Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Bioprocess Engineering

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1572254

Evaluation of a single-use Bioartificial Liver (BAL) biocartridge consisting of cryopreservable alginate encapsulated liver cell spheroids as a component of HepatiCan TM , a novel Bioartificial Liver device

Provisionally accepted
Eloy  ErroEloy Erro1Tom  BrookshawTom Brookshaw1Barry  FullerBarry Fuller2Sweta  ChandelSweta Chandel1Joana  Mendonca da SilvaJoana Mendonca da Silva1Elizaveta  ZotovaElizaveta Zotova1Sherri-Ann  ChalmersSherri-Ann Chalmers1Alfie  WattAlfie Watt1Clare  SeldenClare Selden1*
  • 1Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
  • 2Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Alternative therapies to complement liver transplantation and treat patients with liver failure are not available. In this study, a clinical scale single-use biocartridge was developed for use as part of a novel Bioartificial Liver device (HepatiCan TM ), utilising conditioned human-derived alginate encapsulated liver spheroids (AELS), within a fluidised bed. To develop the optimal biocartridge, two designs (B2 and B3) were created and modelled to best replicate the performance of our pre-existing reusable cartridge (B1). The suitability of designs, and their ability to deliver the required hydrodynamic conditions for AELS, during both spheroid production and treatment phases, was addressed by computational fluid dynamics. The main difference between the designs (B2 and B3) was the base plate flow distributor. Preserving the hole pattern in the base plate, between B1 and B3, was critical for mimicking fluid flow. Additionally, increasing the number of orifices in the cross-patterned base plate design (B3) provided further benefits: maintaining homogeneity in fluid velocity distribution, whilst avoiding "dead-flow" zones. Hence, the final biocartridge design (B3) was as effective in fluid distribution as the original (B1). B3 surpassed B1 in velocity uniformity over the first 10mm above the base plate, critical for good mass-transfer between biomass and perfusing fluid in the fluidised bed.

Keywords: Bioartificial liver (BAL), Single-use biocartridge, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), alginate encapsulated liver spheroids (AELS), Cryopreservation, Hydrodynamic conditions, metabolic activity

Received: 07 Feb 2025; Accepted: 17 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Erro, Brookshaw, Fuller, Chandel, Mendonca da Silva, Zotova, Chalmers, Watt and Selden. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Clare Selden, Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, WC1E, England, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.