIS covered the global health, physical function and pain questionnaires. Comparisons between patients with and without union were performed at one week, six weeks, three months and six months after surgery.Results: Six-month postoperative radiographs revealed nonunion in seven of 18 longitudinally assessed patients and in four patients who underwent a single assessment after nonunion diagnosis. Overall gait patterns, primarily reflected by temporal and pressure distribution parameters, differed significantly between patients with and without union from six weeks onward. These differences between union and nonunion patients were detected via gait patterns significantly earlier than by radiographs or PROMIS questionnaires. In detail, six weeks after surgery, 16 out of the 33 gait parameters were significantly different between the longitudinal union and longitudinal nonunion groups. Three months after surgery, the center of pressure width (p = 0.022), stride time (p = 0.035), stride frequency (p = 0.008), maximal angular velocity (p = 0.014), and asymmetry of the maximal angular velocity (p = 0.035) differed significantly between the longitudinal union and longitudinal nonunion groups.Conclusion: Gait analysis with instrumented insoles can be used to detect patients at high risk of developing nonunion of a tibial shaft fracture already six weeks postoperative.

Keywords: Bone Regeneration, Diaphyseal fracture, Fracture monitoring, orthopaedic trauma, Patient-reported outcome measures, Plantar pressure, Postoperative monitoring, wearables

Received: 29 Nov 2024; Accepted: 12 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Warmerdam, Orth, Müller, Pohlemann and Ganse. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Elke Warmerdam, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.