REVIEW article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biomaterials

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1611508

This article is part of the Research TopicFunctional Biomaterials and Seed Cells in Tissue EngineeringView all 9 articles

Challenges of using tissue engineering methods in the treatment of hypospadias

Provisionally accepted
Piotr  Michal WilczekPiotr Michal Wilczek1*Dorota  BociagaDorota Bociaga2Adrianna  WierzbickaAdrianna Wierzbicka2Marek  KrakosMarek Krakos3
  • 1Calisia University, Kalisz, Poland
  • 2Lodz University of Technology, Łódź, Łódź, Poland
  • 3Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Łódź, Łódź, Poland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background and objective: Reconstructing the urinary tract in patients with hypospadias poses a significant clinical challenge. Despite numerous surgical approaches available, outcomes remain unsatisfactory due to the complexity of the condition and the lack of standardized conventional methods. Material requirements for reconstruction are stringent, necessitating resistance to fluids, adherence, and prevention of hair growth and strictures. Materials should also be biocompatible with the ability to control their biodegradation rate.Methods: A systemic search of PubMed database for studies between 2021 and 2024 was performed. The search terms included surgical methods hypospodia, stem cells in urethra reconstruction, polymer materials used in hypospodia, preclinical and clinical study in reconstruction of urinary system, tissue engineered methods used in urinary reconstruction.Results: Treatment options are notably limited for patients requiring lengthy urethral fragments, primarily due to the scarcity of autologous tissue, particularly penile skin. There is still debate whether using a one-or twostage surgical procedure is more appropriate. Regardless of the surgical technique used, the number of complications increases over time. It's justify the search for new methods of urethral reconstruction Consequently, tissue engineering techniques, cell therapies, and advancements in biomaterials offer promising alternatives to traditional urinary tract reconstruction methods. However, it should be noted that at present, despite the promising results of in vitro studies, the translation of these studies into clinical practice is still unsatisfactory.Conclusion and clinical application: While notable advancements have occurred in tissue engineering methods, cell therapies, and modern biomaterials in recent years, the translation of laboratory findings to preclinical and clinical applications remains inadequate. This deficiency primarily stems from the absence of standardization and the relatively short duration of clinical trial follow-ups.

Keywords: Hypospodia, Urethral reconstruction, Biomaterials, Stem Cells, tissue engineering

Received: 14 Apr 2025; Accepted: 13 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wilczek, Bociaga, Wierzbicka and Krakos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Piotr Michal Wilczek, Calisia University, Kalisz, Poland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.