ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biomechanics

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1595671

Mediation role of corneal biomechanical and topographic parameters in eye rubbing and keratoconus based on the Chinese keratoconus (CKC) cohort study

Provisionally accepted
Kaili  YangKaili Yang1Runqi  TuRunqi Tu1Liyan  XuLiyan Xu1Yuwei  GuYuwei Gu1Qi  FanQi Fan1Shanshan  YinShanshan Yin1Yi  YuanYi Yuan1Anqi  ChangAnqi Chang1Yifan  WangYifan Wang1Chenchen  YinChenchen Yin1Yonghao  ZangYonghao Zang1Chenjiu  PangChenjiu Pang1Dr  Daniela OehringDr Daniela Oehring2Yibin  HaoYibin Hao1Shengwei  RenShengwei Ren1*
  • 1Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
  • 2University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Several studies have shown that eye rubbing is associated with an increased risk of keratoconus (KC).However, the potential mediating roles between eye rubbing and KC remain largely unknown. Thus, this study aimed to explore the mediating roles of two specific factors, the inverse stiffness parameter at the first applanation (-SPA1) and maximal corneal keratometry (Kmax) values, in the relationship between eye rubbing and KC.A total of 395 KC patients and 396 controls from Chinese keratoconus (CKC) cohort study were included in this case-control analysis. Spearman correlation and generalized linear regression models were used to analyze the associations between the time of eye rubbing, -SPA1, Kmax and KC. Three mediation models (individual mediation, parallel multiple mediation and serial multiple mediation) were utilized to investigate the mediating roles of -SPA1 and Kmax in the relationship between eye rubbing and KC.After adjusting for confounding factors, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the time of eye rubbing, -SPA1, and Kmax in relation to KC were 1.02(1.01, 1.04), 1.16(1.12, 1.19) and 3.86(2.52, 5.92), respectively. The individual mediation analysis indicated that the indirect effect of -SPA1 and Kmax were 0.084 and 0.056, respectively. The parallel multiple mediation analysis showed a total indirect effect of -SPA1 and Kmax of 0.081. Additionally, the serial multiple mediation analysis (the time of eye rubbing → -SPA1 → Kmax → KC) indicated that Kmax, following -SPA1, partially mediated the relationship between the time of eye rubbing and KC, with a total indirect effect of 0.024 (95% CI: 0.016-0.042), accounting for 14.5% of the total effect (the time of eye rubbing on KC), while no significant indirect effect was found for Kmax alone.The individual, parallel, and serial mediation analyses consistently demonstrated the mediating roles of -SPA1 and Kmax in linking eye rubbing duration to KC progression. Notably, the serial mediation pathway (the time of eye rubbing → -SPA1 → Kmax → KC) exhibited a significant indirect effect.These findings confirm and complement the theoretical framework linking eye rubbing and KC, providing a reference for further exploring the pathogenesis of KC.

Keywords: eye rubbing, Keratoconus, stiffness parameter at the first applanation, maximal corneal keratometry, Mediation

Received: 18 Mar 2025; Accepted: 19 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Tu, Xu, Gu, Fan, Yin, Yuan, Chang, Wang, Yin, Zang, Pang, Daniela Oehring, Hao and Ren. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Shengwei Ren, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, Henan Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.