PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biosafety and Biosecurity
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1609110
This article is part of the Research TopicThe Future of Agricultural Biosafety RegulationsView all 6 articles
Regulatory Challenges and Global Trade Implications of Genome Editing in Agriculture
Provisionally accepted- 1Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
- 2San Carlos University, Asuncion, Asuncion, Paraguay
- 3Grupo de Investigación Mycology Investigation and Safety Team, Centro Multidisciplinario de Investigaciones Tecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
- 4Centro Multidisciplinario de Investigaciones Tecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
- 5Unión de Gremios de la Producción, Asunción, Paraguay
- 6Coordination of Innovation and Biotechnology, National Bioeconomy Directorate, Sub-secretariat of Agricultural Production and Forestry, Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In this article, we analyse the impact of regulatory divergence on the development and commercialization of genome-edited crops, focusing on how process-based versus product-based approaches affect innovation and trade. Using examples from the European Union, Africa, Asia, and Latin America, we examine how classification criteria, risk assessment triggers, and approval procedures shape the cost and feasibility of bringing genome-edited products to the market. Our analysis highlights how small developers and public sector initiatives are particularly disadvantaged by inconsistent definitions and regulatory uncertainty. We evaluate ongoing efforts toward regulatory alignment and assess their potential to support harmonized, science-based oversight. This contribution supports the development of adaptive biosafety frameworks that promote equitable access to agricultural innovation.
Keywords: Genome editing, New Breeding Techniques (NBTs), Regulatory Science, international trade, harmonization
Received: 09 Apr 2025; Accepted: 23 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Fernández Ríos, Quintana, Gómez Paniagua, Arrúa, Brozón, Bertoni Hicar, Castro Alegría and Goberna. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Danilo Fernández Ríos, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay
María Florencia Goberna, Coordination of Innovation and Biotechnology, National Bioeconomy Directorate, Sub-secretariat of Agricultural Production and Forestry, Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries, Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.