ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biomechanics

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1547652

This article is part of the Research TopicApplication of Biomechanics in Diagnosis & Therapy of Skeletal System DiseasesView all 11 articles

Development of a Global Forearm Reconstruction System (GFRS) for Post-Tumor Resection Defects of the Radius or Ulna: a proof-of-concept study

Provisionally accepted
Haijie  LiangHaijie LiangJie  ZangJie ZangSiyi  HuangSiyi HuangBoyang  WangBoyang WangShun  TangShun TangZhiye  DuZhiye DuFeiyang  QiFeiyang QiWei  GuoWei GuoJichuan  WangJichuan Wang*Xiaodong  TangXiaodong Tang*
  • Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Bone defects resulting from sarcoma resection in the forearm present significant challenges for reconstruction, with limited guidance available in the literature.We developed a novel series of 3D-printed endoprostheses, called the Global Forearm Reconstruction System (GFRS), to reconstruct defects of the proximal radius (PR), distal ulna (DU), total ulna (TU), and total radius (TR). Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to determine the mechanical support function of the GFRS endoprostheses. We also tested the rotatory function of the endoprostheses ex vivo using a resin model. Finally, we summarized the preliminary outcomes of three pediatric cases using the GFRS endoprostheses for reconstruction.Resection of PR, DU, TU and TR leads to stress concentration in the remaining structures, which can be mitigated by the corresponding GFRS endoprostheses. The novel endoprostheses demonstrated full supination capability and approximately 50% of pronation in the ex vivo model. All of the three clinical cases achieved satisfactory functional status (MSTS-93:28-29; MEPS: 95-100) without complications during mid-term follow-up (32 to 42 months).In this proof-of-concept study, we demonstrated that the GFRS endoprostheses not only meet the theoretical reconstruction requirements but also exhibit a good safety profile and produce satisfactory functional outcomes in a preliminary cohort with mid-term follow-up.

Keywords: 3D printing, Ulna, Radius, Endoprosthesis, tumor

Received: 18 Dec 2024; Accepted: 20 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Liang, Zang, Huang, Wang, Tang, Du, Qi, Guo, Wang and Tang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jichuan Wang, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
Xiaodong Tang, Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.